These videos shows the mercy of halal slaughter and the power of the word.

[flash=435,344]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quhVxLUwiBw[/flash]

[flash=435,344]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zwh72o1G0rs[/flash]

[flash=400,250]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sktLQCUcUZY[/flash]

Now back to reality,
http://www.abc.net.au/landline/content/2010/s3235919.htm

And your point is

Play Video

So some people threat animals badly, It is wrong and sad. I have read reports on Animal maltreatment in indonesia, which is horrible to be honest.

but the Argument of stunning the animal before slaughter or not is one that will continue go on . Does stunning the animal make it more humane??

bloodthirsy muslims.

der will be a day when the animals will hav their share of revenge.

Classic case of how culture and relgion blind people and encourage irrational behaviour. Slicing an animals neck while reciting some prayer is inhumane and irrational especially when there are more humane and quicker methods to reduce the suffering of the animal. This process of slaughter is outdated and should no longer be encouraged in countries where butchers that can afford the equipment to stun the animals.

PAGAN  9JA:

bloodthirsy muslims.

der will be a day when the animals will hav their share of revenge.

Are you a vegetarian??

divinereal:

Classic case of how culture and relgion blind people and encourage irrational behaviour. Slicing an animals neck while reciting some prayer is inhumane and irrational especially when there are more humane and quicker methods to reduce the suffering of the animal. This process of slaughter is outdated and should no longer be encouraged in countries where butchers that can afford the equipment to stun the animals.

It is arguable that stunning is more humane. You rob the animal of its senses, then slaughter it. The blood coagulates in the animal's body.

Unless you eat only vegetables, animal slaughter is inevitable, there is no slaughter more humane  than the other. For religious people, calling the name of the creator before slaughter is a means of seeking his permission and blessing for food which we need for sustenance.

In Islam, Animals are not killed for sport. Only for food and other forms of provision.

tbaba1234:

Are you a vegetarian??

no im not but i generally avoid unnecessary meat consumption where I can especially red meat. ive heard that red meat consummption in high quantities is cancerous. i generally love animals because of their inocence, so wer i can, I always offer them a helping hand because animals cant help themselves.

tbaba1234:

It is arguable that stunning is more humane. You rob the animal of its senses, then slaughter it. The blood coagulates in the animal's body.

Unless you eat only vegetables, animal slaughter is inevitable, there is no slaughter more humane  than the other. For religious people, calling the name of the creator before slaughter is a means of seeking his permission and blessing for food which we need for sustenance.

In Islam, Animals are not killed for sport. Only for food and other forms of provision.

but u muslims consume animals heavily, which is as good as saying unnecessairly. human do not require daily meat consumption. u can consume a few times a week but everyday is not good. and muslims mass-slaughter sheep in the billions on Id ul-Adha. this is just unjustifiable cruelty.