I can see the butt hurt losers have created another thread to lie on the existence of Jesus after they got a sound trouncing on this thread;

https://www.nairaland.com/7174898/how-realized-jesus-fraud

1. Can they explain who Josephus Flavius (a first century Jewish historian) wrote about in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews? Please they should explain who Jesus Christ of Nazareth the brother of James is. (Screenshot 1)

2. Can they explain to us who Nero blamed for the great fire that ravaged Rome? (Screenshot 3)

3. Do these clowns suddenly know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

You can only fool those who know next to nothing on the history of their faith.

Cc: NNTR, MaxinDHouse, Budaatum

MaxInDHouse:

My Muslim friend, you need to be sincere with yourself when diving into this type of issues.
I know you're a Muslim and you people are easily manipulated without you suspecting a single thing.

He's not one of your gullible followers you can easily deceive. His wants to find out the truth by himself which is the best way to know the truth and not just believing your deceit like your gullible followers do

OkCornel:
I can see the butt hurt losers have created another thread to lie on the existence of Jesus after they got a sound trouncing on this thread;

https://www.nairaland.com/7174898/how-realized-jesus-fraud

1. Can they explain who Josephus Flavius (a first century Jewish historian) wrote about in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews? Please they should explain who Jesus Christ of Nazareth the brother of James is. (Screenshot 1)

2. Can they explain to us who Nero blamed for the great fire that ravaged Rome? (Screenshot 3)

3. Do these clowns suddenly know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

You can only fool those who know next to nothing on the history of their faith.

Cc: NNTR, MaxinDHouse, Budaatum

The major issue is not about the existence of Jesus but acceptance of his teachings in any human society.
Jesus himself was never accepted among the Jews due to his teachings but as for whether he was a real historical figure even the Jews themselves can't deny it!

MaxInDHouse:


The major issue is not about the existence of Jesus but acceptance of his teachings in any human society.
Jesus himself was never accepted among the Jews due to his teachings but as for whether he was a real historical figure even the Jews themselves can't deny it!

Exactly at the bolded!
The creators of this thread need to be clear on what their problem is.

The existence of Jesus? or the teachings of Jesus? or both...

They seem confused

OkCornel:

Exactly at the bolded!
The creators of this thread need to be clear on what their problem is.
The existence of Jesus? or the teachings of Jesus? or both...
They seem confused

From inception light and darkness has always been enemies, so when the light finally comes to visit the earth mankind rejected him because their works are evil {John 3:19} many prefer dancing to the name of celebrities Jesus rejected such fame since it will not deepen his teachings in the minds of people who needs it but Satan and his demons knows very well that many will easily be carried away by the fame so they wanted to complicate things for Jesus {Luke 4:41} but they succeeded in turning Jesus into a celebrity only to be celebrated for fame and not for his teachings! Matthew 7:21-23

So if some now wants to bury Jesus' history today we know that this is not their first time, agents of darkness has been fighting this battle for long {Act 4:18; 5:28} but they will always fail Jesus' case can never be buried or swept under the carpet! Matthew 16:18

MaxInDHouse:


The major issue is not about the existence of Jesus but acceptance of his teachings in any human society.

I'd say checking if, and showing that, what Jesus taught is true and valid (where it is), is the major issue, and learning from it is much more important than acceptance. And the lack of 'acceptance' is due to our woe, and it is us who must seek for forgiveness because if what we were peddling were worth it many would even pay for its acceptance.

If there is Power in this Jesus, and if it is shown by it's powerful manifestation in those who have accepted and understood his teachings, human society would gladly enlighten their minds with it and do.

Rather that claim the tree is in their eyes, I should first prune the forest in my eyes, is my point.

Let me lash you seriously so that you'll know that you are the BIG looser.

1. Flavius Josephus: Born: 37 or 38 Jerusalem Israel - So he never meet Jesus and he wrote his book some decades later.

2. He was the military leader in Judea who lead the resistance against the Romans, under the command of the future emperor Vespasian, arrived in Galilee in the spring of ad 67 and quickly broke the Jewish resistance in the north.

