I came across this excellent website advertising books described as politically incorrect, one particular book caught my attention its called : Trojan Horse: Death of a dark nation.

I read a few excerpts and was mesmerised. Its author is an african american but its message will appeal to all victims of white supremacy world wide.

Its about how white supremacy operates to destroy the black race.

If you can, try and buy it, it contains invaluable information, here is an excerpt:





TROJAN HORSE: Death of a Dark Nation - Excerpts
Excerpt #1


CHAPTER ONE

What Is Racism/White Supremacy?
“Racism is white supremacy. White supremacy is racism. There is no other form.” -- Neely Fuller, Jr.

Let’s Begin At The Beginning By Defining The Words:

White Supremacy -- a social, economic, and political system based on the belief that whites are superior to non-whites. (the Foundation).

Racism -- the systematic discrimination (the denial of rights and benefits) by whites against non-whites in all areas of human activity: (1) economics, (2) education, (3) entertainment, (4) labor, (5) law, (6) politics, (7) religion, ( sex, and (9) war. (the Behavior).

Q: Why is it called “Racism/White Supremacy?”
A: Because this describes exactly WHO is practicing racism. For one group to practice racism that group must have MORE POWER than another group. Since whites control ALL the major areas of human activity in America -- housing, education, health, entertainment, economics, politics, law, and religion -- it is accurate to define all “racism” as “white supremacy.” We must be accurate so the victims of racism do not become confused.

Q: Isn’t all racism the same, regardless of who is practicing it?
A: There is only ONE kind of racism: white supremacy. White people are the only group in America with the POWER to discriminate (deprive or punish other ethnic groups), and the systems and institutions to maintain the imbalance of power.

For example, rich people are more powerful than poor people. Rich people have the POWER to discriminate against poor people by depriving them of income, promotions, jobs, housing, land, justice, and any other rights – if they choose to do so.

In America, whites have the POWER to discriminate against blacks (and other non-whites) by depriving them of income, promotions, jobs, housing, land, justice, and any other rights – if they choose to do so. It doesn’t matter that some whites are poorer than some blacks.

In all things and in all places in America, whites are collectively more powerful than blacks are collectively. This imbalance of (white) power creates the opportunity and the ability to practice racism against non-whites. Racism is not empty rhetoric (words) or mindless emotion. Racism is economic, political, institutional, and systematic POWER. Since whites control all the institutions and systems of power in America, only whites have the power to practice racism.

Q: Why are people referred to as “groups” instead of “races?”
A: Because there is ONLY ONE RACE: the white race. To prove this statement, let’s look at the TRUE meaning of “race.” In ancient civilizations tens of thousands of years ago (before Europeans inhabited the planet), the world’s people identified themselves by bloodline, birthplace, and culture – but NEVER by the artificial construct (concept) of “race.”

What is the “black race” in real terms? It does NOT describe the place where black people were born because there is no such place as “black land,” (or red, yellow, brown, or white land). Race does not describe a person’s religion because there is no such thing as a black, red, brown, yellow, or white religion.
Race does not describe a person’s culture (except in false, stereotypical terms), and it does NOT define biology, ethnicity, or nationality. Race does not describe skin color because the so-called “black race” includes people whose complexions range from the palest pink to the purest blue-black. Therefore, “race” is a false, manmade concept.

Q: If “race” is a false concept, why was it created?
A: Race was created for ONLY one purpose: to practice race-ism (racism). To practice “racism,” whites had to separate themselves from other groups of people by artificially creating different “races.”

Q: Why was “racism/white supremacy” created?
A: Dr. Frances Cress Welsing, a black psychiatrist and the author of ‘The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors’ (1991), states that White Supremacy is practiced by the global “white” minority on the conscious and unconscious level to ensure their genetic survival by any means necessary.
Because of their “numerical inadequacy,” whites may have defensively developed “an uncontrollable sense of hostility and aggression” towards people of color, and developed a social, political, and economic structure to give blacks and other non-whites the appearance of being inferior.”

Q: Who decides what “race” a person will be?
A: The same (white) people who created the concept of race. If the ONLY purpose of “race” is to practice racism, and whites are the only group or “race” (in a white supremacy system) that can practice racism, then it is logical to assume there is ONLY ONE RACE: the white race.

Q: If the white race is the only race, what are the other ‘groups’ called?
A: There are three types of people in a white supremacist system:

1. Non-white people
2. White people (Racist Suspects)
3. White Supremacists (Racists)

Q: What is a “Non-White” person?
A: Anyone who is NOT classified as “white.” This includes all black, red, yellow, and brown people aka “people of color.”

Q: What is a “Racist Suspect?”
A: ANY white person who is CAPABLE of practicing racism against non-whites. Since all whites are able to practice racism in a white supremacy system if they choose to do so, it is correct (and logical) to use the term “racist suspects” to identify whites who do not openly function as white supremacists (racists). This is not a hateful, unjust, or racist statement, but it is a logical statement.

Q: What is a “White Supremacist?”
A: A white person (a racist) who practices racism against non-whites. Being a white supremacist has nothing to do with income, title, or status. It does not mean a white person belongs to the KKK, the Aryan Nation, or is covered with Nazi tattoos. A white supremacist can be a soccer mom, a businessman, or a US Senator if they are practicing racism against non-whites. Another term for a white supremacist is “racist white man” and “racist white woman.”

