Hi landers,
check this web site out and comment
www.papelimage.com

1) no contact form on the "contact:" page. Also, no need for a separate "email" button. Those all belong to the "contact" page.

2) I would have at least centered the site and given it a red background. Right now, there is a huge white gap to the right.

3) on movie preview page, there are 2 "play movie" buttons which when clicked, dont do anything. Also, clicking in the green area, brings up the download box. Wouldn't it b better for the movie to play within the box?

4) the content area on all pages except "news" and "profile" is gray. for consistency, I would make all of them the same color.

5) Most of your pages consist of images, even where text would be best, including content areas. This is baaaaaaad.

[font=trebuchet MS ]From my perspective the website design is rather a bit of the amarteur or rookie oriented with a lot emphasis made on graphics. I guess you need to look more at Web 2.0 css oriented website development if you must sail through this competitive web industry.[/font]

all has been said between the first 2 posters, save for mine.

Just out of curiosity, would this be the job for the Website Ad you posted earlier?

This is baaaaaaad.
yawa-ti-de thanks for criticising, everything is taking note of you can go ahead and check the site again there are lots of updates lately www.papelimage.com/index.
Landers check this site and send you comment plssssssssssssssssssssss

@luwy

I only surf with FF and none of the changes I stated above have taken effect.

Hi Yawatide, can you pls check it again?
and pls access it and comment

webmonk yes it is
how does it look

of all i stated, it seems only 1 (again, I surf with FF) has been implemented and poorly at that - centering the pages. On your contact us page, the page is scrolling horizontally and all the form fields are to the right.

Good to see a webmistress in NL.

luwy:

webmonk yes it is
how does it look

Leaves very much to be desired - for an international video studio. But like most things in life, you get what you pay for.

I think I'll expand on tundewood's comment (which is a nutshell)

1 - Slice and Dice with tables is VERY old school - too much overhead
2 - There's more to CSS than just specifying font type
3 - spaces in URLs of images might be tolerated by new browsers, but is still a big NO-NO for serious designers (URL:http://www.papelimage.com/image/my%20pict%20profile.jpg under http://www.papelimage.com/profile.htm)
4 - As far as i can tell - everything is static HTML. Granted, I'm convinced the price is cheap. But have you considered running costs of maintenance? Or is he doing it for free?

My thoughts.

Applause! i think he try a little bit but need to put more effort base on my observation.

From a glimpse i can guess d site was designed with a WYSIWYG app. Hey as webmasters, we need to leave dos realms - i mean realms of frontpage and co. Using a WYSIWYG app will only give u d same old look and add exra junks to ur code, it's a world of web 2.0 and we need to embrace it.

@kehers

How can they when there are posts like this: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-136441.0.html ?

yawa-ti-de:

@kehers
How can they when there are posts like this: https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-136441.0.html ?

You won't make me choke in laughter!

;d