ERRORS IN THE BIBLE (PART 135)
FALSE PROPHECY FULFILLMENT
THE CLAIM OF PROPHECY FULFILMENT:-
"He [Joseph] rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, ‘Out of Egypt I called my son' " (Matt. 2:13-15)
EVIDENCE THAT IT'S FALSE CLAIM
The unknown Gospel writer here quoted only part of Hosea 11:1 claiming that it's a prophecy for Jesus' ESCAPE TO Egypt. But the CONTEXT of Hosea 11:1 proves that it's not even a prophecy but a simple narration of the past history of the whole people of Israel ESCAPE FROM Egypt (the exodus):
"When Israel was a child, I loved him, and I called my son out of Egypt." (Hosea 11:1)
FIRST, note that Matthew 2:15 deliberately left out the first part of the Hosea 11:1 which says "When Israel was a child I love him" just to hide the fact that Hosea is here talking about the whole nation of Israel not a single person.
SECOND, many Christians think wrongly that Hosea 11:1 speaks about only one person as it says "I called my SON out of Egypt". The word "son" is singular here but its just a collective singular noun for the whole nation of Israel. Yes, the Old Testament writers show that the whole nation of Israel was God's SON in the singular. In Exodus 4:22-23, Moses was sent to tell Pharaoh to let go the entire people of Israel, and that the first thing he should tell the Pharaoh was "Israel is MY SON, my first born". And the next thing to tell him was "Let my SON go, so he may worship me." (Exodus 22:23). Therefore, the Bible writers refer to the whole people of Israel in the collective singular noun SON (My Son).
THIRD, the next verse (Hosea 11:2) proves that the Son (Israel) called out of Egypt was rebellious to God and practiced idolatry:-
"But the more I called to him, the farther he moved from me, offering sacrifices to the images of Baal and burning incense to idols." (Hosea 11:2)
So, the Son called out of Egypt in Hosea 11 was rebellious and an idolater! Is this a type of Jesus?
CONCLUSION:
It's clear that the author of the Gospel attributed to Matthew is dishonest and fraudulent in Matthew 2:13-15 for deliberately misquoting part of Hosea 11:1 as a prophecy for Jesus while the passage in its context is not even a prophecy but a summary of the exodus out of Egypt of the rebellious and idolatrous people of Israel!
And the other Christian claim that Matthew 2:13-15 refereed to Hosea 11:1 just because Jesus was a type (typology) of Israel is also clearly false! In Hosea 11:1-2, Israel was a rebellious and idolatrous nation, while Christians claim that Jesus was sinless. Thus, the claim that that Israel is a type of Christ violates the very definition of types (typology).

[s]

Taremode:
ERRORS IN THE BIBLE (PART 135)
FALSE PROPHECY FULFILLMENT
THE CLAIM OF PROPHECY FULFILMENT:-
"He [Joseph] rose and took the child and his mother by night and departed to Egypt and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what the Lord had spoken by the prophet, ‘Out of Egypt I called my son' " (Matt. 2:13-15)
EVIDENCE THAT IT'S FALSE CLAIM
The unknown Gospel writer here quoted only part of Hosea 11:1 claiming that it's a prophecy for Jesus' ESCAPE TO Egypt. But the CONTEXT of Hosea 11:1 proves that it's not even a prophecy but a simple narration of the past history of the whole people of Israel ESCAPE FROM Egypt (the exodus):
"When Israel was a child, I loved him, and I called my son out of Egypt." (Hosea 11:1)
FIRST, note that Matthew 2:15 deliberately left out the first part of the Hosea 11:1 which says "When Israel was a child I love him" just to hide the fact that Hosea is here talking about the whole nation of Israel not a single person.
SECOND, many Christians think wrongly that Hosea 11:1 speaks about only one person as it says "I called my SON out of Egypt". The word "son" is singular here but its just a collective singular noun for the whole nation of Israel. Yes, the Old Testament writers show that the whole nation of Israel was God's SON in the singular. In Exodus 4:22-23, Moses was sent to tell Pharaoh to let go the entire people of Israel, and that the first thing he should tell the Pharaoh was "Israel is MY SON, my first born". And the next thing to tell him was "Let my SON go, so he may worship me." (Exodus 22:23). Therefore, the Bible writers refer to the whole people of Israel in the collective singular noun SON (My Son).
THIRD, the next verse (Hosea 11:2) proves that the Son (Israel) called out of Egypt was rebellious to God and practiced idolatry:-
"But the more I called to him, the farther he moved from me, offering sacrifices to the images of Baal and burning incense to idols." (Hosea 11:2)
So, the Son called out of Egypt in Hosea 11 was rebellious and an idolater! Is this a type of Jesus?
CONCLUSION:
It's clear that the author of the Gospel attributed to Matthew is dishonest and fraudulent in Matthew 2:13-15 for deliberately misquoting part of Hosea 11:1 as a prophecy for Jesus while the passage in its context is not even a prophecy but a summary of the exodus out of Egypt of the rebellious and idolatrous people of Israel!
And the other Christian claim that Matthew 2:13-15 refereed to Hosea 11:1 just because Jesus was a type (typology) of Israel is also clearly false! In Hosea 11:1-2, Israel was a rebellious and idolatrous nation, while Christians claim that Jesus was sinless. Thus, the claim that that Israel is a type of Christ violates the very definition of types (typology).

[/s]

Rubbish From the Pit of Hell!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbyGFQKkYeg

Righteousness89:
[s][/s]
Rubbish From the Pit of Hell!!

Your Bible right??

FAKE PASTOR Alinco... hahaha, this guy won't kill me.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RbyGFQKkYeg