This is a question that should be thought about. If nature is such a phenomenon that is independent and self- sustainable, then should nature not provide women with beauty routines?

These days, with the skyrocketing prices of beauty. products, it seems as though only the rich can be beautiful. One would only wonder what women without enough resources or assessability to these products will do.
According to the research done by the Dysh editorial on the topic 'beauty products are more expensive than ever', beauty prices are rising at the fastest rate in ten years, and this is a result of several factors stated in the article.

Also, it was stated with valid proof that women suffer more economic crises than men. Even with the biological nature of women, it is almost as if it was designed for women to be in crisis monetarily. And with other aspects to cater for, such as budgeting for materials for the monthly menstrual periods and childbearing, it is a wonder if a disadvantaged woman should search for beauty in these glorified expensive beauty products, standards and routines.

Now, the questions are, are there any outrageous consequences of not following a beauty routine?
Should there not be something pocket friendly, natural, yet effective that could substitute for expensive products?
Since it is embedded in the woman's nature to quest for beauty, how do the disadvantaged deal with beauty? And, is there any surety that these products are not harmful?

Read the full article on Dyshus webpage(link in bio)

Join us on our black skin matters group let's talk about it🙂