rottennaija:
Why did the NATO tactics fail in Ukraine? Because NATO instructors only knew how to fight inferior forces with overwhelming American superiority.

A tank – including the Abram - performs its functions when there are friendly helicopters in the sky, when there is aviation in the sky.

Bradleys travel under tank cover. None of this happened in Ukraine. They instructed Ukrainian commanders at assembly points, that they should fight, as if they had some kind of superiority.

In other words, the tactics they proposed to Ukraine led to unjustifiable losses, to the dispersion of forces and means along the flanks, and along the front.

NATO failed utterly to create any of the prerequisites for a successful offensive - other than words. Words, spoken loud and clear. Especially loud.

Obrigardo:


STFU killer putin apologist. It's crystal clear on this board that you are a russo-propagandist. The thing we haven't figured out is if he pays you.
According to AfDAfrica, elements of the kremlin are paying some africans to push propaganda.
But i doubt they would involve nairaland or its trolls.

rottennaija:


Cry me a river.
NATO/US failed and has been revealed to be a paper tiger who can only face weak opponents. The day NATO/US decides to face Russia or China directly will be their end.

rottennaija:
Why did the NATO tactics fail in Ukraine? Because NATO instructors only knew how to fight inferior forces with overwhelming American superiority.

A tank – including the Abram - performs its functions when there are friendly helicopters in the sky, when there is aviation in the sky.

Bradleys travel under tank cover. None of this happened in Ukraine. They instructed Ukrainian commanders at assembly points, that they should fight, as if they had some kind of superiority.

In other words, the tactics they proposed to Ukraine led to unjustifiable losses, to the dispersion of forces and means along the flanks, and along the front.

NATO failed utterly to create any of the prerequisites for a successful offensive - other than words. Words, spoken loud and clear. Especially loud.

rottennaija:


Cry me a river.
NATO/US failed and has been revealed to be a paper tiger who can only face weak opponents. The day NATO/US decides to face Russia or China directly will be their end.

Obrigardo:


You are not even ashamed. Why didn't you mention russia on its own? why mentioning China to get an erection? Because even you know russia and putin is weak as fvck. Or you did not know killer putin is a sick goat? Even President Biden has more stamina than that clusterfuck.

Tiopii:
Obviously you're not following the war, how is Ukraine failing when they are recapturing territories and Russia is on the defense??

Jane74:

at this rate, Ukraine will need 120 years to win back all its territories from Russia

Obrigardo:


STFU killer putin apologist. It's crystal clear on this board that you are a russo-propagandist. The thing we haven't figured out is if he pays you.
According to AfDAfrica, elements of the kremlin are paying some africans to push propaganda.
But i doubt they would involve nairaland or its trolls.

Mossadd:
nobody should take this useless gay seriously he is not okay upstair

Tiopii:



According to?

Obrigardo:


STFU killer putin apologist. It's crystal clear on this board that you are a russo-propagandist. The thing we haven't figured out is if he pays you.
According to AfDAfrica, elements of the kremlin are paying some africans to push propaganda.
But i doubt they would involve nairaland or its trolls.

rottennaija:
Defective Challenger 2 Tank Loses Front Armor Panel, Raising Concerns About British Armor Quality

During combat operations in the Eastern European theater, the performance of British Challenger 2 tanks has come under scrutiny, particularly after two of them were destroyed by Russian anti-tank guided missiles (ATGMs) 'Kornet,' highlighting significant vulnerabilities.

Social media and forums have been abuzz with reports that the first of the destroyed tanks had its front hull armor panel detached, and an internal ammunition explosion tore off the multi-ton turret. This has raised questions about the combat effectiveness of a vehicle that has long been touted as the gold standard of armored protection. In practice, it appears to have little advantage over previous-generation counterparts.

Challenger 2's combat record was primarily against less formidable opponents during the 2003 Iraq War, facing Soviet-era T-55 tanks and Chinese Type 69-I/II tanks armed with outdated anti-tank rocket-propelled grenades and guided missiles like the 'Malutka.' However, when confronted by a modern military equipped with potent anti-tank capabilities such as the 'Kornet' missile system, British armor faced a humiliating defeat. This may explain the reluctance to deploy these tanks into the frontlines for so long.

Currently, out of the 14 units supplied, only 12 remain in service, and there are no plans for further deliveries. Online, some humorously refer to the remaining tanks as the 'Twelve Friends of Zelensky.'

The unfortunate fate of these multi-ton 'gifts' has had a demoralizing effect on Americans, leading to delays in the delivery of their M1A1 Abrams tanks. It seems likely that these tanks will be sent to Ukraine when the Ukrainian Armed Forces exhaust other options, and the autumn thaw provides an opportunity to exclude the use of heavy armored vehicles.

Mossadd:
nobody should take this useless gay seriously he is not okay upstair

Tiopii:
Obviously you're not following the war, how is Ukraine failing when they are recapturing territories and Russia is on the defense??

Tiopii:



According to?

Jane74:

for clarity, the result of the "successful" offensive of the Ukrainians at the beginning of August

udemzyudex:


Successful what?

Western media don deceive una sha, madam go and do your research, the offensive had been a big failure.

If you follow this man Patrick Lancaster on YouTube, you'll also hear from the Russian side, don't just listen to only the information the west feed you.

Ukraine will hurried raise their flag in a territory and claim it is now taken by Ukraine, snap pictures and then remove it and get out.

What his videos, he went to the so called area they claim to have captured and all you see are Russian soldiers, even civilians that are still remaining will tell you nothing like that happen, all they do is shell schools, churches every civilian places instead of fighting the soldiers.

udemzyudex:


Successful what?

Western media don deceive una sha, madam go and do your research, the offensive had been a big failure.

If you follow this man Patrick Lancaster on YouTube, you'll also hear from the Russian side, don't just listen to only the information the west feed you.

Ukraine will hurried raise their flag in a territory and claim it is now taken by Ukraine, snap pictures and then remove it and get out.

What his videos, he went to the so called area they claim to have captured and all you see are Russian soldiers, even civilians that are still remaining will tell you nothing like that happen, all they do is shell schools, churches every civilian places instead of fighting the soldiers.

udemzyudex:


Successful what?

Western media don deceive una sha, madam go and do your research, the offensive had been a big failure.

If you follow this man Patrick Lancaster on YouTube

Jane74:


you have now arranged friendly fire
Have you noticed that I put the word successful in quotation marks?
Are you Russian? with a poor knowledge of English? If so, then use the translator of Google or Yandex to understand what I wrote

Jane74:


Please be careful who you write to.

I have previously argued that at the current pace of the offensive, it will take Ukrainians 120 years to win back the territories occupied by the Russians
Tiopii did not agree with me and demanded justifications - where did I get it from
I wrote the post in words, and then decided that the best thing about the "successes" of the Ukrainian offensive could be a visual picture.

and why did you give me a lecture on the topic. that I am deceived by Western propaganda on the topic of a successful offensive - I cannot understand

Do you think I don't have eyes, or what?