This is a video clip of over an hour. Watch it and make comments on it, if you like to.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmmEB40O96Y

If this is true, which i think it is, it would be the greatest act of deception in the history of man. I and quite a number of members of this forum have already known the deception, but it would blow the religious folks right into immense inner turmoil.

Did not watch ur video. But by heading of ur post its obvious u do not understand the bible. Well he the god of old testa is devil why did the law say a witch should not be allowed to live they must be stoned to death. Hope u are not mis interseting the judgement of the old testa as evil no its not.

I have watched it and i think you should. The video clip is eye opening.

procedure: Did not watch ur video. But by heading of ur post its obvious u do not understand the bible. Well he the god of old testa is devil why did the law say a witch should not be allowed to live they must be stoned to death. Hope u are not mis interseting the judgement of the old testa as evil no its not.

I thought Jagunlabi is same person as Jenwitemi.Pls correct me if am wrong

Wrong. They are twins.

Back to the topic. If that man in the video is correct, Christians are screwed big time. And so are the rest of us.

chukwudi44: I thought Jagunlabi is same person as Jenwitemi.Pls correct me if am wrong

^ Wud be hard to watch or even load an hour long video. Is there a transcribed version that we can read?

Unfortunately no, but here is the guy's website, http://www.hiddenmeanings.com/index.html . Search through it and you might get lucky. Watching the video is the best, though.

Deep Sight:
^ Wud be hard to watch or even load an hour long video. Is there a transcribed version that we can read?

So, is Yahweh the devil? Has the ultimate switch, the ultimate deception been done on the pages of the bible to send a huge part of humanity astray? The bible seems to have stated this quite clearly on it's pages but the adherents have been indoctrinated, programmed not to see it. An amazing feat, if you ask me.

If one reads the bible with the all the critical and analytic brain functions permanently switched on, it would not have taken long before one actually spot this switch because the holy book did little to actually hide it from the reader.

This is why for centuries, the bible was never released to the public to read until the reformation era. The priests and the clerics were the only ones who had the right to own and read the book. The masses, on the other hand, were to be "coached" by the clerics on how to interpret the scriptures so as not to be able to easily discovered this fantastic deception.

It did not work with me though, for right from the first time i started reading that book i sported the switch, the deception instantly and it has never been the same since then. I guess the truth is not for all, it is only open for those with eyes to see. Jesus said that many times in the bible NT when he was asked why he spoke in riddles and parables so much. Jesus was never a straight talker back then, it seems.

Take heed and let no man deceive you. Many shall come IN MY NAME saying that I AM THE CHRIST and shall DECEIVE MANY. DO NOT BELEIVE THEM! The words of Jesus himself. How clearer could that have been that there is great deception going on? I think there is still time for more people to wake up to this deception, but it seems like time is starting to run out for them.

chukwudi44: I thought Jagunlabi is same person as Jenwitemi.Pls correct me if am wrong

u are not wrong sir

the old jagunlabi was a terror and a fighter in the old nairaland(jagunlabi) means a warrior born to always cause trouble.

Jenwitemi of the new nairaland is ..........................................

I am not surprised you said this. The truth is always "trouble" to those whose intentions are to deceive and to those who are already deceived.

toba: the old jagunlabi was a terror and a fighter in the old nairaland(jagunlabi) means a warrior born to always cause trouble.

Jenwitemi of the new nairaland is ..........................................

In the bible OT, is "God" the devil and the " Devil" God? Is the Christian religion based on an insidious deity switch to deceive the masses of faithfuls?

Yes! And of the New Testament too.

currently watching this video. i am at the 20 minute mark and so far it has been a bunch of hogwash. this guy is nuts

finished watching it. i have never listened to so much unintelligent drivel in my life as this

Unintelligent drivel? It is via intelligence that the presenter was able to present what he presented. Why don't you disprove him if you can, o intelligentsia.

buzugee: finished watching it. i have never listened to so much unintelligent drivel in my life as this

That's the deceived in you talking there. When you have been so deceived by your religion, it is hard to admit it to yourself at first, so your reaction is as expected.

buzugee: currently watching this video. i am at the 20 minute mark and so far it has been a bunch of hogwash. this guy is nuts

Jenwitemi: Unintelligent drivel? It is via intelligence that the presenter was able to present what he presented. Why don't you disprove him if you can, o intelligentsia.

well for one, i would expect someone of his 'perceived intelligence' to know that you dont read the bible literally. most of the bible is symbolic and allegoric.

