stupid usless people Mohammed that u are killing for that dnt have a root no brother or sisters no father or mother animals

madridguy:
Stop deceiving yourself because there's no freedom of expression anywhere without you respecting others belief.
Maybe you should go to India and start doing nonsense with cow and let see if the Hindus followers will allow you to see next minutes.
Stop mocking people's religious view.

We Christians cannot count how many times christainity and our God has been mocked. If we decide to be cutting off all your heads like that, tell me how this world will be like.

Advice to the muslims

Sometimes it is better to IGNORE abuse to your religion.

Take christians. There have been cartoons and oother literature mocking christianity from time inmemmorial. Intially christians used violence and harsh laws, until they woke up to the reality that the violence was making them look bad....so they adopted tolerance

Yes, the teacher did bad by showing the cartoons....but the thing is, the guy who behaded him has just ended up doing the enemies of Islam a big favour.

Now all they need to do is say 'Look...bad muslims'.Meanwhile the teacher becomes a heroic figure, as do thechaps who drew the cartoons....

And people will contiue badmouthing your religion.

AsiwajuNdigbo:

Yoruba muslims thats thinking how to buy aso ebi for christmas party in ibadan. If you want him to stab someone wait till he buy the agbada and then announce party is cancelled. That will do it. A muhammed cartoon can not do the trick.

Yoruba Muslims are the best

loveth360:
Thank God for Ipob,if not by now those blood thirst in north would have start killing Easterners.



Any nonesense from them,they will receive much more nonesense.

No, thank 'God' for the Tiv people and other middle belt groups who stopped Dan Fodio's Jihad from spreading East

IGBOSON1:


There are just too many radical Muslims in that country! Now they’re paying the price for being too welcoming and tolerant! They need to take lessons from China on how to handle these people!

Muslims in that country is gaining too much confidence, it will get out of hands if care is not taken.

Ah yes, the peaceful Muslims. Is it a coincidence that every terrorist group is from this religion?

When Allah cannot withstand criticism from insects, he sends a fly swatter

Madridguy, mu2sa2, x123xlolls, Elrasheed95

How come so much violence and atrocities are being committed in the name of the so called 'religion of peace'?

Are we missing something here?

If, of all the religions in the world, only adherents of Islam are more likely to murder because of criticism or opposition to the religion isn't it high time for the world to find out why and take needed actions?

Is the often touted claim of 'religion of peace' a PROPAGANDA after all? A smokescreen to hide some more sinister gameplan?

If Mohamed were alive today he would kill in the name of Islam. He saw to the beheadings of about 900 Jews in one day according to Islamic books.

Most Moslems do not know who their prophet Mohamed was. They never study the history of Islam personally. They depend only on what their leaders and teachers tell them. Or they run with their own idea of what Islam is or should be. But what Islam is can be found in its books not in a personal opinion of any Moslem.

Any Moslem who does not have a personal knowledge of what he religion stands for is only living in a FANTASY Islamic world.

x123xlolls:



HMM... SEE THIS ONE.

Something like you that don't even know the purpose of his life on earth, you was once created from nothing but sperm, but you are here pretending to be omini knowest !!!

To tell you the truth, every Muslim out there is busy doing his life peacefully without any concern to draw Jesus and insult him, or any other religion's God.

Your answers:

1. No purpose in telling you because you will never agree

2. same as above

I agree to facts and not fictions!

sagenaija:
Madridguy, mu2sa2, x123xlolls, Elrasheed95

How come so much violence and atrocities are being committed in the name of the so called 'religion of peace'?

Are we missing something here?

If, of all the religions in the world, only adherents of Islam are more likely to murder because of criticism or opposition to the religion isn't it high time for the world to find out why and take needed actions?

Is the often touted claim of 'religion of peace' a PROPAGANDA after all? A smokescreen to hide some more sinister gameplan?

If Mohamed were alive today he would kill in the name of Islam. He saw to the beheadings of about 900 Jews in one day according to Islamic books.

