XxSabrinaxX:

I'm an atheist and I don't. You christians love to commit this fallacy of generalization.

MrPRevailer:


Fallacy of generalization is the brain of Athiests.

Bacteriologist:


I agree with you to some extent.

Einstein was religious but not as many people think.

MrPRevailer:


Einstein did not believe in life after death.
His reason: "because one life is enough for him".

Even the creative can sound stupid sometimes.
But the Athiests are always. They don't want to believe in God for silly reasons....because of a hellfire, or moral inclinations, fear etc.

Even robots would not want to be recycled. But is it their choice to make?

XxSabrinaxX:

@Bolded: Classic fallacy of generalization example.

Bacteriologist:


Proof of evolution include:

1. Fossil records
2. Comparative anatomy.
3. Embryology
4. Biogeography.


A simple Google search could solve these problems but there I helped you. If you need articles you can signify.

BeansAndBread:
But this isn't observable and cannot be proved using the scientific method. This is what we call speculative science and it is blind belief something y'all accuse theists of.

HellVictorinho:
The Universe wasn't like this billions of years ago-FACT.
The Big Bang happened-THEORY.
Cosmic Systems Occur and this also involves cosmic explosions-FACT.
Matter is life and life is matter-FACT.
God exists-BELIEF.
In-Existence is impossible-FACT.
The Forming Of Existence doesn't involve first/last events-FACT.

GeneralShepherd:


Let me start by saying that I am a Christian but I also know that the big bang is a fact. There are many ways to come to a definite scientific conclusion without an experiment.

There is something called inference. It allows humans to come to definitive conclusion without having to run any experiments.

The universe is currently expanding every second, and the microwave background noise keeps getting fainter this suggests that the universe was once dense. This is by no means the only evidence of the big bang theory.

However, the big bang does not dispel God, because it still begs the question of where did the original dense energy point that caused the universe come from?

Why the dense point? Why could have been nothingness instead of something? By Fermi's paradox, if truly that live is not special we should have come in contact with evidence of extraterrestrial life.

By the way evolution does not claim to explain the origin of the first simple organism that started life, let alone the universe. So I don't see how these scientific theories threaten your faith.

Lastly, our forefathers all believed in God why have you believed that the white man's view of God is the correct view?

OpenYourEyes1:


Makes no sense.

How about
Proofs of God include:

1. Church
2. Bible
3. Moses
4. John

Why don't you explain some of them. I want the proofs from you not google...

Bacteriologist:


No, you're the one making no sense.

The church is a building, the Bible is a book of fairytales and what nots, Moses and John are most certainly fictional characters.

I'm not going to explain none of those as I'm clearly not responsible for your education or your apparent lack of it.

Oh and Google doesn't "provide" answers, it's merely a search engine which links the user to carefully conducted research pages.

OpenYourEyes1:


Are you scared of intellectual debate?
Why are you afraid of debating with a low IQ religious folk like me.

Bacteriologist:

You just confirmed my initial premise with your uncivil response. But I'll still attend to you.
Do you need links for unbiased materials for my OP? Then here they are:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/science/atheists-more-intelligent-than-religious-people-faith-instinct-cleverness-a7742766.html%3famp
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.livescience.com/59361-why-are-atheists-generally-more-intelligent.html
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/the-human-beast/201005/the-real-reason-atheists-have-higher-iqs%3famp
Moreso, the ability to accept the truth (even if you're too dumb to internalise it) without resorting to cheap insults is an indication of a bright mind. Which you clearly seem to not have.

Bacteriologist:
A theory is a theory whether you believe it or not.

OpenYourEyes1:


Where is the Transitional Fossil or the missing link? .. i mean a Creature in-between that transition from orangutan to human.
A half-human, half-ape fossil should exist according to Darwin.

OpenYourEyes1:


Where is the Transitional Fossil or the missing link? .. i mean a Creature in-between that transition from Bonobo to human.
A half-human, half-ape fossil should exist according to Darwin.

Bacteriologist:


Like I said, read up on evolution and then we can have a debate.

Till then, enjoy my silence.

Heathen777:
I find that most people who doubt the big bang theory have a very poor rudimentary understanding of it.

The big bang theory doesn't state that something exploded from nothing.

All what the big bang theory claims is that:

1) The early universe used to be a lot more hot and dense.

2) The universe has been undergoing expansion.


Each assumptions made is backed up by supporting evidence such as:

1) The Cosmic Microwave Background radiation, which indeed prove that the universe used to be extremely hot.

2) The Red shifts of light from distant galaxies , which also proved the universe has been expanding as time went on,also meaning if we were to run the clock backwards the universe was a lot closer together and denser, meaning temperatures were a lot hotter which would explain the CMB radiation.

OpenYourEyes1:


Makes no sense.

How about
Proofs of God include:

1. Church
2. Bible
3. Moses
4. John

Why don't you explain some of them. I want the proofs from you not google...

OpenYourEyes1:
Charles Darwin was likely a Mason.

His father(or grandfather?) was a known Mason. He actually was the first to propose the theory evolution.

Mason is an organization of Crooks. Believe them at your own risk.


Here is darwin making freemasonry hand sign called "vow of silence".
Google to see what it means.

OpenYourEyes1:



The expanding universe is a fact. I have no problem with that one. our Bible actually recognizes the expansion.

"It is he who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in; " —Isaiah 40:22.


I only disagree with the explosion thing. Explosion does not create order. And the Big bang violates first law of thermodynamics

Heathen777:


As the universe expanded it cooled sufficiently to allow for the formation of things with more complexity....

OpenYourEyes1:

The universe and other complex matters were designed by our Designer.
The Designer "molded" the universe to its current form just as humans "mould" plastic, metals, gold, by heating them up... The molding of our universe probably explains the cosmic radiation relics. This radiation can also be created when we melt metals, golds. We can't detect the radiation because we don't live in space or vacuum. If you melt this things in vacuum the radiation will also linger for a long time.

Heathen777:


In a nut shell here's the stages of our stellar evolutions:

After the big-bang: photons >> subatomic particles >> atoms >> gases >> stars >> nebulae >> planets,comets, asteroids, smaller stars >> solar systems >> life forms (under the right conditions)

These are the harmonic stages of our cosmic evolution, it wasn't designed, but a series of random events guided by the laws of nature.

OpenYourEyes1:


Well, no scientist has been able to replicate these things in laboratories or stimulate them on supercomputer. Scientists claimed they could but still no life has emerged from their experiments. You should be able to replicate a theory otherwise it remains a theory.

Anyone who understand how complex a single cell is won't accept that living things developed spontaneously. .

It is ironic how you guys attribute creations to a thing called Nature and at thesame claim things developed by chance. If Nature could write laws then it means natura is Sentient. Just stick with your random chance theory. We will stick with Intelligent design. Our God write the rules not nature.