highcollide:
That must be sarrki...only a master zombie can ingest cocaine of this magnitude.

deomelo:




lmao @ rational discussion with fake and fraudulent rubbish, internet rumors and gossips



.

highcollide:
keep laughing. We all know you're high on cocaine.

litdutchboy:

Sarrki is a shameless brainwashed slave.

babyfaceafrica:
whether it is a lie or not is not my problem, the onus is on you and the twitter user to proof your case!!!.....tinubu is no saint,but you won't catch him!!!!

highcollide:
Let's have a rational discuss.

Why did tinubu forfeit that money?

Where did he get such amount if money as at 1993?

What did he do for a living?

highcollide:
keep laughing. We all know you're high on cocaine.

litdutchboy:

He stated he only made $2400 a month working for Mobil, so how did he accumulate $460k in cash in 1993 after paying his rent,taxes,utility and feeding expenses.
American investigators and Judges are not fools, they knew it was proceeds of drug trafficking.

StOla:


As at 1993, Tinubu was already a Senator representing Lagos during the short lived Babangida transition.

Tinubu was part of the inner caucus of MKO Abiola's team.

As at the time that case was filed in 1993, a lot had transpired in Nigeria. The June 12 elections had been cancelled.

The money could have been funds meant for any number of political plans/schemes in Nigeria, and could have been owned by Tinubu or on behalf of others.

What Tinubu refused to do was state the true source of the funds and only tried to account for it, hence he had to forfeit the funds without further prejudice.

There is no narcotics or drugs accusation concerning the funds.

I maintain those funds were traceable back to the politics of the Babangida democratic transition programme that had just been truncated at that time in 1993.

No drugs involved whatsoever.

deomelllo:
[s][/s]




The only cocaine sniffer here is the ignorant and unintelligent ipob peddling fake and fabricated ipob rubbish on the internet.


Cocaine must be the new ipob way of life..


See ya life

highcollide:
A US court has said the property was seized because it is probably a proceed from narcotics business and you're lying down on your wooden bench somewhere in modakeke making conclusions that it wasn't narcotics without any backings for your claim.


Oya take another sniff.

highcollide:
Get away from my mentions......educated slave of a drug dealer.

StOla:



Exactly!

You should have shown me where the Judge accused Tinubu of drug dealing. Why not show me a charge that reads drug/narcotics offence?

You must think I am easily fooled.

Is this not the same tale that has been in circulation since Tinubu's campaign for 2nd term as Lagos Governor?

Did you think you unearthed anything new?

chiedozie198100:


u guys should just let clear issues be, instead of trying too hard to argue, n then end up being extremely foolish.

Judges don't accuse people of a crime, PROSECUTORS do.

what you see is a judgment.

highcollide:
A US court has said the property was seized because it is probably a proceed from narcotics business and you're lying down on your wooden bench somewhere in modakeke making conclusions that it wasn't narcotics without any backings for your claim.


Oya take another sniff.

StOla:


Probably is not the same as fact.

Or did the same report not allude to other probabilities as the source of the money?

So why hold on to a probability that suits you without any evidence of it?

Or why was Tinubu not convicted or even charged at all for Narcotics trade?

StOla:


And did the prosecution accuse him of drug trafficking?

Yes or No?

StOla:


Probably is not the same as fact.

Or did the same report not allude to other probabilities as the source of the money?

So why hold on to a particular probability that suits you without any evidence of it?

Or why was Tinubu not convicted or even charged at all for Narcotics trade?

highcollide:
where did you get your claim that it is not connected to narcotics? Where is proof for your claim?

There is a document here saying it is probable that it is connected to narcotics. You're just presenting words...nothing substantial or concrete from you...


You're discussing with a logician. You dont win with words. You win with evidence or logical deductions....

StOla:


The proof of my claim is that he was never charged for narcotics of for holding funds linked to narcotics.

Probability is not fact, probability is nothing, hence no charge related to narcotics was filed.

You have only presented probability as your concrete evidence, hence Tinubu remains a free man that strolls in and out of America.

That is my hard fact as to why Tinubu only forfeited funds in his account without further prejudice.

litdutchboy:

The judge gave a judgement of forfeiture of the $460k because the prosecution had proven beyond reasonable doubt that the proceeds where from drug trafficking.

StOla:


The proof of my claim is that he was never charged for narcotics or for holding funds linked to narcotics.

Probability is not fact, probability is nothing, hence no charge related to narcotics was filed, because probability is useless.

You have only presented probability as your concrete evidence, hence Tinubu remains a free man that strolls in and out of America.

That is my hard fact as to why Tinubu only forfeited funds in his account without further prejudice.

I have already alluded to the political nature of the said funds. Yet it is still not a fact, just as the US prosecution and court cannot factually say the funds were drug related.

Hence Tinubu's freedom and easy entry to USA till today.

StOla:


The proof of my claim is that he was never charged for narcotics of for holding funds linked to narcotics.

Probability is not fact, probability is nothing, hence no charge related to narcotics was filed.

You have only presented probability as your concrete evidence, hence Tinubu remains a free man that strolls in and out of America.

That is my hard fact as to why Tinubu only forfeited funds in his account without further prejudice.

litdutchboy:

Why didn't Tifnubu allude to the political nature of the funds then-clown?

StOla:


Dude please shut up and stop embellishing facts.

The prosecution proved that the defendant could not have validly owned the funds.

That was all that was proven.

The rest is probability, and you are left to chose any probability that suits you.

Till today, your supposed drug dealer walks in and out of the same America despite not being a US citizen.

litdutchboy:

Why didn't Tifnubu allude to the political nature of the funds then-clown?

highcollide:
They are high on cocaine.

StOla:


Because you will then involve other parties in the matter.

Or are you too daft to understand the concept of taking one for the team?

highcollide:
you're still going round and round...if he's not guilty, why did he forfeit the money? For what reason?


If a man tells you to forfeit your hardearned N150m because its suspected to be connected to a drug business, you'll leave it if you're innocent abi?

A clear conscience fears no accusation.

Stop deceiving yourself....that is why Nigeria is not going forward. Almost everybody is deceiving themselves....

Please I'm trying not to use the cocaine memes again...not If you keep defending him, I'd have no choice.

StOla:


And did the prosecution accuse him of drug trafficking?

Yes or No?

StOla:


Because you will then involve other parties in the matter.

Or are you too daft to understand the concept of taking one for the team?

Or will that then make it right with American laws?