Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,161,443 members, 7,846,829 topics. Date: Saturday, 01 June 2024 at 02:17 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Health / Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong (555 Views)
Amazing ! Cancer Is No Longer A Death Sentence With Swissgarde Supplements! / Colon Cancer Is Dangerous, Know Causes And Prevention / Pls Share For Our Ladies About Cancer Of The Vaginer (2) (3) (4)
Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong by xamuelotu(m): 7:30pm On Jul 30, 2017 |
Many people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage
and that not even nature can cure cancer. Both of these
assumptions are pure nonsense. Most likely everything you
know about cancer was intentionally designed to deceive
you so that cancer patients will choose the wrong cancer
treatments.
Why would someone spread false information about
cancer? That is what this article is about.
Let us start with a three-question test:
What causes a cell to be cancerous?
What is the 5-year “cure rate” of orthodox medicine,
meaning what percent of their cancer patients are alive
five years after diagnosis?
What is the 5-year “cure rate” of several of the best-
known natural cancer treatment experts?
Most people think that cancer is caused by DNA damage
and that orthodox medicine is frantically searching for a
cure for cancer.
There are two problems with these beliefs. Both beliefs are
complete nonsense and come from the propaganda and
deceptions of television.
Cancer is not caused by DNA damage. The definition of a
cancer cell is a cell with low ATP energy (i.e. a low level of
adenosine triphosphate). It is difficult to imagine a cell
biologist who is so stupid they think that DNA damage can
cause low levels of ATP energy. Only a very, very small
fraction of DNA has anything to do with the creation of ATP
energy.
Yet the media glorifies all of the “cancer researchers” who
are diligently trying to “fix” the DNA damage of cancer cells.
It is all a scam to make sure that cures for cancer are never
found.
The truth is that there are many people who know how to
cure cancer. They just don't work for the pharmaceutical
industry and you don't hear about them in the media and
they don't win Nobel Prizes.
The low ATP level is actually caused by microbes which are
inside the cancer cells, generally Helicobacter Pylori. This is
an amazing microbe which can have 16 different sizes and
shapes and sizes depending on the pH it is exposed to.
Advanced Cancer Theory
This microbe intercepts glucose as it enters the cancer cells
and thus reduces the amount of glucose available to be
converted into pyruvate. With less pyruvate, the cell will
create less ATP energy (of course I am skipping many steps
in this process). For a more detailed discussion read What
Causes Cancer .
The ICRF has developed more than 20 cancer treatments
which revert the cancer cells into normal cells. How do they
revert cancer cells into normal cells? They safely target and
kill the microbes inside the cancer cells.
Killing cancer cells is “old school” but there is nothing
wrong with things that can safely target and kill cancer cells
(such as purple grape juice), but the new approach is to kill
the microbes inside the cancer cells. This was first done in
the 1930s but that technology was persecuted and shut
down by the FDA and AMA. It has been restored, however,
by the High RF Frequency Devices (which are not their real
name, which we cannot use on this website due to the FDA). |
Re: Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong by xamuelotu(m): 7:31pm On Jul 30, 2017 |
About cure rates
You probably think that orthodox medicine (e.g. the
pharmaceutical industry, oncologists, the American Medical
Association or AMA, etc.) has a 5-year cure rate for cancer
patients of more than 50 percent. A “5-year cure rate” would
mean, by definition, that 50 percent or more of their cancer
patients are still alive five years after being diagnosed with
cancer.
You probably think that the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) is not only doing its best to find cures for cancer but
are shutting down “quacks” who are pretending to cure
cancer but in fact do not know how to cure cancer.
You probably think that the media is constantly looking for
who has the best cure rates for cancer so the media's
investigative journalists can keep the general public
apprised of who has the most effective cancer treatments.
And so on.
Are your assumptions correct? NO.
Cure rates are not an academic issue because you, the
reader, may get cancer some day or you may know
someone who gets cancer, such as a spouse or relative.
Your very life, or the life of a friend of loved-one, may be on
the line as you decide who is telling the truth about cancer
research.
Choosing a cancer treatment is literally a life-and-death
decision. The “cure rates” for different cancer treatments
can range from 3 to 95 percent for the same type of cancer.
So who is telling the truth and who is lying? And if they are
lying, why are they lying?
So let's talk about cure rates.
First, what is the overall 5-year cure rate of the oncology
profession according to their own statistics?
Second, what was the cure rate of a South African
immigrant who used nothing but purple grape juice to treat
cancer?
