randomperson:

Oh you didn't... U only showed where some articles referred to him as atheist... U didn't show why they were wrong... U don't know how proof works, do you??

Claims made without evidence should be dismissed without evidence . Its simple logic .

Wall Street made a claim without any evidence and it should equally dismissed without evidence .

Imagine Wall Street should call me a deist without evidence , anyone can dismiss their claims without even stating that I'm a Christian because they had no evidence .

No single evidence even points to Mark Zuckerberg as an atheist .

Summary : The onus is on the claimant making the claim .

notjonbellion:
At that time I was reading on artificial intelligence I then decided to pop in and see what was going on on NL only the saw the thiests rejoicing over nothing

We were mocking and ridiculing the delusional atheists . While you were incensed over the fact that Mark rejected atheism .

KingEbukasBlog:


24 more days bro . You make me have a vicarious excitement about this just seeing how happy you are .

My Geee

Our redemption draweth niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiighhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Praise God

KingEbukasBlog:


To ruin their Christmas again !!!

Lmaoo ... you are wicked ooo

That would certainly ruin their lives forever !

Hearts will break

randomperson:
U can prove that he was never an atheist... Please do

ignore the thread

notjonbellion:
I think this forum should start paying for any thread opened
That way we won't be giving stupidity a chance

ignore the thread

MrMontella:

ignore the thread

Pained atheist

Rotflmaoo

Ignore the thread indeed .

This thread will flourish without their inputs , just wait and see .

Muafrika2:


Hearts will break

And of course , many atheists will abjure their beliefs . It could augur the rise of deism .

KingEbukasBlog:


And of course , many atheists will abjure their beliefs . It could augur the rise of deism .

Mr appeal to authority nobody ever became an athiest because of mark
Zuckerberg personally he was one of by inspirations for programming same with Sergey brin so if you think anybody would leave atheism because of him then you must be steewpeder than you already are
And I'm an agnostic btw

KingEbukasBlog:


We were mocking and ridiculing the delusional atheists . While you were incensed over the fact that Mark rejected atheism .

I was never incensed
I
Did
Not
Care

notjonbellion:
Mr appeal to authority nobody ever became an athiest because of mark
Zuckerberg personally he was one of by inspirations for programming same with Sergey brin so if you think anybody would leave atheism because of him then you must be steewpeder than you already are
And I'm an agnostic btw

Do you know what an appeal to authority is ? Yikes ! how can one be this ignorant

Young man , the brain is powerful . . When prominent figures like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg who were once seen as atheists have now distanced themselves from atheism , its gona make you ponder . You'd be forced to question your position .

Why do you think atheists are fighting hard to associate atheism with prominent figures and intellectuals when clearly these luminaries are not atheists ? Its because it makes it feel right that people of such high intellect and popularity share the same affiliation with you . It gives that conviction of truth .

Can't you see that Seun is intransigent about his views without evidence that Mark is an atheist when clearly he never was . Why do you think so ? It now makes him uncomfortable . He bluntly refuses to accept despite the evidence . His wavering faith in atheism is now bare for all to see.

But still sha I don't think the guy is an atheist . He just needs it to draw the attention to himself . Its good to promote controversy . Controversies elicit reactions . And people need to be continuously engaged for your business to grow .

KingEbukasBlog:


And of course , many atheists will abjure their beliefs . It could augur the rise of deism .

notjonbellion:

And I'm an agnostic btw

Let your position be clear

Agnostic atheist or just agnostic .

Muafrika2:

And through Deism , you could draw someone to Christ . Yes , its possible .

Deism is not totally logical , I discovered that this morning .

KingEbukasBlog:


Do you know what an appeal to authority is ? Yikes ! how can one be this ignorant

Young man , the brain is powerful . . When prominent figures like Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg who were once seen as atheists have now distanced themselves from atheism , its gona make you ponder . You'd be forced to question your position .

Why do you think atheists are fighting hard to associate atheism with prominent figures and intellectuals when clearly these luminaries are not atheists ? Its because it makes it feel right that people of such high intellect and popularity share the same affiliation with you . It gives that conviction of truth .

Can't you see that Seun is intransigent about his views without evidence that Mark is an atheist when clearly he never was . Why do you think so ? It now makes him uncomfortable . He bluntly refuses to accept despite the evidence . His wavering faith in atheism is now bare for all to see.

But still sha I don't think the guy is an atheist . He just needs it to draw the attention to himself . Its good to promote controversy . Controversies elicit reactions . And people need to be continuously engaged for your business to grow .

l actually said appeal to authority because you are making it look like that is what the atheists are doing and what you would do if a famous christian became a skeptic

notjonbellion:
I was never incensed
I
Did
Not
Care

You don't care ?

