Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,160 members, 7,815,049 topics. Date: Thursday, 02 May 2024 at 06:00 AM

History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade - Culture - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Culture / History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade (2768 Views)

The Name Lagos, Was Called Ekonunuame By The Benins / Traditional Rulers Storm Anambra For Abolition Of Osu, Others / How Madam Efunroye Tinubu Aided Abolishment Of Slave Trade In 1800s (2) (3) (4)

(1) (Reply) (Go Down)

History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by jmoore(m): 2:39pm On Jul 21, 2018

The United Kingdom abolished import of slaves to their colonies in 1807, and abolished slavery in all British territories in 1833. The British became increasingly active in suppressing the slave trade.[15] At the end of 1851 a naval expedition bombarded Lagos into submission,[16] deposed Oba Kosoko, installed the more amenable Oba Akitoye, and signed the Great Britain-Lagos treaty that made slavery illegal in Lagos on January 1, 1852.




Below is the treaty Britain and Lagos.

The text of the Lagos Treaty of 1852 is transcribed below:[4]

Commodore Henry William Bruce, Commander-in-Chief of Her Majesty’s ships and vessels on the West Coast of Africa, and John Beecroft, Esquire. Her Majesty's Consul in the Bights of Benin and Biafra, on the part of her Majesty the Queen of England, and the King and Chiefs of Lagos and of the neighbourhood, on the part of themselves and of their country, have agreed upon the following Articles and Conditions:

Article I
The export of slaves to foreign countries is for ever abolished in the territories of the King and Chiefs of Lagos; and the King and the Chiefs of Lagos; and the King and Chiefs of Lagos engage to make and to proclaim a law prohibiting any of their subjects, or any person within their jurisdiction, from selling or assisting in the sale of any slave for transportation to a foreign country; and the King and Chiefs of Lagos promise to inflict a severe punishment on any person who shall break the law.

Article II
No European or other person whatever shall be permitted to reside within the territory of the King and Chiefs of Lagos for the purpose of carrying on in any way the traffic in Slaves; and no houses, or stores, or buildings of any kind whatever shall be erected for the purpose of Slave Trade within the territory of the King and Chiefs of Lagos; and if any such houses, stores, or buildings shall at any future time be erected, and the King and Chiefs of Lagos shall fail or be unable to destroy them, they may be destroyed by any British officers employed for the suppression of the Slave Trade.

Article III
If at any time it shall appear that the Slave Trade has been carried on through or from the territory of the King and Chiefs of Lagos, the Slave Trade may be put down by Great Britain by force upon that territory, and British officers may seize the boats of Lagos found anywhere carrying on the Slave Trade; and the King and Chiefs of Lagos will be subject to a severe act of displeasure on the part of the King and Queen of England.

Article IV
The slaves now held for exportation shall be delivered to any British officer duly authorized to receive them, for the purpose of being carried to a British Colony, and there liberated; and all the implements of Slave Trade, and the barracoons or buildings exclusively used in the Slave Trade, shall be forthwith destroyed.

Article V
Europeans or other persons now engaged in the Slave Trade are to be expelled from the country; the houses, stores, or buildings hitherto employed as slave-factories, if not converted to lawful purposes within three months of the conclusion of this Engagement, are to be destroyed.

Article VI
The subjects of the Queen of England may always trade freely with the people of Lagos in every article they wish to buy and sell in all the places, and ports, and rivers within the territories of the ing and Chiefs of lagos, and throughout the whole of their dominions; and the King and Chiefs of Lagos pledge themselves to show no favour and give no privilege to the ships and traders of other countries which they do not show to those of England.

Article VII
The King and Chiefs of Lagos declare that no human being shall at any time be sacrificed within their territories on account of religious or other ceremonies; and that they will prevent the barbarous practice of murdering prisoners captured in war.

