hello all, after going through some thread i came across a thread where it was stated that The jews were never slaves in eygpt. well according to the findings so far. but i beg to disagree (based on my hunches) which made me to start a search on net on some possible reason why.

well lets start from here

Could it be that there is no known records of egyptian origin which buttresses the biblical account becasue

1. Due to war, some records were destroyed, carted away and kept somewhere that not yet ? (on yahoo recently i read how a ships grave yard was discovered at the bottom of the sea containing ancient artifacts. Also i read in a website whereby eygpt was attacked by rome and posibly there was destruction of records)

2. Due to maybe pride/pestige the egyptians have refused to document what occured to them as a nation?

3. Could egyptologist have not acccurately interpreted the signs of Hieroglyphics and thus have not given us the story from this signs

well this are hypothesis that we can work on to unravel.

The alleged Jews enslavement was Fiction. For instance, the 430 year bondage that is mentioned in the Torah involving the Israelites enslaved to the Egiptians, was actually the Egiptian bondage to the Heka Khasut (“captive shepherd”), who took over Tama-Re (“Egipt”) and suppressed the original Blacks people for a time, until their exodus from Tama-Re, when they were being chased across the sands of the desert.

thx horus but strictly, i feel that is your hunch and it can be taken as a hypothesis not a fact. . . but remember i have stated that its a hypothesis that research can and will be carried out. therefore i still lay claim to my previous hypothesis. . .

jamiru:

thx horus but strictly, i feel that is your hunch and it can be taken as a hypothesis not a fact. . . but remember i have stated that its a hypothesis that research can and will be carried out. therefore i still lay claim to my previous hypothesis. . .

I dont deal with hypothesis. Hypothesis is ignorance. Hypothesis mean that you dont know.

therefore i still lay claim to my previous hypothesis

What is your previous hypothesis?

gud thinking horus, u dont expect me to swallow hook, line and sinker what u presented and just keep quite becuase HORUS has spokken and that is final? never man, u too dont know all but are ever learning as well. . . and what i say might be a hypothesis that can be proven as more facts are unearthed.

@jamiru
You didnt answer the question: What is your previous hypothesis?

Horus:

@jamiru
You didnt answer the question: What is your previous hypothesis?

sorry pls ignore that line thankx