First, your use of capital letters DOES NOT make your write-up legible. Infact, it makes it very difficult to read. There is no good reason to make your write up all in capital letters, if there is, pleases lets know. But there is NOTHING fancy about it. It reeks of immaturity and forced sense of importance.

Just a note please!

motayoayinde:


FIRST QUESTION,: THERE NOTHING GOD CANNOT DO OF COURSE BUT THERE ARE THINGS HE WILL NOT DO.
LIKE BECOMING A MAN IN THE FORM OF JESUS AND BE BEATEN AND HUMILIATED BECAUSE HE WANTS TO DIE FOR THE SINS OF THE WICKED SOULS WHO BEAT HIM UP.
GOD/ALLAH IS MIGHTY AND SUPREME AND PERFECT AND FAR ABOVE ALL THE ATTRIBUTES OF MAN.
HE'S BEYOND THE KIND OF HUMILIATION DESCRIBED ABOVE.

It seems to me that YOU and Mohammed are the one deciding what God cannot do!

Here lies one of the biggest fundamental difference between CHristianity and Islam.
In Christianity, GOD so loved the World that He did the unthinkable to save man from the consequence of SIN

Let me put it this way: Is it possible for President Buhari to enter into a sewage tank?
The obvious answer is NO!

But what if Buhari and one of his grand daughters were having a walk and the granddaughter climbed unto a sewage tank and fell inside. For the sake of LOVE, Buhari will be the first to jump into the sewage tank to pull out his granddaughter. So it is with God.

John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life

motayoayinde:

QUESTION TWO: WHY DO WE SAY TRINITY IS SHIRK?

BECAUSE IT IS.
SHIRK MEANS JOINING PARTNERS WITH ALLAH IN WORSHIP.

TRINITY MAKES THE ONLY ONE GOD INTO THREE GODS WHO ARE CO,-EQUAL IN THEIR GODHOOD. THIS IS SHIRK.
CHRISTIANS MAKE THIS WORSE BY ERECTING IMAGES OF THE SON-god, JESUS IN PLACES OF WORSHIP.
THIS IS IDOLATRY.

Any one who erects an image to be worshiped is an idolater!


BUT Christians and the Scriptures had ALWAYS Affirmed that there is only one God! There has been no time when Christians said that there are two, three or any other number of gods.

What we have said is that: GOD is a TITLE just like the President or Chairman etc

GOD Reveals Himself in three ways to His creations
1. God is the FATHER:
God is the God of everything and everyone BUT He is not the FATHER of everyone. God is the God of Shaitan but not the Father of Shaitan. God is the God of the Pig but God is not the Father of the Pigs.
GOD becomes the FATHER of ANYONE He ADOPTS as Son!

The FATHER WILLED/DECIDED everything that will BE!
2. God is the WORD:
The WORD spoke everything into being according to the WILL of the FATHER.
Does God have a mouth with which He speaks? NO!

The WORD of GOD is GOD Himself.

3. God is the SPIRIT:
Who actualized the Command of the WORD. God's SPIRIT forced out substance from nothing for God is HIS SPIRIT.
God Himself is the POWER that EXECUTES His WILL and COMMAND!

So, my friend: this had been the misconception of even the quran calling TRINITY God, Mary and Jesus!

I asked you the question which you refused to answer:
How come God can be on His throne in Heaven and yet be 100% present everywhere in space?

Like I said before: even the concept of trinity that you deliberately chose to mis-comprehend is even in Islam as duality!
How can duality make sense and trinity doesnt?

motayoayinde:

QUESTION THREE: THE MUSLIM TESTIMONY IS TWO IN ONE.
TESTIFYING THE ONLY GOD IS GOD AND NO OTHER AND THAT MUHAMMAD(saw) IS HE MESSENGER.
THE SECOND TESTIMONY IS AMONG OTHER THINGS, TO SHOW THAT MUHAMMAD WAS NO MORE THAN A HUMAN PROPHET AND MESSENGER OF THE MOST HIGH WHO SENT HIM.

The Muslim testimony is a perfect example of partnership between Mohammed and Allah!
To become a Muslim you must recite the shahada: There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger.

