[Ezekiel 5:3]

"You shall also take thereof a few in number, and bind them in your skirts." [AKJV]

You shall also take from these a small number of hairs and bind them in the skirts of your robe. [AMPC]

"HAIR IN THE HEM OF HIS SKIRTS"

Other Bible versions chose to avoid the use of "Skirts" in this Bible verse above but these which I cited above remained faithful to showing forth that the son of man or men generally wore skirts in those days. When you find people that argues a woman should not wear trousers, they would most likely be quoting from that which was written in "Deuteronomy 22:6." But that Bible reference never mentioned "Trousers" nor "Skirts" but just "What belongs to a man" and "Woman's Garment." I don't know how people conclude trousers belong to men, and skirts belong to women. And foolishly, the same people fighting against women putting on trousers were permitting women putting on pants/boxers under their skirts/wrappers.

But I tell you, trousers are pants or pants are trousers. Any cloth or garment that your legs put on to cover your private part is either of these two: "Trouser (Pant)" or "Skirt."

* Trouser or Pant, if that cloth/garment separate your two legs/thighs with a partition in between.

* Skirt, if that cloth/garment does not separate your two legs/thighs or has no partition in between.

In Bible days, both men and women all wore "Skirts" outwardly, and trousers were just formed as short pants with the folding of garments as napkins between thighs, like you saw in pictures or movies that the Lord Jesus wore while hanging on the cross. So a man's garment differed from a woman's garment in the Bible days just by the way they were designed to reflect their gender difference, not by being Skirts or Trousers.

Even so, there are women do put on trousers (pants) as well as men; just as men could put on skirts as well as women. None belongs to one gender alone.
-----------------------------------------------------------
[Ezekiel 5:3]
"You shall also take thereof a few in number, and bind them in your skirts." [AKJV]

In this Bible verse, the son of man, Ezekiel, was under instruction of the Word of God to still spare few of his fallen and judged hair. Sparing those few while the others were given to third-part destruction still does not mean to save them, but meant to delay their destruction the way Satan would be cast into the abyss of bottomless pit for a thousand years, delaying Satan's being given into the lake of fire were the antichrists, false prophets, false pastors, and false teachers, would have been for a thousand years before Satan would join them there. So the son of man, Ezekiel, would spare few of those hairs of his head but for later to be cast into fire also.

In sparing those few, he was under instruction to bind (chain) them; not in the bottomless pit like Satan would be, but those hair would be bound by or at the Hem of his garment or his skirts precisely.

In my childhood, I used to see women including my mother wrap money with the hem or tips of their wrappers worn as Skirts, and then fold the wrapper around their waists. If a man would reach for the money, he may be accused of trying to reach for something else under those wrappers. So the women's wrappers were securing so many secrets that a man's could not easily reach. It was easier for me as a boy to reach the money my mom kept in her pulse than to reach the money she bound with the hem of her wrapper on her waist as secure pocket.

The son of man (Ezekiel) wearing skirts in those days, had no pockets on those skirts. But then like those women, even men who wore skirts would form pockets with the hem of their skirts to bind, store or safely secure pieces of treasures. In this case, they were few hair of his head, not pubic hair under his skirts.