.

guysbewise:
.

You have never in fact read The Testament of Solomon for yourself, have you?

Kobojunkie:
You have never in fact read The Testament of Solomon for yourself, have you?

Have you?

guysbewise:
■ Have you?

Yes, I have, and more than once as I did do some research back into claims made in demonic texts back sometime ago. I wonder what part of it convinced you that it belongs in the what you think is the original Torah?

Kobojunkie:
Yes, I have, and more than once as I did do some research back into claims made in demonic texts back sometime ago. I wonder what part of it convinced you that it belongs in the what you think is the original Torah?

What research was that you had to do into claims made in demonic texts?
If The Testament of Solomon was not in the Original Torah then where do you believe it belongs to? Though this one on youtube is still not the original but still has some information.

guysbewise:
■ What research was that you had to do into claims made in demonic texts?
■ If the Testament was not in the Original Torah then where do you believe it belongs to?

I had so much interest in the Supernatural(Dean and Sam Winchester)— I was a big-time fan of the show from its beginning—, so I used to research the books mentioned on the show for knowledge purposes. I ended up reading so many books on the subject of demons and supposed angels from different cultures and myths during that period.

2. Nothing of what is recorded in the testament fits with that declared in and contained in the Torah. You would need to read it for yourself to see this. A story of how Solomon came upon a ring that was supposedly imbued with the power to control demons and how he then used the demons to build God's Holy Temple fits best in a book of magic and other supernatural tales rather than in the same space as the Torah.

Kobojunkie:

2. Nothing of what is recorded in the testament fits with that declared in and contained in the Torah. You would need to read it for yourself to see this. A story of how Solomon came upon a ring that was supposedly imbued with the power to control demons and how he then used the demons to build God's Holy Temple fits best in a book of magic and other supernatural tales rather than in the same space as the Torah.

Well we cannot be sure if this book is the real account.

guysbewise:
■ Well we cannot be sure if this book is the real account.

Real account of what exactly?

Kobojunkie:
Real account of what exactly?

Of how King Solomon built the First Temple.

May be the developed countries are using the same ring to develop all the technology today.

guysbewise:
■ Of how King Solomon built the First Temple.
■ Maybe the developed countries are using the same ring to develop all the technology today.

So, you reject the accounts contained in Scripture of how the Temple was built the first and even the second time, all so you can chase after a narrative that suggests instead that it was all thanks to a magical ring and 99 demons?

2. So you would really believe a story about a magical ring and 99 demons to the fact that human intelligence and prowess are behind it all? WOW!!

Kobojunkie:
So, you reject the accounts contained in Scripture of how the Temple was built the first and even the second time, all so you can chase after a narrative that suggests instead that it was all thanks to a magical ring and 99 demons?

2. So you would really believe a story about a magical ring and 99 demons to the fact that human intelligence and prowess are behind it all? WOW!!

Well the account says God gave it to king Solomon.

guysbewise:
■ Well the account says God gave it to king Solomon.

That is the claim made but the pattern does not fit that which is written in the Torah at all. The whole tale fails as far as the established character of the God of Israel.