WorstWanderland:

yes but not at all times

i cases like that of Job, he seek God's approval

and in cases like that of Jesus and that of Adam and Eve we never read any where that he ask for permission.

.
Its ok.

Moblux:


Son of sorrow I guess. I don't want to be tempted to check up in the Bible

i've been preparing to correct you to remove the my

but you've corrected it yourself

Matheusmartin:
.
If he acts with God permission he's certainly not the bad guy, is he?

Created an angel but to seek to usurp power with a third of the host of heaven ( angels probably in his legion) was an aberration.

WorstWanderland:

HE is, God allowed everyone do what they wish but there are times he took over things himself irrespective how men want it to be.

for the fact that God allow him to do what he like doesn't mean he is no longer responsible for them

.
More like different rules at different times right?

Moblux:


Created an angel but to seek to usurp power with a third of the host of heaven ( angels probably in his legion) was an aberration.

...

Since God is omnipresent and omnipotent, don't you think he already knew a day like that would come??

OkCornel:

Son of my pain/bitterness/sorrow I think.

there's nothing like my
JUST 'SON OF SORROW'

Matheusmartin:
. More like different rules at different times right?

yes!

Matheusmartin:
...

Since God is omnipresent and omnipotent, don't you think he already knew a day like that would come??

Sure He knows in my thinking. Unfortunately, the difference between man and angel is man's opportunity to repent. Angels from what is known about them are not permitted to repent. During my Theodicy class, so many questions were asked that the prof could not answer such as you are asking.

Things not known shall be made known in the fullness of time

Matheusmartin:
...

Since God is omnipresent and omnipotent, don't you think he already knew a day like that would come??

he knew but let it happen

more might had happen if he let satan know that he GOD know what satan want to do. satan may repent but not he may not change.

Moblux:


Sure He knows in my thinking. Unfortunately, the difference between man and angel is man's opportunity to repent.[/b] Angels from what is known about them are not permitted to repent[b]. During my Theodicy class, so many questions were asked that the prof could not answer such as you are asking.

Things not known shall be made known in the fullness of time

.
Any proof of this?

WorstWanderland:
there's nothing like my

JUST 'SON OF SORROW'

Thanks

WorstWanderland:
[/b]he knew but let it happen[b].


more might had happen if he let satan know that he GOD know what satan want to do. satan may repent but not he may not change.

.
To serve what purpose?..

Matheusmartin:
..
Meaning he acts with God's permission right?

He is not responsible for the bad stuffs around, is he?

moreover, to make you understand better i'll like you to answer this question.

if a plate of food was kept for your father but he wasn't around and didn't return early enough

you then ask your mother if you should eat it and she allowed you and you ate it

if your father came back and ask for his food, who will you said had eaten it?

OkCornel:

Thanks

over to you ask yours

WorstWanderland:


moreover, to make you understand better i'll like you to answer this question.

if a plate of food was kept for your father but he wasn't around and didn't return early enough

you then ask your mother if you should eat it and she allowed you and you ate it

if your father came back and ask for his food, who will you said had eaten it?

.
I ate the food.
I'm not sure where u are heading with this question

Matheusmartin:
. To serve what purpose?..

as in satan might do something worst because his mind is already made up

WorstWanderland:

as in satan might do something worst because his mind is already made up

.
You are beginning to make things up.

Matheusmartin:
. I ate the food.

which means satan is still responsible for anything God permit him to do

Matheusmartin:
.
I'm not sure where u are heading with this question

I hope you still remember you asked

if satan is responsible for all the bad stuff he is doing

? so the example is to make you understand better

Matheusmartin:
.
Any proof of this?

yes he may be right if he said

from what is known angels are not permitted to repent

because through out the bible there is no place where an angel is given a second chance, because there judgement came almost immediately after their transgression(sin)

WorstWanderland:

over to you ask yours

What was the reason for the sharp dispute between Paul and Barnabas?

Matheusmartin:
.
You are beginning to make things up.

hope you are Getting it?

you are free to ask if you are confuse in any question, answer or explanation

OkCornel:


What was the reason for the sharp dispute between Paul and Barnabas?

because unfortunately, for the very first time; where paul wanted to go and preach the gospel was not where barnabas wanted to go and preach the gospel anymore.

WorstWanderland:

because unfortunately, for the very first time; where paul wanted to go and preach the gospel was not where barnabas wanted to go and preach the gospel anymore.

I think so. I think there was an argument concerning Mark accompanying Barnabas on his journey or so

OkCornel:


I think so. I think there was an argument concerning Mark accompanying Barnabas on his journey or so

yes that was the mean reason

paul refused mark must not go with them and barnabas maintain he must follow them and so they got seperately on their mission of evangelism; mark with barnabas and silas with paul


thats where the story of paul and silas began

more questions please!

OkCornel:


I think so. I think there was an argument concerning Mark accompanying Barnabas on his journey or so

take note! paul didn't just refused the ideal of mark following them for nothing sake or because he don't wants him to,

but it is because mark had earlierly abandoned them somewhere (probably in time of trouble) when they where preaching the gospel(together with mark)

Moblux:


Created an angel but to seek to usurp power with a third of the host of heaven ( angels probably in his legion) was an aberration.

i think i'll start asking you soon since you don't want to ask.

should i?

WorstWanderland:


take note! paul didn't just refused the ideal of mark following them for nothing sake or because he don't wants him to,

but it is because mark had earlierly abandoned them somewhere (probably in time of trouble) when they where preaching the gospel(together with mark)

Beyond that there was an undercurrent. Barnabas had in a way been Paul's mentor ( I said in a way with intention). Barnabas would have wanted to exert his authority to take Mark along being an earlier convert before Paul and having been the person that first associated himself with Paul against all odds.

The lesson here is that mentee can be used by God above the mentor in spiritual matter.

Unfortunately, Barnabas became weaker and was rebuked by the same Paul of his hypocritical tendencies ( Gal 2:11ff)

WorstWanderland:


which means satan is still responsible for anything God permit him to do

.
Doesn't Make sense, lol.
Its ok.

OkCornel:


I think so. I think there was an argument concerning Mark accompanying Barnabas on his journey or so

AM WAITING FOR MORE QUESTIONS