Why did you call me a liar when I told JackBizzle that Mark wasn't an atheist then ?

You would have ignored it.


Care

Dictionary : feel concern or interest

As far as you showed interest by replying , you simply care

KingEbukasBlog:


And through Deism , you could draw someone to Christ . Yes , its possible .

Deism is not totally logical , I discovered that this morning .

I had to look at the definition. It's sounds abit more honest, even if it's inaccurate.

Muafrika2:

I had to look at the definition. It's sounds abit more honest, even if it's inaccurate.

Yeah and its inaccurate

The constructional elements of deist thought include :

1. God exists and created Nature

2. God gave humans the ability to reason

Some deists believe that God is not interested in human affairs , here is why I think they are wrong . And that stance by deism that God does not intervene seems dogmatic . So its unfair to religion that its theologies are repudiated by Deism .

Deists are proponents of the First cause and they believe this cause is external and uncaused . Now , imagine the law of cause and effect existing in timeless eternity . Example : 0 degree Celsius (cause ) , Frozen water (effect) . That means if this should take place in a timeless eternity then frozen water should always be . That is to say since God exists in timeless eternity as a cause , then the effect which is the universe should co-exist with God . But since the universe is created then it shows that God has the will to lead to its cause . And since it shows that God can act on Its own volition , then he is a personal God . A personal God is saliently implied in his timelessness and freedom of will since he set out and created a new effect which is the universe without any antecedent determining conditions . Ergo , God also has the freedom of will to intervene in the affairs of the universe and of men .

And that is why Polydeism is illogical too . That means you have multiple unembodied individual minds who very unlikely agreed in unison to cause the universe to exist . And here is why Christianity is powerful true , since God is three cosubstantial hypothases then its very logical that these three irrefragably caused the universe since they are of one Divine mind though of distinct personalities .

I might be wrong

cc : DeepSight , 4kings , MrMontella , notjonbellion .

KingEbukasBlog:


Let your position be clear

Agnostic atheist or just agnostic .

How do you know he was never an atheist? He himself never said he was never an atheist, he only said he is not an atheist. Unless, you have been in Mark's head from the day he was born, there is no way you can know if he was ever an atheist. He even said there was a period he questioned things. Do you understand what he meant by that? That can only mean that there was a time he questioned religion and God, meaning he was an atheist.


If mark zukerberg was never an atheist according to you, how come you and your fellow anti-atheists brand Hitler, Plutarco Elías Calles, Pol pot and others as atheist. These people never called themselves atheists and would have answered negative if they had been asked if they are atheists.

This is what Hitler said about atheism;

We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations; we have stamped it out” [2] ~Adolf Hitler

So how come you guys brand Hitler an atheist and attribute all his atrocities to atheism, when he vehemently oppose atheism, and at the same time celebrate mark zukerberg for saying he is not an atheist and then attributing his achievements to theism.
In other words any great achiever in the world is a theist, and is celebrated, whether he believes in your God or not, and anyone who commits atrocities must be branded atheist whether he identify himself as one or not.

@ebuka, you can never be too sure if mark wasn't an atheist. What can you say about these links

http://www.beliefnet.com/celebrity-faith-database/z/mark-zuckerberg.aspx

http://hollowverse.com/mark-zuckerberg/

http://www.boomsbeat.com/articles/174/20140204/50-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-mark-zuckerberg.htm

wirinet:
How do you know he was never an atheist? He himself never said he was never an atheist, he only said he is not an atheist. Unless, you have been in Mark's head from the day he was born, there is no way you can know if he was ever an atheist. He even said there was a period he questioned things. Do you understand what he meant by that? That can only mean that there was a time he questioned religion and God, meaning he was an atheist.


If mark zukerberg was never an atheist according to you, how come you and your fellow anti-atheists brand Hitler, Plutarco Elías Calles, Pol pot and others as atheist. These people never called themselves atheists and would have answered negative if they had been asked if they are atheists.

This is what Hitler said about atheism;



So how come you guys brand Hitler an atheist and attribute all his atrocities to atheism, when he vehemently oppose atheism, and at the same time celebrate mark zukerberg for saying he is not an atheist and then attributing his achievements to theism.
In other words any great achiever in the world is a theist, and is celebrated, whether he believes in your God or not, and anyone who commits atrocities must be branded atheist whether he identify himself as one or not.

ooh I know what this is called
Hypocrisy!!!

wirinet:
How do you know he was never an atheist? He himself never said he was never an atheist, he only said he is not an atheist. Unless, you have been in Mark's head from the day he was born, there is no way you can know if he was ever an atheist. He even said there was a period he questioned things. Do you understand what he meant by that? That can only mean that there was a time he questioned religion and God, meaning he was an atheist.

