I have come to learn a lot from the present campaigns, debates and votes currently preceding the US upcoming elections.
In my own little way, I have tried to analyse both candidates and really find both interesting, opposite and complex individuals to actually assess.

Hillary is experienced, calm, intelligent but I think she will make a weak president. I see a woman that will be greatly influenced in her decisions and really hunted by her poor diplomatic archives.

On the other hand, Donald is inexperienced, hot tempered, intelligent, rich and quick in conclusions. I Consider him an extremist. He's the type that can go all the way to achieve what he views as correct in his own understanding.

The big question now is, based on these two points of mine, how will u choose? Will u go for a weak person or an extremist? It's quite difficult, considering the times we are in.

If you call a trash character strong, then I don't know what to say.

Hillary Clinton stuck to her plan. And that was to appeal to the undecided voters.

Trump's rants were only effective on his die hard supporters. He didn't win over the undecided

Buhari

Hilary Clinton has already won this election technically...even the rich bully, trump, already knows this.

And who says Hilary is weak? That woman knows her sh*t. She's going to make a very active president..you'll see.

We all know who will be a better president. That person is Trump.

Clinton really would be a weak president. When it comes to the sand niggers from the middle east, she will let down her guards just for the oil money.

Trump on the other hand has said countlessly that America doesn't need to waste Tax payers monies on oversea wars.

If Trump wins the average American will be richer because Trump isn't new to wealth Creation. He will reduce tax and this will discourage investors from relocating their businesses to China and other developing countries while still increasing import tax.

Also, if Trump wins foreigners will be less likely to get citizenships or green cards or even visas due to very strict immigration laws - this will be very beneficial to an American citizen.

None..who told you clinton is weak?...you don know anything?..countinue

How do you define weak?
Someone who is articulate with her plans, intelligent, experienced, had handled the second toughest position in the cabinet which is secretary of states. I see nothing weak about her.
I think because she is diplomatic and does not use brute force, some consider her weak. But diplomacy is strength with intelligence.

loseyourseld:
How do you define weak?
Someone who is articulate with her plans, intelligent, experienced, had handled the second toughest position in the cabinet which is secretary of states. I see nothing weak about her.
I think because she is diplomatic and does not use brute force, some consider her weak. But diplomacy is strength with intelligence.

What did she achieve as secretary of state? Benghazi. Syria. Isis. Email leaks. Using government staff for private business. You know, let's just say it: Hillary is the choice of the Washington elite, she will serve special interests and that's why they are pulling all the big guns,media and all, to force her down everyone's throat s. Too bad.

I have with trump anytime

Localamos:
If you call a trash character strong, then I don't know what to say.

Hillary Clinton stuck to her plan. And that was to appeal to the undecided voters.

Trump's rants were only effective on his die hard supporters. He didn't win over the undecided

No no no, I referred to Trump as an extremist, not necessarily strong. Well I think he is also strong. Forget about the stunts Hillary is pulling against Russia.. The truth is that she will end up making America a weak country. One reason I said so is the times we are in now requires something more than diplomacy. End of Obama's tenure will usher in a different kind of world politics. I doubt if u will understand what I mean.

zubino:


... I doubt if u will understand what I mean.

I am of a sound mind. Articulate your thoughts in a clear manner and the world would understand you.

Trump, if elected, would become a trainee President who has no clear understanding of how world politics works. He would need to take time to learn - and trust me, there is no time for that!

To make matters worse, Trump is a spoilt brat from childhood. His excessive ego would not allow him to learn. He has always bragged of how he makes his own gut decision without consulting the advice of others.

Is that the person that you want to take over the affairs of the world?

Is that the person that you want to take over the affairs of the world? [/quote]

My brother, I actually respect your opinion. To tell u the truth, I don't support any of them. If I happen to be in America, I won't cast my vote on that day.
I really have problem with Trumps discrimatory lifestyle & I doubt if he will change bow.

On the other hand, democrats including Hillary will end up putting America in worse state with their diplomacy. By the time Hillary wins, u will understand what I mean in some years to come. America is likely to lose their respect as world power.

zubino:
I have come to learn a lot from the present campaigns, debates and votes currently preceding the US upcoming elections.
In my own little way, I have tried to analyse both candidates and really find both interesting, opposite and complex individuals to actually assess.

Hillary is experienced, calm, intelligent but I think she will make a weak president. I see a woman that will be greatly influenced in her decisions and really hunted by her poor diplomatic archives.

On the other hand, Donald is inexperienced, hot tempered, intelligent, rich and quick in conclusions. I Consider him an extremist. He's the type that can go all the way to achieve what he views as correct in his own understanding.

The big question now is, based on these two points of mine, how will u choose? Will u go for a weak person or an extremist? It's quite difficult, considering the times we are in.

From watching the debates, you notice that Hilary Clinton is anything but weak. And Trump is not really an extremist, he is just a fake chap with below average IQ, and no selling points, which he overcomes by appealing to the inherent racist nature of conservative republican voters.

I won't choose any of them.

[quote author=Farmerforlife post=50100840]

From watching the debates, you notice that Hilary Clinton is anything but weak. And Trump is not really an extremist, he is just a fake chap with below average IQ, and no selling points, which he overcomes by appealing to the inherent racist nature of conservative republican voters.[/quote

I strongly disagree with u on Trump being below average. He's really intelligent, but has problem with temper and also very proud.
Sometimes I just wonder how both candidates emerged as party's candidates. Wonders they say shall never cease.

Caseless:
I won't choose any of them.

We are in the same shoes, I just wanted to know how people interprete these human presidential aspirants.

They're both working assiduously to bringing forth the new world order. Why bother who wins?

iSlayer2:
They're both working assiduously to bringing forth the new world order. Why bother who wins?

I think it's natural to be inquisitive at this point in time.

[quote author=zubino post=50122305][/quote]

I believe that the Republicans deliberately choose an extreme candidate among their nominees as a shock contrast to their more 'moderate' ones. Then they shelve him/her along the line. Trump, Palin, a host of others fill this bill. Unfortunately for them, this year's shock candidate refused to be shelved, and got himself nominated instead.

And there is no evidence that he has a higher than average IQ. His speeches, fudging up of facts, poor analysis all show otherwise.

I think Hilary might be a passable president. Definitely much less vacillating than Obama... I think he is too weak and insincere.

zubino:


We are in the same shoes, I just wanted to know how people interprete these human presidential aspirants.

I don't like both of them.

Farmerforlife:


I believe that the Republicans deliberately choose an extreme candidate among their nominees as a shock contrast to their more 'moderate' ones. Then they shelve him/her along the line. Trump, Palin, a host of others fill this bill. Unfortunately for them, this year's shock candidate refused to be shelved, and got himself nominated instead.

And there is no evidence that he has a higher than average IQ. His speeches, fudging up of facts, poor analysis all show otherwise.

I think Hilary might be a passable president. Definitely much less vacillating than Obama... I think he is too weak and insincere.

Yes I really agree with u expect that u termed Obama as a weak president.
I will summarise my response by " saying if u think education is expensive then try illeteracy". So I wonder what Hillary will become if Obama is termed weak.

zubino:


Yes I really agree with u expect that u termed Obama as a weak president.
I will summarise my response by " saying if u think education is expensive then try illeteracy". So I wonder what Hillary will become if Obama is termed weak.

I don't think she's weak, and we don't have long to wait to find out. It is most likely that she'll be the next US president.

Farmerforlife:


I don't think she's weak, and we don't have long to wait to find out. It is most likely that she'll be the next US president.

Yes she's likely to be the next president. I want u to visit this post in years time then u will understand my point.