The secret relationship between Blacks and Jews is that Blacks enslaved most of the world and Jews bought slaves from them. Blacks are the biggest cross dressers and pedophiles and Jews help cover it up. We shall explore and expose this phenomenon in this post.

a religious person will do what he is told no matter what is right, a spiritual person will do whats right no matter what he's told..

Long after it seemed the issue of Barack Obama’s birthplace was no longer an issue, thanks to his half-brother, the topic is back in the news again.

Malik Obama tweeted a “copy” of what he claims is a valid birth certificate proving that his half-brother was born not in the USA, but in Mombasa, Kenya.

Obama an African and his mother Ann Durham is a Jew.

For a staunch Roman Catholic, President –Elect Joe Biden has a remarkably Jewish family.

All three of his children married Jewish spouses. And the baby grandson that he cradled in his arms after his victory speech last week is halachically Jewish, as are the children of his late son Beau.

Pres. Joe Biden is Jewish and his whole family is Jewish..

Male Fraud

Hypocrites are worse than disbelievers

The Dragon and the beast revealed

Think of the strategy of Legions which etymologically means countless, numerous and many. When you have a few Noble families that are of one bloodline particularly Black skin, who rule over an alamagated group of many nations and phenotypes, they then devise a system, White Supremacy, as a cover for them. A wall or shield to protect them from direct attack by giving the appearance of power unto the Legionnaires, and thus rule from behind the throne. Blackbeard Mirage, Bobbi Hemmitt, others and myself know that the so called Whiteman does not rule the world but it's made to appear so. France does not rule those West African nations it's made to look like they do. When the Hebrews and Moors stopped ruling over Europe they conceded to White take over. They could have easily regrouped and took back over, or is that what really happened? Did the Hebrews and Moors really lose power or did they just concede to a system of Legions? These Europeans of color were extremely wicked and extremely deceitful. Even though some of them were righteous they were in the minority and
an overwhelming majority of nobles families of color were enslavers, sodomites, prostitutes, witches, warlocks and just evil in general. This rivalry between good and evil is what spawned the evil ones to give power unto the white legions in order to prevent it from falling into the righteous hands. The fear was karma, justice and retaliation for the wickedness that they had done. The Stewart family were slave traders and they owned the African Trading Company which held slaves in the colonies. When they began to fall off these Stewarts fled to other countries around the world.

My Dottie who is a De France and bears the royal name of the house of Merovingian, I asked him why did we loss power in Europe? And my uncle said that we married too many White women. For a while I accepted this explanation because I was under the assumption that Hebrews were originally black. Yet based upon the Egyptian description of Hebrews and Semitic people being brown, the Fayum Portraits and the portraits of the European Nobility showing that an overwhelming number of them were light skin, I reconfigured my thinking. What if the Hebrews were brown and the Moors being black then the mixing occurred not with whites but with blacks which changed the appearance of the Hebrews. Most of the whites were migrants from Central Asia and Russia who had no urban civilization. There would have been no incentive in the beginning to form marriages with people that were mostly servants to the Hebrew Edomite ruled Roman Empire that was mostly brown skin. The Franks, Germans, Dutch, Italians, Silicians,
Spheraic Jews, Greeks, Scotts, English and Irish were mostly swarthy which is brown skin. The introduction of the Moors would have brought a powerful and wealthy group of blacks into Europe. And this is where the mixing occurred and it was detrimental to the Hebrews that mixed heavily with the Gentile nations of blacks for it took them away from their God. And this coupled with the fact that the Roman Empire of Hebrew Edomites already worshiped the gods of Egypt and the Spheraic Jews were Edomites who worshipped the Babylonian Talmud.

What's the secret relationship between Blacks and Jews?

Jews masks themselves as regular white people who help evil Blacks by committing racist hoaxes in order to keep a divide the two can exploit. It's called Freemasonry.

Male Fraud

Dec. 14, 2020 -- Kizzmekia Corbett, PhD, is among the National Institutes  of Health scientists working directly to develop and produce the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine.

