God created only one man in his image and likeness and that was Adam, let's see what the scripture has to say about it in Genesis 2:7 "then the Lord God formed [that is, created the body of] man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being [an individual complete in body and spirit]"(AMP).

If God had created numerous men, it then means that only Adam and Eve would have been driven from the garden of Eden because they were the only one that ate of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

.I actually feel that when man fell, all that God created for man to have dominion over started to work against man, that is why a Lion that was suppose to be man's friend became an enemy after the fall.



A scorpion that was suppose to be a man's friends is now an enemy.I actually feel that when man ate of the corruptible seed all that was created had a change in nature.Like the animals becoming carnivorous, herbivorous etc.

They became the exact opposite of their original nature.

Adam was created in the image and likeness of God, it took the effort of God the father, the word and the spirit.

An image is a reflection of who you are, if you stand in front of the mirror, what would you see? You would see an image of yourself.

Just picture what God did with the created man from the above illustration.



Man had the insight of God, he could see the way God saw things, he had God eyes.

He had the mindset of God, he thinks the way God thinks.

He strategized the way God strategize.

He was decked in God's glory, he was clothed in God's beauty.

He had the ability to call those things which be not as though they were.He saw things from the eyes of eternity that was why he could name the animals.

The man God created is different from the man after the fall.

The man God created had God's nature, but the man after the fall took upon him the nature of the tree of good and evil, which was the Adamic nature, every man birthed after the fall took upon them the nature of Adam.

Another Adam had to be sent to break the adamic nature in man and to release the God life.

1 Corinthians 15:21 "For since [it was] by a man that death came [into the world], it is also by a Man that the resurrection of the dead has come" .

Vs 22 "For just as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive".

Vs 23 "But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, then those who are Christ’s [own will be resurrected with incorruptible, immortal bodies] at His coming".
1COR 15:21‭-‬23 AMP

Watch out for my next post
Check out mervicksblog for more of this

MhizVee:
God created only one man in his image and likeness and that was Adam, let's see what the scripture has to say about it in Genesis 2:7 "then the Lord God formed [that is, created the body of] man from the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and the man became a living being [an individual complete in body and spirit]"(AMP).

If God had created numerous men, it then means that only Adam and Eve would have been driven from the garden of Eden because they were the only one that ate of the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

.I actually feel that when man fell, all that God created for man to have dominion over started to work against man, that is why a Lion that was suppose to be man's friend became an enemy after the fall.



A scorpion that was suppose to be a man's friends is now an enemy.I actually feel that when man ate of the corruptible seed all that was created had a change in nature.Like the animals becoming carnivorous, herbivorous etc.

They became the exact opposite of their original nature.

Adam was created in the image and likeness of God, it took the effort of God the father, the word and the spirit.

An image is a reflection of who you are, if you stand in front of the mirror, what would you see? You would see an image of yourself.

Just picture what God did with the created man from the above illustration.



Man had the insight of God, he could see the way God saw things, he had God eyes.

He had the mindset of God, he thinks the way God thinks.

He strategized the way God strategize.

He was decked in God's glory, he was clothed in God's beauty.

He had the ability to call those things which be not as though they were.He saw things from the eyes of eternity that was why he could name the animals.

The man God created is different from the man after the fall.

The man God created had God's nature, but the man after the fall took upon him the nature of the tree of good and evil, which was the Adamic nature, every man birthed after the fall took upon them the nature of Adam.

Another Adam had to be sent to break the adamic nature in man and to release the God life.

1 Corinthians 15:21 "For since [it was] by a man that death came [into the world], it is also by a Man that the resurrection of the dead has come" .

Vs 22 "For just as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive".

Vs 23 "But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, then those who are Christ’s [own will be resurrected with incorruptible, immortal bodies] at His coming".
1COR 15:21‭-‬23 AMP

Watch out for my next post
Check out mervicksblog for more of this

MhizVee, hi are you OK for me to ask you a few easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions that you would not try to avoid answering, hmm? Promising post you have up here.

Yeah, do I avoid your questions

MuttleyLaff:
MhizVee, hi are you OK for me to ask you a few easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions that you would not try to avoid answering, hmm? Promising post you have up here.

this story sweet when we dey small, but as i grow older my working brain refuse to stay put, all these numerous questions keep popping up so i had to look for more convince answers

MuttleyLaff:
MhizVee, hi are you OK for me to ask you a few easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions that you would not try to avoid answering, hmm? Promising post you have up here.

