MuttleyLaff:
In adults consentin, both have expressively given permission, the roach in this regard, has not consented and hardly can give permission to be a party to the abuse and ridicule it was subjected to by this inadequate and delusional man

How do you know this?
Please answer? Do you speak cockroach?

I never counted how many, if I did, well, I am still counting how many I've killed in my going on life.

Why did you not ask for consent before killing them? Why do you think it is okay to kill them without consent but wrong to start a relationship with them without consent ?

Roaches just like fleas, mice etcetera are vermins and being pests that they are, get killed for same reason
If you professed you loved termites or frogs and are sexually attracted to either, then if you eat them after they died, you effectively have carried out "cannibalism" on them. This is a malignant morbid and terrible thing to do. Besides, for the fact that termites have more than four legs, they so, are advised against to eat

I don't understand you at all. Is it cannibalism when you eat chickens?

LordReed:
I don't give a hoot how many times it happened. When adults believe without proof that animals can talk then I will milk it with both hands and feet.

You need to give two hoots actually. They were one offs. and happened a long time ago.

LordReed:
BTW pls educate me on the difference between serpent and snake.

Ranchhoddas:
I was about to ask that. Muttleylaff wants to drop another bomb.

I know it's things like this that makes your ear want to prick Ranchhoddas

LordReed, serpent was before snake. Snake is what became of the serpent and/or what the serpent became after its irreversible demotion and permanent transformation

Legged serpent, arguably is man's last common ancestor otherwise known, as the "missing link" and not apes

Somehow nothing wey person no go see and hear as in cockroach like he mad or somefing

Somehow nothing wey person no go see and hear as in Cockroach like he mad or somefing

Ranchhoddas:
Why do you say a roach cannot give consent. Who even came up with this consent rubbish?
When you want to slaughter chickens for food do you ask for their consent? Why is that acceptable to you and not this?

When did killing require consent? Man please I beg don't descend into more ridiculousness please I beg you.

If someone rapes your 1 year old baby then tells you your baby gave her consent, come and ask me who came up with this consent rubbish.

I can see you are eager to put me in a box.
I cannot deny the things my eyes have seen. I cannot see a a man drop his crutches in a church and start denying it because I want to sound smart. Could it be staged? Probably. But the logistics of doing that successfully would be so huge that it won't even be worth it. Plus the risk of getting caught. The next time Chris Oyaks is having a crusade in your state, try and attend. Go early and get a front row seat. What have you got to lose? See it as a fact finding mission.

Since you are eager to label me I'll say the word that comes closest to describing me is "freethinker".

I was a Christian for years I never saw a crippled healed in all that time and we had quite a number of them come in their wheelchairs regularly. Where did you see this person drop his crutches? What was his ailment? DO you know what happened to him after?

MuttleyLaff:
You need to give two hoots actually. They were one offs. and happened a long time ago.



Serpent was before snake, snake is what became of the serpent and/or what the serpent became.

Legged serpent, arguably is man's last common ancestor otherwise known, as the "missing link" and not apes

La illaha illallah

Na William Branham church you dey go?

LordReed:


When did killing require consent? Man please I beg don't descend into more ridiculousness please I beg you.

If someone rapes your 1 year old baby then tells you your baby gave her consent, come and ask me who came up with this consent rubbish.

You are comparing an animal to a baby? Would it be okay if someone killed your one year old baby for food?

I was a Christian for years I never saw a crippled healed in all that time and we had quite a number of them come in their wheelchairs regularly. Where did you see this person drop his crutches? What was his ailment? DO you know what happened to him after?

Plenty questions.
I have a theory that a larger crowd makes it easier for these things to happen. Oyaks pulls crowds. Attend his programs.

MuttleyLaff:
You need to give two hoots actually. They were one offs. and happened a long time ago.



I know it's things like this that makes your ear want to prick Ranchhoddas

LordReed, serpent was before snake. Snake is what became of the serpent and/or what the serpent became after its irreversible demotion and permanent transformation

Legged serpent, arguably is man's last common ancestor otherwise known, as the "missing link" and not apes

I still don't give a rats arse.

LMFAO! Tomorrow you will say you are not editorializing. Please show me where in the bible this "missing link" is mentioned?