She is also an African American woman, who has been praised by top infectious disease experts for her role in the vaccine’s development. Corbett is the National Institute of Health's lead scientist for coronavirus vaccine research.






Nigerian Doctor, Onyema Ogbuagbu, Helped Develop COVID-19 Vaccine

Danielle Sanders, Interim Managing Editor

8 months ago

Dr. Onyema Ogbuagbu is a member of the team that helped develop the COVID-19 vaccine for Pfizer. Dr. Onyema Ogbuagbu is an Infectious Disease Specialist at the Yale School of Medicine.



The Jewish African Pandemic

The Jewish African Atlantic Slave Trade


Jews have always conspired with blacks for great evils done unto humanity and they have not stopped.

Covert narcissist

Slavery existed long before the Atlantic slave trade and was practiced by various civilizations around the world. Therefore, it is misleading to solely attribute the relationship between Blacks and Jews to this particular historical period.

HarshBitterTrut:
a religious person will do what he is told no matter what is right, a spiritual person will do whats right no matter what he's told..

honesttalk21:
Slavery existed long before the Atlantic slave trade and was practiced by various civilizations around the world. Therefore, it is misleading to solely attribute the relationship between Blacks and Jews to this particular historical period.

Yes slavery did exist around the world with exception of Europe my ancestors had no slaves..Yet the Atlantic Slave Trade was all Africans and Jews coming to buy and trade amongst themselves.

Don't be so certain or feel Europe was an exclusion.
Slavery in ancient Europe was not primarily based on racial distinctions. Slavery in this region was largely an outcome of war, as individuals captured during conflicts were often enslaved. These slaves were considered property and were bought, sold, and owned by individuals and households. Slavery provided an essential labor force that contributed to the functioning of ancient European societies, allowing for the expansion of agriculture, mining, and domestic work.

In ancient Greece, slavery was a fundamental aspect of their society. Slaves, known as douloi, were owned by both individuals and the city-state itself. These slaves performed a wide range of tasks including agricultural work, household chores, and even serving in the military. The concept of slavery in ancient Greece was intertwined with notions of citizenship, as slaves were considered property and lacked many of the rights granted to citizens. However, it is important to note that not all ancient Greeks were in favor of slavery, and some philosophers like Aristotle even questioned its ethical implications.

The Roman Empire also heavily relied on slavery as it expanded and consolidated its power across Europe. Slaves, known as servus, were used in various aspects of Roman society such as agriculture, construction, and entertainment. Slavery was an important component of the Roman economy, allowing for the production of surplus goods and the accumulation of wealth by the elite. Although conditions for slaves varied, with some being treated relatively well while others suffered harshly, there was no doubt that their labor was essential for the functioning of Roman society.

EnvyandHate:



Yes slavery did exist around the world with exception of Europe my ancestors had no slaves..Yet the Atlantic Slave Trade was all Africans and Jews coming to buy and trade amongst themselves.

honesttalk21:


Don't be so certain or feel Europe was an exclusion.
Slavery in ancient Europe was not primarily based on racial distinctions. Slavery in this region was largely an outcome of war, as individuals captured during conflicts were often enslaved. These slaves were considered property and were bought, sold, and owned by individuals and households. Slavery provided an essential labor force that contributed to the functioning of ancient European societies, allowing for the expansion of agriculture, mining, and domestic work.

In ancient Greece, slavery was a fundamental aspect of their society. Slaves, known as douloi, were owned by both individuals and the city-state itself. These slaves performed a wide range of tasks including agricultural work, household chores, and even serving in the military. The concept of slavery in ancient Greece was intertwined with notions of citizenship, as slaves were considered property and lacked many of the rights granted to citizens. However, it is important to note that not all ancient Greeks were in favor of slavery, and some philosophers like Aristotle even questioned its ethical implications.