Is there any other prophet you know whose name is required in their repentance and conversion? No!
Can I become a Muslim by testifying that "There is no God but Allah" alone. Is this sufficient?
Quran 4:59
O believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you ˹truly˺ believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is the best and fairest resolution.

Is this NOT a partnership?

Every evidence actually point to the fact that Allah is actually alter-image of Mohammed for it seems that it is actually allah that serves Mohammed and not the other way round.

Magnoliaa:


Where is the prohibition in the verse? "After their compulsion" -- what is this part talking about? I'm curious.

This is what was posted in full.

Allaah Says (what means): {But let them who find not [the means for] marriage abstain [from sexual relations] until Allaah enriches them from His bounty. And those who seek a contract [for eventual emancipation by purchasing their freedom from their owners for a price agreed upon] from among whom your right hands possess — then make a contract with them if you know there is within them goodness and give them from the wealth of Allaah which He has given you. And do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, if they desire chastity, to seek [thereby] the temporary interests of worldly life. And if someone should compel them, then indeed, Allaah is [to them], after their compulsion, Forgiving and Merciful.}[Quran 24:33]

The above verse is an order from Allaah to whoever is not able to marry to abstain from illegal sexual relations, like the Prophet sallallaahu `alayhi wa sallam ( may Allaah exalt his mention ) said: "O young people, whoever is able to marry should marry, and whoever is not able to do so, he should fast, as fasting diminishes his sexual desires." Then the verse advised those who own slaves to make a contract with those slaves who seek such a contract to pay money in order to emancipate themselves.

However, it is not permissible for a woman to commit Zina (adultery or fornication) whether she is a slave woman or a free woman, and it is not permissible for her master to allow her to do so; rather, he is obliged to prevent her from committing Zina according to his ability. This verse was revealed to clarify what used to happen at that time as some hypocrites, like ‘Abdullaah ibn Ubay ibn Salool, used to compel their slave girls to commit Zina so that they would bring them some money, so the verse prohibited them from doing so.

The condition of desiring chastity in the verse is mentioned because it corresponds to the state of being compelled to do so and this is the case in which desiring chastely often exists, because if a slave girl does that out of her own will, then she does not need to be compelled to do that in principle, and this meaning is mentioned by Ibn Al-‘Arabi may Allaah have mercy upon him in his book entitled “Ahkaam Al-Quran” (The Rulings of the Quran).

Allaah Knows best.

Magnoliaa:


jessus. wah kinda deflection is this?? (ham expeerrin yor' personal attack oh).

I was honestly, even hoping, I'd gain one or two clarifications from your explanation -- I didn't see you address the very last last line in that verse. The one talking about when a person is actually compelled and Allah being compliant with them??

Quote the relevant citations make I remember!

shadeyinka:
First, your use of capital letters DOES NOT make your write-up legible. Infact, it makes it very difficult to read. There is no good reason to make your write up all in capital letters, if there is, pleases lets know. But there is NOTHING fancy about it. It reeks of immaturity and forced sense of importance.

Just a note please!


It seems to me that YOU and Mohammed are the one deciding what God cannot do!

Here lies one of the biggest fundamental difference between CHristianity and Islam.
In Christianity, GOD so loved the World that He did the unthinkable to save man from the consequence of SIN

Let me put it this way: Is it possible for President Buhari to enter into a sewage tank?
The obvious answer is NO!

But what if Buhari and one of his grand daughters were having a walk and the granddaughter climbed unto a sewage tank and fell inside. For the sake of LOVE, Buhari will be the first to jump into the sewage tank to pull out his granddaughter. So it is with God.

John 3:16
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life


Any one who erects an image to be worshiped is an idolater!


BUT Christians and the Scriptures had ALWAYS Affirmed that there is only one God! There has been no time when Christians said that there are two, three or any other number of gods.

What we have said is that: GOD is a TITLE just like the President or Chairman etc

GOD Reveals Himself in three ways to His creations
1. God is the FATHER:
God is the God of everything and everyone BUT He is not the FATHER of everyone. God is the God of Shaitan but not the Father of Shaitan. God is the God of the Pig but God is not the Father of the Pigs.
GOD becomes the FATHER of ANYONE He ADOPTS as Son!