Jenwitemi: That's the deceived in you talking there. When you have been so deceived by your religion, it is hard to admit it to yourself at first, so your reaction is as expected.

i have no religion.

Well, Christians all read and interpret the bible literally. The Christian religion was built on literal interpretations of the scriptures, bro. That's where it has it's doctrinal foundations.

Besides, how do you know which part of the bible deserves literal interpretations and which part deserves symbolic or metaphoric translations? Man, your religion is a FAKE one.

buzugee: well for one, i would expect someone of his 'perceived intelligence' to know that you dont read the bible literally. most of the bible is symbolic and allegoric.

You don't? For someone who does not have a religion, you sound very christian to me.

buzugee: i have no religion.

Jenwitemi: Well, Christians all read and interpret the bible literally. The Christian religion was built on literal interpretations of the scriptures, bro. That's where it has it's doctrinal foundations.

Besides, how do you know which part of the bible deserves literal interpretations and which part deserves symbolic or metaphoric translations? Man, your religion is a FAKE one.

i repeat again, i have no religion . and when a story is too weird and unrealistic to be true ? then it is symbolic.

And further more, the guy was referring to the Christian clerical interpretations of their own scriptures down the ages and not just anybody's. Get it?

buzugee: well for one, i would expect someone of his 'perceived intelligence' to know that you dont read the bible literally. most of the bible is symbolic and allegoric.

Understood. But symbolic of what? Share with us, please.

buzugee: i repeat again, i have no religion . and when a story is too weird and unrealistic to be true ? then it is symbolic.

Jenwitemi: You don't? For someone who does not have a religion, you sound very christian to me.

i aint no christian. i dont go to church, or acknowledge xmas and easter. and i dont eat easter eggs neither

Early versions of Psalms 82 states "jehovah sits in the assembly of the gods where he is judged", but later tranlators , embarrassed by this statement, changed the wordings to now read " god standeth in the congegation of the mighty, he judgeth among the gods". This though, is still a big contradiction of their one and only god theory.

I understand. But you have read the bible, no? How did you interpret the whole texts in it?

buzugee: i aint no christian. i dont go to church, or acknowledge xmas and easter. and i dont eat easter eggs neither

Interesting information that.

plaetton: Early versions of Psalms 82 states "jehovah sits in the assembly of the gods where he is judged", but later tranlators , embarrassed by this statement, changed the wordings to now read " god standeth in the congegation of the mighty, he judgeth among the gods". This though, is still a big contradiction of their one and only god theory.

Jenwitemi: Understood. But symbolic of what? Share with us, please.

ok for example. the talking serpent in the garden of eden ? was not a snake. its symbolic for ' a man with a different philosophy and doctrine ' who came and enticed eve with his idolatry. and when she got seduced by his philosophy, she turned away from God, and seduced adam ( which is not one man but a nation of people. adam means ' made from the ground' . adam is not a name. its a nation of people made from the ground 'adamah' ) and adam also turned away from God because of her and the lord cast them out of the garden of eden ( which symbolises heaven ) and into hell ( which is the current state of earth today as we speak ). see, its all coded and symbolic.

plaetton: Early versions of Psalms 82 states "jehovah sits in the assembly of the gods where he is judged", but later tranlators , embarrassed by this statement, changed the wordings to now read " god standeth in the congegation of the mighty, he judgeth among the gods". This though, is still a big contradiction of their one and only god theory.

stick to KJV 1611

Buzugee, can I open a thread for both of us to discuss the black Israelite myth,or should I list my objections here. I have objections to that myth, major ones in fact. You sound smart albeit deceived.
Also, your bible interpretation is fail/highly suspect. If you read some places as allegory then allegory for what, in the end you just end up projecting your own biases into the book. A link to a discussion letsrollforums.com/black-hebrew-israelites-t27057.html a link to an article rationalwiki.org/wiki/Black_supremacy