EnvyandHate:
Make sure no one who really wants to hit the ball gets up to the plate

That's Jezebel's assignment.

Watching news reports of sexual assault and mass shootings can certainly have a significant impact on TV viewers, and the effects can vary widely from one person to another. Some potential effects of watching such content may include:

1. Fear and Anxiety: News reports of violent or traumatic events can provoke feelings of fear, anxiety, and distress in viewers. This can stem from a sense of unease about personal safety or concerns about the world at large.

2. Paranoia: In some cases, constant exposure to news reports of violent or traumatic events can contribute to feelings of paranoia or a heightened sense of vigilance. This can lead to individuals feeling more suspicious or mistrustful of others and their surroundings.

3. Emotional Distress: Watching news reports of sexual assault and mass shootings can trigger strong emotional responses, including sadness, anger, and helplessness. This can have a significant impact on individuals' mental well-being.

4. Desensitization: With repeated exposure to traumatic content, some individuals may become desensitized to the emotional impact of such events. This can lead to a decreased sensitivity to the suffering of others.

It's important to note that the impact of viewing such content can vary greatly depending on the individual's mental state, prior experiences, and coping mechanisms. Additionally, media consumption habits, such as excessive exposure to distressing news, can also play a role in shaping the viewer's response.

It's essential for individuals to be mindful of their media consumption and recognize when exposure to distressing content is having a negative impact on their mental well-being. Engaging in self-care practices, seeking support from loved ones, and taking breaks from consuming distressing news can all be helpful strategies for managing the potential negative effects of media exposure. Additionally, seeking professional help from mental health professionals may be necessary for individuals experiencing significant distress as a result of media consumption.

MaxInDHouse:
All you need is give them scriptural backing and leave whoever doesn't agree with his or her problem.

According to God's word the one and only time heavenly creatures came to have sexual relations with human they were attracted to females {Genesis 6:1-3} that's what led to their disengagement and they became demons! 2Peter 2:4

zolajpower:

Thank God they re not touching color blue. Because color blue is next to white before master Jesus and that is why they can't go near it.
Im proud I represent color blue . See how mancity is winning anyhow

GodisStriking:
Leaders Launch New $1bn Gender Fund to Advance Global Equality and Women’s Leadership
03.17.22
The Gender Fund aims to transform systems to be more just and inclusive ensuring at least 100 million people have better healthcare, quality education, and the opportunity to thrive – regardless of their gender, class, ethnicity, or race. This will be achieved through supporting organizations across Africa, Asia, and Latin America to advance their vision for change.
The distinct potential of the Gender Fund comes from the diversity, leadership, and collaboration between supporters, including Cartier Philanthropy, the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation, The Estée Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation, MacKenzie Scott and Dan Jewett, Melinda French Gates, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, The Rockefeller Foundation, Roshni Nadar Malhotra, Thankyou Charitable Trust, Target Foundation, Tsitsi Masiyiwa, and others.
The Fund, run by Co-Impact, will benefit from a world-class Advisory Group – experts in women’s rights, finance, social change, and advocacy including Anita Zaidi, Crystal Simeoni, Elizabeth Yee, Lakshmi Sundaram, Mabel van Oranje, Rebeca Gyumi, Tara Abrahams, Theo Sowa, Vidya Shah, and Wanjiru Kamau-Rutenberg.

It’s Not the Equality Act, It’s The Pedophile Protection ActATTENTION:


BRYAN FISCHERFORMER STAFFMORE
The hideously misnamed “Equality Act” begins its journey through Congress this week. It’s designed “to prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation.”

Now the 1964 Civil Rights Act already makes it illegal for discrimination to occur on the basis of “sex,” by which the authors of the bill meant “male or female.”

One significant thing to note in passing is that the authors of this bill evidently agree - whether they realize it or not - that the CRA of 1964 does NOT provide special protections based on “gender identity” or “sexual orientation,” because if the term “sex’” was expansive enough to include both, there would be no need for the Equality Act.

So we should all be able to agree that, while “sex” in the 1964 CRA referred to the division of humanity into males and females, protections were not extended to lesbians, gays, bisexuals, and transgenders. Hence the felt need for the “Equality Act,” to address this lacuna in civil rights law.

“Gender identity” contains a raft of problems all by itself, for the category seems limited only by the hyperthyroidal imaginations of gender activists. Facebook allows you to choose from no less than 71 - count ‘em - genders. The old “male and female” thing is so last century. Now you can adopt a veritable cornucopia of sexual identities, starting with “asexual,” “hermaphrodite,” or “intersex,” and working your way up to “gender variant” or “pangender.”

Mind you, there is no biological or genetic marker for these various departures from the norm - it’s all in your head. Which makes the whole concept enormously subjective and fluid, and allows you to slip into it just about anything you want.

But what is truly pernicious is that “sexual orientation” is nowhere defined in the bill. Now everyone has a working definition of “sexual orientation” in their heads, a definition that begins with “male” and ends with “transgender” or some such thing. But “sexual orientation” is not defined anywhere in the bill or anywhere else in federal law. Everyone, including off-the-reservation judges, will get to make up their own definition.

This means that “sexual orientation” will mean anything you want it to mean, INCLUDING PEDOPHILIA OR BESTIALITY.

On 5 May 2018, the University of Würzburg in Germany held a conference with the theme of “Future Societys” that featured a presentation by Mirjam Heine, a medical researcher. Here’s what she had to say (emphasis mine):

“According to current research, pedophilia is an unchangeable sexual orientation, just like for example heterosexuality. No one chooses to be a pedophile. No one can cease being one.”

Snopes investigated the report of her remarks and found it to be “True.” In fact, organizers admitted that “a speaker (at their conference) described pedophilia as a condition some people are born with.”

So now we have medical professionals saying pedophiles are born that way, God made them that way, they can’t stop being one no matter how hard they try, and if you’ve got a problem with that, your problem is not with the guy who wants to rape kids but with the God who made them that way.

If the “Equality Act” were to become law, pedophiles would have special privileges and protections under the law that you and I would not have. Because religious exemptions are specifically forbidden in the bill, pedophiles could not be prevented by Trail Life USA (the conservative Christian alternative to the Boy Scouts) from becoming leaders of small boys. And if you have a problem with that, you’re the one who is going to wind up in jail.

Churches could not prevent pedophiles from working with their children and their youth groups. The Roman Catholic Church could not prevent self-admitted pedophiles from becoming priests and working with altar boys.

It will not be long before bestiality (sex with animals) becomes a protected category. Prostitution will soon follow, as will incest and necrophilia (sex with dead people).

This is what the future holds if this law passes. If you want to keep our country from becoming the Disneyland of Deviancy, it’s time to bombard our men and women in Congress with phone calls urging them to vote against the “Equality Act.” Why? Because it, in reality, is the “Pedophile Protection Act.”

Not only does homosexual sex apparently play a role in Masonry, but so do homosexual orgies.

Pike, speaking in general of a newly initiated member, says: "he mingles with the crowd of Initiates, and, crowned with flowers, celebrates with them the holy orgies."

Needless to say, Pike does not define "holy orgy." In at least two other locations in his book he mentions that orgies are associated with Masonic initiations.