Q: How can a non-white person determine if a white person is a racist?
A: Non-whites cannot always determine who is a racist, and who is not, because it is impossible to monitor (or judge) all the individual actions and words of any white person at all times. To illustrate this point:

Case Of The Stolen Wallet

There are five people in a room when a wallet that belongs to a sixth person (who is not in the room) is stolen. All five are “suspects” because every person in the room had the ability and the opportunity to take the wallet. This does not mean all five are thieves NOR does it mean all five are not thieves, because any of them could have stolen something at an earlier time.

As it turns out, two of the five people in the room CONSPIRED to steal the wallet by breaking into the sixth person’s locker. The other three saw it happen, did not participate in the crime, did not care that the wallet was stolen, and did and said nothing to stop it from happening.

The sixth person – the owner of the wallet -- has no idea who stole it, if anyone saw what happened, or how many participated in the theft. All he knows is has been the VICTIM of a crime because his wallet is missing.

The two people who stole the wallet are guilty of “commission” – they actually committed the crime. The three witnesses are guilty of “omission” since they witnessed the crime, said nothing and did nothing to stop it, and refused to help the victim with the information they had.

The next day the two thieves treat the three witnesses to lunch, paying for it with the money from the stolen wallet. The witnesses did not steal the wallet but are knowingly or unknowingly benefiting from the theft.
The three witnesses are not legally liable, but they are morally liable, and are correctly viewed as “suspects” by the victim.

Racism operates the same way. There are whites who:

are practicing racism against non-whites at a particular moment
are not practicing racism at that moment but have practiced it at a previous time, or will practice it at a later time
are not practicing racism at that moment, but say and do nothing to stop those who are
are not practicing racism at that moment, but have no problem with other whites practicing racism (don’t care)
are benefiting from the crime of racism even if they are not practicing racism at that moment
refuse to tell WHO is practicing racism; HOW racism is being practiced; and refuse to help the victims with the information they have
oppose racism by exposing and opposing whites who practice it
Another Example:

Mr. X, a black management trainee, is looking for an apartment closer to his new job. He calls an upscale rental complex near his office, and asks if they have any one-bedroom apartments. The rental agent, a young white male, says there are two one-bedroom apartments available, takes Mr. X’s name and phone number, and asks him to stop by and fill out an application.

The next day Mr. X stops by the complex after work. A different rental agent, Mrs. W, a middle-aged white female, greets him in the reception area. She says she’s sorry, but there are no apartments available.
She suggests he fill out an application so they will have his information on file, and promises Mr. X that he will be the first one she calls when a one-bedroom becomes available.

Mr. X is immediately suspicious, but he fills out an application anyway. On his way home, he replays the conversation with the rental agent. Mr. X has no way of knowing if the first rental agent made an honest mistake, or if he has just been a victim of racial discrimination. His gut tells him it was the latter.

The Crime
When Mrs. W saw Mr. X was black, she used the same line she always used with black applicants. Later, she warns the new rental agent -- who talked to Mr. X over the phone – to never rent to blacks or Hispanics.

The Victim
Like the man whose wallet was stolen, Mr. X is the victim of a crime. The problem is, Mr. X can’t be sure a crime was even committed, which makes it more difficult for him to protect himself from being victimized in the future. It is this kind of confusion that wreaks the most psychological damage on black people who run a DAILY risk of being victimized by racism – without being able to prove they were victimized.

The Criminals
Mrs. W is guilty of commission (practicing racism). The new rental agent is guilty of omission because he said and did nothing, and refused to help Mr. X with the information he had (that another white person, Mrs. W, was practicing racism).

It is the crime of commission AND omission that allows the system of racism/white supremacy to function so effectively. The system does not require all whites to practice racism at all times, but it does require that the majority of whites say and do nothing when racism is occurring and allow themselves to benefit from the victimization of non-whites.

Those benefits include better jobs, housing, food, medical care, education, police protection, justice, etc., than non-whites. If the majority of whites were opposed to racism/white supremacy, it would NOT be the most powerful social, economic, and political system on the planet.
It is LOGICAL to assume that the majority (or possibly all) white people have made a DELIBERATE DECISION to do one or all of the following:

practice racism
do nothing and say nothing to stop others from practicing racism
deny racism is being practiced even when they know it is happening
refuse to help the victims of racism with the information they have
That’s why simple-minded thinking is useless when determining which white person is a racist and which one is not. It cannot be determined by a white person’s sexual behavior. White slave owners had sexual relations with male and female slaves but they were still white supremacists (racists).

Whites have engaged in sexual relations with black people, but that doesn’t mean they are not racists. Whites who have black friends, wives, husbands, or children are still “racist” if they are practicing racism against non-whites.

It cannot be determined by observing the words or the actions of a particular white person, who may or may not be practicing racism at that particular time. It cannot be determined by a random (or deliberate) act or acts of kindness toward a non-white person. Mass child-murderer John Gacy was “kind” to children when he performed in his clown costume. There were slave-owners who were “kind” to their slaves, but not kind enough to stop selling human beings.

AXIOM #1: YOU CANNOT OPPOSE SOMETHING AND KNOWINGLY BENEFIT FROM IT AT THE SAME TIME.

It is LOGICAL in a white supremacist society to assume the majority of whites are either practicing racism (the act of commission), or are cooperating with those who are, by saying and doing nothing to stop them, refusing to help the victims of racism with the information they have (the act of omission), and are benefiting from the practice of racism.

Q: Do non-racist whites benefit from White Supremacy?
A: ALL white people benefit from white privilege in a white supremacy system, even if they are not practicing racism at that moment. It does not matter if they rich or poor; or whether they admit there is such a thing as white privilege. Anyone who is classified as “white” in a white supremacy system will always have advantages over someone who is not. Just as a black person in a black supremacy system (if one existed) would have advantages over someone who is not black.