The FATHER WILLED/DECIDED everything that will BE!
2. God is the WORD:
The WORD spoke everything into being according to the WILL of the FATHER.
Does God have a mouth with which He speaks? NO!

The WORD of GOD is GOD Himself.

3. God is the SPIRIT:
Who actualized the Command of the WORD. God's SPIRIT forced out substance from nothing for God is HIS SPIRIT.
God Himself is the POWER that EXECUTES His WILL and COMMAND!

So, my friend: this had been the misconception of even the quran calling TRINITY God, Mary and Jesus!

I asked you the question which you refused to answer:
How come God can be on His throne in Heaven and yet be 100% present everywhere in space?

Like I said before: even the concept of trinity that you deliberately chose to mis-comprehend is even in Islam as duality!
How can duality make sense and trinity doesnt?


The Muslim testimony is a perfect example of partnership between Mohammed and Allah!
To become a Muslim you must recite the shahada: There is no God but Allah, and Muhammad is his messenger.

Is there any other prophet you know whose name is required in their repentance and conversion? No!
Can I become a Muslim by testifying that "There is no God but Allah" alone. Is this sufficient?
Quran 4:59
O believers! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in authority among you. Should you disagree on anything, then refer it to Allah and His Messenger, if you ˹truly˺ believe in Allah and the Last Day. This is the best and fairest resolution.

Is this NOT a partnership?

Every evidence actually point to the fact that Allah is actually alter-image of Mohammed for it seems that it is actually allah that serves Mohammed and not the other way round.

MY WRITE-UP WASN'T DIFFICULT TO READ WHEN YOU QUOTED ME AT FIRST WAS IT? WHY COMPLAIN NOW THAT YOU'RE BEING TUTORED?

BUT ON A SERIOUS NOTE, I'D HAVE TAKEN YOUR COMPLAIN SERIOUSLY IF YOU DIDN'T ACCOMPANY IT WITH CHILDISH JIBES OF A TYPICAL ISLAMOPHOBE (which made it sound insincere).
I ACTUALLY THINK WRITING THAT WAY LOOKS NICE, SO IT'S NOTHING TO DO WITH TRYING TO FEEL IMPORTANT.
BEING A MUSLIM MAKES ME IMPORTANT ALREADY (Praises to Allah).
MY JOB NOW IS TO BE HUMBLE ABOUT IT; NOT TO CRAVE WHAT I ALREADY HAVE.

NOW, YOUR BUHARI-IN-THE-GUTTER ANALOGY TO EXPLAIN YOUR POINT ABOVE IS AN AFFRONT, AN INSULT AND NOTHING SHORT OF A COMPLETE DISGRACE. WHAT I FELT AT FIRST WAS SHOCK, THAT ANYONE COULD ASSOCIATE GOD/ALLAH WITH THIS KIND OF SCENARIO.
MY SHOCK GAVE WAY TO PITY THOUGH WHEN I REALIZED WHAT A MESS TRINITY HAS TURNED CHRISTIANITY TO.
ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT GOD BECAME A MAN WILL IMAGINE THAT GOD WILL THINK AND ACT LIKE MAN.

THE EMOTION YOU DEPICTED IN YOUR ANALOGY RESIDES ONLY WITH MAN.
BUHARI OR TRUMP WILL JUMP INTO THE CESSPIT WITHOUT HESITATION IF THEIR INTEREST OR THEIR LIVES DEPEND ON IT.

GOD HAS NO SUCH INTERESTS.
IT'S THE REASON HE IS ONE, ALONE, SELF SUFFICIENT AND SELF DEPENDENT
HE HAS NO SON,
HE HAS NO FAVOURITES
HE HAS NO NEEDS.
HE DOES HAVE FEELINGS BUT ABSOLUTELY UNLIKE MAN'S.
THIS IS WHY HIS RULES ARE CLEAR AND HIS STANDARDS SAME FOR ALL.