3. After Flavius Josephus was defeated he surrendered to the Romans to save himself and switched sides to the Romans and emperor Vespasian liked him and gave him a accommodation in emperor Vespasian's palace in Rome

4. What is claimed he wrote about Jesus Christ was not from Flavius Josephus, as he normally gives full details of the people he writes about. As a Jew he would have clearly explained what Christ means as Christ is not a Jewish word. So it's either he was made to write by it the Romans or someone else added Jesus Christ in his book

5. Flavius Josephu aso mentioned other Jesuses too:First of these to discuss is Jesus Ben
Ananias
Jesus Ben Ananias was a prophet in
the 60s AD who was famous for prophesying
the destruction of the temple the
destruction of the temple happened in
the year 70 but this Jesus according to
Josephus was talking about its
destruction for almost eight years prior
the Jewish leaders of Jerusalem turned
him over to the Romans who tortured him
but he was declared a madman and
released.

Other Jesuses mentioned by Josephus include people
like Jesus son of Elias and Jesus the
brother of John, both of these Jesus's were priests there
was also another Jesus, Jesus son of Damneus

You will find more information here on Flavius Josephus writings:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:
I can see the butt hurt losers have created another thread to lie on the existence of Jesus after they got a sound trouncing on this thread;

https://www.nairaland.com/7174898/how-realized-jesus-fraud

1. Can they explain who Josephus Flavius (a first century Jewish historian) wrote about in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews? Please they should explain who Jesus Christ of Nazareth the brother of James is. (Screenshot 1)

2. Can they explain to us who Nero blamed for the great fire that ravaged Rome? (Screenshot 3)

3. Do these clowns suddenly know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves?

You can only fool those who know next to nothing on the history of their faith.

Cc: NNTR, MaxinDHouse, Budaatum

MindHacker9009:
Let me lash you seriously so that you'll know that you are the BIG looser.

1. Flavius Josephus: Born: 37 or 38 Jerusalem Israel - So he never meet Jesus and he wrote his book some decades later.

2. He was the military leader in Judea who lead the resistance against the Romans, under the command of the future emperor Vespasian, arrived in Galilee in the spring of ad 67 and quickly broke the Jewish resistance in the north.

3. After he was defeated he surrendered to the Romans to save himself and switched side to the Romans and emperor Vespasian like him and gave him a accommodation in emperor Vespasian's palace in Rome

4. What is claimed he wrote about Jesus Christ was not from Flavius Josephus, as he normally gives full details of the people he writes about. As a Jew he would have clearly explained what Christ means as Christ is not a Jewish word. So it's either he was made to write by it the Romans or someone else added Jesus Christ in his book

5. Flavius Josephu aso mentioned other Jesuses too:First of these to discuss is Jesus Ben
Ananias
Jesus Ben Ananias was a prophet in
the 60s AD who was famous for prophesying
the destruction of the temple the
destruction of the temple happened in
the year 70 but this Jesus according to
Josephus was talking about its
destruction for almost eight years prior
the Jewish leaders of Jerusalem turned
him over to the Romans who tortured him
but he was declared a madman and
released.

Other Jesuses mentioned by Josephus include people
like Jesus son of Elias and Jesus the
brother of John, both of these Jesus's were priests there
was also another Jesus, Jesus son of Damneus

You will find more information here on Flavius Josephus writings:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

I was expecting an intelligent response, not deflections and appeals to emotional sentiments.

1. Josephus Flavius is a first century Jewish historian whose works are widely accepted as authentic by history scholars all around the world. So cry me a river.

2. I specifically asked about Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews (no one can dispute the authenticity of this historical account). I don't give a damn about the other Jesuses. The one I've circled in the screenshot is the Jesus of the New Testament. Prove otherwise.