SMDH Muttley you are a piece of work. LoL

Ranchhoddas:
La illaha illallah

Na William Branham church you dey go?

I dont know about William Branham church.

LordReed:
I still don't give a rats arse.

LMFAO! Tomorrow you will say you are not editorializing. Please show me where in the bible this "missing link" is mentioned?

SMDH Muttley you are a piece of work. LoL

I am just saying that the reason why the missing link is not found and never will be found. "Alọ rami rami", loosely translated means "that knowledge & info is forever lost in the black hole"

Wherever the serpent is mentioned, as in with Genesis, in the bible, is where and when the "missing link" is mentioned LordReed

Ranchhoddas:
You are comparing an animal to a baby? Would it be okay if someone killed your one year old baby for food?

Dude are you jokingly asking this question or have you finally descended into full time ridiculousness?

Plenty questions.
I have a theory that a larger crowd makes it easier for these things to happen. Oyaks pulls crowds. Attend his programs.

No chance in hell. I barely manage to attend church for the wife then I will go and endure hours of punishment? Not on your life. BTW if they have the power why are the hospitals not empty? Why is modern medicine having more success rate?

MuttleyLaff:
I dont know about William Branham church.

I am just saying that the reason why the missing link is not found and never will be found. "Alọ rami rami", loosely translated means "that knowledge & info is forever lost in the black hole"

I've heard this before, and it was from someone who followed the teachings of William M. Branham. I'm sure like him, you have no evidence.

MuttleyLaff:

I am just saying that the reason why the missing link is not found and never will be found. "Alọ rami rami", loosely translated means "that knowledge & info is forever lost in the black hole"

Wherever the serpent is mentioned in the bible, is where and when the "missing link" is mentioned LordReed

LMFAO! O my fucking days! Just LoL!

Ranchhoddas:
I've heard this before, and it was from someone who followed the teachings of William M. Branham. I'm sure like him, you have no evidence.

Dont have evidence of particularly and specifically what Ranchhoddas?

LordReed:
LMFAO! O my fucking days! Just LoL!

You asked a question, and I just simply and easily responded. If I bring you to a watering can, I cant force you to drink water now or can I?

LordReed:


Dude are you jokingly asking this question or have you finally descended into full time ridiculousness?

I'm just wondering why it's okay to kill animals for food but wrong to have sexual relations with them. I have a feeling the animals would prefer the former if you gave them a choice.

No chance in hell. I barely manage to attend church for the wife then I will go and endure hours of punishment? Not on your life. BTW if they have the power why are the hospitals not empty? Why is modern medicine having more success rate?

The crowd is a contributing factor I hypothesize. There are not enough people in hospitals to draw on the power responsible for the healing. A faith healer can still do it alone if he has sufficient faith (healing vibrations). A crowd makes it easier.

MuttleyLaff:
Dont have evidence of particularly and specifically what Ranchhoddas?

The missing serpent link.

Ranchhoddas:
I'm just wondering why it's okay to kill animals for food but wrong to have sexual relations with them. I have a feeling the animals would prefer the former if you gave them a choice.

You mean the latter? Yes I suspect they would if they could but unfortunely for them they don't get a say so for someone to pretend that the sexual relations with them is good or consensual is delusional.

The crowd is a contributing factor I hypothesize. There are not enough people in hospitals to draw on the power responsible for the healing. A faith healer can still do it alone if he has sufficient faith (healing vibrations). A crowd makes it easier.

Have you ever been to a general hospital before? Do you imagine if you went to one announced something like "everybody here will be healed today!" people wouldn't respond positively?

LordReed:
When did killing require consent? Man please I beg don't descend into more ridiculousness please I beg you.
If someone rapes your 1 year old baby then tells you your baby gave her consent, come and ask me who came up with this consent rubbish.
I was a Christian for years I never saw a crippled healed in all that time and we had quite a number of them come in their wheelchairs regularly. Where did you see this person drop his crutches? What was his ailment? DO you know what happened to him after?

Ranchhoddas:
You are comparing an animal to a baby? Would it be okay if someone killed your one year old baby for food?

Plenty questions.
I have a theory that a larger crowd makes it easier for these things to happen. Oyaks pulls crowds. Attend his programs.

LordReed:
Dude are you jokingly asking this question or have you finally descended into full time ridiculousness?