HE SET THE RULES FOR GOOD AND EVIL.
HE'S GLAD WHEN YOU DO GOOD,
HE'S SAD WHEN YOU DO EVIL, HE MIGHT EVEN GIVE YOU MORE TIME TO CHANGE, BUT IT'S YOUR DECISION AT THE END OF THE DAY.
HE NEEDN'T TAKE DRASTIC ACTIONS LIKE HIS LIFE DEPENDS ON IT TO STOP YOU CHOOSING YOUR PATH.
IT'S YOUR LIFE AND ETERNITY THAT DEPENDS ON NOT SINNING, NOT GOD'S.

ALL OF THESE WERE MADE UP TO JUSTIFY WHY JESUS HAD TO DIE FOR OUR SINS BUT THEY DON'T JUST ADD UP. NOW YOU KNOW.

YOU SAID CHRISTIANS HAVE ALWAYS AFFIRMED GOD TO BE ONE. THAT'S TRUE BUT HOW "ONE" IS THE CHRISTIAN GOD WHEN THERE ARE TWO OTHER CLAIMANTS TO GODHOOD ACCORDING TO YOUR DOCTRINE?

THIS WAS WHAT CAUSED VERY SERIOUS UPHEAVAL IN CHRISTIANDOM IN THE YEARS RUNNING UP TO 325 AD.
ARIUS LED THE UNITARIANS WHO MAINTAINED THAT GOD WAS ONE AND HE WAS NOT JESUS.
ATHANASIUS LED THOSE WHO CLAIMED GOD AND JESUS WERE TWO GODS.
CONSTANTINE WADED INTO THE MATTER BY ADDING THE THIRD GOD (holy spirit). THUS WAS TRINITY IMPOSED ON YOUR FAITH. TILL THIS MOMENT, THE ARGUMENT AMONG YOU CHRISTIANS IS STILL ALIVE.

THE MUSLIM TESTIMONY OF FAITH OS CLEAR TO ANYONE WHO ISN'T A MISCHIEF MAKER.
THE SHAHADA, QURAN AND HADITH MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD IS ONLY GODS MESSENGER AND A MAN.
CAN ONE BE A MUSLIM WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MUHAMMAD?
OF COURSE NOT. BELIEVING IN THE PROPHET (not worshipping him), ENSURES THAT YOU ACCEPT THE LAWS HE BROUGHT AND ALL HE SAYS ABOUT GOD.
CAN ANYONE BE A JUDAIST WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MOSES AND HIS LAWS?

motayoayinde:


MY WRITE-UP WASN'T DIFFICULT TO READ WHEN YOU QUOTED ME AT FIRST WAS IT? WHY COMPLAIN NOW THAT YOU'RE BEING TUTORED?

BUT ON A SERIOUS NOTE, I'D HAVE TAKEN YOUR COMPLAIN SERIOUSLY IF YOU DIDN'T ACCOMPANY IT WITH CHILDISH JIBES OF A TYPICAL ISLAMOPHOBE (which made it sound insincere).
I ACTUALLY THINK WRITING THAT WAY LOOKS NICE, SO IT'S NOTHING TO DO WITH TRYING TO FEEL IMPORTANT.
BEING A MUSLIM MAKES ME IMPORTANT ALREADY (Praises to Allah).
MY JOB NOW IS TO BE HUMBLE ABOUT IT; NOT TO CRAVE WHAT I ALREADY HAVE.

NOW, YOUR BUHARI-IN-THE-GUTTER ANALOGY TO EXPLAIN YOUR POINT ABOVE IS AN AFFRONT, AN INSULT AND NOTHING SHORT OF A COMPLETE DISGRACE. WHAT I FELT AT FIRST WAS SHOCK, THAT ANYONE COULD ASSOCIATE GOD/ALLAH WITH THIS KIND OF SCENARIO.
MY SHOCK GAVE WAY TO PITY THOUGH WHEN I REALIZED WHAT A MESS TRINITY HAS TURNED CHRISTIANITY TO.
ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT GOD BECAME A MAN WILL IMAGINE THAT GOD WILL THINK AND ACT LIKE MAN.

THE EMOTION YOU DEPICTED IN YOUR ANALOGY RESIDES ONLY WITH MAN.
BUHARI OR TRUMP WILL JUMP INTO THE CESSPIT WITHOUT HESITATION IF THEIR INTEREST OR THEIR LIVES DEPEND ON IT.

