My Lord,i hereby seek for adjournment of this case.this is because i have not had time to prepare a detailed brief on this case.as i write this now,am already on my way to attend a compulsory Govt sponsored programme that will take me out of the state for the next 3weeks.i pray that my request is granted.

Why are you chickening out? u de fear? Make we wait for the judge decision.

Still waiting for submissions 4rm the prosecuting and defence attorneys

Grabs a seat in the court.

[color=#000099][/color] . . . . .Clears throat . . . .   The Ruling: The case brought to this honourable court by citizen Aieromon against citizen Dwayne on the refusal of the the defendant(dwne) to transform the plaintiff(aie) into a fulltime fbt guru. In his initial statement citizen dwayne denied receiving any such email but speculated that maybe the mail went into his spam box, he also disputed the fact that he was a fbt guru.                                         The court was adjourned to today to entertain the case in anticipation of the filing of briefs by their respectively attorneys. However the court clerk has received no such files. Just this morning the plaintiff in a telegram prayed this honorable court to adjourn the matter due to his compulsory 3 weeks hiatus to a nothern province of this country.                                          Based on the aforementioned,  i hereby Strike this case out of court for Lack Of Merit!  In the interim, citizen aieromon, you are required to take all the time you want to prepare your case and when you are through you file a fresh petition. Citizen dwayne you have the right to a minimum of one attorney to defend your self or you can self defend.  You are warned to behave yourself in court or next time you may face contempt of court This court is hereby dismissed and reverted back to the chat room

**All Rise**
~ evryone rises nd waits 4d judge 2take his leave ~

With due respect my lord, i would want this case to continue and i will also crave the indulgence of my lordship not to revert this thread back into a chat room until palpable justice is seen to have been done.The principle of Audi alteram partem is pertinent here.Hence, i took the challenge upon myself to be Dwayne's Solicitor in accordance with SECTION 36(6)(C) of our grundnorm--the 1999 constitution.I also promised that my client will be of good comportment to this honourable court.

---Barr. Hon.Sule---

Everything depends on the plaintiff for now but note that this court will only entertain prima facie cases.

So much for legal wranglings 2day, dwayne and aieromon show face. im off for lunch.

So much for legal wranglings 2day, dwayne and aieromon show face. im off for lunch.

I'm a new guy in this forum,i would like to be a part of the pesecutor counsel,if only he would allow me explore my raw talent on this case to see that dwayne looses this case.all you need to do jus hire me and let me negociate wit ur attorney,in order to present a concrete evidence before the judge and the honourable court,that wil make dwayne and his solicitor defenceless,and for will to triumph on the case.

First, i would like 2 thank my lawyer although arrived late.
I refuse dis case to b adjurned or rule out. Airomon accusation was adhorent and i sugest he abjures and abnegate all of his claims. U better show ur face b4 d court rules u out without ur cognition. I leave d rest talking and bla bla stuf 2 my legal advicer.

aieromon:

@all
Shey all of you can see iniguy again?first he wanted me to sort him to pass my NL exams.because he knows i abhor any form of corruption,he has started lobbying for kola from dwayne.

@Dwayne.u are accused of corruption even by the "so-called plaintiff".Based on that ground and other surrounding factors, you are to appear before the Judicial Disciplinary committee to respond to this grievous allegation.Meanwhile,u are not worthy res ipsa loquitur to preside over this case.The case is hereby transferred to another competent and trust worthy Judge for adjudication.

aieromon:

@all
Shey all of you can see iniguy again?first he wanted me to sort him to pass my NL exams.because he knows i abhor any form of corruption,he has started lobbying for kola from dwayne.

@Iniguy.u are accused of corruption even by the "so-called plaintiff".Based on that ground and other surrounding factors, you are to appear before the Judicial Disciplinary committee to respond to this grievous allegation.Meanwhile,u are not worthy res ipsa loquitur to preside over this case.The case is hereby transferred to another competent and trust worthy Judge for adjudication.