So you are an atheist immediately you start questioning God and religion

Atheism is the conscious explicit rejection of God not the questioning of your beliefs in God

So you mean those days as a Christian I was searching on the Internet , questioning many things and seeking reasons to believe I was an atheist ?

Sir , that is not atheism , it is skepticism . Two entirely different things .

adepeter26:
@ebuka, you can never be too sure if mark wasn't an atheist. What can you say about these links

http://www.beliefnet.com/celebrity-faith-database/z/mark-zuckerberg.aspx

http://hollowverse.com/mark-zuckerberg/

http://www.boomsbeat.com/articles/174/20140204/50-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-mark-zuckerberg.htm

Lol . Its all about the rumors . The rumors were instigated by Wall Street's unsubstantial claim . They are not true .

KingEbukasBlog:


Let your position be clear

Agnostic atheist or just agnostic .

agnostic

notjonbellion:
ooh I know what this is called
Hypocrisy!!!

adepeter26:
@ebuka, you can never be too sure if mark wasn't an atheist. What can you say about these links

http://www.beliefnet.com/celebrity-faith-database/z/mark-zuckerberg.aspx

http://hollowverse.com/mark-zuckerberg/

http://www.boomsbeat.com/articles/174/20140204/50-things-you-probably-didnt-know-about-mark-zuckerberg.htm

wirinet:
How do you know he was never an atheist? He himself never said he was never an atheist, he only said he is not an atheist. Unless, you have been in Mark's head from the day he was born, there is no way you can know if he was ever an atheist. He even said there was a period he questioned things. Do you understand what he meant by that? That can only mean that there was a time he questioned religion and God, meaning he was an atheist.

KingEbukasblog's lie has been exposed here
https://www.nairaland.com/3541812/kingebukasblog-misinformation-zuckerberg-actually-atheist

KingEbukasBlog:


[s]Lol . Its all about the rumors . The rumors were instigated by Wall Street's unsubstantial claim . They are not true [/s].

just shut up
Did mark zuckerberg ever complain or take legal action
When the question was asked he said no
He didn't say "I never was"

Most of ya threads get as e be oooo

if I become famous tomorrow, and someone ask bout my religious views, I will simply say that am a Christian(cos I was raise to be one) even though I'm not.

why?
cos I've learnt a lesson by studying the life of Thomas Paine(a deist), who after his death, only 7 people attended his funeral, cos he was a religious skeptic.

these people(mark, bill, etc) are intellectuals, they know how the world works.
so am not surprised that they choose to say things that will sooth the crowd.

notjonbellion:
just shut up
Did mark zuckerberg ever complain or take legal action
When the question was asked he said no
He didn't say "I never was"

Why does he need to take legal action Do you have sense at all Does he need to say I never was .


He told you that he was raised a Jew and went through a period when he questioned this . Please questioning things does not make anyone an atheism . Religious skepticism is not atheism . And only deism I think has religious skepticism as a facet of the philosophical position .

KingEbukasBlog:




So you are an atheist immediately you start questioning God and religion

Atheism is the conscious explicit rejection of God not the questioning of your beliefs in God

So you mean those days as a Christian I was searching on the Internet , questioning many things and seeking reasons to believe I was an atheist ?

Sir , that is not atheism , it is skepticism . Two entirely different things .

You are forgetting to put Mark Zukerbergs reaction in its proper context. He was asked whether he is an atheist, and he answered in the negative, but he now added that although he was raised as a Jew, there was a period he questioned things. This could only mean, that he questioned the Jewish God. And since he was still in the process of responding to the question of whether he is an atheist or not, it could only mean that there was a period he was an atheist.

niyihawking:
Most of ya threads get as e be oooo

if I become famous tomorrow, and someone ask bout my religious views, I will simply say that am a Christian(cos I was raise to be one) even though I'm not.

why?
cos I've learnt a lesson by studying the life of Thomas Paine(a deist), who after his death, only 7 people attended his funeral, cos he was a religious skeptic.

these people(mark, bill, etc) are intellectuals, they know how the world works.
so am not surprised that they choose to say things that will sooth the crowd.

They are not atheists . You have to prove they are atheists first before surmising that they want to please the crowd .

KingEbukasBlog:


They are not atheists . You have to prove they are atheists first before surmising that they want to please the crowd .

you are just unbelievable
You are a special breed of internet troll