Before reading on, take a guess at the answers to both of
these questions and write your answers down to see how
you did.
According to Dr. Jonathon Stegall, the answer to the first
question is this:
“A 2004 study in the journal Clinical Oncology evaluated the
contribution of chemotherapy to 5-year survival rates
among adult cancer patients. In other words, the goal of the
study was to look at how significant chemotherapy's role
was in successful treatment outcomes (defined by
oncologists as 5-year survival). In order to arrive at a
meaningful conclusion, data from many previous studies
was pooled and analyzed. The 22 most common cancer
types were included in the study.
“The results were surprising. The overall contribution of
chemotherapy to five-year survival in American adults was
2.1 percent. This means that approximately 98 percent of
the credit for survival was attributed to all other treatments,
such as surgery, radiation, nutrition, etc.
“It is important to note that this study is often misquoted.
You have probably heard this statistic quoted in a way
which suggests that those receiving chemotherapy only
have a 2.1 percent 5-year survival rate.
“In reality, the average five-year survival rate for cancer is
69 percent. This includes all stages of cancer and makes no
distinction between who received which treatments.
However, given the most commonly used treatments in
oncology today, it is safe to assume that many of these
surviving patients received chemotherapy.
“At this point, it is important to discuss what 5-year survival
means. In the oncology world, 5-year survival measures the
percentage of patients who are still alive five years from the
date of diagnosis. It does not mean that they are cancer-
free, and it does not mean that they are completely healthy.
Instead, it simply means that they have not died from
cancer (or any other cause) in the five years since
diagnosis.
“Survival rates can be further broken down. For example,
cancer-specific survival looks at the percentage of patients
with a particular type of cancer and can be further broken
down to look at survival rates for each stage of cancer.
Using the 5-year survival statistic with respect to breast
cancer, we see that Stage 0 or Stage I breast cancer has a
5-year survival rate of nearly 100 percent.
“For Stage II breast cancer, the five-year survival rate is 93
percent, while for Stage III breast cancer, the 5-year survival
rate is 72 percent.
“Stage IV breast cancer has a 5-year survival rate of
approximately 22 percent. Thus, when we look at survival
rates for cancer, it is important to be as specific as possible
with regard to cancer type and cancer stage since some
cancers have very poor survival rates while others have very
good ones.
“I always tell my patients that it is important to look at
survival statistics on the population level in order to know
what we are dealing with, but it is equally important to
realize that those statistics do not necessarily apply to
them. Many factors contribute to treatment outcomes, and
many of those are directly in the patient’s control.”
As if the battle against cancer weren't bad enough, some
chemical companies seem dedicated to making you sick so
that you will need prescription drugs. For example,
Monsanto loves to put chemicals in your foods and loves
for you to eat GMO foods. Because the average person has
been brainwashed by the media, they think that nature can
do nothing to help cancer.
The answer to the second question is this: Johanna
Brandt's cure rate was 100 percent.
Johanna Brandt did not need to know how to cure cancer,
Nature had to know how to cure cancer. And Nature had put
at least 12 chemicals in purple grape juice that can kill
cancer cells.
The best way to survive cancer is to figure out what Nature
has already done. |
Re: Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong by xamuelotu(m): 7:33pm On Jul 30, 2017 |
Dr. Kelley's cancer treatments
Another natural medicine cancer researcher was Dr. William
D. Kelley, a dentist turned natural medicine cancer
researcher. He worked with more than 30,000 cancer
patients using his protocol.
Dr. Kelley had a cure rate of 93 percent on his newly
diagnosed cancer patients who had not had chemotherapy,
radiation or surgery.
Dr. Kelley was thrown in jail and later went to Mexico to
treat cancer patients.
Why did he go to jail? Because he used products to treat
cancer which cannot be patented. Thus, the pharmaceutical
industry and medical community had no interest in his
treatments because they cannot make huge profits from
treatments that cannot be patented.
So they had him thrown in jail. They did not care that he had
a 93 percent cure rate, his treatments were not profitable
enough to satisfy their greed.
Dr. Kelly used cancer treatments designed by Nature, such
as natural enzymes. These enzymes made the cancer cells
visible to the immune system and the immune system cured
cancer. The enzymes were natural and could not be
patented.
In other words, Dr. Kelly was not a medical doctor and he
used natural medicine to achieve his 93 percent cure rate.
Using Nature is an unforgivable sin according to the AMA
and the media. His cure rate was irrelevant. Dr. Kelley died
on January 30, 2005, at the age of 79.