GOD HAS NO SUCH INTERESTS.
IT'S THE REASON HE IS ONE, ALONE, SELF SUFFICIENT AND SELF DEPENDENT
HE HAS NO SON,
HE HAS NO FAVOURITES
HE HAS NO NEEDS.
HE DOES HAVE FEELINGS BUT ABSOLUTELY UNLIKE MAN'S.
THIS IS WHY HIS RULES ARE CLEAR AND HIS STANDARDS SAME FOR ALL.

HE SET THE RULES FOR GOOD AND EVIL.
HE'S GLAD WHEN YOU DO GOOD,
HE'S SAD WHEN YOU DO EVIL, HE MIGHT EVEN GIVE YOU MORE TIME TO CHANGE, BUT IT'S YOUR DECISION AT THE END OF THE DAY.
HE NEEDN'T TAKE DRASTIC ACTIONS LIKE HIS LIFE DEPENDS ON IT TO STOP YOU CHOOSING YOUR PATH.
IT'S YOUR LIFE AND ETERNITY THAT DEPENDS ON NOT SINNING, NOT GOD'S.

ALL OF THESE WERE MADE UP TO JUSTIFY WHY JESUS HAD TO DIE FOR OUR SINS BUT THEY DON'T JUST ADD UP. NOW YOU KNOW.

YOU SAID CHRISTIANS HAVE ALWAYS AFFIRMED GOD TO BE ONE. THAT'S TRUE BUT HOW "ONE" IS THE CHRISTIAN GOD WHEN THERE ARE TWO OTHER CLAIMANTS TO GODHOOD ACCORDING TO YOUR DOCTRINE?

THIS WAS WHAT CAUSED VERY SERIOUS UPHEAVAL IN CHRISTIANDOM IN THE YEARS RUNNING UP TO 325 AD.
ARIUS LED THE UNITARIANS WHO MAINTAINED THAT GOD WAS ONE AND HE WAS NOT JESUS.
ATHANASIUS LED THOSE WHO CLAIMED GOD AND JESUS WERE TWO GODS.
CONSTANTINE WADED INTO THE MATTER BY ADDING THE THIRD GOD (holy spirit). THUS WAS TRINITY IMPOSED ON YOUR FAITH. TILL THIS MOMENT, THE ARGUMENT AMONG YOU CHRISTIANS IS STILL ALIVE.

THE MUSLIM TESTIMONY OF FAITH OS CLEAR TO ANYONE WHO ISN'T A MISCHIEF MAKER.
THE SHAHADA, QURAN AND HADITH MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD IS ONLY GODS MESSENGER AND A MAN.
CAN ONE BE A MUSLIM WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MUHAMMAD?
OF COURSE NOT. BELIEVING IN THE PROPHET (not worshipping him), ENSURES THAT YOU ACCEPT THE LAWS HE BROUGHT AND ALL HE SAYS ABOUT GOD.
CAN ANYONE BE A JUDAIST WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MOSES AND HIS LAWS?

Until I know a single successful person who write like you! Only immature people write like that, for they think it makes them stand out of the crowd. Let your intelligence, words, knowledge and character property you out of the crowd, not capitalization of words. Do what you will after this, its a free world.


1. Why should God display the emotion of sadness as this is a position of weakness of humans?

2. Is there a difference between the ruh of a man and himself?

3. Do you know Munkar and Nakir?

shadeyinka:

Until I know a single successful person who write like you! Only immature people write like that, for they think it makes them stand out of the crowd. Let your intelligence, words, knowledge and character property you out of the crowd, not capitalization of words. Do what you will after this, its a free world.


1. Why should God display the emotion of sadness as this is a position of weakness of humans?

2. Is there a difference between the ruh of a man and himself?

3. Do you know Munkar and Nakir?

YOU'RE BEGINNING TO SOUND SPENT Shady, WHY STRESS THIS MUCH ABOUT WHY I CAPITALIZE MY WRITE-UP WHEN YOU CAN READ IT.

BTW, YOU'VE SAID BARELY NOTHING ABOUT MY TUTORIALS THIS MORNING EXCEPT TO ASK A QUESTION THAT'S BEEN ANSWERED AND OTHERS NOT RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION.

