Let them go to court to settle it,

But if they can settle it amicably it will be better.

wow

The facts are not clear...

Since B claimed that the machine was used as collateral, what was the transaction between them.
Why was the machine used as collat. And why did it take up to 9years before party B is coming forward.

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

The fact that the original owner still has the receipt of purchase is irrelevant in this case as far as I am concerned.

By reason of using the machine as collateral for 9 years without making any effort to pay back the loan it is deemed that she has lost her right of title in that item

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

Woman A will win in any court. If it is concluded to be a sale, B will be ordered to give A the receipt. , This one will not even happen because B publicly calls it collateral and allegedly has the receipt.

If it is concluded to be collateral, B will pay interest.

This is because woman B gave out the machine without any legal agreement. Whether A bought it or got it as collateral, there is no legal agreement to bar her from selling it. Also, B admits it happened 9 years ago. If it was as collateral and B wants it back, the B will pay interest for 9 years. The interest will be enough for A to compensate the buyer of the machine. It is true they did not legally agree that A will be paid interest. But B cannot have it all. B cannot call it collateral and still refuse to pay interest. B may not even provide the receipt.

The only way B can win is by claiming she leased the machine to A or that A stole it. But the same B has already said it is for collateral. If the court calls it collateral, B will pay interest. If the court calls it a sale, B will rest. A receipt would have implicated A if it is a case of theft allegation.

The hearing is incomplete.

upower123:
The woman that want to claim the sewing machine is a witch....9 years ago..it is this time that she want to claim the machine...did she wrote any agreement..if it is me I will say I did not take any machine from her...intact I don't know her

write

Scottz:
Victim A bought the machine
Nigeria happened to victim B she’s broke and hence got an idea from an adviser to take a bold step of reclaiming what doesn’t belong to her anymore because she’s got the receipt.

Nigerian courts will embarrass you of course
Victim B will win the case
Except victim A paid through bank transfer and a proof of payment is shown

Something wey happen for 2013

darling2222:
Many stories like this do happen, and one very important thing is, As I read, Vitim A is the rightful owner,but sure she will have to lose her property, because she can't provide the recept, which Vitim B claims to have
So ,the initial mistake she made was she didn't request for the recept when she bought it from Vitim B

The very important thing here now is the recept,so we shouldn't make such expensive mistake next time

Woman A should deny knowing or having anything to do with any sewing machine, since the very machine is not in her possession again and she have no receipt for it either. Case end.

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

The law is 11 years not 1 year. Thanks.

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

Since there's no evidence that shows that B transferred possessory rights to A.
A should just deny that B ever gave her any sewing machine since B is going mad.
Has B heard of the principle of laches and acquiescence ? I guess not. As she's shouting court upandan.

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

Ler her sell the machine back to her with a very crazy price that will buy such machine 100 times

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

google statute of limitation

9 years ago? Haba!

It's as simple as ABC, the one sold has seen that with the receipt on her hand, she can still claim the Machine, that's what her dirty mind tells her.

There are so many types of Justice delivery, Court Justice delivery, jungle Justice delivery and even traditional Justice delivery.

I am not an advocacy of "juju" but this is why African traditional structure is unbeatable.

Ehinjuola:

Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Only Nigeria Police would say this. Who keeps a receipt for 9 years? After 1 year, if out of warranty, toss the paper away.

Over here, they'd throw the case out. After 9 long years?

Haba!!

all these poor people matter sef. engage yourself in this one and watch your intellectual and financial capabilities dwindle. messing with a pig makes you one.