Q: Aren’t some white people opposed to racism?
A: Only if they are saying and doing something to oppose it. For example, John Brown, a white male, encouraged armed insurrection by slaves as a means to end slavery, and as a result, was charged with treason and hanged.
However, that does not mean John Brown did not practice racism at an earlier time OR would not have practiced it at a later time had he lived.

Q: What about the white anti-racist activists who speak out against about racism? Aren’t they opposed to white supremacy?
A: The self-annointed, white anti-racist activists offer little more than LIP SERVICE. They sacrifice NOTHING, take NO risks, and reap MORE financial rewards than the black activists fighting in the (real) trenches.

The white anti-racist actually creates MORE confusion by creating the FALSE illusion that the devastated black masses can be liberated from racism by sitting in an auditorium or conference room, listening to a white person making anti-racism speeches (while STILL enjoying their white privileges).

It is UNLIKELY that the same white anti-racist activists who PROFIT from writing books and giving speeches about racism -- have any real desire (or intent) to destroy the same white supremacy system that allows them to oppose it without losing a single ‘white privilege. There may be whites who SINCERELY want to replace the system of white supremacy with a system of justice, but that number is so statistically small, it is insignificant.

Q: When blacks mistreat whites, isn’t that “racism/black supremacy?”
A: No, because black supremacy does not exist. If black people were collectively more powerful than whites collectively, blacks would have the power to practice racism. Logically speaking, that would mean the end of white supremacy.

AXIOM #2: BLACK SUPREMACY CAN EXIST ONLY IN THE TOTAL ABSENCE OF WHITE SUPREMACY. WHITE SUPREMACY CAN EXIST ONLY IN THE TOTAL ABSENCE OF BLACK SUPREMACY. THE TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF “SUPREMACY” IS:

THE HIGHEST RANK OR AUTHORITY.

THIS MEANS ONLY ONE THING CAN BE “SUPREME” OR OCCUPY THE “HIGHEST RANK” AT A TIME.

If blacks and whites had equal power and resources, there could be no black supremacy OR white supremacy. Our ability (power) to discriminate against (mistreat) each other would be cancelled out, leaving only two options: coexist peacefully or destroy each other.



To top of page.



Excerpt #2


CHAPTER TWO


Black Power in a White Supremacy System
“What about black people who believe in ‘black supremacy?’ You can believe in something like a prisoner believes in being the warden, or thinks he or she is the warden, but that doesn’t make it true. There’s a difference between being in a position and aspiring to be in a position.” -- Neely Fuller, Jr.

Q: Aren’t “black supremacy” groups like the Nation of Islam racist toward white people?

A: The Nation of Islam is a religious organization, not a black supremacy group. Even if its members so desired, the Nation of Islam cannot be a “black supremacy” organization because “black supremacy” cannot exist at the same place and same time as “white supremacy.” The Nation of Islam cannot be a “racist” organization because it does NOT have the ability or a history of interfering with the rights of white people, or dictating where whites can live, work, shop, play, learn, or teach.

The Nation of Islam does not advocate harming or killing white people. To the authors’ knowledge, no white person has ever been attacked, murdered, denied housing, a job, a fair trial, an education, a law license, or any rights by the Nation of Islam, or under the banner of black supremacy. In fact, every so-called “black supremacist” organization in America was created in self-defense to white racism. To compare the KKK to any black group is the same as comparing the bully to the person being bullied, who eventually fi ghts back, then calling BOTH of them bullies.

Q: Are you saying blacks cannot be racist toward whites?

A: That’s correct. Of course, all people can be bigoted, hateful, or prejudiced. Those terms describe individual behaviors, not systematic power. Racism is the COLLECTIVE behaviors of a group. A white individual within a system of racism/white supremacy has the implicit or explicit support of that system IF they choose to practice racism. If a poor man robs a rich man at gunpoint that doesn’t mean the poor man is more powerful (economically and politically) than the rich man. The poor man is an individual who committed a crime of opportunity. There are no powerful institutions or systems that support his right to rob the rich man, but there are institutions and systems that allow the rich man to rob the poor man – which is why he doesn’t need a gun to do it.

A black person who mistreats a white person doesn’t mean black people are more powerful (economically and politically) than white people. Never confuse the actions of a black individual (or a group of black individuals) that mistreats someone white as proof that black racism exists. Their “power” is limited ONLY to what they can do as individuals. There are NO black institutions or systems that support, defend, or finance the right of blacks to mistreat whites.

There are NO black individuals or black organizations that have the power to strip whites of their collective right to live where they want, work where they want, get an education wherever they want, or control what white people do collectively in ANY area of human activity. There are NO black institutions that are more powerful than white institutions. Therefore, blacks do not have the COLLECTIVE POWER to diminish the quality of life for the white collective.

Q: What is collective power?

A: Collective power is the institutions and systems that benefit one group at the expense of another group, and allow one group to dominate another group in all areas of human activity. For example, when a white policeman shoots an unarmed black man (50 times), his fellow offi cers, the police chief, internal affairs, the union, the media, the prosecutor, the judge, and the jury will support, defend, and finance that white police officer’s “right” to shoot (murder) an unarmed black person. That is white collective power.

It is rare for a white police officer to be punished for using excessive force against a black man, woman, or child. It is just as rare for a black police officer to use excessive force against a white person. In fact, the authors were unable to find a single instance of a black police officer shooting or killing an unarmed white person in the history of modern law enforcement. This is not surprising but it is absolute proof that the black individual operating within a system of white supremacy cannot mistreat whites even if he or she is wearing a uniform, a badge, and carrying a gun.

