LordReed:


Yet the system has indicted him for 2 separate matters plus a JUDGE of the same system rejected the deal so your narrative falls flat.

bemeruca:


So prosecutors tried to shield Hunter Biden from future indictment. That's the system, which should not be doing that.
Now, no one has claimed the whole system is compromised, but the DNC is trying its best. Hence, the attack on the Supreme Court etc.

Basilico is saying hunter knows where to go to get a favorable judgment against Fox.

When someone is sarcastically saying something, you don't grasp it, you also think everything is absolute.

LordReed:


LoLz. So plea deals are now not part of the justice system? Is that the stance you are taking?

So Hunter will take a case out of Delaware where Fox is incorporated in because?

bemeruca:


You argue like an headless chicken. No direction, just making claims and insinuating what no one is saying.
A black woman who was stealing was giving a plea deal by the system, plead guilty and go to jail for 3 years. She said no, she was found guilty and sentenced 30 years.

Like I said, comprehension is important. The system, tried to give him a sweetheart deal. How did you land or come to the notion that plead deal is not the system?

Fox news headquarters is New York city, we all know what goes on in New York city.

LordReed:


And you respond like a seneless person. I asked a straight forward question "Is that the stance you are taking?" What claim or insinuation am I then making.

The system tried to give him a sweetheart deal which the same system rejected so what are you complaining about?

LordReed:


LoLz. So plea deals are now not part of the justice system? Is that the stance you are taking?

So Hunter will take a case out of Delaware where Fox is incorporated in because?

bemeruca:


Wasn't the justice system that was hiding his IRS issues and trying to give him that sweetheart deal? Are they not the system? (Note, Sweet heart deal is the plea deal)

Did the system not suppress his laptop? Wasn't there a letter from a security agency claiming the laptop was Russian propaganda? Is that not the system?

bemeruca:




your question is stupid because, in my previous response to you, I said the system wanted to give him a sweetheart deal. try and keep up. before you argue with someone, you should be able to comprehend and recollect.

you are here making claims no one made then attack it earlier. i called you out for it... now you are deflecting by asking stupid questions.



try and keep up. You cannot be arguing with no comprehension. Your question is dumb and when you put the "NOW" there, you are actually implying i said something rather than asking me a question.

LordReed:


You are the dumbass here. You make claims and when shown the facts you act like a stupid madman. Hunter was indicted and got a plea deal that was REJECTED but here comes stupid arses like you claiming he is favoured by the system. What a load of shit. Meanwhile dumbasses you are not aware that Fox is registered in Delaware so the case will be in Delaware. But stupido like you wants him to take the case to NY yet you claim to be aware of how things work. You are too stupid so it's a wonder you even know hoe NL works.

bemeruca:


You asked stupid question, no facts from you. Anyone that argues with you is the dumbest. Make up your mind. Am I the dumbest or basilico is the dumbest? This goes to show why you are like an headless chicken. Jump around with no direction.

Question to you, why was the plea deal rejected? Why should a system that indict a criminal give the criminal a deal that protects the criminal from the present and future crime?
New York has long-arm statutes that allow courts to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
If Fox News has sufficient contacts with New York (such as broadcasting there), New York courts may have jurisdiction.
Fox news is a national network, their headquarter is in new York, they broadcast from new York, the have significant contacts and presence in new York, so new York is an option. It's funny how you said I WANT HIM TO TAKE THE CASE TO NEW YORK.
This is how you put words into people's mouth because you are a headless chicken manufacturing lies, attribute it to someone then attack the lie.

bemeruca:


You asked stupid question, no facts from you. Anyone that argues with you is the dumbest. Make up your mind. Am I the dumbest or basilico is the dumbest? This goes to show why you are like an headless chicken. Jump around with no direction.

Question to you, why was the plea deal rejected? Why should a system that indict a criminal give the criminal a deal that protects the criminal from the present and future crime?
New York has long-arm statutes that allow courts to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants.
If Fox News has sufficient contacts with New York (such as broadcasting there), New York courts may have jurisdiction.
Fox news is a national network, their headquarter is in new York, they broadcast from new York, the have significant contacts and presence in new York, so new York is an option. It's funny how you said I WANT HIM TO TAKE THE CASE TO NEW YORK.
This is how you put words into people's mouth because you are a headless chicken manufacturing lies, attribute it to someone then attack the lie.

basilico:


Lordreed is arguing out of ignorance
Its not his fault that he knows not how Hunter was handled by Weiss before Weiss was appointed Special Counsel. How a judge rejected a plea deal where he was to plead guilty to gun charges in return for a blanket immunity on his tax crimes.

