Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,163,301 members, 7,853,395 topics. Date: Friday, 07 June 2024 at 03:49 PM

Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? (15105 Views)

"How Large Was Noah's Ark?" / Fearing The Apocalypse, Man Tries To Build His Own Ark / Noah's Ark Remnants Found In Turkey - Fox News (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply) (Go Down)

Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by mantraa: 9:27pm On Oct 31, 2011
If the story of noahs ark is literally true as millions of christians believe it to be. How did kangaroos (and koalas etc) manage to get off Australia and make their way the thousands of miles to the middle east where Noah was building the ark?

This is a question that has been bugging me for a while now and any rational answer from someone who takes the story literally will be very welcome.

Respects
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 9:40pm On Oct 31, 2011
mantraa:

If the story of noahs ark is literally true as millions of christians believe it to be. How did kangaroos (and koalas etc) manage to get off Australia and make their way the thousands of miles to the middle east where Noah was building the ark?

This is a question that has been bugging me for a while now and any rational answer from someone who takes the story literally will be very welcome.

Respects

Will you accept the answer given from the Bible?
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by PAGAN9JA(m): 9:48pm On Oct 31, 2011
haha now lets see hoe Olaadegbu answers this one. grin grin grin grin

was it divine angels who descended from heaven in order to carry them? tongue
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by joinnow: 9:50pm On Oct 31, 2011
Some have contended that the presence of animals on isolated islands like Australia and New Zealand is an indication that not all land animals outside the ark perished in the Deluge. However, the findings of oceanographers indicate that at one time land ridges connected what are now isolated land areas. For example, oceanographic studies indicate that the Mid-Atlantic Ridge may have crossed that ocean above the surface. Possibly there were also other ridges, and animals could have migrated by means of these before such ridges sank below the surface of the ocean. Other oceanographic studies have turned up evidence that once there existed a huge South Pacific continent that took in Australia and many of the South Sea isles. If such was the case, then, of course, the animals had no difficulty in migrating to these lands
from watchtower
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by mantraa: 11:12pm On Oct 31, 2011
From the movement of the earths crust it is possible to rewind the clock to when the the earths land mass was one giant continent, but this was roughly 200 million years ago and long before the time of Noahs ark. 50 million years ago australia had already long been isolated from the rest of the land masses, which is why the plants and animals there are so unique to it.

Even if the animals on australia did manage somehow to cross the ocean to the mainland, how long do you think it would take for a kangaroo to hop to the middle east or for a koala bear to walk there, considering that it only eats eucalyptus tree leaves? What about the flightless birds of new zealand like the big fat kakapo:

http://nbnl.globalwhelming.com/2009/10/03/video-the-last-remaining-kakapo-parrot-in-new-zealand-tried-to-mate-with-a-human/

