The Kano State Government has imprisoned 50
married men and 5 women for 4 months for taking alcoholic beverages during the Ramadan month. Kano State Hisba Board Director-General, Alhaji Abba Sufi, said the convicts were arrested last week following raids on their hideouts. “All the 55 persons were sentenced to four months imprisonment without option of fine in order to serve as deterrent to others who might contemplate doing same. “From those arrested, 50 of them are married men while the remaining five are women. “Even if we are not in the month of Ramadan, nobody should take alcohol because the state is implementing Sharia law,” Sufi said.
www.theheraldng.com/55-married-men-women-jailed-kano-drinking-booze-ramadan/?wt=3

Dia ris God ooo. So booze no fit break fast?

Although it is against their Religion of 'Peace'...but that's none of my business.

Although it is against the Religion of 'Peace'...but that's none of my business.

Good for them. When you are in Rome you do as Romans. They know that kano operates sharia law and they went drinking alcohol there. They should cool in prison for 4 months. Welldone kano state.

What is the difference between Kano state government and boko haram?
No wonder Shekau in his latest video commended the arrest of that atheist man by Kano state government.
Birds of a feather.

Should APC win, this Sharia justice would be replicated nationwide, I think not.

sa no to APC now!!!

ukeleh: Good for them. When you are in Rome you do as Romans. They know that kano operates sharia law and they went drinking alcohol there. They should cool in prison for 4 months. Welldone kano state.

the sharia law is not binding on non Muslims ,they shld appeal the judgement.

[

Is sharia law binding on non Muslims?

Should religious laws superceed that of the state in a secular country?

Getting into the Ramadan spirit in Iran, where this man is having the holy hell beat out of him for snacking during the day.

To avoid giving biased response, are the accused all Muslims? If yes, then it serves them right because they agreed to be ruled by that law, but if they are non muslims, then I think its wrong because when they introduced sharia law, I remember they said it was not binding on non-muslims.

This is Nigeria, not Iran or ISIS, all Nigerians have right to drink whatever the Nigerian constitution deems safe for drinking at anytime.

Or is the sharia superior to the constitution?

In the 1946-47 Partition of India massacre, Sikh women in Western Punjab were subjected to Islamic gang rape, followed by kicking iron/pointy bamboo rods up their vaginas, chopping off their breasts, noses and ears, writing “Allah-u-Akbar” on their chests, and then brutally killing them. Little children were tossed up landing on spikes, pregnant women had their stomachs slit open and unborn infidels taken out and ripped apart. A million Sikhs and Hindus were murdered in cold blood at the hands of Muslims during the partition of India.

What triggered this chain reaction of partition violence? In August 1946, on the 18th of Ramadan (the Muslim holy day when Muhammad himself slaughtered the infidels of Arabia in the Battle of Badr), Muslims responded to Jinnah’s (Jinnah was the Father of Pakistan) call for Direct Action Day to slaughter Hindus and Sikhs and terrorize them to accept Pakistan just like their Prophet in the Battle of Badr. Based on the historical timeline of events leading to Partition, it is clear that it was the Muslims who first started killing the Sikh and Hindu infidels to terrorize them into accepting Pakistan.

In the backdrop of the British leaving India, Muslims suddenly realized that cohabitation with kuffars is ‘haram’ by Islamic standards, hence Muslims should fight to get their own dar-ul-Islam of Pakistan because living with Hindu and Sikh kuffars counts as ‘persecution of Muslims’ and hence killing kuffars to force them to accept Pakistan is morally justified in Islam.

Besides, the Qur’an has many verses calling for the slaughter of infidels. So it is already an Islamic duty for Muslims to kill infidels, ‘cow worshippers’, and anything other than Allah worshippers. The Muslim slogans while slaughtering infidels used to be “Maar-ke Lenge Pakistan, Mar-ke-lenge Pakistan, LekeRahenge Pakistan! NARA-E-Takbir! ALLAH-U-AKBAR!”