No chance in hell. I barely manage to attend church for the wife then I will go and endure hours of punishment? Not on your life. BTW if they have the power why are the hospitals not empty? Why is modern medicine having more success rate?

Ranchhoddas:
I'm just wondering why it's okay to kill animals for food but wrong to have sexual relations with them. I have a feeling the animals would prefer the former if you gave them a choice.

The crowd is a contributing factor I hypothesize. There are not enough people in hospitals to draw on the power responsible for the healing. A faith healer can still do it alone if he has sufficient faith (healing vibrations). A crowd makes it easier.

If I didnt know you well enough, I would have said you've gone bad, gone sickening and have at last lost your marbles

Ranchhoddas, I know you are aware there is something called beastiliality. Also animals, rightfully so, are a source of food to human beings and never to be sexually objectified. Get a grip Ranchhoddas, pack it in as you've pushed this your ridiculousness too far enough

Ranchhoddas:
The missing serpent link.

What does "The missing serpent link" mean?
Try and be specific, what particularly are you asking?

LordReed:


You mean the latter? Yes I suspect they would if they could but unfortunely for them they don't get a say so for someone to pretend that the sexual relations with them is good or consensual is delusional.

Have you ever been to a general hospital before? Do you imagine if you went to one announced something like "everybody here will be healed today!" people wouldn't respond positively?

They may not be able to make it happen. A crowd is a catalyst.

MuttleyLaff:
What does "The missing serpent link" mean?
Try and be specific, what particularly are you asking?

How do you know that a serpent is different from a snake?

MuttleyLaff:






If I didnt know you well enough, I would have said you've gone bad, gone sickening and have at last lost your marbles

Ranchhoddas, I know you are aware there is something called beastiliality. Also animals, rightfully so, are a source of food to human beings and never to be sexually objectified. Get a grip Ranchhoddas, pack it in as you've pushed this your ridiculousness too far enough

Homosexuality, bestiality and every other depraved behavior people try to justify are in the same category. i.e. unnatural behavior. If you accept one you must accept all.

Ranchhoddas:




They may not be able to make it happen. A crowd is a catalyst.

You seem to be very knowledgeable about these things so how big a crowd does it take? In a church of over 3000 a person in wheelchair could not be healed, in a Shiloh event of millions of people all connected by satellite a person in a wheelchair could not be healed, please tell me what level of crowd you need.

LordReed:


You seem to be very knowledgeable about these things so how big a crowd does it take? In a church of over 3000 a person in wheelchair could not be healed, in a Shiloh event of millions of people all connected by satellite a person in a wheelchair could not be healed, please tell me what level of crowd you need.

The crowd is just a catalytic factor. It's not absolutely necessary. Healings are likelier in a large crowd. It does not mean that you will necessarily get healed in a large crowd. Faith (immense healing vibrations) both on the part of the faith healer and the recipient makes the odds greater. Na theory sha. I still dey research.

One thing I'm sure of is that people actually get healed.

Ranchhoddas:
How do you know that a serpent is different from a snake?

"And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all the days of thy life:"
- Genesis 3:14

Ranchhoddas:
Homosexuality, bestiality and every other depraved behavior people try to justify are in the same category. i.e. unnatural behavior. If you accept one you must accept all.

Two easy going, ordinary consenting adults, minding their own businesses enjoying a life long caring, faithful, committed, truthful, honest, loving each other lasting that's life-long and loyal same-sex relationship, that has no detriment to another person, no betrayal of another person, or no cheating on another person, and not harmful to an object or neighbour are not in the same category as bestiality and every other depraved behavior people like you try to justify like cannibalism.

What is there no to accept in two easy going, ordinary consenting adults, minding their own businesses enjoying a life long caring, faithful, committed, truthful, honest, loving each other lasting that's life-long and loyal same-sex relationship, that has no detriment to another person, no betrayal of another person, or no cheating on another person, and not harmful to an object or neighbour?