Is it really feasible or just totally irrational when you think about it? The people who wrote the story didn't even know that a place like australia or new zealand (or all the other thousands of south pacific islands) existed and would not have even thought that the fatal paradox in the story would arise.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by joinnow: 11:32pm On Oct 31, 2011
EXACTLY what is a marsupial, and what makes marsupials amazing?
Put simply, a marsupial is a type of mammal, that is, a warm-blooded animal that suckles its young. Unlike most mammals, however, female marsupials do not form placentas in their womb at the time they become pregnant. They give birth to young that are in a tiny, sightless form, then suckle and protect them in external pouches. So, basically, a marsupial is a mammal with a pouch, for the Latin word marsupium means “pouch” or “pocket.”
Actually, the kangaroo is just one of about 250 species of marsupials. There are marsupials in countries other than Australia—but not many. For example, the North American opossum is a marsupial, and others are found in South America. But by far most of the world’s marsupials are limited to the Australasian region, some 175 different kinds having been identified there. Altogether, there are 45 species of kangaroos in Australia, but the giant red kangaroo is the best known. He is the largest of all marsupials, weighs up to 200 pounds [90 kg], and stands taller than most men. His female mate, though, is noticeably smaller and is bluish-gray in color.
Kangaroos can jump up to 37 feet [11 m] in a single bound. Some have been clocked at speeds of up to 40 miles per hour [64 km/hr] and have jumped over fences more than ten feet [3 m] high. This giant red and the slightly smaller gray kangaroo are found in most parts of the continent down under. They are a common and exciting sight for tourists who drive across semiwooded areas and even over the arid desert regions of central Australia. Kangaroos are gregarious animals and usually stay together in groups called mobs.
A Spectacular Birth
Perhaps the most amazing aspect of marsupial life is the birth and care of the young. Kangaroos are typical of most marsupials. Just 33 to 38 days after mating, baby kangaroo is born. But the new baby is really little more than an embryo—a tiny, bean-shaped creature, weighing about one fiftieth ounce [0.75 gm], smaller than the top of your little finger, and almost transparent.
Immediately after he is born, he “climbs” from his mother’s uterus into her fur. Then, using tiny forearms equipped with claws, he struggles six inches [15 cm] to mother’s pouch. There he attaches himself to one of four teats, which then swells inside his mouth. Through this lifeline, he receives all the nourishment needed, and for the next five months, he remains in this comfortable nursery before poking his head outside for the first time.
At about six months, young joey (as baby kangaroos are called) takes his first tentative step outside, but he often returns to the pouch for nourishment and security. Finally, however, mother decides that joey is too big for the pouch and so prevents him from hopping back inside at all. By the time he is 18 months old, he is completely independent of mother.
Another amazing phenomenon is that mother kangaroo can produce two different types of milk at the same time. Just after the birth of joey number one, she mates again. The newly conceived embryo remains dormant until the first joey begins his brief excursions from the pouch. Then joey number two is born in his tiny form and attaches himself to another teat in the pouch.
But big joey is still taking milk from his original teat. To further complicate matters, the new embryolike joey needs a different milk formula. This is no problem, however, as from his teat, mother is now able to provide high-sugar-content milk, while from big brother’s original teat she continues to provide high-protein and high-fat milk for him!
Although not normally aggressive animals, males sometimes engage in what seem to be boxing matches. Often it is only two younger males testing their strength. At other times two adult males fight by fisticuffs—actually boxing each other over a chosen female! These fights can be quite serious, as the rival suitors claw each other with their forearms and kick violently with their hindlegs.
The Delightful Koala—Another Amazing Marsupial
Almost as well-known as the kangaroo, and featured just as often on Australian tourist brochures, is the cutest marsupial of all—the koala. This little creature is strictly tree-dwelling and moves around mainly at night. He is often confused with a bear because of his appearance, and so he is sometimes erroneously called a koala bear. But he has no relation to the bear family whatsoever, nor is he a kind of opossum or monkey. He is truly unique. Yes, there is only one species of koala, and it is limited to the eastern states of Australia.
The koala has an infinite ability to charm, with its soft, cuddly appearance, bright button eyes, soft rubbery nose, and almost constantly perplexed expression. Not large animals, they grow some two feet [60 cm] in height and weigh from 18 to 30 pounds [8-14 kg].
Baby koala is born like most other marsupials except that mother koala has a backward-opening pouch. The newborn remains in the pouch for six months, and when he finally ventures out, he clings to his mother’s back as she goes about busily searching trees for tasty leaves.
A Unique Digestive System
Koalas are fussy eaters. They limit themselves to the leaves of the eucalyptus tree. And not just any leaf will do. Of the available 600 different species of eucalyptus, koalas eat only 50 or 60. If other animals were to eat these leaves, they would most likely die because of the oil and toxic chemicals in the leaves that are poisonous. A highly complex digestive system helps koalas digest their special food, but such a unique diet does tend to give them a rather distinctive body odor!
Some authorities claim that koalas do not drink water at all, and the word “koala” is purported to be an Aboriginal word meaning “I do not drink.” Yet careful observation has shown that koalas do occasionally come down from their trees to drink, and sometimes they even eat a little soil to augment their mineral-deficient diet.
Although kangaroos can be seen in a number of zoos around the world, koalas are found in very few zoos outside of Australia. But whether you ever have the opportunity personally to see them or not, we feel sure that you will agree that they are truly amazing animals—these mammals with pouches and no placentas.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by joinnow: 11:38pm On Oct 31, 2011
the kangaroo is just one of about 250 species of marsupials. There are marsupials in countries other than Australia—but not many. For example, the North American opossum is a marsupial, and others are found in South America

Could the Ark Have Held All the Animals?It is true that encyclopedias refer to over a million species of animals. But Noah was instructed to preserve only representatives of every “kind” of land animal and flying creature. Some investigators have said that just 43 “kinds” of mammals, 74 “kinds” of birds, and 10 “kinds” of reptiles could have produced the great variety of species of these creatures that are known today. The ark had about 40,000 cu m (1,400,000 cu ft) of usable space—ample for the passenger list
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Nobody: 11:43pm On Oct 31, 2011
joinnow:

the kangaroo is just one of about 250 species of marsupials. There are marsupials in countries other than Australia—but not many. For example, the North American opossum is a marsupial, and others are found in South America

