The president claim to get 198000 votes from the south east yet he appointed some minister to them.
Please someone should tell him the following
1) ministerial appointment is constitutional and so he had no choice
2)If he had decided not to appoint ministers to the south east whether junior or senior ,the national assembly would have rejected the ministerial list
3)If he had his way he wouldn't have appointed any minister to the south east.
4)The south east complain is not on ministerial appointment as denying them those position would be like sharing excess crude fund to state government without giving the south east.
5)The complain of the south east and in fact the whole south is that his appointed northerners to major sectors is the economy like civil service,security agencies(security chiefs)investment sectors,and many other sectors was done to favour his region and completely neglecting the south east(in fact if the total appointment he has made so far apart from ministerial appointment,is 1000,the south east did not get up to 5)
6)He should stop denying or making flimsy excuses when he shamefully told the world that there is no way he will favour those that gave him 5% against the 97%

Finally it's undemocratic and immature for any president who wins election to be telling the world that they can't expect things to be done equally when he got only 5% from a region,yet he is for "every body and not for anybody". Most people who won election have always embraced opposition and also sort to prove to those that did not vote them that they were wrong.But in his case,he has justified the fear of the south east that he was not the right candidate for them.
But on a general note has he been fair to.the south west? Even Lai can't defend him on this.So what will he claim the south west did to him?.probably he got only a million vote from them...

Methinks you have forgotten that your President is an illiterate.

Southeast is shithole anyway