The Roman Empire also heavily relied on slavery as it expanded and consolidated its power across Europe. Slaves, known as servus, were used in various aspects of Roman society such as agriculture, construction, and entertainment. Slavery was an important component of the Roman economy, allowing for the production of surplus goods and the accumulation of wealth by the elite. Although conditions for slaves varied, with some being treated relatively well while others suffered harshly, there was no doubt that their labor was essential for the functioning of Roman society.

Greece and Rome were not Europe they are Mediterranean kingdoms and empires. My forefathers the Franks built Europe and they had serfs but no slaves. And prisoners of war were made to perform forced labor it's considered humane than just killing them all. The concept is simple, war costs in lives and property so the captured enemy owes a debt he must repay.


Lastly the Romans were not true Christians they kept their pagan practices even after conversion. My ancestors the Franks were true Christians and treated people under their rule as Christians. At one point my ancestors dynasty the Merovingian even tolerated pagans as long as the Salic Law was obeyed.

Sometimes straight off killing may be better than the horrors of forced labor. Pretty lame excuse for labour though it is excused that all is fair in love and war.
The Brown Race consisted of a joint Mediterranean-Hamite-Semite grouping of ancestrally related peoples, into which Elliot Smith included the Proto-Egyptians.

EnvyandHate:



Greece and Rome were not Europe they are Mediterranean kingdoms and empires. My forefathers the Franks built Europe and they had serfs but no slaves. And prisoners of war were made to perform forced labor it's considered humane than just killing them all. The concept is simple, war costs in lives and property so the captured enemy owes a debt he must repay.


Lastly the Romans were not true Christians they kept their pagan practices even after conversion. My ancestors the Franks were true Christians and treated people under their rule as Christians. At one point my ancestors dynasty the Merovingian even tolerated pagans as long as the Salic Law was obeyed.

As the Franks expanded their territory and established their dominance in Europe, they often took captives from conquered peoples as slaves. Slavery became a common practice within Frankish society, and slaves were used for various purposes such as labor, concubinage, and even as warriors. The Franks' reliance on slaves not only helped to build their empire but also perpetuated the institution of slavery in medieval Europe.

The Franks played a crucial role in spreading the institution of slavery to other parts of Europe. Through their conquests and subsequent establishment of feudalism, the Franks introduced a hierarchical system of social organization that relied heavily on the presence of slaves.

As the Franks converted to Christianity, the Franks began to view the enslavement of fellow Christians as immoral. This led to the distinction between "Christian" and "non-Christian" slaves, with the former often being treated more leniently. However, this distinction did not eliminate the institution of slavery altogether, but rather served to justify and perpetuate it through religious doctrine. Ultimately, the Franks' integration of Christianity into their social fabric had both positive and negative implications for the institution of slavery.

EnvyandHate:



Greece and Rome were not Europe they are Mediterranean kingdoms and empires. My forefathers the Franks built Europe and they had serfs but no slaves. And prisoners of war were made to perform forced labor it's considered humane than just killing them all. The concept is simple, war costs in lives and property so the captured enemy owes a debt he must repay.


Lastly the Romans were not true Christians they kept their pagan practices even after conversion. My ancestors the Franks were true Christians and treated people under their rule as Christians. At one point my ancestors dynasty the Merovingian even tolerated pagans as long as the Salic Law was obeyed.

honesttalk21:
Sometimes straight off killing may be better than the horrors of forced labor. Pretty lame excuse for labour though it is excused that all is fair in love and war.
The Brown Race consisted of a joint Mediterranean-Hamite-Semite grouping of ancestrally related peoples, into which Elliot Smith included the Proto-Egyptians.

Well if another country attacks yours and is defeated yet they took thousands of lives and destroyed untold amount of property, then someone has to pay. Prisoners of war were put to work to recoup war damages. Usually the nobles demanded forced labor and even if the King wanted he couldn't allow the captured enemy go Scott Free. All is fair in war.


