EnlightenedSoul:


I didn't know you were an atheist, Neo. I totally thought you were Catholic You'll find that the Eastern religions are infinitely superior to Abrahamic religions where the concept of peace and "live and let live" is concerned. Islam, alongside Judaism and Christianity, cannot be classified as a "peaceful" religion, since the holy texts routinely glorify and incite believers to violent acts, as well as prescribing extreme bodily punishments without so much as bothering to place conclusive restrictions as to their harsh perpetration.

These holy texts are saturated with verses of violence, hatred, and intolerance toward those outside the faith, neighboring ethnic groups, and in the case of Islam particularly, the sowing of discord within the immediate community itself through the ambiguous mention of folks simply referred to as "hypocrites" throughout the length of the text (Muslims who don't act like Muslims, or who follow Islamic mandates without much faith or fervor).

In sharp contrast to the Bible, which generally moves from incredibly violent episodes to far more peaceful mandates (Ecclesiastes being the most humane, peaceful, genuinely likable among them), the Quran notably travels in the opposite direction (violence is first forbidden, then permitted, then, in rather ambiguous fashion, mandatory).

The promising earlier verses which speak of peace and tolerance are overwhelmed by an avalanche of later verses that are a rallying cry to, well. Also, whilst a portion of the Old Testament's blood and steel verses are generally bound by a descriptive historical context within the text itself, Quranic imperatives to violence usually appear open-ended and are therefore subject to personal interpretation.

If one were to thoroughly read the holy text in its original Arabic, gain knowledge on the birth of the religion, it's prophet & Hadith, and examine the period after his death, i.e, caliphate rule/conquest, etc, they could hardly come to a "peaceful" conclusion. Put under the same light of scrutiny, no other monotheistic religion can be deemed "peaceful" in any sense, really. I sometimes wonder if the "peace" label mysteriously garnered by Islam comes from the manner in which Muslims greet each other (by uttering the words 'peace be upon you'), but then that'd be ironic since Muslims aren't allowed to greet disbelievers (anyone who isn't Muslim) with those same words.

EnlightenedSoul:


I didn't know you were an atheist, Neo. I totally thought you were Catholic You'll find that the Eastern religions are infinitely superior to Abrahamic religions where the concept of peace and "live and let live" is concerned. Islam, alongside Judaism and Christianity, cannot be classified as a "peaceful" religion, since the holy texts routinely glorify and incite believers to violent acts, as well as prescribing extreme bodily punishments without so much as bothering to place conclusive restrictions as to their harsh perpetration.

These holy texts are saturated with verses of violence, hatred, and intolerance toward those outside the faith, neighboring ethnic groups, and in the case of Islam particularly, the sowing of discord within the immediate community itself through the ambiguous mention of folks simply referred to as "hypocrites" throughout the length of the text (Muslims who don't act like Muslims, or who follow Islamic mandates without much faith or fervor).

In sharp contrast to the Bible, which generally moves from incredibly violent episodes to far more peaceful mandates (Ecclesiastes being the most humane, peaceful, genuinely likable among them), the Quran notably travels in the opposite direction (violence is first forbidden, then permitted, then, in rather ambiguous fashion, mandatory).

The promising earlier verses which speak of peace and tolerance are overwhelmed by an avalanche of later verses that are a rallying cry to, well. Also, whilst a portion of the Old Testament's blood and steel verses are generally bound by a descriptive historical context within the text itself, Quranic imperatives to violence usually appear open-ended and are therefore subject to personal interpretation.

If one were to thoroughly read the holy text in its original Arabic, gain knowledge on the birth of the religion, it's prophet & Hadith, and examine the period after his death, i.e, caliphate rule/conquest, etc, they could hardly come to a "peaceful" conclusion. Put under the same light of scrutiny, no other monotheistic religion can be deemed "peaceful" in any sense, really. I sometimes wonder if the "peace" label mysteriously garnered by Islam comes from the manner in which Muslims greet each other (by uttering the words 'peace be upon you'), but then that'd be ironic since Muslims aren't allowed to greet disbelievers (anyone who isn't Muslim) with those same words.

vooks:

I think there are lesbian houris who service female jihadists in he afterlife

Empiree,tartar9,Rilwayne001 can you please confirm

AfricanApple:
only foolss and gullible people will see Ijab wearers as innocent, holy, loyal or even 'can't kill a fly' Ijab wearing is just a way of dressing just like other types of attire, every tribe, nation, country or what have you have their way of dressing. those who wears Ijab do every other thing that a person who doesn't wear do. its about individual personality and and state of mind not the clothing.

