Terror Attack In France? Jan 8 2014 – The FINAL NAIL in
the Paris terror scam (Final
definitive proof they used
blanks) Here is the plot: Comic magazine Charlie Hebdo
produced anti-Islamic cartoons. Three well armed “terrorists” stormed
the place with machine guns ablaze
while screaming “Allahu Akbar.” Terrorists escape completely, while
shooting at police all over Paris, 10
dead. The final SLAM on Paris terror attack Many people have analyzed the police
officer shooting video very carefully,
and have noticed something I missed,
but they do not know what it is. I do.
Something flies out of the gun and flits
around behind the police officer’s head. Shills have said it is obviously a
skull fragment. But that would not
happen with no blood, and there is a
far better explanation which when put
along with the rest of the scene proves
beyond all doubt they were shooting blanks. A blank round has a paper wad where
the bullet would be to hold the
powder in place. When fired, this
paper wad comes out of the gun and
goes nowhere, it stalls near the barrel
and flits around for a while. This mystery object many have made note
of is simply the paper wad from the
blank. Here is the scenario: The camera man was all set up with his
cell phone (why use more if it is
supposed to be raw) in the perfect
location to film the event perfectly. The
police officer was given earplugs so
the muzzle blast would not be too loud. An expert shooter made sure
the paper wad did not hit the police
officer’s head. “Terrorists” pull up for
no reason at all (they are not being
chased) get out and shoot the police
officer at random. There is no logic in this, other than to get a show. The
officer falls down for the first part of
the show, and to prove how bad the
terrorists are, is “killed” while
wounded and laying down. Only
BAAAAD people kill the already wounded. Good psychological effect. Problems: The camera man was so perfectly
positioned he got a perfectly clear line
of sight to where the terrorists car
stopped AND to the police officer at
the same time. Not probable in the real
world. AND HERE IS THE KICKER THAT REALLY
NAILS IT: How did the camera man
know where to point the camera?
How did he know THAT is where the
terrorists would stop and get out?
How did he even know what car they had to begin with? Them getting out
was captured in full, why would
anyone have a camera ready and
rolling to capture a scene when they
were not supposed to even know it
was going to happen? That proves it was all pure BULLSHIT in a single
whack. And we have no recoil on the gun. We
have the exact same white smoke
blanks cause, the wad out of the
blank, no blood from the police officer
at all, only a small response from the
police officer when the gun goes off (about what you would expect as a
startle response from a man wearing
earplugs and doing a drill) a perfectly
placed cameraman who magically
knew it was all going to happen
ahead of time. Folks, this is sewn up in a body bag. Final inconsistencies (now 12) tally: 1. 10 people were supposed to have
died with others injured. Yet at the
scene, a max of 2 ambulances showed
up when well over 10 would have
been needed for such an event. 2. It looks like they did fire some real
rounds from the looks of one of the
police cars for this “drill”, however the
pictures are not clear enough to show
if the bullet holes are just gangsta
stickers, in one of the photos the police officers are laughing and joking
next to the shot up car where
someone supposedly died.
Additionally, images on Google of shot
up windshields have cracks going all
through the windshield. In this France event, all damage is limited to where
the holes are. Is that possible? 3. All people who responded to the
scene had French Foreign Legion
haircuts. Odd for ambulance drivers
and EMT’s. 4 (a good one) – If the perpetrators
got away and have not been captured,
HOW did the French police already
identify them when they have not
turned up elsewhere? Sort of like the
passport on 911 or all those pristine passports from flight MH17. That
works. Gotta have a positive ID on
them to “prove” they are “Muslim” and
not just the Mossad out on a field trip.
Gotta do it when the shock factor is at
max. And no one dropped a passport this time, HOW did the police figure it
out? TIMES THREE? 5. I never saw any bloody photos
from this, not even fake blood, not
even from a police officer who was
shot by an AK and laying on the
sidewalk for 10 seconds before being
“shot” a second time, and still no blood. Very odd if this is real. 6. Target was a group of Jews, who
