mamagee3:
Why would someone do horrible things to you so you would block them?

It might be because they dislike one, or are paying one back for being horrible to them, or they are just wicked, or they may be planning to do even more horrible things to one and you do not wish to give them the opportunity to.

It's better than killing them, I guess.

budaatum:


It might be because they dislike one, or are paying one back for being horrible to them, or they are just wicked, or they may be planning to do even more horrible things to one and you do not wish to give them the opportunity to.

It's better than killing them, I guess.

whic one is they dislike ONE or paying ONE back or do more horrible things to ONE? Na only ONE give thwm the problem? What of TWO, THREE, TEN etc?

Na ONE start the numbers no mean say na him go carry all the problems bros

mamagee3:
Why would someone do horrible things to you so you would block them?

Ask your booboo. He will give you his reasons for doing it.

One thing I dislike lately, you don't do things deliberately just to satisfy your ego with the expectations of apologizing later.

It's a big no to me

budaatum:


It might be because they dislike one, or are paying one back for being horrible to them, or they are just wicked, or they may be planning to do even more horrible things to one and you do not wish to give them the opportunity to.

It's better than killing them, I guess.

The problem is we are all selfish when it comes to decision making. The consideration of others are not that valued

Papichulostunne:
whic one is they dislike ONE or paying ONE back or do more horrible things to ONE? Na only ONE give thwm the problem? What of TWO, THREE, TEN etc?

Na ONE start the numbers no mean say na him go carry all the problems bros

I agree o. Sometimes one never give them any problem at all, so it's probably better one just move block instead of one carrying their problem for thwm.

helinues:


The problem is we are all selfish when it comes to decision making. The consideration of others are not that valued

No sir, the problem is not "we". In fact, there is no "we", yet

The problem is one. It is one who is selfish when it comes to decision making, and to be honest, some "consideration of others" have no value.

If one put value into one's own consideration, one would value the consideration others put into theirs if they have put value into theirs

Then, perhaps, "we".

budaatum:


No sir, the problem is not "we". In fact, there is no "we", yet

The problem is one. It is one who is selfish when it comes to decision making, and to be honest, some "consideration of others" have no value.

If one put value into one's own consideration, one would value the consideration others put into theirs if they have put value into theirs

Then, perhaps, "we".

Considering we grew up from different backgrounds, exposed to different things, the one's might be limited to some values

helinues:


Considering we grew up from different backgrounds, exposed to different things, the one's might be limited to some values

Or the we's might be insufficiently exposed and therefore "might be limited to some values".

The outcome of the decision made still determines value.