Is frosbel the final authority in christianity? Is he the only one that reads and comprehends the bible morethan all? Does it not occur to you that mr frosbel opposes what thousands of reputable people of God from the time of the apostles till now believed,preached,or even died for. To mention but a few such men like Charles finney,John wesley,John Knox,David Brainerd,Jonathan Edwards,Hudson Taylor, John'praying' Hyde,Smith wigglesworth,John Lake,Charles price,F.F Bosworth and a thousand others.Men that lived far more holy lives than frosbel or any of us can easily muster today,men that shook kingdoms,won millions of souls to christ,caused nationwide spiritual awakenings of prayer and righteousness,healed millions of incurable sick people,fasted & prayed far more,suffered far more for christ than many today can bear,some saw the Lord Jesus & holy angels face to face several times in their lifetime,some even sealed their faith with their blood in matyrdom.
Most of these men preached and upheld most of what Mr frosbel calls heresy today.At least all of them fully upheld the hell & eternal torment doctrine as the apostles of christ did but of which mr frosbel twists the scriptures regarding this matter to his fancy just because he belongs to the brand of christians that cannot bear to see a loving father rewarding sin & willful disobedience. I ask again Is frosbel the final authority?

The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.

frosbel: The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.

POIGNANT ANSWER

,,,,,,,

Pygru: ,,,,,,,

please stop stalking me , I am married.

frosbel:

please stop stalking me , I am married.

I fit be second wife na

frosbel: The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.

sabinus

frosbel:

The Bible not MEN.

Do you mean the Bible according to frosbel?

frosbel:

The Minority not the Majority.

The majority on NL don't necessarily believe in God, you for instance don't believe in the triune God.

frosbel:

Jesus not Tradition.

The Jesus you believe in is another Christ. You don't believe that he is the second Person in the Godhead.

frosbel:

Amen.

You should be saying: Oh me!

^^^

When you fix the hypocrisy in your club , I might give you some audience.

Pygru:

I fit be second wife na

So you also believe in second marriage ? See how you are deep into false doctrine.

frosbel: The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.

Are the men in my post not following the bible & Christ Jesus.Or are you alluding that you are the only one that ever read the bible or believed in Christ.Face it; in 100 lifetimes you may never know Christ or the bible as much as those men knew but here you are all over this forum spewing all manner falsehood that opposes most of what the bible represents & which many of these men of high level christian integrity & standards taughty & upheld as they were taught of Christ.

Frosbel believe me, hell is real.

I serve there.

bizmahn:

Are the men in my post not following the bible & Christ Jesus.Or are you alluding that you are the only one that ever read the bible or believed in Christ.Face it; in 100 lifetimes you may never know Christ or the bible as much as those men knew but here you are all over this forum spewing all manner falsehood that opposes most of what the bible represents & which many of these men of high level christian integrity & standards taughty & upheld as they were taught of Christ.

Though I respect John Wesley etc, you seem to place more emphasis on MEN than the word of GOD.

Just my small observation.

OLAADEGBU:

Do you mean the Bible according to frosbel?



The majority on NL don't necessarily believe in God, you for instance don't believe in the triune God.



The Jesus you believe in is another Christ. You don't believe that he is the second Person in the Godhead.



You should be saying: Oh me!

So on point Ola.We need to expose this personality.He is doing more harm than we can imagine.I seriously fear for so many misguided souls he has derailed on this forum.He posts so frequently,responds to every thread with his falshood timely.It appears he's unemployed & has lots of time but his greatest weapon is that he operates subtly by giving friendly & innocent looking responses backed by twisted scripture & the name of the Lord Jesus.So its easy to believe him if one can't discern.Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field...Gen.3:1

^^


Deception will not be deception if people like you were not deceived.

frosbel:

Though I respect John Wesley etc, you seem to place more emphasis on MEN than the word of GOD.

Just my small observation.

I base all my emphasis on the word of God but since you have have chosen to totally mutilate,corrupt & twist the word of God to your fancy,I chose to use these men that are authorities in the word & stood on nothing else than the incorruptible word to expose your error.

bizmahn:
I base all my emphasis on the word of God but since you have have chosen to totally mutilate,corrupt & twist the word of God to your fancy,I chose to use these men that are authorities in the word & stood on nothing else than incorruptible word to expose your error.

The Holy Spirit is the authority on God's word, not Charles G Finney or John Wesley.

If the Berean Christians challenged Paul's teachings and if Paul admonished us to test all things, I am sure we are to rely on GOD and not MEN.

frosbel:

So you also believe in second marriage ? See how you are deep into false doctrine.

Joke!

frosbel: ^^


Deception will not be deception if people like you were not deceived.

Your target is not people like me.You decieve the unstable & undiscerning with your errors.They are your targets.Much like the drummer folks drumming for you now.I know your next strategy is to drag me to arguements which won't work for I may not reply you beyond this except I decide otherwise.LK.11:53,54

bizmahn:
Your target is not people like me.You decieve the unstable & undiscerning with your errors.They are your targets.Much like the drummer folks drumming for you now.I know your next strategy is to drag me to arguements which won't work for I may not reply you beyond this except I decide otherwise.LK.11:53,54

Read Mark 7:8.