Most Moslems do not know who their prophet Mohamed was. They never study the history of Islam personally. They depend only on what their leaders and teachers tell them. Or they run with their own idea of what Islam is or should be. But what Islam is can be found in its books not in a personal opinion of any Moslem.

Any Moslem who does not have a personal knowledge of what he religion stands for is only living in a FANTASY Islamic world.

Better still, go and learn about Islam ....

You are here showing how much you hate islam.

While even xtians know that our BELOVED PROPHET is kind.

All of the battles He fought within His life is to defend His people.

He never attack.

Go and Study Islamic History.

Not Online History.

See this.

#WeLoveIslam

x123xlolls:

All of the battles He fought within His life is to defend His people.

He never attack.

Go and Study Islamic History.

#WeLoveIslam

From Islamic history:
"Narrated Abdullah Ibn Umar:

The Prophet fought with the people of Khaybar, and captured their palm-trees and land, and forced them to remain confined to their fortresses. So they concluded a treaty of peace providing that gold, silver and weapons would go to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and whatever they took away on their camels would belong to them, on condition that they would not hide and carry away anything. If they did (so), there would be no protection for them and no treaty (with Muslims).

They carried away a purse of Huyayy ibn Akhtab who was killed before (the battle of) Khaybar. He took away the ornaments of Banu an-Nadir when they were expelled.

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) asked Sa'yah: Where is the purse of Huyayy ibn Akhtab?

He replied: The contents of this purse were spent on battles and other expenses. (Later on) they found the purse. So he killed Ibn AbulHuqayq, captured their women and children, and intended to deport them. They said: Muhammad, leave us to work on this land; we shall have half (of the produce) as you wish, and you will have half. The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to make a contribution of eighty wasqs of dates and twenty wasqs of wheat to each of his wives. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 19, Number 3000)"

Did you notice that Mohamed FOUGHT and CAPTURED Khaybar's land?
Do you capture another person's land when you are 'DEFENDING' yourself?
Do you capture a land when you don't ATTACK?

Because you want to believe something doesn't make it true.
Islamic history as shown above clearly reveal what Mohamed did. If you choose to DECEIVE yourself into believing the opposite then go ahead.

sagenaija:

From Islamic history:
"Narrated Abdullah Ibn Umar:

The Prophet fought with the people of Khaybar, and captured their palm-trees and land, and forced them to remain confined to their fortresses. So they concluded a treaty of peace providing that gold, silver and weapons would go to the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him), and whatever they took away on their camels would belong to them, on condition that they would not hide and carry away anything. If they did (so), there would be no protection for them and no treaty (with Muslims).

They carried away a purse of Huyayy ibn Akhtab who was killed before (the battle of) Khaybar. He took away the ornaments of Banu an-Nadir when they were expelled.

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) asked Sa'yah: Where is the purse of Huyayy ibn Akhtab?

He replied: The contents of this purse were spent on battles and other expenses. (Later on) they found the purse. So he killed Ibn AbulHuqayq, captured their women and children, and intended to deport them. They said: Muhammad, leave us to work on this land; we shall have half (of the produce) as you wish, and you will have half. The Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) used to make a contribution of eighty wasqs of dates and twenty wasqs of wheat to each of his wives. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 19, Number 3000)"

Did you notice that Mohamed FOUGHT and CAPTURED Khaybar's land?
Do you capture another person's land when you are 'DEFENDING' yourself?
Do you capture a land when you don't ATTACK?

Because you want to believe something doesn't make it true.
Islamic history as shown above clearly reveal what Mohamed did. If you choose to DECEIVE yourself into believing the opposite then go ahead.

Ok, noted.

Arabs when at war, both parties are to leave their homes.

The war will take place somewhere else.

This applies when you are defending or attacking.

What will happen when you win?.

You will then go to the enemies homeland, capture or what ever.

Do you get it?.

So, this your Hadith have no point here.

Go and Study islam when you want to post about it.