Could the Ark Have Held All the Animals?It is true that encyclopedias refer to over a million species of animals. But Noah was instructed to preserve only representatives of every “kind” of land animal and flying creature. Some investigators have said that just 43 “kinds” of mammals, 74 “kinds” of birds, and 10 “kinds” of reptiles could have produced the great variety of species of these creatures that are known today. The ark had about 40,000 cu m (1,400,000 cu ft) of usable space—ample for the passenger list

No, Evilution is the LIE OF THE DEVIL!!!!!!! Noah had every kind of every specie created by Mr. Jehovah God, but he banished the dinosaurs and unicorns for reasons still unknown. He also banned leprechauns, flying dragons and Neanderthals.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by EvilBrain1(m): 11:52pm On Oct 31, 2011
Martian:

No, Evilution is the LIE OF THE DEVIL!!!!!!! Noah had every kind of every specie created by Mr. Jehovah God, but he banished the dinosaurs and unicorns for reasons still unknown. He also banned leprechauns, flying dragons and Neanderthals.

Actually, the neanderthals were also in the ark. Noah's descendants who settled in eurasia later started sleeping with them and this gave rise to the oyimbo and chinko races.

Only we Africans are pure of blood. We are the last of the Aryans, the master race!

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/05/neanderthal-genome-draft-done-indicates-interbreeding-occurred.ars
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by IDINRETE: 12:02am On Nov 01, 2011
How did Noah and his family deal with ventilation? Bearing in mind that the Ark supposedly, had only one tiny window.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Nobody: 12:22am On Nov 01, 2011
IDINRETE:

How did Noah and his family deal with ventilation? Bearing in mind that the Ark supposedly, had only one tiny window.

MAGIC!!!!!
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Nobody: 12:23am On Nov 01, 2011
Evil Brain:

Actually, the neanderthals were also in the ark. Noah's descendants who settled in eurasia later started sleeping with them and this gave rise to the oyimbo and chinko races.

Only we Africans are pure of blood. We are the last of the Aryans, the master race!

http://arstechnica.com/science/news/2010/05/neanderthal-genome-draft-done-indicates-interbreeding-occurred.ars

Bulls#it!!!!! We Africans are the descendants of the Nephilim Giants. Or probably the descendants of the Ancient Aliens who built the pyramids.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Kay17: 10:46am On Nov 01, 2011
There was this idea, that the kangaroos made boats for themselves and other animals and sailed off to Americas to pick up more guys then off to Middle East.

Those animals are fantastic and brilliant.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 12:19pm On Nov 01, 2011
This is the Kangaroo I know:

Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by PAGAN9JA(m): 12:51pm On Nov 01, 2011
^Olaadegbu. u speak like illiterate man.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:34pm On Nov 01, 2011
PAGAN 9JA:

^Olaadegbu. u speak like illiterate man.

Real education starts with the fear of God. Without it you are all living in darkness.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by PAGAN9JA(m): 5:32pm On Nov 01, 2011
^i respect God but i dont talk like illiterate man.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 5:56pm On Nov 01, 2011
PAGAN 9JA:

^i respect God but i dont talk like illiterate man.

If you respect God you will be interested in knowing what He said that answers the question of the OP, wouldn't you?
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by PAGAN9JA(m): 7:59pm On Nov 01, 2011
OLAADEGBU:

If you respect God you will be interested in knowing what He said that answers the question of the OP, wouldn't you?

God did not say any of them words. it is just you and some desert banshee by the name of jesus, who said those words. and you dare to lie by blaming it only on your creator. for shame. angry
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 10:48pm On Nov 01, 2011
PAGAN 9JA:

God did not say any of them words. it is just you and some desert banshee by the name of jesus, who said those words. and you dare to lie by blaming it only on your creator. for shame. angry

What words are you talking about?  I asked the OP whether he will accept answers given from the Bible and he has not responded.  Don't blame me if you have a grudge against your Maker.  It is just like you are cutting off the branch you are hanging on for dear life.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OmoPastor(m): 8:32pm On Nov 02, 2011
Whats this trash about. how is this going to help humanity. please get a job!
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by PAGAN9JA(m): 5:29pm On Nov 03, 2011
OLAADEGBU:

What words are you talking about?  I asked the OP whether he will accept answers given from the Bible and he has not responded.  Don't blame me if you have a grudge against your Maker.  It is just like you are cutting off the branch you are hanging on for dear life.


i am taking about the very words you claim, have come from God, but which have been written down by man. angry
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by mantraa: 6:46pm On Nov 07, 2011
What words are you talking about? I asked the OP whether he will accept answers given from the Bible and he has not responded. Don't blame me if you have a grudge against your Maker. It is just like you are cutting off the branch you are hanging on for dear life.