Article VIII
Complete protection shall be afforded to Missionaries or Ministers of the Gospel, of whatever nation or country, following the vocation of spreading the knowledge and doctrines of Christianity, and extending the benefits of civilization within the territory of the King and Chiefs of Lagos.

Encouragement shall be given to such Missionaries or Ministers in the pursuits of industry, in building houses for their residence, and schools and chapels. They shall not be hindered or molested in their endeavours to teach the doctrines of Christianity to all persons willing and desirous to be taught; nor shall any subject of the King and Chiefs of Lagos who may embrace the Christian faith be on that account, or on account of the teaching or exercise thereof, molested or troubled in any manner whatsoever.

The King and Chiefs of Lagos further agree to set apart a piece of land, within a convenient distance of the principal towns, to be used as a burial-ground for Christian persons. And the funerals and sepulchres of the dead shall not be disturbed in any way or upon any account.

Article IX
Power is hereby expressly reserved to the Government of France to become a party to this Treaty, if it shall think fit, agreeably with the provisions contained in Article v of the Convention between Her Majesty and the King of the French for their suppression of the Traffic In Slaves, signed at London, May 22, 1845.

In faith of which we have hereunto set our hands and seals, at Lagos, on board Her Britannic Majesty’s ship Penelope, 1st January, 1852.


(L.S. ) H. W. BRUCE
(L.S. ) JOHN BEECROFT
(L.S. ) KING AKITOYE
(L.S. ) ATCHOBOO
(L.S. ) KOSAE

Sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_Between_Great_Britain_and_Lagos,_1_January_1852
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lagos_Colony

Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by FriendsOPdotcom: 3:22pm On Jul 21, 2018
Wow.. Front page material..


FriendsOp
Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by davidnazee: 7:28pm On Jul 21, 2018
[quote author=jmoore post=69580987][/quote]

Africans should not be deceived into praising the same people who started the slave trade as heroes who ended it.
Slavery was ended due to the rise of machines. If machines had not been invented they would still be selling Africans as slaves.

2 Likes 1 Share

Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by jmoore(m): 7:08am On Jul 22, 2018
davidnazee:


Africans should not be deceived into praising the same people who started the slave trade as heroes who ended it.
Slavery was ended due to the rise of machines. If machines had not been invented they would still be selling Africans as slaves.
The problems with most Africans is that they hardly accept responsibility. They always look for who to blame for their own misfortune.
Invention of machines may have ended international slave trade. But white people were never the ones that started slave trade. Africans were already selling themselves.
They bought what you offered them. And Nigeria was a hub because that's what Nigeria could offer in large quantity.
Nigeria/Benin Republic- Slave coast (source of slaves)
Cote d'ivoire -Ivory coast (source of ivory)
Ghana- Gold coast (source of gold)

3 Likes

Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by gregyboy(m): 9:25am On Jul 22, 2018
jmoore:

The problems with most Africans is that they hardly accept responsibility. They always look for who to blame for their own misfortune.
Invention of machines may have ended international slave trade. But white people were never the ones that started slave trade. Africans were already selling themselves.
They bought what you offered them. And Nigeria was a hub because that's what Nigeria could offer in large quantity.
Nigeria/Benin Republic- Slave coast (source of slaves)
Cote d'ivoire -Ivory coast (source of ivory)
Ghana- Gold coast (source of gold)



. Thanks bro well said africans like blaming people and not themselves anything done towards a particular african is seen as racism ...the white dont fucking care if africans are blaming them for thier misfortunes they are doing thier best to make heaven on earth in thier places while africans are busy using 5000yrs to cry slavery .....

Many reasons made british abolished slavery not because africans spoke but because they had a goods system of government who considers humanity before anything same people who van protect animals will do more for his fellow humans tooi still have that believes africans didnt need liberation from colonization early
Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by Nobody: 7:30pm On Aug 07, 2021
Re: History 101: Oba Kosoko Of Lagos Was Against Abolition Of Slave Trade by TAO11(f): 12:44am On Aug 08, 2021
Debunked once, debunked forever. You and your fake videos have been debunked. I know it hurts, but it is what it is.