The Brown race is separate of any black or white race. Noah's sons in order, Yapeth white race, Shem brown race and Ham black race. Ham is the youngest and the least developed. All this melanin theory is pseudoscience. The Into Africa Theory is more plausible as Asia has the oldest civilization, language and diversity.

honesttalk21:
As the Franks expanded their territory and established their dominance in Europe, they often took captives from conquered peoples as slaves. Slavery became a common practice within Frankish society, and slaves were used for various purposes such as labor, concubinage, and even as warriors. The Franks' reliance on slaves not only helped to build their empire but also perpetuated the institution of slavery in medieval Europe.

The Franks played a crucial role in spreading the institution of slavery to other parts of Europe. Through their conquests and subsequent establishment of feudalism, the Franks introduced a hierarchical system of social organization that relied heavily on the presence of slaves.

As the Franks converted to Christianity, the Franks began to view the enslavement of fellow Christians as immoral. This led to the distinction between "Christian" and "non-Christian" slaves, with the former often being treated more leniently. However, this distinction did not eliminate the institution of slavery altogether, but rather served to justify and perpetuate it through religious doctrine. Ultimately, the Franks' integration of Christianity into their social fabric had both positive and negative implications for the institution of slavery.

Serfdom is not slavery yet it is viewed unfavorably by white Jewish historians whom are writing these histories. Serfs were waves of white migrants from Eastern Europe and Asia into the forests surrounding Frankish towns and cities. Many lords offered land to Wild Men as they were called because they were Nomadic and dressed in animal skins. The deal called for Serfs to be contracted to work the land, produce a crop and pay the Lord each harvests. The Serfs were also conscripted for wars and there were many due to the times. Yes Serfs were treated many times unfairly due to the fact of human heirarchy but not all the Franks were unjust. The lower class people in Europe enjoyed more rights than anywhere else in the world. Just look at today's migration map most poor people in the third world including Arab nations flock to Western nations by the millions every year. When we talk Western World we are talking the Franks.

Serfdom refers to a condition in medieval Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a hereditary plot of land and to the will of his landlord. The vast majority of serfs in medieval Europe obtained their subsistence by cultivating a plot of land that was owned by a lord.

The essential additional mark of serfdom was the lack of many of the personal liberties that were held by freedmen.

Serfdom is essentially a form of slavery that was predominant in feudal societies during the medieval period. While serfs were not technically considered property like slaves, the similarities between the two systems are striking. Serfs were bound to the land and were obligated to work for their lords, receiving meager compensation for their labor. Their work was not only their own, but also the work of their children and grandchildren, passing down from one generation to another, akin to the hereditary enslavement of slaves.

EnvyandHate:



Serfdom is not slavery yet it is viewed unfavorably by white Jewish historians whom are writing these histories. Serfs were waves of white migrants from Eastern Europe and Asia into the forests surrounding Frankish towns and cities. Many lords offered land to Wild Men as they were called because they were Nomadic and dressed in animal skins. The deal called for Serfs to be contracted to work the land, produce a crop and pay the Lord each harvests. The Serfs were also conscripted for wars and there were many due to the times. Yes Serfs were treated many times unfairly due to the fact of human heirarchy but not all the Franks were unjust. The lower class people in Europe enjoyed more rights than anywhere else in the world. Just look at today's migration map most poor people in the third world including Arab nations flock to Western nations by the millions every year. When we talk Western World we are talking the Franks.

honesttalk21:
Serfdom refers to a condition in medieval Europe in which a tenant farmer was bound to a hereditary plot of land and to the will of his landlord. The vast majority of serfs in medieval Europe obtained their subsistence by cultivating a plot of land that was owned by a lord.

The essential additional mark of serfdom was the lack of many of the personal liberties that were held by freedmen.

Serfdom is essentially a form of slavery that was predominant in feudal societies during the medieval period. While serfs were not technically considered property like slaves, the similarities between the two systems are striking. Serfs were bound to the land and were obligated to work for their lords, receiving meager compensation for their labor. Their work was not only their own, but also the work of their children and grandchildren, passing down from one generation to another, akin to the hereditary enslavement of slaves.