MhizVee:
Yeah,

Oh. You're so kind, thank you for obliging.

MhizVee:
do I avoid your questions

I dont think you have yet, but there is always a first time. Anyway, here are the simple questions
1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

We can discuss your original post together and have a heart-to-heart over it after you've attempted the two above easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions

Adam, the created man is my topic, I laid an emphasy here, i am not asking a question. God's original intention was that man would remain in his image and replicate that is give birth to children in God's nature, this is because the created man before he fell had the nature of God and any seed he produced as at the time will also have the God nature, it was after man ate of the fruit that he became corruptible. What's your intention/ motive of asking me this question?

MuttleyLaff:


Oh. You're so kind, thank you for obliging.

I dont think you have yet, but there is always a first time. Anyway, here are the simple questions
1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

We can discuss your original post together and have a heart-to-heart over it after you've attempted the two above easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions

MhizVee:
Adam, the created man [s]is my topic, I laid an emphasy here, i am not asking a question. God's original intention was that man would remain in his image and replicate that is give birth to children in God's nature, this is because the created man before he fell had the nature of God and any seed he produced as at the time will also have the God nature, it was after man ate of the fruit that he became corruptible.[/s] What's your intention/ motive of asking me this question?

Just as I suspected that you would avoid answering my easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions. Never mind, smh.

Cognitive incision

MuttleyLaff:
Just as I suspected that you would avoid answering my easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions. Never mind, smh.

Bodydialect57:
Cognitive incision

Mummy, no ooo, not necessarily that. Not necessarily cognitive incision. I really wanted her and I, to both and as well with any others interested, embark on an aha-moment journey with those two questions. I wanted to see whats going to develop from the simple questions and answers discussion I was hoping we strike. I dont know why the questions couldnt just simply be answered. Such a promising post

Bodydialect57, you know me that, I am a strong believer in the saying that, advances are made by answering questions and discoveries are made by questioning answers advanced. Minds are formed from asking and/or answering questions.

MuttleyLaff:


Oh. You're so kind, thank you for obliging.

I dont think you have yet, but there is always a first time. Anyway, here are the simple questions
1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

We can discuss your original post together and have a heart-to-heart over it after you've attempted the two above easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions

give thwm serial numbers.. problem solved

kkins25:
give them serial numbers.. problem solved

You're providing a solution to a problem that isnt tabled, lol. Giving them serial numbers is going ahead of the curve. You're driving too fast, you're unnecessarily just getting ahead of yourself kkins25, lol. Slow down tiger, lol.

The questions again, are:
1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

Know this kkins25, you have to start with the first and then start the making of each one of the gazillion objects, before any chance of giving identification numbers come up nah, lol. So here's repeating kkins25 and repeating with clarifications, for your benefit especially. What is the correct approach, most effective method, skilful technique and/or efficient way to go about the start and the making of these gazillion objects? lol

MuttleyLaff:


Oh. You're so kind, thank you for obliging.

I dont think you have yet, but there is always a first time. Anyway, here are the simple questions
1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

We can discuss your original post together and have a heart-to-heart over it after you've attempted the two above easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions

1. Not too sure I get your question but for what it's worth. Maybe God did that by creating prototypes(adam inclusive) and putting regenerative ability in each.
2. Adam was a prototype(for remote-controlling the universe Ps.115:16, Ps.82:6) having an Female(for regeneration) inside of him but was obviously for undisclosed reasons unable to connect with this Female until she was brought out of Him by God hence being "alone". Gen 3:18

Finallydead:
1. Not too sure I get your question but for what it's worth. Maybe God did that by creating prototypes(adam inclusive) and putting regenerative ability in each.
2. Adam was a prototype(for remote-controlling the universe Ps.115:16, Ps.82:6) having an Female(for regeneration) inside of him but was obviously for undisclosed reasons unable to connect with this Female until she was brought out of Him by God hence being "alone". Gen 3:18

You should have waited a bit before wading in. You should have let others have their say first, but its alright, lol. You give good answers, but please simplify your two given answers. Also explain what a prototype is, what you mean by prototype and why Adam, as you've advanced needed to be a prototype

You make a sample firstWhats your motive of asking the question

MuttleyLaff:
Just as I suspected that you would avoid answering my easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions. Never mind, smh.