Another example of white collective power is the mortgage and real estate industry, which systematically discriminates against black (and non-white) renters, homebuyers, and homeowners by:

Red-lining – denying home loans to minority geographical areas.
Reverse red-lining -- targeting minority areas for fraudulent sub-prime home loans that are designed to self-destruct.
Inflating home appraisals in racially changing neighborhoods to defraud (overcharge) minority homebuyers.
Low-balling appraisals in minority areas to reduce home equity.
Raising property taxes in minority areas to drive minority residents out of desirable inner-city neighborhoods. (gentrification)
Exclusion from special financing deals that are not generally known to the public, and are only offered to a select group of white buyers.
Banks, real estate brokers, appraisers, and mortgage lenders represent INSTITUTIONAL RACISM (power) that is reinforced by the courts, banking, and government (systems). This does not mean blacks are less likely to abuse power than whites if given the opportunity. It means blacks cannot abuse power that does not exist. The proof: there is no place in America where blacks
are collectively practicing racism against whites collectively.

Q: Don’t black politicians and corporate executives represent black power?

A: Not necessarily. Having a powerful position does not make a person powerful. For example, shortly after a female employee sued the XYZ firm for sex discrimination, Ms. X and Mrs. Y are appointed to the corporate board. They will be used as proof in the upcoming trial that the XYZ firm does not discriminate against women. Like most token board members, Ms. X and Mrs. Y are benchwarmers; not policy makers. Their “powerful” positions are an ILLUSION designed to deceive the public and the courts. The black man or woman in a (public) position of power often serves the same purpose: to give the appearance that certain companies do not discriminate. These blacks may be qualified for their position; however, even the “powerful” black person – regardless of title -- is still controlled by more powerful whites who limit whatever authority or power this black individual possesses.

Q: If a powerful black person mistreats a less powerful white person, isn’t he or she practicing black racism?

A: A black person whose power comes from a white institution will not be allowed to mistreat whites – unless he or she is following orders from more powerful whites. In a system of white supremacy, all whites are more powerful than blacks. A white supremacy system by its very NATURE forbids ALL non-white people – regardless of wealth, status, or position – from victimizing white people. Of course, a powerful black person can – as an individual – harm a white individual. For example, it was well known that OJ Simpson physically
abused his white ex-wife, Nicole, but that abuse was limited to what he was able to do as an individual.

Powerful blacks present no danger to the white collective but they can be extremely dangerous to other blacks. They are often rewarded for victimizing black people (doing the dirty work), and are usually following orders from more powerful whites behind the scenes. If they are not following direct orders, they will abuse other blacks: (1) for profit or career advancement; (2) out of fear of losing status or income; (3) out of fear of being lumped with the “inferior” black masses; (4) because of self-hatred issues, which they project onto other blacks; or (5) out of frustration because they have no real power (over whites).
Even the most “powerful” blacks in America cannot practice black racism because it does not exist. Nor can they be black supremacists because black supremacy cannot co-exist within a system of white supremacy. They cannot practice white racism because they are not white. They cannot be racists of any kind; but are knowingly OR unknowingly agents (extensions) of the white supremacist system. If anyone disagrees with this premise and believes that blacks can be racist, he or she should be able to answer the following question:
Name one thing that black people – as a group -- have stopped white people – as a group -- from doing that they had a RIGHT to do? For example, denying them the right to work, own a home, live in a certain area, get a fair trial, an education, or use any public facility.

Affirmative action is not a correct response. Affirmative action is NOT black racism. Black people did not create affirmative action, the terminology, or the where, when, and how it becomes a policy in Corporate America. Blacks do NOT have the power to implement any just or unjust policies at any white college or university. Whites control, name, legislate, and decide everything that happens within America’s institutions of power – including black institutions.

If it can be documented (proven) that black people are COLLECTIVELY mistreating white people COLLECTIVELY in the United States, someone should write a book about it. The truth should be made public, even if it contradicts what is written here. Any corrections would be greatly appreciated in the interest of being as accurate as possible.

Q: What about rich black entertainers and athletes? They don’t work for Corporate America. Isn’t that “black power”?

A: All black entertainers work for Corporate America in one fashion or another. Corporate America controls everything that happens in the entertainment industry; whether it’s the movie, music, television, radio, news, advertising, publishing, or sports industry. It is impossible to be a successful black (or white) entertainer if you do not have access to movie theaters, chain music and bookstores, comedy clubs, stadiums, ballparks, cable, radio, magazine, and television. The corporations that control the airwaves, athletic arenas, retail stores, networks, movie, and television studios, distributors, and advertisers are more powerful than all the black entertainers combined. Money is NOT synonymous with power. Power is NOT a paycheck; even a forty-million-dollar one. The person with the most power is the one who SIGNS THE CHECK. For every black person who is paid in the millions, there are whites behind the scenes making BILLIONS.

Q: If money isn’t power, what is power?

A: Power is self-evident. Power answers to no one other than God, himself. Power is the ability to determine the status quo and who sits at the top of the pecking order. Power is the ability to determine what is news and what is not.

Power is controlling the financial, political, and educational institutions so you and your kind benefit. Power is the ability to CONTROL your own images and the images of those who are less powerful than you are. Power is the ability to determine WHO goes to jail, for what crime, and for how long. Power is the ability to VOTE in an election and STILL HAVE THAT VOTE COUNTED.