Don't do it #uphead.

We are watching you from angle 5300°

#IslamForever

madridguy:
Stop deceiving yourself because there's no freedom of expression anywhere without you respecting others belief.
Maybe you should go to India and start doing nonsense with cow and let see if the Hindus followers will allow you to see next minutes.
Stop mocking people's religious view.

Nonsense point...Indians are in their country.
Big difference.

Hindu Indians dey for US. Have they ever gone to a Rodeo to make noise? No


These middle east muslims want the freedoms but not the culture of the westerners. 100% assimilation is never in the game plan

madridguy:
The teacher should have draw someone else. Must you guys always inciting Muslims? It is easy to condemned Muslims or Islam but others should respect us too. Over 1.2 billion followers of ISLAM won't keep quiet.

Start drawing or making cartoon about Hindu, Buddhism, Sihk and others but leave our noble prophet PBUH out of it.

If they don't, you KILL them??

It was just a harmless drawing and claiming to preach peace is just a disguise to perpetrate more evil.

Trying to talk with one of you guys is like pouring water on a cocoyam leaf.
I'm not against any religion but,this is just too much for people who preach PEACE.

EagleNest:


Look at the number of insults and curses rained on someone just because he aired his opinion. You don't quench fire with fire my son will say. ElRufai have used detestable languages on Jesus Christ in the past, mocking him but the true followers of Christ refused to tow that line of ignorance.

France is a Liberal society that are open to knowledge and learning. It sometimes clashes with Christian values but they don't go about killing people. A Chechen killing a French teacher in France because of cartoon of mohammed is worrying.

Forget this your big grammar abeg.

These white folks know what they are doing when they draw insulting images of Muhammed.

It is a racist reaction to people not all following their ''white Jesus''.

How dare you have an Arab saviour? He must be a blonde haired white, just like our 'lamb', Jesus.

That's what this is all about. Pure unadulterated racism.

Unlike christianity, in Islam, it is forbidden to create an image of the prophet Muhammed. Any image.

To then draw cartoons of him is the ultimate insult to a muslim.

There will always be muslims who react viciously to that.

StacyO:


It was just a harmless drawing

That is your LOW IQ and GROSS STUPIDITY talking.

''Harmless drawing'' indeed.

Rosskii:


That is your LOW IQ and GROSS STUPIDITY talking.

''Harmless drawing'' indeed.

Shut up!!

Go make a drawing of the Christian's JESUS and see if they'll come for your head.
You don't only kill once but,in a gruesome manner.

Don't make me lecture you this night.
Using religion to block your already blocked brain.

PhiliptheArab:
Advice to the muslims

Sometimes it is better to IGNORE abuse to your religion.

Take christians. There have been cartoons and oother literature mocking christianity from time immemorial. Intially christians used violence and harsh laws, until they woke up to the reality that the violence was making them look bad....so they adopted tolerance..

Stop lying. No one ever made it their job to draw insulting cartoons of 'Jesus', and even if they did, it would draw no anger, since christians themselves have drawn many pictures of 'Jesus'.

In islam it is forbidden to represent Allah or the prophet Muhammed in pictorial form.

When you now do so in CARTOON for, it is clearly a deliberate insult of the religion.

Question is WHY do that?

It can only be because they WANT a reaction from muslims.

Deliberate provocation to cause discontent, instability, animosity etc etc.

That is why many people say the white man is the devil.

Rosskii:


Forget this your big grammar abeg.

These white folks know what they are doing when they draw insulting images of Muhammed.

It is a racist reaction to people not all following their ''white Jesus''.

How dare you have an Arab saviour? He must be a blonde haired white, just like our 'lamb', Jesus.

That's what this is all about. Pure unadulterated racism.

Unlike christianity, in Islam, it is forbidden to create an image of the prophet Muhammed. Any image.

To then draw cartoons of him is the ultimate insult to a muslim.

There will always be muslims who react viciously to that.