3. Kindly explain to us who Emperor Nero blamed for the great fire of Rome, and why he ordered Apostle Paul and Peter to be executed. Oh wait...lemme guess, Nero is fake too? Apostle Peter and Paul never existed hmmm?

4. The logic that Josephus not meeting Jesus invalidates his work is a laughable thought process. I guess all historians' works should be treated as trash since they were not there to witness the events they've written in their books too.

I'm awaiting intelligent replies, not deflections and appeals to emotions. Thank you.

OkCornel:


I was expecting an intelligent response, not deflections and appeals to emotional sentiments.

1. Josephus Flavius is a first century Jewish historian whose works are widely accepted as authentic by history scholars all around the world. So cry me a river.

2. I specifically asked about Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews (no one can dispute the authenticity of this historical account). I don't give a damn about the other Jesuses. The one I've circled in the screenshot is the Jesus of the New Testament. Prove otherwise.

3. Kindly explain to us who Emperor Nero blamed for the great fire of Rome, and why he ordered Apostle Paul and Peter to be executed. Oh wait...lemme guess, Nero is fake too? Apostle Peter and Paul never existed hmmm?

4. The logic that Josephus not meeting Jesus invalidates his work is a laughable thought process. I guess all historians' works should be treated as trash since they were not there to witness the events they've written in their books too.

I'm awaiting intelligent replies, not deflections and appeals to emotions. Thank you.

This is really hilarious!

So i need to live during the days of Herbert McCauley before i can say something true about him, shey?

MaxInDHouse:


This is really hilarious!

So i need to live during the days of Herbert McCauley before i can say something true about him, shey?

Very hilarious I tell you.

I wonder if these dudes take their time to think through their replies.

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:


I was expecting an intelligent response, not deflections and appeals to emotional sentiments.

1. Josephus Flavius is a first century Jewish historian whose works are widely accepted as authentic by history scholars all around the world. So cry me a river.

2. I specifically asked about Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 of the Antiquity of the Jews (no one can dispute the authenticity of this historical account). I don't give a damn about the other Jesuses. The one I've circled in the screenshot is the Jesus of the New Testament. Prove otherwise.

3. Kindly explain to us who Emperor Nero blamed for the great fire of Rome, and why he ordered Apostle Paul and Peter to be executed. Oh wait...lemme guess, Nero is fake too? Apostle Peter and Paul never existed hmmm?

4. The logic that Josephus not meeting Jesus invalidates his work is a laughable thought process. I guess all historians' works should be treated as trash since they were not there to witness the events they've written in their books too.

I'm awaiting intelligent replies, not deflections and appeals to emotions. Thank you.

OkCornel:

Very hilarious I tell you.
I wonder if these dudes take their time to think through their replies.

NO OK, let's ask him, if my father, mother, aunties, uncles, grandma and grandpa all lived as contemporaries of Herbert McCauley won't i have the truth about him?

I only knew Awólọ́wọ̀ slightly because i enjoyed his free education program but my dad was an Awoist (the name his loyalists call themselves)
Even i know more than Wikipedia regarding Jeremiah Ọbáfẹ́mi Oyèníyì Awólọ́wọ̀.

Wikimedia says he's from Ìkẹ́nẹ́ whereas his father is from Ìliṣàn (not Ìkẹ́nẹ́) so how did i know better than those who composed the Wikipedia?
Well i have someone who knew Awólọ́wọ̀ inside out!

MindHacker9009:
Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius writing an Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so there his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

Story, story, story...

Show us clear cut evidences Josephus Flavius' work is a forgery. I want evidences, not appeals to emotions and sentiments.

Your argument is with the first century Jewish historian - Josephus Flavius, and all the history scholars who have accepted the work as valid and authentic.

Jesus Christ of Nazareth, brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews existed. Argue with the Jews, since you know their history better than them!


Let's go by your logic on Josephus not being born in Jesus' time and apply same on other historical texts. Every other historian works should be thrown into the gutter since they were not witnesses to the events they wrote in their books

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:


Story, story, story...