His treatment is not a mystery, just buy his book on
Amazon — Cancer: Curing the Incurable Without Surgery,
Chemotherapy or Radiation
— or the original book One Answer To Cancer
Note: The Kelley Protocol is no longer one of the major cancer
treatments in natural medicine, due to newer technologies,
though it is frequently added to the newer and more powerful
protocol.
So let's talk about today.
Today, the instant someone hears the term “natural
medicine” they immediately run out the door as fast as they
can run. But they are running away from the only highly
effective cancer treatments. Nature is a lot smarter than
any chemist.
Many people have cured their newly diagnosed cancer by
using a very healthy diet and drinking a quart of carrot juice
(with a little beet juice mixed in) every day. That is all they
did.
In fact, if all cancer patients did that instead of using
chemotherapy, radiation and surgery, the “cure rate” for
cancer in America would jump dramatically.
But who would make huge profits telling cancer patients to
drink a quart of carrot juice, mixed with a little beet juice,
every day, and eat a healthy diet? Certainly not the medical
community and certainly not the pharmaceutical industry
and media. Carrot juice and beet juice cannot be patented.
Nor can a healthy diet be patented.
The general public is so brainwashed they think Nature is
too stupid to be a medical doctor. Yet scientists only
understand about 3 percent of human DNA after studying it
since 1953. This means scientists still don't have a clue
what 97 percent of all human DNA does.
There are many other examples of natural cancer
researchers who also had very high cure rates.
Dr. Philip Binzel had an 81 percent cure rate using liquid
laetrile from apricot seeds . He got liquid laetrile from
Mexico. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tried to
block the import of liquid laetrile into the United States.
Fortunately, Dr. Binzel's son was an attorney and the FDA
was defeated in court.
Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, had a 100 percent cure rate
using electromedicine to kill microbes inside the cancer
cells. The American Medical Association (AMA) tried to buy
him out. Rife refused so the FDA shut him down and
destroyed his lab and inventory.
And there are many others. In fact, the best cancer
researchers ever are all alive today. We have had to develop
very advanced cancer protocols because many of the
patients we work with are very sick due to their starting their
cancer treatment with orthodox cancer treatments.
All of the above natural technologies are currently used. The
“Rife Machine” is now called a High RF Frequency
Generator-Contact (15 watts) or High RF Frequency
Generator-Plasma (207 watts).
Well, that is not their real names. We are not allowed by the
vendor to mention their real names. I will bet by now you
can figure out why the vendor does not want us to use the
real names of these devices. He is afraid of the FDA.
Natural medicine cancer researchers today use many of the
above protocols, but newer products and newer
combinations of products have made some of the above
protocols obsolete if used by themselves.
A powerful combination of natural cancer treatments and
electromedicine are needed by cancer patients.
That is why the experts put together protocols with names
like Cellect-Budwig, Dirt Cheap Protocol, High RF Frequency
Protocol, Cesium Chloride, etc. |
Re: Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong by xamuelotu(m): 7:34pm On Jul 30, 2017 |
What the media doesn't tell you about cancer
The media has conditioned the American people to believe
that cancer is caused by DNA damage and that not even
Nature can figure out how to cure cancer.
But surprisingly, DNA damage has absolutely nothing to do
with causing cancer. But even if it did – so what? If you
safely target and kill the cancer cells, what difference would
it make that the cancer cells have DNA damage?
A Nobel Prize was awarded in 1930/31 for the discovery
that low ATP energy was the definition of a cancer cell.
But it was a natural medicine cancer researcher (who
obviously did not win a Nobel Prize) who discovered that the
low ATP energy was caused by microbes inside the cancer
cells which intercept glucose before it can be converted into
pyruvate and then, via two chemical cycles, into ATP.
By killing these microbes, cancer cells can be reverted into
normal cells. We now know it is not even necessary to kill
cancer cells, they can be reverted into normal cells. The
ICRF (Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. –
natural medicine researchers) has developed more than 25
treatments that revert cancer cells into normal cells.
The DNA damage in cancer cells has absolutely nothing to
do with causing cancer. The DNA damage is caused by the
same thing that causes cancer — the microbes inside the
cancer cells.
There are many cures for cancer. But these cures do not
come from the pharmaceutical industry. The multi-
billionaires/trillionaires who own the pharmaceutical
industry have zero interest in the “little people” surviving
their cancer.