All logical replies are welcome. I cant understand how anyone with a basic knowledge of the life on this planet could believe that all the millions of species of animals on this planet (including microscopic lifeforms) could travel from their specific climatic locations to the middle east and live on a boat with no specific food supplies for everyone.

It makes no sense to me, but i would sincerely like to know how it makes sense to you.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by thehomer: 7:18pm On Nov 07, 2011
mantraa:

If the story of noahs ark is literally true as millions of christians believe it to be. How did kangaroos (and koalas etc) manage to get off Australia and make their way the thousands of miles to the middle east where Noah was building the ark?

This is a question that has been bugging me for a while now and any rational answer from someone who takes the story literally will be very welcome.

Respects

You're still wondering about the kangaroos. How about the sloths? The can move at speeds of up to 4 metres a minute when threatened. grin They also sleep for about 10 hours a day.
Just ask yourself how long it will take for one of them to wander from South America to the Middle Eastern region.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by billyG(m): 9:21pm On Nov 07, 2011
do sloths swims or it has to be carried across the atlantic by crocs,my ques. is why are rats,mosquitoes and roaches allowed into the ark ;d
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:11am On Nov 08, 2011
mantraa:

All logical replies are welcome.

Do you think answers from the Bible are logical?

mantraa:

I cant understand how anyone with a basic knowledge of the life on this planet could believe that all the millions of species of animals on this planet (including microscopic lifeforms) could travel from their specific climatic locations to the middle east and live on a boat with no specific food supplies for everyone.

Do you have the "basic knowledge of how life started on this planet"?  If you do please let us know.  And who told you that "millions of species of animals" had to travel from one end of the world to live in a boat?  I wonder where you are getting this information from, the Bible certainly didn't tell us that.

mantraa:

It makes no sense to me, but i would sincerely like to know how it makes sense to you.

You simply built up a Strawman only for you to claim that it makes no sense to you.  Your "Strawman" definitely makes no sense to anyone because you made it up.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Horus(m): 1:38am On Nov 08, 2011
Were dinosaurs on Noah's Ark?
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 1:40am On Nov 08, 2011
Horus:

Were dinosaurs on Noah's Ark?

Are answers from the Bible acceptable?
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by OLAADEGBU(m): 2:15am On Nov 08, 2011
The bible has answers to all your questions but what's the point asking us when you have already made up your minds that answers from the Bible are not acceptable and would not like to be confused with the facts, this time the truth.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Joagbaje(m): 5:59am On Nov 08, 2011
mantraa:

If the story of noahs ark is literally true as millions of christians believe it to be. How did kangaroos (and koalas etc) manage to get off Australia and make their way the thousands of miles to the middle east where Noah was building the ark?

This is a question that has been bugging me for a while now and any rational answer from someone who takes the story literally will be very welcome.

Respects

They didnt have to migrate . They must have been there that time. If there's any migration at all ,it would be from the Ark to Australia cool
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by mantraa: 9:37am On Nov 08, 2011
If you need to refer to your bible for answers to explain an illogical story in the bible that's no problem. I would prefer if you used your own rational thinking, bearing in mind that the bible was written by men who had no idea that there were places thousands of miles away with animals that could not survive in the place where the ark was built. But even if they were all there, how could a sloth walk from the ark to south America, or a lemur to madgascar, or a kangaroo to Australia? It is too far for them to survive and there would be vast oceans to cross.
I know you really don't want to doubt the literal truth of any words in the bible but just try to think outside the box for a minute and think of how the story originated and when.
Re: Were Kangaroos On Noahs Ark? by Horus(m): 12:12pm On Nov 08, 2011
OLAADEGBU:

Are answers from the Bible acceptable?
You answers the question by a question?.
Here is the question again:Were dinosaurs on Noah's Ark?

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (Reply)

The Rosicrucian Order And Its Multiple Lies / Please Recommend A Church For Me In Ado-Ekiti / Pope Francis' Inauguration: Pictures & Videos

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 88
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.