Mutteylaff, if you have a different opinion of the topic, why not share, instead of asking question, my topic wasn't a question, of course everyone can drop a different perspective. Tell us what you know.

The adam myth has certain truths in it, but it is a jewish myth to explain our existence. There are possibly truth in these myths, which at first came from ancient Sumeria and Babylon, but at the time they were written down, became mixed with fairy tales.

For example l believe Genesis 1 is a profound chapter and we can learn a lot from it. but Genesis 2 is slightly different.

They all however give us a foundation for faith that we are made in the image of God to dress and keep God's earth.

MhizVee:
You make a sample first Whats your motive of asking the question

It would be the same motive you have for creating and/or opening up this thread

MhizVee:
Mutteylaff, if you have a different opinion of the topic, why not share, instead of asking question, my topic wasn't a question, of course everyone can drop a different perspective. Tell us what you know.

I am not advancing opinions. Why not just answer the questions, in a similar way finallydead had beat you to in doing and done, hmm? People with unnecessary suspicious minds sha. Ah, o ga ooo.

Mutteylaff, oga o, I explained my answers already, I don't understand what point you are trying to drive, are you an atheist took, if you have a problem with my post, or if it doesnt tally with your believe, you can share, by the way, who is finally dead.

MuttleyLaff:
It would be the same motive you have for creating and/or opening up this thread

I am not advancing opinions. Why not just answer the questions, in a similar way finallydead had beat you to in doing and done, hmm? People with unnecessary suspicious minds sha. Ah, o ga ooo.

MhizVee:
Mutteylaff, oga o, I explained my answers already, I don't understand what point you are trying to drive, are you an atheist took, if you have a problem with my post, or if it doesnt tally with your believe, you can share, by the way, who is finally dead.

MhizVee, lets start afresh

1/ Here's a scenario for consideration MhizVee. Say, you have gazillion (i.e. 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ve) objects in mind you want to make. Each one of the gazillion objects to be made, need to be an exact copy of the gazillion objects lot but not be the same as any from the gazillion objects lot.
Here comes the question MhizVee. How would you suggest is the best practice to go about the start and making of the gazillion objects?

2/ Now MhizVee, what to your understanding, and that's after answering #1 above, is Adam, the created man?

In short about question #1, what correct approach, most effective method, skilful technique and/or efficient way would you recommend to about the start and the making of these gazillion objects?

We can discuss your original post together and have a heart-to-heart over it after you've attempted the two above easy, simple, harmless, direct and straightforward questions

MhizVee:
Mutteylaff, oga o, I explained my answers already, I don't understand what point you are trying to drive, are you an atheist took, if you have a problem with my post, or if it doesnt tally with your believe, you can share, by the way, who is finally dead.

Hi.

MuttleyLaff:
You should have waited a bit before wading in. You should have let others have their say first, but its alright, lol. You give good answers, but please simplify your two given answers. Also explain what a prototype is, what you mean by prototype and why Adam, as you've advanced needed to be a prototype

For time sake, could we go directly to the meat of this so I can lend my opinion and learn from yours.

Finallydead:

For time sake, could we go directly to the meat of this so I can lend my opinion and learn from yours.

Of course, of course, but please simplify your earlier answers. Also dont forget to explain what a prototype is, what you mean by prototype and why Adam, as you've advanced needed to be a prototype.

I am actually responding while on the road. Give a few hours to get back home to give the thread my undivided attention and response you sought.

Okay.
Responses are coming in already.

MuttleyLaff:
Mummy, no ooo, not necessarily that. Not necessarily cognitive incision. I really wanted her and I, to both and as well with any others interested, embark on an aha-moment journey with those two questions. I wanted to see whats going to develop from the simple questions and answers discussion I was hoping we strike. I dont know why the questions couldnt just simply be answered. Such a promising post

Bodydialect57, you know me that, I am a strong believer in the saying that, advances are made by answering questions and discoveries are made by questioning answers advanced. Minds are formed from asking and/or answering questions.

Bodydialect57:
Okay.
Responses are coming in already.

Yeah, true, but I am still waiting for finallydead to please simplify his earlier given response. Also to explain how and what he means a prototype and why, he advanced that Adam needed to be a prototype.