AfricanApple:

plappville:


The unpalatable truth is that the root cause of much of the world’s entrenched misogyny in 2015 in Nigeria, France Afghanistan etcetera, is Islam and it manifests itself in a variety of ways including the requirement for women to cover up everything except the eyes. I think this is a boring restricted life. See how Hausa women looks like when she is religious..

EnlightenedSoul:


I didn't know you were an atheist, Neo. I totally thought you were Catholic You'll find that the Eastern religions are infinitely superior to Abrahamic religions where the concept of peace and "live and let live" is concerned. Islam, alongside Judaism and Christianity, cannot be classified as a "peaceful" religion, since the holy texts routinely glorify and incite believers to violent acts, as well as prescribing extreme bodily punishments without so much as bothering to place conclusive restrictions as to their harsh perpetration.

These holy texts are saturated with verses of violence, hatred, and intolerance toward those outside the faith, neighboring ethnic groups, and in the case of Islam particularly, the sowing of discord within the immediate community itself through the ambiguous mention of folks simply referred to as "hypocrites" throughout the length of the text (Muslims who don't act like Muslims, or who follow Islamic mandates without much faith or fervor).

In sharp contrast to the Bible, which generally moves from incredibly violent episodes to far more peaceful mandates (Ecclesiastes being the most humane, peaceful, genuinely likable among them), the Quran notably travels in the opposite direction (violence is first forbidden, then permitted, then, in rather ambiguous fashion, mandatory).

The promising earlier verses which speak of peace and tolerance are overwhelmed by an avalanche of later verses that are a rallying cry to, well. Also, whilst a portion of the Old Testament's blood and steel verses are generally bound by a descriptive historical context within the text itself, Quranic imperatives to violence usually appear open-ended and are therefore subject to personal interpretation.

If one were to thoroughly read the holy text in its original Arabic, gain knowledge on the birth of the religion, it's prophet & Hadith, and examine the period after his death, i.e, caliphate rule/conquest, etc, they could hardly come to a "peaceful" conclusion. Put under the same light of scrutiny, no other monotheistic religion can be deemed "peaceful" in any sense, really. I sometimes wonder if the "peace" label mysteriously garnered by Islam comes from the manner in which Muslims greet each other (by uttering the words 'peace be upon you'), but then that'd be ironic since Muslims aren't allowed to greet disbelievers (anyone who isn't Muslim) with those same words.

vodkat:



BRO ACCORDING TO ONE GUY SHE WILL BE SERVICE WITH A GUY IN THE AFTERLIFE WITH A MAN WHOSE JOHN TOMAS IS ALWAYS ERECT 247. THE JOMAS TOMAS TIME NO DEY CHANGE ALWAYS 3 O'CLOCK, AS STRAIGHT AS A PIPE AND WITH LARGE DIAMETER...HONESTLY NO BE ME TALK AM NA IMAM TALK AM

EnlightenedSoul:


Plappville's gripe seems personal.

Annunaki:


I mostly agree with your brilliant write up here except the part you lumped up christianity with other abrahamic faiths as not being peaceful. You have to note that christianity is based purely on the teachings of Jesus christ and not the whole bible so if you want to judge christianity you will have to restrict yourself to the new testament were christianity started and I can assure you that true christianity goes beyond just being peaceful to actually loving your enemies. Yes due to our human nature most christians are not able to love their enemies but that does not take away the fact that it is a core doctrine in christianity thus making christianity an extremely peaceful religion at it's core.

plappville:


And you think it warrant insulting someone to have a point? what is thé Hausa woman traditional way of dressing outside Islam? Hausa women do wear colorful wrappers with matching blouses. Nothing like hijab, niqab whatever. The hijab code is religious. And when they wear it the have theses impressions. But it has shown that this mode of dressing facilite to hid explosive objects than normal dressing code.
What Hausa woman look like in her traditional attire:

AfricanApple:
what do you mean by personal. btw from your above post, are you like religion-less?

neoapocalypse:



Interesting piece , you have seen both sides of the coin and I respect that you say it as it is.
Catholic ? why would you think that of me ? Of all the religious denominations Catholicism has the most foibles , I have always thought my stance on religion has always been pretty transparent.