READ YOUR POST AGAIN, THE WORD "PROPERTY" HAS NO PLACE IN THERE.
SO CALM DOWN.

IF YOU'RE SPENT, TAKE A BOW.

hello

motayoayinde:


YOU'RE BEGINNING TO SOUND SPENT Shady, WHY STRESS THIS MUCH ABOUT WHY I CAPITALIZE MY WRITE-UP WHEN YOU CAN READ IT.

BTW, YOU'VE SAID BARELY NOTHING ABOUT MY TUTORIALS THIS MORNING EXCEPT TO ASK A QUESTION THAT'S BEEN ANSWERED AND OTHERS NOT RELEVANT TO THE DISCUSSION.

READ YOUR POST AGAIN, THE WORD "PROPERTY" HAS NO PLACE IN THERE.
SO CALM DOWN.

IF YOU'RE SPENT, TAKE A BOW.

Fear has caught up with you again!
You couldn't answer 3 simple questions!

motayoayinde:


MY WRITE-UP WASN'T DIFFICULT TO READ WHEN YOU QUOTED ME AT FIRST WAS IT? WHY COMPLAIN NOW THAT YOU'RE BEING TUTORED?

BUT ON A SERIOUS NOTE, I'D HAVE TAKEN YOUR COMPLAIN SERIOUSLY IF YOU DIDN'T ACCOMPANY IT WITH CHILDISH JIBES OF A TYPICAL ISLAMOPHOBE (which made it sound insincere).
I ACTUALLY THINK WRITING THAT WAY LOOKS NICE, SO IT'S NOTHING TO DO WITH TRYING TO FEEL IMPORTANT.
BEING A MUSLIM MAKES ME IMPORTANT ALREADY (Praises to Allah).
MY JOB NOW IS TO BE HUMBLE ABOUT IT; NOT TO CRAVE WHAT I ALREADY HAVE.

NOW, YOUR BUHARI-IN-THE-GUTTER ANALOGY TO EXPLAIN YOUR POINT ABOVE IS AN AFFRONT, AN INSULT AND NOTHING SHORT OF A COMPLETE DISGRACE. WHAT I FELT AT FIRST WAS SHOCK, THAT ANYONE COULD ASSOCIATE GOD/ALLAH WITH THIS KIND OF SCENARIO.
MY SHOCK GAVE WAY TO PITY THOUGH WHEN I REALIZED WHAT A MESS TRINITY HAS TURNED CHRISTIANITY TO.
ANYONE WHO BELIEVES THAT GOD BECAME A MAN WILL IMAGINE THAT GOD WILL THINK AND ACT LIKE MAN.

THE EMOTION YOU DEPICTED IN YOUR ANALOGY RESIDES ONLY WITH MAN.
BUHARI OR TRUMP WILL JUMP INTO THE CESSPIT WITHOUT HESITATION IF THEIR INTEREST OR THEIR LIVES DEPEND ON IT.

GOD HAS NO SUCH INTERESTS.
IT'S THE REASON HE IS ONE, ALONE, SELF SUFFICIENT AND SELF DEPENDENT
HE HAS NO SON,
HE HAS NO FAVOURITES
HE HAS NO NEEDS.
HE DOES HAVE FEELINGS BUT ABSOLUTELY UNLIKE MAN'S.
THIS IS WHY HIS RULES ARE CLEAR AND HIS STANDARDS SAME FOR ALL.

HE SET THE RULES FOR GOOD AND EVIL.
HE'S GLAD WHEN YOU DO GOOD,
HE'S SAD WHEN YOU DO EVIL, HE MIGHT EVEN GIVE YOU MORE TIME TO CHANGE, BUT IT'S YOUR DECISION AT THE END OF THE DAY.
HE NEEDN'T TAKE DRASTIC ACTIONS LIKE HIS LIFE DEPENDS ON IT TO STOP YOU CHOOSING YOUR PATH.
IT'S YOUR LIFE AND ETERNITY THAT DEPENDS ON NOT SINNING, NOT GOD'S.