The politicians, of course, side with the trillionaires because
they are the ones who own the media and thus they are the
ones who own the minds of the American people. You
cannot get elected to the White House without selling out to
the super-rich.
Cures for cancer must come from cancer researchers who
have integrity and do not work for the pharmaceutical
industry or Food and Drug Administration (Congress has
given the FDA to the pharmaceutical industry as a gift to
crush anyone who can cure a highly profitable disease) or
any of the large cancer charities (which are controlled by the
pharmaceutical industry).
The American Cancer Society and Susan G. Komen For The
Cure have no interest in curing cancer. They are collecting
money. In fact, the American Cancer Society was really
founded by John D. Rockefeller Jr. — son of the founder of
the pharmaceutical industry.
No wonder the ACS has never found a cure for cancer. They
have never been looking for a cure for cancer and they
never will. If the ACS hired one of the ICRF researchers they
would have over 25 cures for cancer within one week. But
that will never happen.
The problem with curing cancer has nothing to do with
science and everything to do with politics and information.
People are told there are no cures for cancer, over and over,
so they naturally believe it.
But it is a lie.
Actually, curing cancer is easy and many people know how
to cure cancer.
Revert Cancer Cells Into Normal Cells
The battle against cancer has nothing to do with cancer and
everything to do with the manipulation of information by the
super-rich.
The media uses a very sophisticated brainwashing tactic
that has been around for many decades. Study this brilliant
quote:
“No one understood better than Stalin that the true object of
propaganda is neither to convince nor even to persuade, but
to produce a uniform pattern of public utterance in which
the first trace of unorthodox thought immediately reveals
itself as a jarring dissonance.” — Hitler and Stalin: Parallel
Lives by Alan Bullock
By using the constant repetition of seeing “medical doctors”
on television, people are conditioned (the “uniform pattern
of public utterance”) to believe that anyone who is not a
“medical doctor” must be a quack (the “jarring dissonance”)
.
Thus, people run to their medical doctor when they get
cancer. The media has done their job well.
Almost every time you turn on your television set you see a
medical doctor being glorified. Why? So that when people
are diagnosed with cancer, by a medical doctor, they will
immediately want to know which medical doctors treat
cancer.
This process has been going on for many years, long before
you were born or television was invented. The Big Cartel of
the media, the pharmaceutical industry, the politicians, the
medical industry, etc. don't want people to know that cancer
can be cured.
The secret cartels use the media to turn people into
zombies. Thus, when a person is diagnosed with cancer
they head for an oncologist like a robot.
Because there are many cures for cancer in Nature, the
super rich, who own the pharmaceutical industry and the
media, make sure that no human being in America or in any
other country, knows or believes that there are, in fact,
scores of ways to cure cancer using natural medicine,
meaning medicine from Nature.
Safely targeting cancer cells and killing cancer cells, or
safely reverting cancer cells into normal cells, is not even
remotely on the agenda of Big Pharma or Big Medicine or
Big Media or Big Corrupt Politicians or Big Charities. But
suppressing these cures is one of their highest priorities.
So what is on the radar of Big Pharma, ad nauseum?
Profits, and lots of them. Curing cancer patients is literally
the last thing on their radar.
But natural medicine cancer researchers have been curing
cancer for many decades.
For example, Dr. Royal Rife, a microbiologist, had a 100
percent cure rate on cancer by reverting cancer cells into
normal cells. He did this in the 1930s by using gentle
electrical currents (which is one form of “electromedicine”)
to kill the microbes which are inside the cancer cells.
It is microbes inside the cancer cells that are blocking the
production of ATP energy. Killing these microbes is what
allows cancer cells to be reverted into normal cells.
The American Medical Association (AMA) tried to “buy out
Rife” so they could destroy his machines. Rife refused their
“offer” so the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) shut him
down and destroyed all of his lab and his machines that had
not already been sold.
You probably didn't know about Dr. Rife because the media
has never told you about his 100 percent cure rate. The
media has also not told you that his device has been
replicated using modern technology and that you can buy
these devices over the Internet.
But Dr. Rife is just the tip of the iceberg of things you don't
know … |
Re: Why Everything You Know About Cancer Is Wrong by sleeknick: 8:11pm On Jul 30, 2017 |
Na wa o... My eyes dey pepper me |
(1) (Reply)
Robotic Prostate Cancer Surgery In India At Reasonable Costs / Shocking !!!trending Video Of A Plastic Fish That Was Imported From London (pic) / 16 Disgusting Things We All Do That Seem Normal But Are Not
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 54 |