Let's suppose this: Three children X, Y, Z around the age of 12, bring a case to you an adult, to settle. Other of their playmates also were gathered around. While you are trying to settle the misunderstanding, some of the bystander children who are friends to X are busy raising dust and threatening that their friend X must get justice, because he's innocent. That your integrity is at stake o. And that if X doesn't win the case it'd mean that you are partial or have been bribed.

Question: In all honesty, what will you do considering that if you pronounce a judgement favoring X, children Y and Z would think that it was because X's supporters psychologically or emotionally blackmailed you??

Obi supporters have constantly subjected the tribunal members to online harassment, threats, and all sort of manipulations, and it'd be seen as great weakness and capitulation if the tribunal by any stretch make a judgement that could have a semblance of favoring Obi's Petition.

So your x,y,z narrative is what the tribunal will use to deliver judgement. I laugh.

For me, I've given up on the judiciary with so many reasons. But then irrespective of where the judgment goes, let the tribunal try and be upright no matter whose ox is gored. But the question is can they be neutral?

RenaissanceGuy:
Let's suppose this: Three children X, Y, Z around the age of 12, bring a case to you an adult, to settle. Other of their playmates also were gathered around. While you are trying to settle the misunderstanding, some of the bystander children who are friends to X are busy raising dust and threatening that their friend X must get justice, because he's innocent. That your integrity is at stake o. And that if X doesn't win the case it'd mean that you are partial or have been bribed.

Question: In all honesty, what will you do considering that if you pronounce a judgement favoring X, children Y and Z would think that it was because X's supporters psychologically or emotionally blackmailed you??

Low intelligence quotient!

Just deliver the darn judgment.


It's as clear as day.

Reality dawning

When you made Lawan and Akpabio that did not contest senatorial elections candidates,
how do you expect thos children x, y, z you mentioned trust your impartial judgement?

RenaissanceGuy:
Let's suppose this: Three children X, Y, Z around the age of 12, bring a case to you an adult, to settle. Other of their playmates also were gathered around. While you are trying to settle the misunderstanding, some of the bystander children who are friends to X are busy raising dust and threatening that their friend X must get justice, because he's innocent. That your integrity is at stake o. And that if X doesn't win the case it'd mean that you are partial or have been bribed.

Question: In all honesty, what will you do considering that if you pronounce a judgement favoring X, children Y and Z would think that it was because X's supporters psychologically or emotionally blackmailed you??