Fertile land was held by the Nobles and only the marsh and forest were available. Owning land was the only way up the social ladder. Many people did make it out of Serfdom and that's something not discussed by the people firmly against the Feudal system today. Yet what other solution was available to people who were mostly migrants? Serf means Surf that these people rode the waves of migration into the Frankish Empire from Eastern Europe and Asia.

EnvyandHate:



Fertile land was held by the Nobles and only the marsh and forest were available. Owning land was the only way up the social ladder. Many people did make it out of Serfdom and that's something not discussed by the people firmly against the Feudal system today. Yet what other solution was available to people who were mostly migrants? Serf means Surf that these people rode the waves of migration into the Frankish Empire from Eastern Europe and Asia.

That some people made it out doesn't make it right. Some slaves got free and some escaped.
Where they all migrants or born into slavery or serfdom?

honesttalk21:


That some people made it out doesn't make it right. Some slaves got free and some escaped.
Where they all migrants or born into slavery or serfdom?

Serfs could leave when they wanted only they had to inform their Lord. Many serfs went on pilgrimages and travelled. There was no slavery in Europe.

EnvyandHate:



Serfs could leave when they wanted only they had to inform their Lord. Many serfs went on pilgrimages and travelled. There was no slavery in Europe.

Interesting point when the serfdom gets passed on to their children

honesttalk21:
Interesting point when the serfdom gets passed on to their children

If you don't make it out of poverty then doesn't poverty gets passed on to your children?

In France there were royalty, nobles, middle class
usually merchants, peasants and serfs. The merchants were usually foreigners and the serfs were usually poor migrants. The same reality exists in the world today with poor migrants that flood the borders of rich nations. Some people take advantage of them and work them with little or no pay. This is
why KingPharamond my ancestor created the Salic Law to govern some of this area as best as possible. Maybe you aught to read the Salic Law it's based on the laws of Judah.

EnvyandHate:


If you don't make it out of poverty then doesn't poverty gets passed on to your children?

In France there were royalty, nobles, middle class
usually merchants, peasants and serfs. The merchants were usually foreigners and the serfs were usually poor migrants. The same reality exists in the world today with poor migrants that flood the borders of rich nations. Some people take advantage of them and work them with little or no pay. This is
why KingPharamond my ancestor created the Salic Law to govern some of this area as best as possible. Maybe you aught to read the Salic Law it's based on the laws of Judah.

The majority of serfs were born into serfdom and inherited their status from their parents. Life as a serf was often harsh, with limited social mobility and personal freedoms. They were tied to the land and were not legally allowed to leave their lord's estate without permission. This lack of mobility made it nearly impossible for them to migrate or seek a better life elsewhere, as they were bound by their obligations and responsibilities to their lord.

Even when serfs were granted permission to leave their lord's estate, it was usually for a specific purpose such as attending fairs, family events, or religious pilgrimages. However, their freedom to travel was still heavily restricted and closely monitored. Many serfs would be required to obtain a written pass or document from their lord, which they would have to present to authorities if questioned while traveling. This further emphasizes the fact that despite having the ability to leave temporarily, they were not considered migrants as they were still tied to their original estate.

Salic law focused on issues of inheritance and succession, particularly excluding women from inheriting property or ruling as monarchs. On the other hand, serfdom was a labor system that bound peasants to the land they worked on, subjecting them to the control and authority of feudal lords.

The Salic law was established around the 6th century and governed many aspects of medieval life, especially inheritance rights. It is notable for its exclusionary nature, limiting the rights of women to inherit or hold positions of power. This legal framework was part of a larger societal context that perpetuated male dominance and patrilineal succession. The Salic law played an enduring role in shaping European monarchies, as it reinforced the principle of male primogeniture, where the eldest son was entitled to inherit titles, land, and power.

honesttalk21:

The majority of serfs were born into serfdom and inherited their status from their parents. Life as a serf was often harsh, with limited social mobility and personal freedoms. They were tied to the land and were not legally allowed to leave their lord's estate without permission. This lack of mobility made it nearly impossible for them to migrate or seek a better life elsewhere, as they were bound by their obligations and responsibilities to their lord.