There is nothing not to accept in two easy going, ordinary consenting adults, minding their own businesses enjoying a life long caring, faithful, committed, truthful, honest, loving each other lasting that's life-long and loyal same-sex relationship, that has no detriment to another person, no betrayal of another person, or no cheating on another person, and not harmful to an object or neighbour but there is a great deal not to accept with promscuous homosexuality, bestiality and every other depraved behavior you've tried try to justify as in the same category with dirty and unethical behaviour

LordReed:
You seem to be very knowledgeable about these things so how big a crowd does it take? In a church of over 3000 a person in wheelchair could not be healed, in a Shiloh event of millions of people all connected by satellite a person in a wheelchair could not be healed, please tell me what level of crowd you need.

Ranchhoddas:
They may not be able to make it happen. A crowd is a catalyst.

If crowd are catalyst, that should let your alarm bell raise that there is something fishy going on. Bunch of toothless bulldogs. They hold to an outward form of godliness but havent the power to evidence it

MuttleyLaff:


If crowd are catalyst, that should let your alarm bell raise that there is something fishy going on. Bunch of toothless bulldogs. They hold to an outward form of godliness but havent the power to evidence it

Maybe they are ignorant. It's like a herbalist that prescribes herbs for treatment of ailments but is unaware of the workings of the herbs; i.e the phytochemicals that render the herb potent against diseases and in what proportions they would be most effective. So Mr A gets relief after taking the herbs and Mr B gets nothing or even worse consequences.


It does not necessarily mean the herbalist is a fraud.

Enter the chemist. The chemist analyses the plant and extracts the chemical compounds from the plant. In tandem with the pharmacologist, he works to get the compounds in the right dosage, adds other compounds and gets a more effective product with minimal side effects.
The mystic is the chemist here or so goes my hypothesis.

Ranchhoddas:
The crowd is just a catalytic factor. It's not absolutely necessary. Healings are likelier in a large crowd. It does not mean that you will necessarily get healed in a large crowd. Faith (immense healing vibrations) both on the part of the faith healer and the recipient makes the odds greater. Na theory sha. I still dey research.

One thing I'm sure of is that people actually get healed.

I heard of a case of a man who was healed and went into remission several times depending on what he was told about the medicine he was taking. If he was told it was a cancer drug with high efficacy the cancer will go, if he told its a placebo it will return. Point being what has faith in a god got to do with healing? Have you looked into the placebo and nocebo effect?

LordReed:


I heard of a case of a man who was healed and went into remission several times depending on what he was told about the medicine he was taking. If he was told it was a cancer drug with high efficacy the cancer will go, if he told its a placebo it will return. Point being what has faith in a god got to do with healing? Have you looked into the placebo and nocebo effect?

The crowd is not a placebo. Faith is additive. More believers mean more power can be drawn. So even if their faith is low, the strength of their numbers will make it work. A man with intense single pointed faith will be able to get the same effect as thousands or even millions of people.
Case in point: Jesus the Christ.

Ranchhoddas:
The crowd is not a placebo. Faith is additive. More believers mean more power can be drawn. So even if their faith is low, the strength of their numbers will make it work. A man with intense single pointed faith will be able to get the same effect as thousands or even millions of people.
Case in point: Jesus the Christ.

The Jesus stories refute your point, Jesus never needed a crowd to heal anybody. In fact in some of the stories he even purposely avoided crowds. So this your theory is one that you came up with by yourself.

LordReed:


The Jesus stories refute your point, Jesus never needed a crowd to heal anybody. In fact in some of the stories he even purposely avoided crowds. So this your theory is one that you came up with by yourself.

Read my post again.

A man with intense single-pointed faith will be able to get the same effect as thousands or even millions of people

Yes it is my hypothesis based on observation and study.

Ranchhoddas:
Read my post again.

A man with intense single-pointed faith will be able to get the same effect as thousands or even millions of people

Yes it is my hypothesis based on observation and study.

Ah I misread your post. OK so all the pastors are not up to Jesus even though Jesus supposedly said greater works than these shall you do?

And BTW faith in what? So people who experience placebo and nocebo effects are doing what?

LordReed:


Ah I misread your post. OK so all the pastors are not up to Jesus even though Jesus supposedly said greater works than these shall you do?

Jesus was talking to everyone. Not just pastors.

And BTW faith in what? So people who experience placebo and nocebo effects are doing what?

I can see you Christian past interfering. Faith in faith. Placebos treat psychological ailments. A placebo will not cure your malaria if you are filled with plasmodium.