Power is other people coming to you to get what they need and you deciding how much they get. Power is the ability to feed yourself without depending on others. Power is the ability to generate and produce what you need to survive -- which includes your own infrastructure and necessities: electricity, gasoline, water, housing, food, clothing, weapons, schools, universities, currency, banking, and hospitals – without depending on others for your survival.

Power is the ability to decide what your currency looks like; how much it is worth; and how much it buys; whether it is a gallon of milk or a gallon of gas. Power is the ability to determine who lives where, how many of them can live there, and how long they can stay there.
Power is the ability to move populations from one place to another, to determine what part of what city will be black and what part will be white.

Power is the ability to own land that no one can take from you, even with eminent domain, because YOU make the laws. Power is the ability to punish a police officer for shooting an unarmed man 41 times. Power is the ability to rescue people from rooftops after a hurricane in less than four days, and to make sure a “Katrina” never happens in the first place.

Not ONE black politician, poet, activist, entertainer, corporate board member, CEO, businessperson, millionaire, or billionaire had the juice (power) to pick up a phone, call the White House, and get ONE black person off the roof after Katrina struck.

Power Is NOT…

…a Mercedes or a Jaguar, a dozen rental properties, a good job in a Fortune 500 corporation, a dozen college degrees, or a Pulitzer Prize. It is not being the biggest rap star, or black movie star with the most crossover appeal. It is not owning the biggest house on the block when the bank still holds the mortgage; the taxing authority can seize it for unpaid taxes; and the government can take the land it sits on by declaring eminent domain. It is NOT owning a black business when the business relies on white suppliers, bankers, dealers, distributors, contracts, and advertising dollars.

This is not intended to demean or diminish the accomplishments of so many distinguished, successful, and talented black people, but it is time to be honest about our situation. We cannot afford to keep telling ourselves that the only color “the (powerful) white man” cares about is the color “green.” If that were true, “white supremacy” would be called “green supremacy.”

AXIOM #3: IN A SYSTEM OF WHITE SUPREMACY, SKIN COLOR ALWAYS TRIUMPHS OVER CASH (GREEN SUPREMACY).

Skin color is as fundamental to racism/white supremacy, as reading is to education. There is short-term rich and long-term wealth, and the white supremacists know the difference. They are long-range strategists who know it is wiser (and more profitable) to pay millions to a handful of blacks in sports, entertainment, and business than to allow blacks to accumulate the tools and capital to generate our own billions.

Q: If blacks are not inferior to whites, why are blacks in such an inferior position, not just in America, but all over the world?

A: There is no way to do justice to such a complex, profound question in one book NOR do the authors pretend to have all the answers. In the Resource Section of this book (page 320) is a list of authors who have written excellent books on Africa before and after European colonization. Historical documents and artifacts prove (without a doubt) that Africans were once the most powerful people on the planet, and that all intellectual human endeavors -- the arts, sciences, writing, astronomy, medicine, architecture, and the world’s first universities – began in Africa.

Do not mistake the present condition of African people as proof of black inferiority. What is happening on the African continent -- widespread starvation, tribal warfare, political chaos, AIDS, or crushing international debt – is the byproduct of European imperialism and white supremacy.

John Perkins, author of the controversial bestseller, Confessions of an Economic Hitman, explained how third-world economies were deliberately undermined to gain control of their natural resources and UN votes. Perkins describes in chilling detail, the two primary objectives of an Economic Hit Man:

1. Make huge loans to third-world countries and funnel the money back to US engineering companies in exchange for construction projects that are (deliberately) never completed.

2. Without the promised infrastructures to modernize their countries, the huge international loans go into default, bankrupt their economies, forcing these third-world nations to turn over control of their natural resources and UN votes to their US “creditors.”

These third-world nations were robbed of their ability to eliminate poverty, educate their people, provide a higher standard of living, and were also deliberately excluded from the technology and information-sharing that occurred freely between non-third-world nations. The conditions in third-world nations have nothing to do with inferiority, but everything to do with skin color and white supremacy.

What Ancient Africans And White Supremacists Have In Common

All great civilizations are destroyed from within, not from without. The seeds of destruction are built into the system of white supremacy because the system is built on injustice. If the white supremacists do not learn from the history of ancient rulers who once wielded supreme power and misused it, they are doomed to repeat it.




http://www.trojanhorse1.com/excerpt_th.htm

Logic with a hammer.
Nigeria is an example of bought UN votes and economic asassination, i was suprised at the interview of Mr Perkins i watched in Youtube he mentioned Nigeria Several times.
I will add this book to my arsenal though.

thoth: Logic with a hammer.
Nigeria is an example of bought UN votes and economic asassination, i was suprised at the interview of Mr Perkins i watched in Youtube he mentioned Nigeria Several times.
I will add this book to my arsenal though.

Can you post that video where he talks about Nigeria in the video? I have two of his books but I would like to see the video as well.

If you believe in the social construct refered to as "race" in any shape of form, which is not biologically a viable concept, then you are a willing participant in it is Delusionary thinking.

Hmm, I could a sworn I have been repeating this point bout a million times, strange how crazy people agree with me too....

Morpheus! Morpheus!! Morpheus!!!
An ignorant house nigga!

...just like your alter ego; the depiction of Morpheus in the movie Matrix is impeccable.
Morpheus a black who sacrifice his life to see a white messiah (Neo, the one) excel.
Morpheus is not the one. Never! Just a slavish house nigga ever loyal to the aspiration of his white master.

Morpheus! I am wishfully hoping you are not an incurable ignoramus "uncle tom"; hence the riddle.

