Blasphemy and Miss Deborah Samuel:

*An Unpopular Opinion*

“My name is Sanusi Lafiagi and I'm a Muslim. I bear witness that none has the right to be worshipped but Allāh and that Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is His Messenger. I affirm the absolute dignity and honour of our leader, Muhammad ﷺ and condemn in totality any disrespect or insult to his person.

Having said that, I've listened a dozen times to the viral audio of late Miss Deborah Samuel, a 200L student of Sheu Shagari College of Education, Sokoto, who was murdered in cold blood and set alight by fellow students on allegations of blaspheming the noble Prophet ﷺ. However, as an academic and researcher in Islamic studies, a fundamentalist Muslim, rational human being, and more importantly, father, I'm inclined to ask a few questions. The circumstances of her grue*some and barbaric m*rder have actually left a whole lot of questions.

1. Did she really, knowingly and intentionally insult the Prophet ﷺ? The viral audio indicated that she was reacting to the action of those who spam the class WhatsApp group with unnecessary messages that are outside the objectives of the group. Some of us do this when people share messages in groups specifically created to serve a purpose. In the context of her reaction to such unwarranted items being shared, can one adjudge her intention to be a deliberate act?

2. Her introductory words were, "ba(bu) abunda zai faru da mu" (nothing will happen to us). I'm inclined to assume that Miss Deborah was reacting to a threat of attack by a section of her colleagues. Could it be that someone threatened her for condemning what was being shared in the group? By sharing only her reactionary voice note, is someone hiding something? Actions and reactions, says Isaac Newton, are equal and opposite. What was said to Miss Deborah to warrant her rebuffing the threat and saying, "no evil shall befall us? Under this circumstance, can she accused of deliberately insulting the Prophet ﷺ?

3. Her reaction is also likely to have been triggered not by someone simply saying, "we are sharing quotes from the Prophet ﷺ" but probably by an insult to her faith. We know how charged the average northerner becomes when a non-Muslim condemns sharing messages with verses of the Qur'ān or texts of the Hadīth. Could it be that someone denigrated her faith and she retorted with her outburst? Or did anyone ridicule her and she overreacted? There's a possibility that whoever Miss Deborah was reacting to had passed an insult on her, which aggravated her anger. Again, we need details of what was exchanged prior to her comments!

4. Do her statements, "manzon Allāh din me, an zo ana min bura uba" constitute an insult to the Prophet ﷺ, let alone being a blasphemy in such a context? Before this, she had referred to the unnecessary things being shared in the group as "abubuwan banza" (rubbish things), which, irrespective of its contents are "rubbishes" in the context of the group's objectives and discusses. I've spoken to quite a few of my northern friends and we seem to agree on her comments being a rebuff and retort of spamming of the group and whatever threats or insults that were hurled at her prior to her reaction rather than an insult to the Prophet ﷺ!

5. Assuming that her statements interpret as insult to the Prophet ﷺ, is every word of insult to the Prophet ﷺ irrespective of gravity considered as blasphemous and deserving of the death penalty? Do scholars of Islām categorise all insulting words against the Prophet ﷺ under the same heading? Do they all carry equal punishment? What constitutes blasphemy under the Sharī'ah? This is a serious question for Muslim law practitioners and judges.

These are a few of the questions that have preoccupied since yesterday and I sincerely hope that someone is able to answer them satisfactorily.

Once again, I affirm that the honour of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ is SACROSANCT and must be protected.

I affirm that the Sharī'ah does NOT condone mob action against anyone.

I affirm that human life is SACRED and NO individual has the right to take it unjustly.

I affirm that in the case of established blasphemy against the Prophet ﷺ, only a judge can convict and execute the culprit...”

COPIED.

Let me educate you:

Your laws should guide only those who believe in it and should have no effect on those who doesn't.

Why? If we began to kill all blasphemous persons in all religion, nobody will be alive.


And don't be surprised when those affected there retaliates!

u people are just hypocrites.....it's only when issues like this happen u will start saying the murderers are not practicing Islam.

yet your Islam allows Christians to be called enemy of Islam or infidels....u people even hate md are against Christians more than sango, obatala, worshippers, or any other religion....u hardly ever have problem with atheists seff..

your Islam might say it is wrong to kill...but still allows violence against infidels/Christians...itsin your Quran unless you want to deny it...1

your islam allows you do whatever you can in your power to ensure Islam rules in the location you reside....this is easily translated to violence just as bokoharam is doing..

this whole problem started with your prophet justifying the killing of thousands of people in the name of they attacked him first in medina ..

if he had taken his gospel elsewhere, perhaps your religion would have truly been peaceful and his followers would never result to killing your fellow man just because you feel offended...

your religion was sustained with violence thousands of years ago.... your followers feel justified to sustain it witj violence thousands of years after.... it's sad...

Why must we kill in the name of gods who can fight for themselves prophet Muhammad S.A.W if he was alive would rather convince her ( Deborah) and gradually make her believe in his faith than resorting to kill her. This barbaric and animalistic behaviours make me hate Islam as a religion

Thank you for being objective in analysing the matter at hand


Oga is this not clear even to the blind?

This is nothing but pure undilluted barbarism. Savage.

This is the reason whiteman is continuously above Blackman.

Putting "fundamentalist Muslim" and "rational human" in the same statement is absurd. It's like putting "holy man" and "adulterer" to describe the same person.

VeeVeeMyLuv:
Thank you for being objective in analysing the matter at hand


Oga is this not clear even to the blind?

This is nothing but pure undilluted barbarism. Savage.

This is the reason whiteman is continuously above Blackman.

I think you are the only one that has read before commenting, I am not the author, I only COPIED it from Facebook, every other person that commented before you were able to spew their trash, thank you.

No justification