EnlightenedSoul:


You agree with the parts that suit you, which is to be expected - you're in denial, and the parts you don't like are the parts that challenge your faith.[s] It's the same phenomenon that makes Plappville fully comfortable in exposing racist hadiths from Islam, but perfectfully fine with the poorly hidden racism inherent in her own Christianity. [/s]

AfricanApple:
@plappville, are you one of the foolss? you shouldn't be pained

wanted to clear your cloudy ascertainment but seeing your signature and one of your posts made me think otherwise. you are being biased, you don't want to learn nor understand, all you just want to do is pour your wrath on islam

EnlightenedSoul:


You agree with the parts that suit you, which is to be expected - you're in denial, and the parts you don't like are the parts that challenge your faith. It's the same phenomenon that makes Plappville fully comfortable in exposing racist hadiths from Islam, but perfectfully fine with the poorly hidden racism inherent in her own Christianity.

Respectfully, the bolded is a joke. In terms of sheer violence and unrestricted bloodthirstiness, the Quran can't even begin to compete with the New Testament. Yes, The New Testament. The difference is, Christianity has reformed, secularized, and modernized itself to the point that most Christians today pay no heed whatsoever to the evil parts of their scripture. Indeed, most of them can't be bothered in reading the darn thing (reason I'm not surprised by your ignorance). Take care.

Annunaki:


My faith is in Christ Jesus and not the old testament bible so I am not in denial. The fact that the old testament is part of the bible does not mean my faith is based on it. That said it's either your ignorance is mind boggling or you are deliberately being dishonest. I here by challenge you to post one single verse in the new testament that instructs christians to commit violence otherwise you should apologise to all christians on this forum for that barefaced lie you wrote.

EnlightenedSoul:


I owe no such apology. No matter what I post, you and Plappville would flat deny it. I'm not going to get sucked into that sideshow. You'll come to the truth on your own time, if ever.

Annunaki:


Then admit you are a very dishonest liar as it won't cost you any thing to post verses that 'proves' your hallucination. If they weighty enough other people reading will learn from it whether plappville and I deny it or not.

To claim that the new testament promotes violence talkless of even ranking it above the evil quoran in terms of violence is the height of dishonesty to me and for a person to make such a glaringly obvious lie, I am tempted to think the person is not mentally stable and should get her head examined. Going forward I will have to assume you are not ok upstairs and will avoid interactions with you except you prove the baseless allegation you made or tender an unreserved apology.

EnlightenedSoul:


For the second time, I owe no such apology. You could've confirmed the truth of my words in the time it took you to contruct the bullshyt babble above, but you're perfectly free to wallow in your own pathetic pit of denial.

The bold is hilarious. I cannot, henceforth, take you seriously. Indeed, to reason with faith is futile! Like I said, you'll come to the truth at your own pace, if ever. Take care!

Annunaki:


Pathological liar, telling glaringly obvious lies she can't substantiate. Poor depraved soul. and the irony is that she calls herself enlightened soul

EnlightenedSoul:


I meant, her tone has a personal tint to it. Like perhaps acts of terrorism or bad Muslims have hit close to home.

EnlightenedSoul:


I owe no such apology. No matter what I post, you and Plappville would flat deny it. That's your game to play, but I'm not going to get sucked into that sideshow. You'll come to the truth on your own time, if ever. Meanwhile, read your Bible, the both of you

AfricanApple:
her pot of soup

you avoided my second quest

Pdizzle:
Learnt from your post Enlightenedsoul. Can you please point out verses in the new testament of the bible that supports violence?

plappville:
We are all aware of the recent Paris attack. Today, there was a raid in an apartment in Saint Danis where the terrorists camped. It was confirmed that a female blew up herself with belt bomb in flat. This is shocking to the Western police. ..do we think the use of hijab makes female look innocent/righteous? This woman has proved the jihab is a way to pretend to look innocent.


Looking at the picture you will think a female wearing hijab cant even kill a fly.....

Edited:

plappville:


They will point to the old testament. . Muslims are led/controlled by the Spirit of the antichrist. .

mamsong9:


Do you mean a Female in Hijab like Mary the Mother of Jesus?
Please think before you say any trash about Islam.

Pdizzle:


Thanks ma'am, but please let enlightenedsoul answer, you never can tell.