Jon.Bee:
Morpheus! Morpheus!! Morpheus!!!
An ignorant house nigga!

"house nigga" reference is played out. I studied Malcolm X's stuff like a decade ago. Oh yeah and if you are going to use the reference again spell "nigga" correctly. The different spellings of the word each connotate different meanings.

Jon.Bee:

...just like your alter ego; the depiction of Morpheus in the movie Matrix is impeccable.
Morpheus a black who sacrifice his life to see a white messiah (Neo, the one) excel.
Morpheus is not the one. Never! Just a slavish house nigga ever loyal to the aspiration of his white master.

You almost got the philisophy behind why the wachowski bros chose a lot of "black characters" in that movie. Need to pick up the book "race matters" and "prophesy deliverance" by DR. Cornell West. The film makers were heavy into his work. Oh yeah study a little Nihilism too might broaden your perspectives and maybe you can actually understand the intricacies behind some of my arguments.

If you also want to know why Cap28 and a bunch of you morons who live overseas are so jaded, spending a good part of your lifes in the western world and feeling "useless" you might also want to study the western adopted government/economic philosophy of "meritocracy". You see in this sort of system, black men such as yourself will find it hard to advance in a society that has religated them to the lowest position in terms of a percieved notion that their intellects are at levels below the merits of "others" in that given society, which most of the time are based on artificial attributes. Same reason why a baseless concept like "race" would hold strong in such a society.(nihilism deals with this particular issue)

Morpheus says " come with me let me show you how deep the rabbit hole goes"

morpheus24: If you believe in the social construct refered to as "race" in any shape of form, which is not biologically a viable concept, then you are a willing participant in it is Delusionary thinking.

Hmm, I could a sworn I have been repeating this point bout a million times, strange how crazy people agree with me too....

So because race is a social construct we should pretend it doesn't exist? This is an extreamly ignorant viewpoint that only comes from people who want to pretend race does not exist for what ever reasons. This is like saying attractiveness is a 'social construct' and unnattractive people should not be surprised when they are not picked to be on the cover of a beauty magazine. I'm sure your going to claim to support this also, but i'm sure you have noticed that your veiw on race is a logical fallacy.

This thing you call delusionary thinking is actually normal human behavior, via the 'own group preference' this is as biologically viable a concept can get. It is inherent in the hard-wiring of all people to divide themselves, this is scientific fact. This own group preference is the psychological predecessor to race, a concept you need to stop pretending isnt here.

pleep: So because race is a social construct we should pretend it doesn't exist? This is an extreamly ignorant viewpoint that only comes from people who want to pretend race does not exist for what ever reasons. This is like saying attractiveness is a 'social construct' and unnattractive people should not be surprised when they are not picked to be on the cover of a beauty magazine. I'm sure your going to claim to support this also, but i'm sure you have noticed that your veiw on race is a logical fallacy.

How does it exist?, A concept constructed in the mind of a human is actual real? At what point does it become real?
1. At what point does a race begin and end?
2. What is race based on, physical characteristics, cultural or biological affinities?

What you refer to as "normal human behavior" in attempts to classify and expression of phenotypical human attributes are nothing more than exercises in taxanomy that are anything other than arbitrary. A way of understanding the world we live in. They are only as real as we make them out to be. Temporary constructs that can be reconstructed at any point in time are real to you? Your example using attractive and unattractive people is flawed because the attributes that are considered under what people 'accept' as attractiveness can and have changed over time. Death is real cause no matter how many times you change the attributes, its the same result every single time. Your organs shut down and you are lifeless. Its not a generally accepted phenomena. It is a reality. The same cannot be said about RACE because its attributes can be changed at any given time. That is why it is not biologically accepted. If you choose to accept its general characteristics, that does not mean they are TRUE, just means you accept them.

pleep:

This thing you call delusionary thinking is actually normal human behavior, via the 'own group preference' this is as biologically viable a concept can get. It is inherent in the hard-wiring of all people to divide themselves, this is scientific fact. This own group preference is the psychological predecessor to race, a concept you need to stop pretending isnt here.

The "own group preference" concept is not hard wired into our DNA, it is a learned behavior(nuture aspect) driven by (natural) survival instincts of all life forms to preserve themselves, It is a precursor to the evolution of the "race concept" but its attributes are arbitrary. If the are not, then we should have a Yoruba race, an igbo race, a hausa race, a fulani race etc. "Own group preferences' can cut across racial, cultural or language lines and are therefore not hard coded because the aforementioned concepts are man made.


Morpheus says "Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth."

Pleep: What truth?

Morpheus: There is no spoon.

Pleep: There is no spoon?

Morpheus: Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.

Morpheus says "Do not try and bend the spoon. That's impossible. Instead... only try to realize the truth."

Pleep: What truth?

Morpheus: There is no spoon.

Pleep: There is no spoon?

Morpheus: Then you'll see, that it is not the spoon that bends, it is only yourself.

With all this you should be the last person to say that a creation of the mind is less valid than a creation of the senses. Just because you see a spoon doent mean it is any more real than the different concepts in your head. Your senses create the spoon out of physical feedback. If you had no senses the spoon would not exist, yet the creations of your mind still would.

2. What is race based on, physical characteristics, cultural or biological affinities?

It is a social construct, like you said, based primarily on physical characteristics. If you think race doesn't exist you might as well say society doesn't exist either, and that is just silly.