To achieve their dream of dar-ul-Islam of Pakistan, Muslims committed unprovoked brutal and horrendous killings starting August 1946, on the day of the Muslim holiday of Friday, to kill all Sikhs and Hindus. The first riots were instigated by Muslims, where first Hindus in Bengal and later Sikhs in Muslim-dominated Punjab were brutally massacred. After a year of unprovoked Muslim atrocities on Sikhs and Hindus, the Sikhs and Hindus retaliated on Muslims in 1947 with just as much barbarity. It is true that Muslims became victims of partition violence as well; but Muslims were the perpetrators who started this chain reaction of partition riots by engaging in unprovoked violence upon Hindus and Sikhs, starting a year earlier than the partition of India under the banner of the Muslim League.

The first deaths were those of Hindus in Bengal and Sikhs in West Punjab. The idea of committing violence upon Hindus and Sikhs was to not only terrorize them to leave the regions demanded as Pakistan but to also clear these infidels from the ‘pure land’ of Pakistan to gain a 100% Muslim majority.

The name of Pakistan means “land of pure Pak people.” Pak people are the Muslims, whereas Na-Pak people are the najis (dirty) kuffars (infidels), namely- Sikhs and Hindus. Indeed Pakistan is close to getting 100% Muslim majority by the continuous slaughter and abduction of Hindus and Sikhs today, whereas in India, Muslims have not only a faster growth rate than Hindus and Sikhs; but Muslims and Islam are given constitutional rights and a separate Sharia code of law in India.



Notice that this picture of a woman with her breast cut off shows an often repeated Islamic method of violating a woman’s body, and gang-raping, a historic trademark of Muslims which they like to do upon the infidels wherever Islam gets the upper hand, be it the genocide of Buddhists, Armenian Christians (in Turkey) or the Sikh and Hindu women as recently as in the partition of India. It seems historically that breast chopping, acid splashing, breast, nose and ear cutting and genital mutilation are some kind of copyrighted Islamic atrocities used by Muslims on infidel women on almost every continent.

Since the 10th century, the ancestors of today’s South Asian Muslims used to be lined up for circumcision with mere swords. While they were standing with their joysticks still bleeding, cow meat would be put in their mouths after making them utter “No God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger.”

Even today their descendants keep the same family name. Initially they would still practice their ancient Hindu or Buddhist beliefs in their houses, but over the centuries they became more devout Muslims and have been radicalized to consider their own Indian ancestors as their enemies.

Since the advent of Islam in India, more than 80 million Indians (Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs) have been slaughtered by Muslims in various capacities according to his power.

Why such barbarity? The answer is that Muhammad himself has set an example of “jihad victory with terror” for Muslims to follow today. Muhammad himself used to conquer tribes, slaughter everybody except the beautiful girls and persons of “slave suitable age”.

Muhammad conducted no less than 80 Gazwas (wars) in the last 10 years of his life. He was a successful gang leader who kept one-fifth of the stolen war booty and women for himself and distributed the rest among his Muslim goons.

The slaughter of the Banu Qurayza tribe by Muhammad is most well-known where Muhammad captured a beautiful girl named Safiya and slept with her the same day after he beheaded Safiya’s parents, brother and husband. Muslims today are merely following their prophet Muhammad, who is considered by Muslims to be the best of creation and a man above the standards of mankind.

Sixty percent of the contents of the Qur’an is filled with verses of jihad, and there are countless verses revealed by Muhammad written in the Qur’an that ask the believers (Muslims) to slaughter infidels until they accept Islam or make them pay jizya tax if the slaughter of infidels is not yet possible. As long as Muslims consider Muhammad to be the “best role model sent by Allah” there will be repeated jihads like this. Muslims’ unquestioned respect of Muhammad the abductor of women, rapist, child molester and murderer, has deprived Muslims of their human strings of compassion for fellow human beings.