Even in Christiandom, there is no such thing as authentic image of Jesus Christ anywhere. What you see as His picture or sculpture of Him is people's imaginations. And it is also a form of idolatry but let's leave it to God to decide.

A point of correction as regards "It is a racist reaction to people not all following their ''white Jesus''." Naaah, many of these people are so secular in life that you don't even talk religion to them in conversations. They only teach general religious study in school as it is a national curriculum, and in some cases you might choose to opt out.

Again we should take it easy with one another. No one has seen God before. If we all started killing each other for every little religious differences, who will remain? The one going on in Nigeria is even unspeakable. You remember the Redeemed Christian woman pastor that was lynched in Kubwa Abuja in July 2016 by some fanatics, her only crime was preaching. We can't go on like this when we don't have the capacity to recreate any human being.

ZKOSOSO:
Mohammed just visited Paris briefly....and left a proof...!

Allahu-aka-bomb......!!

madridguy:
Stop deceiving yourself because there's no freedom of expression anywhere without you respecting others belief.
Maybe you should go to India and start doing nonsense with cow and let see if the Hindus followers will allow you to see next minutes.
Stop mocking people's religious view.

fool

x123xlolls:


Ok, noted.

Arabs when at war, both parties are to leave their homes.

The war will take place somewhere else.

This applies when you are defending or attacking.

What will happen when you win?.

You will then go to the enemies homeland, capture or what ever.

Do you get it?.

So, this your Hadith have no point here.

Go and Study islam when you want to post about it.

Don't do it #uphead.

We are watching you from angle 5300°

#IslamForever

I can see that you have shifted grounds from

All of the battles He fought within His life is to defend His people.

He never attack.

to:

Arabs when at war, both parties are to leave their homes.

The war will take place somewhere else.

This applies when you are defending or attacking.

You guys NEVER want to admit that you are wrong. You just want to win arguments even if it is with lies and deceit.

I hope you know that there is a difference between DEFENDING and ATTACKING. If you don't then maybe you should do some study.

Now the hadith I quoted has a point.
It is clear here that contrary to what you claimed above Mohamed WENT TO Khaybar to fight them. The two parties did not go to war that took place "somewhere else".

Mohamed INITIATED the attack by going to Khaybar. They were not preparing for war. So, not all the battles Mohamed fought were to DEFEND his people like you claim.

I have to teach you Islamic history because apparently you don't know it. You must have depended on all the lies fed to you by Islamic teachers who want to keep followers of Islam in perpetual ignorance as to what Islam truly is.

You go and read your books to know what the true face of Islam is.

madridguy:
The teacher should have draw someone else. Must you guys always inciting Muslims? It is easy to condemned Muslims or Islam but others should respect us too. Over 1.2 billion followers of ISLAM won't keep quiet.

Start drawing or making cartoon about Hindu, Buddhism, Sihk and others but leave our noble prophet PBUH out of it.

That your cow urine drinking, 7year old girl fucker, son's wife snatching, war monger Mohamed... People abuse Jesus everyday n no one cares and his follower would never hack you to death... I wonder why you his follower stick to him eventhough he said he doesn't know of he will go to hell or heaven( n you his stupid flowers still practice is lies called Islam).. Someone that had convulsions n could not heal himself... I even wonder if you read quoran to understand your religion self

zoedew:

Islam forbids it. My take however is that Mohammed should be able to defend himself. God can. I feel strongly the reason all that is in Islam is to scare the typical human away from questioning Islam at the risk of a beheading. A calm reflection should show how insecure such a belief is. Who subscribes to an insecure belief system soon becomes insecure to the degree he commits to It. That explains why Osama bin Laden and the latest killer did what they did. God won’t terrorise you to acknowledge Him and submit. God made man a free moral agent to show to us that deference worth calling one is earned not commanded!