Truthbeatslies:
[s]The true history of the yoruba:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IIporKrPsbU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2hU-ibkPfg

[/s]
I have debunked this false video many, many times. See one of my comments below:

(1) Regarding your bitter lies about the trans-Atlantic slave trade, the following piece-by-piece devastating refutation:

(A) Contrary to your ignorance, captives weren’t taken from “all across Africa” as you imagined.

Rather, captives were taken from Central Africa and West Africa — including people from Benin kingdom whom the Nupe, the Ibadan, Ogedengbe, etc. raided.

(B) Contrary to your ignorance, the Yoruba people have long been known by the name Yoruba (and they’ve been living in their present homeland) for centuries prior to the period when ex-captives began to be returned to Africa.

We know this because the process of returning ex-captives back ‘home’ to West Africa didn’t begin until circa the late-1700s.

Whereas, there are manuscripts written in the early-1600s which list Yorubas (by their name Yoruba) among some of the ethnic groups of our region of West Africa.

This manuscript which was written by Ahmed Baba in 1615 is attached below.

The name Yoruba is shown in red highlight (among the other ethnic groups) as can be seen in the original manuscript as well as in the translation embedded below respectively:

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12934148_5117c6d550154217817d7c66b5fa0fe6_jpeg_jpeg2a73d5172c14cf7a7da91ff200688e3e

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12934147_3336ed29985b499e82c4e140b455b9fa_jpeg_jpeg62ecafabb59c692d4ba471597fdf16bb

This translation was prepared by John Hunwick and Fatima Harrak for The Institute of African Studies Rabat, Morocco

Oh, I should add that we know that this manuscript was written by Ahmad Baba in the year 1615 because he himself penned his date as highlighted (in the attached verso) below:

www.nairaland.com/attachments/13082305_6e49d8d129844a578af9272699e1586a_jpeg_jpeg2d5891d724a6428e2c0f4e6898bd60cc

The highlight here literally shows the wording “(the year) one thousand and twenty four (of the Hijrah)”.

When converted from this Hijri “AH” calendar into our Gregorian “AD” calendar; the year 1024 AH falls into the year 1615 AD

The formula “D = 0.9692*H + 622” proves practically useful for this conversion.

In sum, your falsehood that returned-slaves (from all across Africa) are what became known as Yorubas is nothing but a but-hurt lie from a depressed bald-head.


(C) These ex-captives who were of West-African origin and Central African origin were repatriated directly to Sierra-Leone and Liberia.

Some began a new life there, while some decided to go back to their homeland from which they were taken ab-initio.

Nobody was repatriated to south-West Nigeria, bald-head.

A number of Yorubas among the returnees chose to return back to Yorubaland — just as many others who returned to their respective original homeland.


(2) The only ethnic-group whom I know of who couldn’t fight their way to freedom and be returned back to Africa are ……. [take a guess].


They couldn’t think of returning until about 400 years later when some of their descendants decided to tap into the science of Genetics as a guide to finding their way back home. ~ See video. below:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxDve0rwQbM

The two attachments below also shows some earlier corroborative confessions made available to Dr. R. E. Bradbury by these people themselves.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12996709_af6378be36104010b036a2f7ab4096cd_jpeg_jpeg07ca8a3f5b191f4126cdcd6bf2f7faf7

www.nairaland.com/attachments/12996710_b28de88ee10a4b7a83b95532f6609396_jpeg_jpegaca1a6203806c9d893c79b42b9a6c76e


Peace! cheesy

2 Likes

(1) (Reply)

"DURO" Na Yoruba Word Be Dis?? / Colonial Lies About Igbos: Killing Of Twins. / South African Guys Are Not Hot Like The Ones In The Shaka Zulu Movie?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 33
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.