Enjoy.

frosbel:

The Holy Spirit is the authority on God's word, not Charles G Finney or John Wesley.

If the Berean Christians challenged Paul's teachings and if Paul admonished us to test all things, I am sure we are to rely on GOD and not MEN.

Yes Charles Finney & John Wesley didn't have the holy spirit.You are the only one that has it & will ever have it.You see I know your strategies but I must tell clearly that YOU FROSBEL HAS BEEN EXPOSED!! BUSTED!!

bizmahn:
Yes Charles Finney & John Wesley didn't have the holy spirit.You are the only one that has it & will ever have it.You see I know your strategies but I must tell clearly that YOU FROSBEL HAS BEEN EXPOSED!! BUSTED!!

stop acting like a brainwashed fanatic, even the Bereans challenged Paul.

Who said Charles or John did not have the Holy Spirit ?

Have you read Mark 7:8.

frosbel: The Bible not MEN.

The Minority not the Majority.

Jesus not Tradition.


Amen.

AMEN

Imanuelle:

^^^^

lol these guys in the religion section are off the charts!
they will put anyone on blast!

frosb is sadly an example of who Chesterton described below.
“But the new rebel is a skeptic,
and will not entirely trust
anything. He has no loyalty;
therefore he can never be really a
revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts
everything really gets in his way when he
wants to denounce anything. For all
denunciation implies a moral doctrine of
some kind; and the modern revolutionist
doubts not only the institution he
denounces, but the doctrine by which he
denounces it. . . . As a politician, he will
cry out that war is a waste of life, and then,
as a philosopher, that all life is waste of
time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a
policeman for killing a peasant, and then
prove by the highest philosophical
principles that the peasant ought to have
killed himself. . . . The man of this school
goes first to a political meeting, where he
complains that savages are treated as if they
were beasts; then he takes his hat and
umbrella and goes on to a scientific
meeting, where he proves that they
practically are beasts. In short, the modern
revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is
always engaged in undermining his own
mines. In his book on politics he attacks
men for trampling on morality; in his book
on ethics he attacks morality for trampling
on men. Therefore the modern man in
revolt has become practically useless for all
purposes of revolt. By rebelling against
everything he has lost his right to rebel
against anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton,

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/382030-but-the-new-rebel-is-a-skeptic-and-will-not

bizmahn:
Your target is not people like me.You decieve the unstable & undiscerning with your errors.They are your targets.Much like the drummer folks drumming for you now.I know your next strategy is to drag me to arguements which won't work for I may not reply you beyond this except I decide otherwise.LK.11:53,54

And who said you are a stable??.....

You need persons like frosbel to help you to be stable.....

If you can believe that Jesus is the 2nd person in a Godhead(nothing of this sort nor does the expression exist in the scriptures but it is of mens tradition) then you need somebody to re-allign your thoughts to the truth.......

You see why frosbel said Jesus is not tradition??.........

Image123: frosb is sadly an example of who Chesterton described below.
“But the new rebel is a skeptic,
and will not entirely trust
anything. He has no loyalty;
therefore he can never be really a
revolutionist. And the fact that he doubts
everything really gets in his way when he
wants to denounce anything. For all
denunciation implies a moral doctrine of
some kind; and the modern revolutionist
doubts not only the institution he
denounces, but the doctrine by which he
denounces it. . . . As a politician, he will
cry out that war is a waste of life, and then,
as a philosopher, that all life is waste of
time. A Russian pessimist will denounce a
policeman for killing a peasant, and then
prove by the highest philosophical
principles that the peasant ought to have
killed himself. . . . The man of this school
goes first to a political meeting, where he
complains that savages are treated as if they
were beasts; then he takes his hat and
umbrella and goes on to a scientific
meeting, where he proves that they
practically are beasts. In short, the modern
revolutionist, being an infinite skeptic, is
always engaged in undermining his own
mines. In his book on politics he attacks
men for trampling on morality; in his book
on ethics he attacks morality for trampling
on men. Therefore the modern man in
revolt has become practically useless for all
purposes of revolt. By rebelling against
everything he has lost his right to rebel
against anything.”
― G.K. Chesterton,

http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/382030-but-the-new-rebel-is-a-skeptic-and-will-not

^^^^

Image123 , holler me when you repent of the tithe fraud !

frosbel:


^^^^

Image123 , holler me when you repent of the tithe fraud !

Repent of tithe fraud? What does that even mean? You are hungry for tithe talk again?

Image123:
Repent of tithe fraud? What does that even mean? You are hungry for tithe talk again?

you know what a fraudster is , right ?

frosbel:

you know what a fraudster is , right ?

i think so. Do you know what assumptions are?

frosbel:

you know what a fraudster is , right ?

very correct!