belong to a greater whole which
stages B.S. terror attacks frequently.
That stinks. 7. How did the road miraculously have
no traffic? The scene is set up as if
staged. It is as if the area was
cordoned off prior to the “attack” for a
drill, so the “terrorists” simply parked
smack dab in the middle of the road because they knew there would be no
traffic. 8. How did the attackers know there
would be a giant staff meeting with
everyone important for the publication
present to be shot all at once? A little
help from the NSA or what? 9. The publication had serious prior
financial trouble, and if it was going to
close anyway, why not use it to stage
a psy op? That would “explain” why it
closed, would it not? 10. There is no recoil on the AK as it
shoots. I initially assumed blanks, but
what about rubber bullets? At any
rate, there was no sign of blood at any
point from the police officer, an AK
goes all the way through and bullet proof vests are for handguns, not AK
rounds. If he was wearing one it
would not work. LACK OF ANY RECOIL
AT ALL SCREAMS BLANK. Inconsistency 11: All video initially posted was shot from
rooftops. FOR A SCENE THAT LASTED
LESS THAN A MINUTE. How did anyone
get up to the roof that fast to get video
of this, times several people shooting
from different places? The roof tops were just regular roof tops with no
reason for anyone to be up there. It is
not like there was a roof top Starbucks
or something. Why were people up
there to begin with, how did they
figure out what was going on and have their cell phones all ready to
shoot video from perfect angles from
start to finish? ANSWER: They went up ahead of time, got in position, and shot video of
a drill they knew would happen. It is
the only rational answer. Even if they were a roofing crew, they would not have figured out something was going on and had camera phones (times several) shooting clear video in under 15 seconds to capture this less than a minute long event. The staged camera angles and time frame alone nails this as a fraud,
such timing and positioning is flatly
impossible. Even the robot android
DATA from Star Trek could not have
gotten up to the roof that fast, found
where to shoot the best video from and captured this so well. Inconsistency 12: Getaway driver was in school at the time of the “incident” Classmates stand up for him The classmates of an 18-year-old
suspect in the Paris shooting, that
occurred yesterday afternoon at the
offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine,
have protested his innocence by
saying that he was in class at the time of the incident in which 12 people
were murdered. Hamyd Mourad was reported to have
handed himself to the police at around
11pm last night after he saw his name
mentioned on the news and his
friends and acquaintances have said
that he has an alibi, as they claim he was present in the classrooms that
day. It won’t matter, just like the Boston bombing, where dorm room mates said Tsnarev was not at the bombing scene when it happened. Once they name a patsy, he is TOAST. What an innocent dupe Hamyd was for turning himself in expecting the system to be just when running a Jewish scam! Gitmo time! UPDATE: BUSTED, THEY ARE SHOOTING BLANKS. I just saw the key video that clearly
shows a police officer getting shot in
the head by an AK47 at point blank.
Problems: No brain splatter, no blood
splatter, white smoke off the barrel
dispersing in a wide cloud (which blanks do,) no body lurch at bullet
impact,
Question: Do Muslims always scream Allahu
Akbar while they shoot places up?
With no one identified, and only that
phrase for incrimination, ANYONE
COULD HAVE DONE IT, and that is IF it
even happened and it is not just another psy op. Supposedly they had a rocket
launcher. How did they get that through customs? UPDATE: Supposedly they were
obvious professional hit men, and
there was decent video shot of the
whole thing. Video links here: Update: Month 1, day 7, hour 11. Here is the 11
theme again. Supposedly the
“terrorists” struck at that time because
they somehow knew all the top
people for the publication would be
there in a big meeting at that time. QUESTION: How would they know this?
That is the type of info only an insider
would have, how did an obviously
professional hit team get that info? Another video Source: JimStoneFreelance.com, and
therebel.org
whitewraithe./2015/01/08/2015-first-false-flag-terror-hoax-in-france/

whether

tinkinjow:
whether

it is a critical analysism of the observation to the false flag attack