If slam forbids it, then it's consequence should only be applicable to Muslims... Many things that are not permitted in Christianity but not doing it is only restricted to the faithfuls.. For instance, catholic do not eat meat on good Fridays.. N no one outside catholic is asked to respect the practice... Mary is very important n respected in catholic church.. However no one will curse you for abusing her either ure Muslim of Christian

Elrasheed95:
The fact that he shouted ALLAHU AKBAR before killing doesn't make it right or makes him a Muslim, all these stupid news are been peddled by the enemies of Islam,both in the media and the western world, although we have some hypocrites claiming to be Muslims working to soil the image of Islam and Muslims, they will not succeed, the light of Islam was lit my God himself and no mortal can extinguish it.

You obviously don't understand Islam. Read your quoran more

madridguy:
The teacher should have draw someone else. Must you guys always inciting Muslims? It is easy to condemned Muslims or Islam but others should respect us too. Over 1.2 billion followers of ISLAM won't keep quiet.

Start drawing or making cartoon about Hindu, Buddhism, Sihk and others but leave our noble prophet PBUH out of it.

your noble prophet abi?

kaci buroubanka da kai da Muhammad. Muhammad Jaki ne. Muhammad doki ne. Allah should tsine wa uwar Muhammad albarka. Dan Banza Muhammad akuya

patani:


If slam forbids it, then it's consequence should only be applicable to Muslims... Many things that are not permitted in Christianity but not doing it is only restricted to the faithfuls.. For instance, catholic do not eat meat on good Fridays.. N no one outside catholic is asked to respect the practice... Mary is very important n respected in catholic church.. However no one will curse you for abusing her either ure Muslim of Christian

Islam as a belief system has no respect for your submission that the consequence of what it forbids should only apply to Muslims. During Ramadan you will eat when they are fasting at the risk of your life! Imagine such a belief system! But for the fact that I understand the nature of the spiritual backing Islam has one should be surprised at why the very well educated and exposed still choose to subscribe to its ways!!

sagenaija:
[size=6pt][/size]
I can see that you have shifted grounds from


to:


You guys NEVER want to admit that you are wrong. You just want to win arguments even if it is with lies and deceit.

I hope you know that there is a difference between DEFENDING and ATTACKING. If you don't then maybe you should do some study.

Now the hadith I quoted has a point.
It is clear here that contrary to what you claimed above Mohamed WENT TO Khaybar to fight them. The two parties did not go to war that took place "somewhere else".

Mohamed INITIATED the attack by going to Khaybar. They were not preparing for war. So, not all the battles Mohamed fought were to DEFEND his people like you claim.

I have to teach you Islamic history because apparently you don't know it. You must have depended on all the lies fed to you by Islamic teachers who want to keep followers of Islam in perpetual ignorance as to what Islam truly is.

You go and read your books to know what the true face of Islam is.

He went there abi?

Ok, Noted.

But,

Read this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Khaybar

You are still propagandizing and looking for a way to cause hate on islam.

Those khaibar people are the ones that cause all the war.

for example:

All Muslim r terrorist, forget the fact that some of them do kick against this act!!!

sagenaija:
[size=6pt][/size]
I can see that you have shifted grounds from


to:


You guys NEVER want to admit that you are wrong. You just want to win arguments even if it is with lies and deceit.

I hope you know that there is a difference between DEFENDING and ATTACKING. If you don't then maybe you should do some study.

Now the hadith I quoted has a point.
It is clear here that contrary to what you claimed above Mohamed WENT TO Khaybar to fight them. The two parties did not go to war that took place "somewhere else".

Mohamed INITIATED the attack by going to Khaybar. They were not preparing for war. So, not all the battles Mohamed fought were to DEFEND his people like you claim.

I have to teach you Islamic history because apparently you don't know it. You must have depended on all the lies fed to you by Islamic teachers who want to keep followers of Islam in perpetual ignorance as to what Islam truly is.

You go and read your books to know what the true face of Islam is.

Hi hater,

Read this also

https://www.historynet.com/muhammad-the-warrior-prophet.htm

you generate other hate speech's as well