What you refer to as "normal human behavior" in attempts to classify and expression of phenotypical human attributes are nothing more than exercises in taxanomy that are anything other than arbitrary. A way of understanding the world we live in. They are only as real as we make them out to be. Temporary constructs that can be reconstructed at any point in time are real to you? Your example using attractive and unattractive people is flawed because the attributes that are considered under what people 'accept' as attractiveness can and have changed over time. Death is real cause no matter how many times you change the attributes, its the same result every single time. Your organs shut down and you are lifeless. Its not a generally accepted phenomena. It is a reality. The same cannot be said about RACE because its attributes can be changed at any given time. That is why it is not biologically accepted. If you choose to accept its general characteristics, that does not mean they are TRUE, just means you accept them.

What you are saying is valid enough, but look at this trough the perspective of the topic at hand.

topic: People in group A are harming group B

Morpheus: The difference between group A and B is social and not worth discussing.

What good does this do for group B, who are facing[i] real [/i]danger from group A

pleep: What you are saying is valid enough, but look at this trough the perspective of the topic at hand.

topic: People in group A are harming group B

Morpheus: The difference between group A and B is social and not worth discussing.

What good does this do for group B, who are facing[i] real [/i]danger from group A

The focus should be on the 'real' issue then. People are harming people. The secondary aspect/concept/construct of the arguement is the instrument used to foster and perpetuate the act and anyone who feeds into that arguement or uses it as a basis of defence is just as bad as the one who constructed it because he is a victim of its confineds/prison

Yes, I would fight a war with "people" who group themselves based on an affinity to certain arbitrary characteristics but solely on the reasonining you previous mentioned_ which is self preservation. The same reason the Akintoye family would wage war against the Ojukwu family based on certain affinities to a particular group. However know that as long as I understand the deep reasoning behind my acts, my mind is more powerful than the one who is subject to its percieved limitations or the one who use its limitations to distort the truth. The truth being it really does not matter that you are black or white. We are all acting out the innate attributes of the human mind. The tremendous ability to do good and evil. The desire for power and control are functions of self preservation. We use 'systems', what you call SOCIETIES ( which only exists as a function of these absolute and primal desires) to act them out.

What is argued in the thread's excerp is the ability to control those desires within constructs that one can dictate for himself or his 'group'

Morpheus says " Have you ever had a dream, that you were so sure it was real? What if you were unable to awake from that dream? How would you know the difference between the dream world, and the real world?

morpheus24: If you believe in the social construct refered to as "race" in any shape of form, which is not biologically a viable concept, then you are a willing participant in it is Delusionary thinking.

Hmm, I could a sworn I have been repeating this point bout a million times, strange how crazy people agree with me too....

Jon Bee's description of you is spot on.

You have zero understanding about this topic and therefore I feel it will be completely futile to engage with you.

Nobody is denying the fact that race is an artificially constructed concept created by the white power structure - the issue here is that the people who created it have used it to perpetrate heinous crimes against humanity simply because they are in position of power - to deny this basic fact indicates that you are either living in a fantasy world or of unsound mind.

The basic point you can't seem to comprehend is that victims of racism can not simply pretend as if it doesnt exist as you are trying to say they should as it affects every aspect of their lives. What does a black person who is denied access to the same quality of education, healthcare, access to the judicial system, employment as a white person do - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

what do the parents of a black boy (Trayvon Martin) do when a white assailant shoots and kills their son and is not even arrested by the police - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

what does a young black couple who are denied a mortage to buy a property in the suburbs do when they discover that a white couple have been granted the same mortgage to live in the same neighbourhood at the same time that the banks turned them down - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

cap28:

Jon Bee's description of you is spot on.

You have zero understanding about this topic and therefore I feel it will be completely futile to engage with you.

Nobody is denying the fact that race is an artificially constructed concept created by the white power structure - the issue here is that the people who created it have used it to perpetrate heinous crimes against humanity simply because they are in position of power - to deny this basic fact indicates that you are either living in a fantasy world or of unsound mind.

and so you seek to expose these crimes against humanity, some of which are perpetuated by your own people as well. Is that the point? Maybe you want black people to possess the same power to perpetuate these same heinous crimes on themselves or on others, without the help of white people. Eureka! of course that would create balance, how silly of me not to realize that.

cap28:

The basic point you can't seem to comprehend is that victims of racism can not simply pretend as if it doesnt exist as you are trying to say they should as it affects every aspect of their lives. What does a black person who is denied access to the same quality of education, healthcare, access to the judicial system, employment as a white person do - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

what do the parents of a black boy (Trayvon Martin) do when a white assailant shoots and kills their son and is not even arrested by the police - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

what does a young black couple who are denied a mortage to buy a property in the suburbs do when they discover that a white couple have been granted the same mortgage to live in the same neighbourhood at the same time that the banks turned them down - pretend as if racism doesnt exist?

You seem to think that my point is we "PRETEND", racism does not exist or that there aren't actual discriminatory acts that have been perpetrated in its name. As usual your arguements are always based on emotional sentiment and an idea of the passive aggressor as opposed to your "fiery' and valiant warrior like stance. Typical.

Social constructs are a system of control. When you argue against this particular construct, what specifically are you refering to, The white system of control or white people in general or are they one and the same. Is your mission therefore to inform us that we are lost, and you seek to re-engineer our minds into believing that black people are equivalent to white people and can prosper under our own cultural, economic and political direction. Then simply state that and prove it to us. Stop hiding behind your mumbo jumbo conspiracy theory nonsense. It creates a side show probably born out of some innate resentment or life failure on your part.

Defeat the so called logic behind the construct and you empower the mind. Propaganda does not empower the mind, it distorts it. Keep preaching. The objective has never been to stop you.