Even when serfs were granted permission to leave their lord's estate, it was usually for a specific purpose such as attending fairs, family events, or religious pilgrimages. However, their freedom to travel was still heavily restricted and closely monitored. Many serfs would be required to obtain a written pass or document from their lord, which they would have to present to authorities if questioned while traveling. This further emphasizes the fact that despite having the ability to leave temporarily, they were not considered migrants as they were still tied to their original estate.

Salic law focused on issues of inheritance and succession, particularly excluding women from inheriting property or ruling as monarchs. On the other hand, serfdom was a labor system that bound peasants to the land they worked on, subjecting them to the control and authority of feudal lords.

The Salic law was established around the 6th century and governed many aspects of medieval life, especially inheritance rights. It is notable for its exclusionary nature, limiting the rights of women to inherit or hold positions of power. This legal framework was part of a larger societal context that perpetuated male dominance and patrilineal succession. The Salic law played an enduring role in shaping European monarchies, as it reinforced the principle of male primogeniture, where the eldest son was entitled to inherit titles, land, and power.

Poor people have always existed and only the day Judgement will change that. As far as the Salic Law I suggest you read because it covers more than inheritance rights and male power. It gives a breakdown of what is the appropriate punishment for various acts like such if a Lord kills his serf. My ancestors were not able to stop all of the abuses but they tried. The Salic Law was the most any citizen of government ran by humans can expect. Before you criticize my ancestors show me such law in Medieval Niger Area.

EnvyandHate:



Poor people have always existed and only the day Judgement will change that. As far as the Salic Law I suggest you read because it covers more than inheritance rights and male power. It gives a breakdown of what is the appropriate punishment for various acts like such if a Lord kills his serf. My ancestors were not able to stop all of the abuses but they tried. The Salic Law was the most any citizen of government ran by humans can expect. Before you criticize my ancestors show me such law in Medieval Niger Area.

Perharps I will learn more however serfs had little legal recourse or protection and they were subject to the whims and decisions of their lords, which often meant a lack of control over their lives and futures. This dependence on aristocratic rule perpetuated the subjugation and exploitation of serfs, making it even more challenging for them to break free from their low social status.

Civil law and order in ancient Africa encompassed both customary and centralized legal systems, with a strong emphasis on community participation and consensus building. These systems, although varying across different regions, provided a means to resolve conflicts, punish wrongdoings, and maintain harmony. The involvement of respected community leaders, formal legal experts, and local councils ensured the fair implementation of justice, reflecting the value ancient African societies placed on upholding civil order.

honesttalk21:

Perharps I will learn more however serfs had little legal recourse or protection and they were subject to the whims and decisions of their lords, which often meant a lack of control over their lives and futures. This dependence on aristocratic rule perpetuated the subjugation and exploitation of serfs, making it even more challenging for them to break free from their low social status.

Civil law and order in ancient Africa encompassed both customary and centralized legal systems, with a strong emphasis on community participation and consensus building. These systems, although varying across different regions, provided a means to resolve conflicts, punish wrongdoings, and maintain harmony. The involvement of respected community leaders, formal legal experts, and local councils ensured the fair implementation of justice, reflecting the value ancient African societies placed on upholding civil order.

The Franks had such structure that you mentioned such centralized legal systems which was the Salic Law. The Franks had leadership and community cooperation as various warrior families partook in leadership. We had spiritual leadership coming from the church who helped restrain our power abuses and inspire us to be more Christian like in our rule.

Africa had slavery and it was very brutal with slave raiding, cannibalizing slaves and human sacrifices of slaves. We had no such thing in Europe so there's really no comparison in terms which system was best. We win hands down and it's the same as today because people die to get out of Africa to come to America, France, Germany and the U.K.