Lordreed are you aware that Hunter was paying Eastern European hookers and charging it to his LLC account as a business expense , tax deductible. Are you aware that he has not been charged with violating FARA by virtue of being an unregistered foreign lobbyist? Unlike the case of Flynn and Manafort.

LordReed:


LoLz. If there is an headless person here it is you. You practically make a case for the case to be in NY but turn round to say I am putting words in your mouth. Tell me where should Hunter take his case to?

I said you are too stupid but then you go and prove it. How many times have we seen criminals who become informants and are let go to continue committing crimes because of the information they would gather? Here comes stupido acting like it's a new thing then claiming I put words in his mouth.

You think talking out your arse is what this about? No sir, bring the facts or show us how stupid you are.

bemeruca:


People tend to go to where will favour them, it is common sense. Me saying he may likely go to where he can get favourable judgement is me wanting him to go to new York. That is my analysis of the situation. You talked about dumb here but you cannot grasp simple things. Later you will claim I said the sky is red because along the line you cannot comprehend.

So tell me, where did I say I want him to take the case to New York? It's funny that you are now saying I made the case.

Where should Hunter take the case to? I don't know, I only said he has options and New York is one. He will go where it will favor him, where they can bend the law. That is my analysis. Should I get a dictionary and explain to you how analysis works?

The bold is so dumb

basilico:


Lordreed is arguing out of ignorance
Its not his fault that he knows not how Hunter was handled by Weiss before Weiss was appointed Special Counsel. How a judge rejected a plea deal where he was to plead guilty to gun charges in return for a blanket immunity on his tax crimes.

Lordreed are you aware that Hunter was paying Eastern European hookers and charging it to his LLC account as a business expense , tax deductible. Are you aware that he has not been charged with violating FARA by virtue of being an unregistered foreign lobbyist? Unlike the case of Flynn and Manafort.

LordReed:


Why didn't the Hunter Biden probe bring it up? Why didn't they recommend charges to the Justice Department?

basilico:


Arguing for the sake.What did not come up?If you have not read it then it does not exist?


https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/irs-whistleblowers-testify-at-house-hearing-on-hunter-biden-investigation-transcript

LordReed:


My 2nd question again: why didn't they recommend charges to the Justice Department?

basilico:



Mr. Donalds (03:56:28):

Okay. Question for you, and also for Mr. Shapley, is it a clear line of potential investigation if somebody is charging a massive living expenses through a corporate account and not doing that through their own personal accounts and not accounting for that properly on their income tax returns? Is that the basis of a criminal investigation?

Mr. Shapley (03:56:50

Generally speaking, that would definitely be factors that would spur a criminal investigation, yes.

LordReed:


My question is very simple: Why didn't the committee recommend that the DOJ charge Hunter Biden? Answer this simple question.

basilico:


Stupid . IRS knew he was cheating on taxes. Normally in such cases, the law is such that A republican led committee has to make recommendations before the criminal can be charged.
IRS /DOJ waits for Congress to investigate before they take action.

LordReed:


LoLz! You never answer simple questions why? Because it will reveal how stupid you are. Bwahahahahaha!

basilico:


I would like to see their recommendations in total. Please paste it here

LordReed:


That's a question for to answer.

basilico:


You are asking me why they didn't recommend. That means you have seen their recommendations. I have not seen their report, where is it ?

LordReed:


You go look for it, thats a question for you to answer.

Judge ruled she or her boyfriend had to go in the case she had him earn &600K that they spent lavishly.
She also was subpoenaed in that boyfriend's divorce.
She's being reviewed by Congress for her use of federal grant cash. She's been accused of racism.
She's facing a state legislative investigation.
She's accused of basing her case on an illegally recorded phone call.(Georgia law requires all parties in a call to consent to recording).
She's been charged with having an "aura of mendacity" around the whole prosecution
Her continued stay on the cases is also pending in the appeals court.

basilico:
UCLA gets hundreds of new converts to Islam, before the protest was broken up
Takbir.

https://twitter.com/OliLondonTV/status/1785891276228895152/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1785891276228895152&currentTweetUser=OliLondonTV

bemeruca:


5 mins of virtue signaling. The US is dying

basilico:


Dying by design.All planned.Biden is planning to take in thousands of Palestinian refugees as if the neighbors cant take in their brothers.

raumdeuter:
I think many people will support this Iranian University gesture