Since corruption charges hv bin levelled against both d defendant nd the ruling judge.
These r serious charges nd wil b dealt wit later.
Hence, anoda judge is 2b appointed.
Mr. Hayprof is hereby nominated as d presiding judge 4dis case.

Anybody dat c's hayprof shud pass d message.
**he is nw d presiding judge**

iniguy:

Everything depends on the plaintiff for now but note that this court will only entertain prima facie cases.

@Iniguy.i want to rebut the primae impressionis that u want to assert.you should have adverted your mind to the fact that, a judge exists to determine disputes and to examine with due care and microscopic sense all matters before him in dispute in his pursuit of justice. He is there not to trap any party or to set in motion what the parties have not brought before him. He is not the Grand Inquisitor envisaged by Dostoevsky in his brothers Karamazou. He is a judge governed by rules.
The Judge though he must have some room to manoeuvre, once it is in the interest of justice, is certainly not to create an image of a go-getter,a free for all fighter---per Kayode Eso J.S.C in Sodipo v. Lemminkainen (1986) 1 NWLR Part 15 p.220@224

"I venture to say that it is dangerous for a trial Judge to interfere with the freedom of parties to give their evidence uninterrupted. He ought to be seen as an impartial umpire. On no account should he be seen to descend unto the arena. If he does, it will result in an order of retrial"--per Nnemeka Agu J.C.A in Araba v.Elegba (1986) 1 NWLR part 16 p.333 @335

ERRORS NOTICED:
1.There is no prosecuting counsel
2.My client was not serve/ put on notice
3.The "so-called" Judge is accused of corruption
4.The court is ab initio not properly constituted
5. finally, the "so-called" Judge erred in Law to have given a preposterous and perfidious ruling

@turiano u're welcome, hope the plaintiff is listening @roblance u're welcome in here, but take proxifier stuff outta here!! @honsule clarify urself who are u referring to?

iniguy:

@honsule clarify urself who are u referring to?

is my pontification so nebulous that u can't decipher who is being referred to here?u are to face Judicial Disciplinary Committee for a grievous offence of corruption as alleged by the plaintiff.For the mean time,u are not fit and proper to adjudicate on this case.The matter has been transferred to another Judge for a re-trial.

I want to address the five concerns you raised (1) There is no prosecuting counsel. Yes and there was no defence counsel either. You as rightly stated by your client arrived late (2) Your client was not served put on notice due to some technicalities but he received oral writh of summons which should suffice due to the nature of this court. (3) There is no need to cast aspersion on the integrity of the judge, aieromon was just hallucinating and he admitted this to the judge, that is why he agreed to abide to the judgement of the judge (4) The court is not properly constituted. Yes thats true partly because we didn't have a full house. (5)The judge erred in giving the ruling. Do u consider that ruling preposterous or perfidious? The case was struck out in order to enable both sides prepare their case files and obtain legal advice 4rm their respective attorneys. Based on the above, i hereby affirm that there is no case presently before this court, the court has to be properly constituted before any case can be handled ab initio, Actori incumbit onus probandi(The burden of proof in all cases lies on the plaintiff), This court is hereby dissolved!!

I want to address the five concerns you raised (1) There is no prosecuting counsel. Yes and there was no defence counsel either. You as rightly stated by your client arrived late (2) Your client was not served put on notice due to some technicalities but he received oral writh of summons which should suffice due to the nature of this court. (3) There is no need to cast aspersion on the integrity of the judge, aieromon was just hallucinating and he admitted this to the judge, that is why he agreed to abide to the judgement of the judge (4) The court is not properly constituted. Yes thats true partly because we didn't have a full house. (5)The judge erred in giving the ruling. Do u consider that ruling preposterous or perfidious? The case was struck out in order to enable both sides prepare their case files and obtain legal advice 4rm their respective attorneys. Based on the above, i hereby affirm that there is no case presently before this court, the court has to be properly constituted before any case can be handled ab initio, Actori incumbit onus probandi(The burden of proof in all cases lies on the plaintiff), This court is hereby dissolved!!

fdigital stood outside at the court hall window poppin his eyes wild open to see who the judge will strike the batt on its head .