Nawa o! One can buy fairly used (second hand) machine without demanding for receipt especially when you buy it directly from the main owner.
I bought my sewing machines like that and I don't have issue

Simple

First
The seller is a troublesome person, so play mugu with him, like begging her to forget about the machine, that is a past issue

I know she will refuse your plea, then I would like to let you know that a higher authority has pass his own verdict which is the Nigeria police force, so you can advise her to stick to the decision of the police or go to court


The area landlord should rally round the buyer for necessary help in terms of finance and advice, and as far to witness

A busy judge will strike out the case on first day of hearing

Not a lawyer but maybe woman 'A' could just deny that she ever collected any sewing maching from woman 'B'. Woman 'B' may show the court a receipt but does she have any evidence that she ever gave the macchine to woman 'A'?

upower123:
The woman that want to claim the sewing machine is a witch....9 years ago..it is this time that she want to claim the machine...did she wrote any agreement..if it is me I will say I did not take any machine from her...intact I don't know her

Exactly! Oil dey your head

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

B is a fool, she's using the fact that A cannot produce receipt to drag the case. She should provide her proof of collateral....else she has no case

This kind of issue can only happen in kogi state.

Anyways, let woman A find a way to steal & destroy the receipt. EoD!

Ehinjuola:
Hello NLanders,
I got caught up with something on my neck in my neighboood recently.

There's this woman (A) who bought a sewing machine from one woman (B) 9 years ago, suddenly woman B just came from nowhere to come and claim the sewing machine that she sold years back that she only use the machine as a collateral from woman A that she didn't sell it for her.

Now the issue is Woman A has sold the sewing Machine and also insisted that if truly woman's (B) use it as collateral for how many years now she would wish if Woman B paid her back with the interest on the money which the money is way much more than money for 100 sewing machines.

Now questions is, how will I go abt it cause I happened to be one of the landlords in my area( I guess I am the youngest) and we are called to come and judge over the matter.
1. Woman's A doesn't posses the receipt of the sewing machine and as already sold the sewing machine
2. Woman's B want the machine at any cost claiming she has the receipt with her and she will use it against woman's A in court ( If the judgement didn't suite her taste in landlord meeting)


Note: They've gone to police station around early February which they've told woman's A abt the important of receipt and also let it known to woman's B that collateral shouldn't be more than a year and after that the person you borrow something from might as well claim the ownership what you use as collateral (Don't know maybe there's any law backing it though)

Abeg let it gain more audience by pushing it to front page thanks.

Hmmm nawah ooh

So OP u sef don dey go lanlord meeting to setu kuorel


God abeg pick my call na, my battery don dey low abeg God abeg

She said she said case.

Sewing machine as collateral in the past 9 years? It is very hard to believe. How much did she borrow and what was the agreement?

GreatAdvice:
This is a very simple case and anyone with half a brain should know that Woman B gave it to Woman A as collateral. It doesn't matter if its 9yrs ago or 9 days ago; Woman A needs to pay the money needed to buy a brand new machine in 2022, plus an annualised interest of 30% and severance pay for all the pain and suffering she has inflicted on Woman B. This is a very sad case, you should never sell someone's property that was handed over to you as collateral unless they default on their debt agreement.

If that's the case she need to pay the woman the accrued interest for that 9years

LET HER GO TO COURT, PROVIDED SHE HAS SAID SHE LOANED MONEY FROM THE OTHER WOMAN BEFORE GIVING HER THE MACHINE; YOU SHOULD CALCULATE THE INTEREST ON THE SAID AMOUNT USING COMPOUND INTEREST MONTHLY FOR 108MONTHS, EVEN IF THE INTEREST IS 500NIARA MONTHLY IT WOULD AMOUNT TO ATLEAST 74K PLUS THE INITIAL CAPITAL, WHICH CAN PERFECTLY REPLACE THE SAID MACHINE WITH EXTRA FOR THE OTHER WOMAN TO ENJOY SHAWARMA. JUST BE STRAIGHT FORWARD AND SUPPORT NONE OF THEM

You people should allow B take the matter to court.. No be who first call police they case.

Hmmm things dey sup ooo, judging from my own understanding, it took woman B so long to come for her property and the million dollar question is can she try this with the bank or any lending agency? The collateral could have been long gone

There's no case here

Afonjamuslim24:
Only cone headed Afonjas from the muddy sad west can be this unreasonable in their dealings with fellow humans. They think just like their Slave master, from Iragbiji who still thinks Lagos is his after so many years.

Cc: Seun, lalasticlala

Is there any agreement (btw them) If there is, No case