Show us clear cut evidences Josephus Flavius' work is a forgery. I want evidences, not appeals to emotions and sentiments.

Your argument is with the first century Jewish historian - Josephus Flavius, and all the history scholars who have accepted the work as valid and authentic.

Jesus Christ of Nazareth, brother of James in Chapter 9, Book 20 - Antiquity of the Jews existed. Argue with the Jews, since you know their history better than them!


Let's go by your logic on Josephus not being born in Jesus' time and apply same on other historical texts. Every other historian works should be thrown into the gutter since they were not witnesses to the events they wrote in their books

MindHacker9009:
I have given you an intelligent reply already here is is again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

Bros, my question is simple. Is Josephus Flavius' history literature on the Jews a forgery? Yes or No.

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:

Bros, my question is simple. Is Josephus Flavius' history literature on the Jews a forgery? Yes or No.

MindHacker9009:
Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

This is laughable walahi. You obviously seem to know more than all the history scholars around the world.

Now let's put this into perspective. Is Josephus Flavius literature ON THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS authentic? Yes or No.

Let us bring out your bias on Jesus Christ of Nazareth, brother of James.

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:


This is laughable walahi. You obviously seem to know more than all the history scholars around the world.

Now let's put this into perspective. Is Josephus Flavius literature ON THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS authentic? Yes or No.

Let us bring out your bias on Jesus Christ of Nazareth, brother of James.

MindHacker9009:
Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

Lmao, you can't give an answer on whether Josephus literature on THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS is authentic or not.

It would only expose your bias, and brings you up short against other seasoned historians who have long accepted the authenticity of his work.

All hail Mindhacker9009, the one who knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves.

Who knows, perhaps later on...we would see an European claiming he knows the history of the Yorubas better than the Yorubas themselves.
Beautiful logic, absolutely beautiful...

Most Jews know that Josephus Flavius was a traitor working for the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:


Lmao, you can't give an answer on whether Josephus literature on THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS is authentic or not.

It would only expose your bias, and brings you up short against other seasoned historians who have long accepted the authenticity of his work.

All hail Mindhacker9009, the one who knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves.

Who knows, perhaps later on...we would see an European claiming he knows the history of the Yorubas better than the Yorubas themselves.
Beautiful logic, absolutely beautiful...

According to a "brilliant" logic here, the historian has to be alive to witness events before his work can pass as valid

On this premise, the likes of Bhudda never lived too. He's a fiction.

Most intelligent thing I've witnessed today

MindHacker9009:
Most Jews know that Josephus Flavius was a traitor working for the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

A simple yes or no answer to my question on Josephus' literature on THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS.

You keep focusing on the Jesus part which already shows clear bias. You can't say anything on the other part of Josephus' works, but only the Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James is your problem.

Thanks for reinforcing your bias and dodging the question.

Oya, copy and paste your previous answer and dodge the real question asked.

Cc: MaxinDhouse, budaatum, NNTR

Question of the day, do Jewish historians unanimously deny the existence of Jesus Christ?

Let's await the lies from Nigerians who know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves

What a comedy show

For history to be authentic you need an eye witness account passed down to others. In the case of Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ it is fake as he was not born then and he was a traitor to his own people and used by the Roman empire to create Chritianity.

OkCornel:
According to a "brilliant" logic here, the historian has to be alive to witness events before his work can pass as valid

On this premise, the likes of Bhudda never lived too. He's a fiction.

Most intelligent thing I've witnessed today

Most Jews know that Josephus Flavius was a traitor working for the Roman Empire.

Josephus Flavius' writing on Jesus Christ is fake and was influenced by the Roman empire who captured and asked him to write a histroy on the Jews.

I have given you an intelligent reply already here is it again below:

Josephus Flavius was a traitor to the Jews as he was more concerned about saving his own life so he was an easy tool to be used by the Roman Empire to write about Jesus Christ.

Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ is fake as Josephus Flavius being a Jew from a priestly family would have explained what Christ is as Christ is not a Jewish word. So the truth is that you are the one who is not intelligent.

Better for you to listen to the intellectual analysis of Josephus Flavius writing about Jesus Christ so that you would know that what he wrote about Jesus Christ is not authentic.

Even today with all the technology there is still fake news floating about. The only authentic history accounts are eye witness accounts of historical events.

Josephus Flavius was not born during the supposed time of Jesus Christ so his account is 100% not authentic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QqGRjpGbuA


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQzZPGBMmVc

OkCornel:


A simple yes or no answer to my question on Josephus' literature on THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS.

You keep focusing on the Jesus part which already shows clear bias. You can't say anything on the other part of Josephus' works, but only the Jesus Christ of Nazareth, the brother of James is your problem.

Thanks for reinforcing your bias and dodging the question.

Oya, copy and paste your previous answer and dodge the real question asked.

Cc: MaxinDhouse, budaatum, NNTR

OkCornel:
Question of the day, do Jewish historians unanimously deny the existence of Jesus Christ?

Let's await the lies from Nigerians who know the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves

What a comedy show

You're now his number 2 enemy on this forum for disgracing him with all his chicken brain!

You are the one with a chicken brain if not you'll know that after Josephus Flavius was captured by the Roman empire he was doing all he could to save his own life and the Jews know him as a traitor.

MaxInDHouse:

You're now his number 2 enemy on this forum for disgracing him with all his chicken brain!

MindHacker9009:
For history to be authentic you need an eye witness account passed down to others. In the case of Josephus Flavius writing on Jesus Christ it is fake as he was not born then and he was a traitor to his own people and used by the Roman empire to create Chritianity.

All I see here are emotional sentiments. So it was not the council in Nicea that created Jesus according to your OP. It is now Josephus Flavius abi?

I can also see you have been unusually quiet about who Nero blamed for the great fire of Rome, and why Apostle Paul and Peter were executed.

I'm really enjoying this circus show you're putting up here.

So if the "Roman Empire" created Jesus, why did Nero persecute and kill Christians for the great fire that ravaged Rome?

Tsk tsk tsk... critical thinking

Cc: NNTR Budaatum MaxinDHouse

MindHacker9009:
You are the one with a chicken brain if not you'll know that after Josephus Flavius was captured by the Roman empire he was doing all he could to save his own life and the Jews know him as a traitor.

So flavius Josephus lied shey?

You sabi too much!

MaxInDHouse:


So flavius Josephus lied shey?

You sabi too much!

E sabi pass Josephus Flavius and other Jewish historians.

He knows the history of the Jews better than the Jews themselves

What's important here is that Jesus Christ is a creation of the Roman empire. The book of Josephus Flavius was written under the control of the Roman empire so their emperors over the years were able to add anything they like to it. As an example, more recently King James did not agree with the Catholic church on an action he wanted to take, so what did he do? He wrote his own the King James Bible.

OkCornel:


All I see here are emotional sentiments. So it was not the council in Nicea that created Jesus according to your OP. It is now Josephus Flavius abi?

I can also see you have been unusually quiet about who Nero blamed for the great fire of Rome, and why Apostle Paul and Peter were executed.

I'm really enjoying this circus show you're putting up here.

So if the "Roman Empire" created Jesus, why did Nero persecute and kill Christians for the great fire that ravaged Rome?

Tsk tsk tsk... critical thinking

Cc: NNTR Budaatum MaxinDHouse

MindHacker9009:
What's important here is that Jesus Christ is a creation of the Roman empire. The book of Josephus Flavius was written under the control of the Roman empire so their emperors over the years were able to add anything they like to it. As an example, more recently King James did not agree with the Catholic church on an action he wanted to take, so what did he do? He wrote his own version of the King James Bible.

Politics was the problem England had with Rome but religious wise they are both on the same page Sir!