Oh boyey!!
This case has taken another dimension.

(Quote @honsule clarify yourself who are u referring to ) i submitted that post b4 maybe becos i'm on mobile it didn't go fast enough. I was referring to the first post you made in which you quoted aieromon as accusing me of corruption you typed@dwayne. I don't think that was a mistake or was it? and come to think of it why do you want to be judge, defense counsel and jury all at the same time

@Iniguy.i want to take you on point No.3 you said, Aieromon was just hallucinating,and admitted that to the Judge?can you please tender your evidence by quoting him verbatim.moreover,to hallucinate according to Encarta Dictionaries means"to imagine seeing,hearing,or otherwise sensing people,things or events that are not present or actually occurring at the time" i want to put it to you that,your statement connote Aieromon as being insane/mad.

@Iniguy.you should have taken judicial notice by now that when one post,that post can't be edited again,due to some technical problems.Which i believe will be taken care of in due time,because i have emailed Seun to rectify that anomaly.
Having clarified that misconception i now proceed to answer your second.i don't want to be Judge in this case,am the Solicitor to the Accused.I also want to bring to your notice that in Nigeria our system is adversarial system of administration of justice,so the word Jury should be expunge from your vocab,becoz this is not America. my final submission is that:you must face the Judicial Disciplinary Committee and u can't be the Judge to adjudicate on this case.He who comes to equity,must come with clean hands.

***Tryin' hard to catch a few winks after 14hours on the road***

***Tryin' hard to catch a few winks after 14hours on the road***
U guys are very lucky am wasted right now else i would have sent thugs to beat y'all up just a lil' bit.
@turiano
Feel me to represent me, ,,,pro bono stylee.we'll work on it for presentation in the next three weeks
@all
I'm requestin' for a new trial judge as the present one seems to think am 'hallucinating'?

Hahaha when i said aieromon was "hallucinating", i was using the word in a loose figurative sense not literally, i stand on my convictions, i am ready to face any properly constituted judicial disciplinary commitee because only the guilty are afraid. My final submission is that there is no case and the court remains dissolved presently and any contary arrangement is Ultra vires.

@the judge due to ur elaborate illustration presiding over this case u have proven ur self deem and worthy to judge over this case b4 the law court.@ u honsle i dnt believe ur inauthentic,unworthy,uncertain and unclerified alligation levied against the judge,of assumed corruption of which u dnt have concrete evidence to back it up in the presence of ur supose judiciary commitee.i wil take this as an excuse to back ut of the case between my client the persecutor and ur own client the plentiff.even at dat which u suggested bringing in anthor judge to preside over this case before this honourable court wil be rediculus and prepostrous and i wil cal it null and void because it doesn't make any sens,u can not cal a judge to adjudicate a case he did not start,when the current judge has not be proven unworthy and incapable of handling the case.i advice u to go prepare, the case has only jus began.salis populi suprema lexist,the will of the people is supreme,being that the will of the people is supreme i believe we are nt the only one present,wot eva will say now or do will be examined and commented on by the people ut side this very court,the people i hear to witnes a fair judgement on which i stand for and which i charge this honourable court to do,my lord we cannot say for the sake of one man this case is abbicated.No! I totaly disagree rather there should be a legal combat btween the two attorneys in this court.@judge my lord i want u to reinstate court in session and let the challenge begin.@honsle i would'nt want u to tarnish,jeopardise the image of the jury,in accussation the judge doin dat the court we be in total jeopardy and that wil be to the detrement of this honourable court of law, in the outside word.and i woudn't want the people here to say that the jury has bn corrupted by ur mere accusation,when the authenticity of ur accussation is not proven.i wil rather advice u as a collegue to go prepare ur case to present before this honourable court of justice. I'm watin the "BATTLE LINE IS DRAWN"