Morpheus says " I am an anomaly. That part of an equation that cannot be balanced"

morpheus24:

and so you seek to expose these crimes against humanity, some of which are perpetuated by your own people as well. Is that the point? Maybe you want black people to possess the same power to perpetuate these same heinous crimes on themselves or on others, without the help of white people. Eureka! of course that would create balance, how silly of me not to realize that.



You seem to think that my point is we "PRETEND", racism does not exist or that there aren't actual discriminatory acts that have been perpetrated in its name. As usual your arguements are always based on emotional sentiment and an idea of the passive aggressor as opposed to your "fiery' and valiant warrior like stance. Typical.

Social constructs are a system of control. When you argue against this particular construct, what specifically are you refering to, The white system of control or white people in general or are they one and the same. Is your mission therefore to inform us that we are lost, and you seek to re-engineer our minds into believing that black people are equivalent to white people and can prosper under our own cultural, economic and political direction. Then simply state that and prove it to us. Stop hiding behind your mumbo jumbo conspiracy theory nonsense. It creates a side show probably born out of some innate resentment or life failure on your part.

Defeat the so called logic behind the construct and you empower the mind. Propaganda does not empower the mind, it distorts it. Keep preaching. The objective has never been to stop you.



Morpheus says " I am an anomaly. That part of an equation that cannot be balanced"

All you are doing is tying yourself into a knot of confusion.

White supremacy is destroying the lives of millions of black people world wide - FACT !!!

White supremacy is the architect of black misery and suffering worldwide - FACT!!!

you can continue to make excuses for white supremacy - the bottom line is that as far as white supremacy is concerned you are a non person -

you are suffering from what is known by conscious black people as MENTACIDE --


According to Mwalimu K. Bomani Baruti

"Mentacide occurs when you willingly think and act out of someone else's interpretation of reality to their benefit and against your survival. It is a state of subtle insanity which, over the last few hundred years, has come to characterize more and more Africans globally"


Brother Baruti goes on to observe the following:


"For we, as an Afrikan people, cannot possibly attain an independent, self-sustaining empowerment without a clear understanding of who we are and are not. We cannot be someone else and ourselves at the same time, especially when that someone else is hell-bent on destroying us".

and another definition:

MENTACIDE =PSYCHOLOGICAL SUICIDE:

To be white identified and black is MENTACIDE - the destruction of what should be black centred , self respecting and self loving mindset. The late Dr Bobby Wright, who popularised the term, defines mentacide as "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group's mind with the ultimate objective being the complete extermination of the group."


http://www.akobenhouse.com/mentacide.htm


MORPHEUS THE ABOVE IS YOU IN A NUTSHELL.

cap28:

All you are doing is tying yourself into a knot of confusion.

White supremacy is destroying the lives of millions of black people world wide - FACT !!!

White supremacy is the architect of black misery and suffering worldwide - FACT!!!

you can continue to make excuses for white supremacy - the bottom line is that as far as white supremacy is concerned you are a non person -

you are suffering from what is known by conscious black people as MENTACIDE --


According to Mwalimu K. Bomani Baruti

"Mentacide occurs when you willingly think and act out of someone else's interpretation of reality to their benefit and against your survival. It is a state of subtle insanity which, over the last few hundred years, has come to characterize more and more Africans globally"


Brother Baruti goes on to observe the following:


"For we, as an Afrikan people, cannot possibly attain an independent, self-sustaining empowerment without a clear understanding of who we are and are not. We cannot be someone else and ourselves at the same time, especially when that someone else is hell-bent on destroying us".

and another definition:

MENTACIDE =PSYCHOLOGICAL SUICIDE:

To be white identified and black is MENTACIDE - the destruction of what should be black centred , self respecting and self loving mindset. The late Dr Bobby Wright, who popularised the term, defines mentacide as "the deliberate and systematic destruction of a group's mind with the ultimate objective being the complete extermination of the group."


http://www.akobenhouse.com/mentacide.htm


MORPHEUS THE ABOVE IS YOU IN A NUTSHELL.

Still throwing punches in the air are you now. Tell "Brother- man Baruti" I wil never fit into his black propagandist constructsa are, because they are as ridiculous as the same ones white people conjur up. All a system of control.

You will never get it boy. A couple more years added to your age should do the trick, when all that senseless anxiety has left you body and you begin to see the world for what it really is. Glad you just learnt a new word "MENTACID", thats great to know everyday brings you closer to pure stupidity

Morpheus says "FREE YOUR MIND!!!!"

You guys should learn to ignore certain people sometimes.
@igbo i will try and find it again for you. I tried to reply you pm but it kept bouncing back.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTbdnNgqfs8


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29GhXsx7-Rs&feature=relmfu

you should watch from part one to the final part of the interview.(the one done at the radio station)

thoth: You guys should learn to ignore certain people sometimes.

Sooo true.
I need to adhere to and live by that.

Anyway @ topic. Its a fallacy and comedy.

What i am about to say is kinda off topic but real.

There is no such thing as a superior race.
Every race has had or will have their shine at some point in terms of influence. We saw it with the arabs, then whites and as we speak the asians.

Even then neither group is superior its just that life and everything around us is a cycle and circumstancial. The situations and mentalities will always be the same regardless of "who is on top". You will have those who understand and those who are delusional and clueless.

Rome never lasted....egypt never lasted....neither will the powers that be today.

Why? Because God rules over all.
Until ppl understand that you will always have bozos talking sideways and bragging unnecessarily. Just dont feed into it and live your life.

What is White supremacy ? Here is an answer: Marijuana, stupidity, Crack and trailers.