ALL OF THESE WERE MADE UP TO JUSTIFY WHY JESUS HAD TO DIE FOR OUR SINS BUT THEY DON'T JUST ADD UP. NOW YOU KNOW.

YOU SAID CHRISTIANS HAVE ALWAYS AFFIRMED GOD TO BE ONE. THAT'S TRUE BUT HOW "ONE" IS THE CHRISTIAN GOD WHEN THERE ARE TWO OTHER CLAIMANTS TO GODHOOD ACCORDING TO YOUR DOCTRINE?

THIS WAS WHAT CAUSED VERY SERIOUS UPHEAVAL IN CHRISTIANDOM IN THE YEARS RUNNING UP TO 325 AD.
ARIUS LED THE UNITARIANS WHO MAINTAINED THAT GOD WAS ONE AND HE WAS NOT JESUS.
ATHANASIUS LED THOSE WHO CLAIMED GOD AND JESUS WERE TWO GODS.
CONSTANTINE WADED INTO THE MATTER BY ADDING THE THIRD GOD (holy spirit). THUS WAS TRINITY IMPOSED ON YOUR FAITH. TILL THIS MOMENT, THE ARGUMENT AMONG YOU CHRISTIANS IS STILL ALIVE.

THE MUSLIM TESTIMONY OF FAITH OS CLEAR TO ANYONE WHO ISN'T A MISCHIEF MAKER.
THE SHAHADA, QURAN AND HADITH MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY CLEAR THAT MUHAMMAD IS ONLY GODS MESSENGER AND A MAN.
CAN ONE BE A MUSLIM WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MUHAMMAD?
OF COURSE NOT. BELIEVING IN THE PROPHET (not worshipping him), ENSURES THAT YOU ACCEPT THE LAWS HE BROUGHT AND ALL HE SAYS ABOUT GOD.
CAN ANYONE BE A JUDAIST WITHOUT BELIEVING IN MOSES AND HIS LAWS?

Islamophobe has become a word to threaten or silence people. But the word and use of it has become a misnomer. Phobia is a fear. Critiquing is not necessarily a fear. Pointing out errors, contradictions and confusions are not expressions of fear or even of hatred.

So, whenever the Moslem brandishes 'Islamophobia' or 'islamophobe' at someone or a group of people do they really know what they are doing?

No two individuals think alike. Why then do you think it makes sense to assume that when God became a man he would think like the rest of us? That only happens in the realm of the lopsided thinking of Islam.

The God Christians believe in has interest in his creatures. Maybe your Allah is an IMPERSONAL being. But Jehovah is a relational God with his creatures. It was LOVE that made him take the step to resolve the sin issue. With it we are ASSURED of our salvation because the resurrection was the display of God's acceptance of Christ's work on the cross. Because of Jesus's payment for sin the Christian is no longer under the judgement of God - he is not under any condemnation.

Your Allah certainly had favourite. Is there any single thing you do in Islam without reference to Allah and Mohamed? Can you say the shahada using another prophet's name? Do you mention other prophets by name when you pray daily? If that is not favouritism then tell us what it is.

The Gospels and epistles were not written in 325AD. John 1:1 talks about the deity of Jesus. Hebrews 1 talks about the deity of Jesus. And many other books of the New Testament. When you guys have been fed with a lie that a council 'created' certain doctrines and you run with it without thought you end up displaying your ignorance while claiming to know.

A thousand and one explanations will not be accepted by you because you just wouldn't look at them objectively.

Going back to your early Islamic history should actually give you reasons to be concerned. The infighting that led to the CONTRADICTORY positions of Islam on virtually every issue. The fact that NO SINGLE Islamic literature about Mohamed can be traced to his time; all were written several decades and centuries after him even though writing had developed significantly at that time. That no single archeological finding has been found in Mecca where Islam was supposed to have thrived should concern you. And much more......

You believe and are EXCITED about a man, Mohamed, who life leaves much to be desired. We believe in one whose life had no taint of human foibles. You believe in Mohamed who doesn't know where he would end up - heaven or hell; and you have to daily pray for his soul. We believe in one who is the author and giver of life, the Alpha and the Omega, who was and is and is to come.
The difference, like they say, is simply very CLEAR!