Pastafarian:


David Wood? that joke of an apologist?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=zO5lGJx8JU8


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w6BxHdKT7lw&itct=CA8QpDAYACITCIjj9sqWqNECFTAlfgodhJkNsDIGcmVsbWZ1SM_K8OOJo5n3zAE%3D&gl=US&client=mv-google&hl=en

Watch the full debate, don't watch clips made by muslims with titles saying somebody got "destroyed".

Richirich713:


Watch the full debate, don't watch clips made by muslims with titles saying somebody got "destroyed".

But he should watch clips made by Christians with titles saying somebody got destroyed...

randomperson:

But he should watch clips made by Christians with titles saying somebody got destroyed...

lol, I was about to say this too

Pastafarian:


very lame attempt at invalidating a valid excuse, read the link! I'm pretty sure you didnt

Nope, dawkins excuse was lame.

Pastafarian:

I'm talking old testament!

He prefers to debate the resurrection because the foundation of his faith is the resurrection, to him that's the decider.

Pastafarian:

lol, Dawkins won most of his debates And only a very few could give him a good debate

if he's such a great debator, he should debate craig, not run away.

Pastafarian:

why not check YouTube? don't be scared

I literally found something:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPlTsWFYBIM

Pastafarian:

give examples of such arguments they use

The arguments craig use guy, it's not Christian arguments - its theistic arguments for the existence of God. Christians are not the only theists in the world.

Richirich713:


Nope, dawkins excuse was lame.




He prefers to debate the resurrection because the foundation of his faith is the resurrection, to him that's the decider.




if he's such a great debator, he should debate craig, not run away.




I literally found something:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPlTsWFYBIM



The arguments craig use guy, it's not Christian arguments - its theistic arguments for the existence of God. Christians are not the only theists in the world.

But he shouldn't just debate for theism, he should debate for Christianity since it's the only way... Or maybe the guy can't defend Christianity and he's shying away

randomperson:

But he should watch clips made by Christians with titles saying somebody got destroyed...

nope I never said so, if you wana know who won a debate you should watch the full debate and then do some research afterwards.

randomperson:

But he shouldn't just debate for theism, he should debate for Christianity since it's the only way... Or maybe the guy can't defend Christianity and he's shying away

What should he debate other than the resurrection?

Richirich713:


What should he debate other than the resurrection?

He should debate the killings and genocide of God in the old testament... He should so show why his god is still good despite the genocide

randomperson:

He should debate the killings and genocide of God in the old testament... He should so show why his god is still good despite the genocide

I don't think he debates that because evens if he won it wouldn't make you guys believe in God. He's more interest in giving a positive case for Christianity thru the resurrection. The question also falls back on the question of morality, whether it's subjective or objective.

Atheist asked for evidence for God existence, that's what he does by giving his usual arguments for God existence, atheists know what's coming but most of them still lose against him.

Richirich713:


I don't think he debates that because evens if he won it wouldn't make you guys believe in God. He's more interest in giving a positive case for Christianity thru the resurrection. The question also falls back on the question of morality, whether it's subjective or objective.

Atheist asked for evidence for God existence, that's what he does by giving his usual arguments for God existence, atheists know what's coming but most of them still lose against him
.

I watched the video

Richard Dawkins is just embarrassing

How can an intelligent being try to define nothing

These atheists are clowning here

Richirich713:


Nope, dawkins excuse was lame.




He prefers to debate the resurrection because the foundation of his faith is the resurrection, to him that's the decider.




if he's such a great debator, he should debate craig, not run away.




I literally found something:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPlTsWFYBIM



The arguments craig use guy, it's not Christian arguments - its theistic arguments for the existence of God. Christians are not the only theists in the world.

Lol
Its literally nothing.
Its got to be something.

felixomor:


Lol
Its literally nothing.
Its got to be something.

The dude is confused

No wonder he does not want to debate William Craig . William would use him to mop the floor of the entire podium .

KingEbukasBlog:



The dude is confused

No wonder he does not want to debate William Craig . William would use him and mop the floor of the entire podium .

As in eh.

hahn:


Can snakes talk?

No.

After a long discuss with a friend on the genocide in the bible, she paused, shook her head, stood to her feet and told me the craziest thing I've heard since 2017 began:
"It's not to late to give your life to Christ. You lose nothing in and with him."

I was like, WTF is she talking about? How is this related to our subject of discuss?

Kaycee7:
No.

How come a snake spoke in the bible?

Richirich713:


Nope, dawkins excuse was lame.




He prefers to debate the resurrection because the foundation of his faith is the resurrection, to him that's the decider.




if he's such a great debator, he should debate craig, not run away.




I literally found something:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPlTsWFYBIM



The arguments craig use guy, it's not Christian arguments - its theistic arguments for the existence of God. Christians are not the only theists in the world.

With this let me ask if you are an atheist or anti-christian?

randomperson:

But he should watch clips made by Christians with titles saying somebody got destroyed...

Get info half information is worst than not having any info at all

rhektor:



With this let me ask if you are an atheist or anti-christian?

Neither.

Richirich713:


Neither.

Then why droolin over this thread?

rhektor:


Then why droolin over this thread?

I'm not droolin, I'm just stating facts

Richirich713:


I'm not droolin, I'm just stating facts

Is that what you call fact? Keep deceiving yourself

rhektor:


Is that what you call fact? Keep deceiving yourself

Both of you are Christians ooo

KingEbukasBlog:


Both of you are Christians ooo

I never knew. Bro no vex o

rhektor:


Is that what you call fact? Keep deceiving yourself

Are u an atheist or anti-christian ?

Richirich713:


Are u an atheist or anti-christian ?

I'm a Christian

hahn:


And you failed to put up anas09's Jesus Christ like response



Besides, asking for the size of the dick of an imaginary friend is not as bad as threatening "unbelievers" with the imaginary hell or the wrath of your imaginary god

Atheism is a mental disorder or illness : Only a mental retard disguised as an atheist will dare ask the world for the size of his god's dick. HAHN is displaying many symptoms of insanity and depression.

By now we all realize the terrible inner suffering of the atheist/agnostic/deist.
God will not be mocked !

New information from a 22-year old study at a German University has many psychiatrists and psychologists throughout the world wondering if atheism/ deism, agnosticsm is a sign or warning of a more serious mental illness already present or in the process of developing. Atheists or people who are very strident about their atheism are heavily prone to mental illness:

“There were 17,809 people in the study. It was a very large model as far as psychological experiments go.” This came as quite a shock to us as we studied patient after patient.”

The results of this study have unnerved even the most stoic scientists, physicians and researchers.
Murderers like Hitler and Stalin were also atheists.

ScienceWatch:
By now all enlightened Niaraland readers know that HAHN is a failed gangster now disguised as a foolish atheist.

HAHN want to know the size of his god's dick. He is a shame to established atheists.

I look forward to when we wld have theists, christians precisely who are honest, intelligent and forthright.
Not all these sciencewatch ebuka anas and others who have no knowledge of their bibles talk less of even the ability to think out of the box

Your attempt at blackmail is disgustingly dumb.

hahn:


How come a snake spoke in the bible?

The devil spoke through the snake.

Kaycee7:
The devil spoke through the snake.

Why did god now punish the snake?