Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,152,628 members, 7,816,588 topics. Date: Friday, 03 May 2024 at 01:33 PM

Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer - Religion - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer (2624 Views)

Christians Must Choose Between Apostle Paul And Jesus Christ - Femi Aribisala / What Apostle Paul Had To Say About Tithes And Other Heretic Teachings / Jesus Prophesied and Warned: Paul is False Prophet/Messiah (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 12:51pm On Jul 30, 2013
This post is addressed to Goshen Shidedemi and drummaboy.

I will make it short and simple.

You have all been quite evasive over the issue of paul observing all jewish traditions and cultures as witnessed by scripture

Not one of you have been able to defend your position when asked this question

Shidedemi tried by propsing the vows taken by paul were from a different lifetime and that after his conversion he was compelled to complete it.

I have kindly shown him his errors by stating acts 18:18 happend after his conversion.

My question is..

1. Can you tell me why you are quoting pauls words and only pauls words to fight against yashua AND NOT DOING AS PAUL DID?

2. And even after you have seen paul as a JUDAIZER as you put it why are you still raging and imagining a vain thing? grin

AWAITING RESPONSES wink
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by PastorKun(m): 1:32pm On Jul 30, 2013
Acts 15:5-11



5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”

6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by Nobody: 1:54pm On Jul 30, 2013
Acts 21:21-26 -And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by Nobody: 2:01pm On Jul 30, 2013
Acts 24:14-17 - But this I confess unto thee, that after the way which they call heresy, so worship I the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the law and in the prophets: And have hope toward God, which they themselves also allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust. And herein do I exercise myself, to have always a conscience void to offence toward God, and toward men. Now after many years I came to bring alms to my nation, and offerings.

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 2:44pm On Jul 30, 2013
Pastor Kun: Acts 15:5-11



5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”

6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by [b]putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear?[/b] 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”

You will always quote out of context sad

Bidam thank you for putting it in the correct context smiley

You did not answer yes or no to paul being a judaizer

but I will still respond to your post to point out your error

1. you are a gentile hence you are to recive salvation not directly but through another race (why would any christlike person confess to be a gentile?)

2. you belive that my telling you to obey the law is a heavy burden but this is only true because first you are a gentile an unbeliver

If you had been a jew it would not be a burden it would have been to you for reproof and for instructions in rightouseness

God is HOLY first, Rightousness is just an extension OF HIS DIVINE CHARACTER

Without the LAW there would be no concept of [/b]RIGHTOUSNESS[/b]

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by PastorKun(m): 2:48pm On Jul 30, 2013
^^^
Story!!!
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 3:02pm On Jul 30, 2013
Bidam:

Acts 21:21-26 -And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, [b]save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them [/b]entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.

IT IS QUITE UNFORTUNATE THAT NOT ALL CAN READ AND BE DIRECTLY INSPIRED AS YOU ARE

The bolded is how the elders settled the whole palaver the problem caused by demanding the GENTILES adhere to one LAW was resolved by mutually agreeing they not be pressed to obey that particular law but DEMANDED THEY OBSERVE CERTAIN OTHER ORDINANCES IN LEVITICUS. JUDAIZERS!

AS A SINGLE UNIT THEY ALL AGREED INCLUDING PAUL. AND I THINK GOSHEN SHOULD REALLY MEDITATE UPON THIS VERDICT

GOSHEN AND HIS DESCIPLES ARE PARADING AS ELDERS BUT THEY DONT PASS JUDGEMENT AS ONE

THEY ELDERS STILL HAD TO QUOTE FROM LEVITICUS TO SETTLE THE MATTER. JUDAIZERS!

JUST AS YASHUA CONSTANTLY QUOTED FROM DEUTRONOMY FOR SOLUTIONS TO ALL QUESTIONS ASKED. JUDAIZER!

THE SOLUTION IS ALWAYS WITHIN THE TORAH

Lawlessness is death.

You have been warned.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 3:03pm On Jul 30, 2013
Pastor Kun: ^^^
Story!!!

I hear you

Goshen and his desciples.

A lawless crew grin

Pls answer the queshun about paul being a JUDAIZER.

Or park one side jare

wink
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 6:43pm On Jul 30, 2013
Is there any further proof that Bidam and MostHigh are Judaizers, than this thread?

I will answer ur question when power is restored here.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 9:03pm On Jul 30, 2013
DrummaBoy: Is there any further proof that Bidam and MostHigh are Judaizers, than this thread?

I will answer ur question when power is restored here.

Only Bidam and mosthigh?

What about the master himself?

Joker.

I hope you will address the question head on and not be a grasshopper on this one.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by Nobody: 11:18pm On Jul 30, 2013
what is a judaizer ? tongue
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 11:38pm On Jul 30, 2013
obadiah777: what is a judaizer ? tongue

Derogatory term.

A Slur word

Used for those that uphold the efficacy of the law

It is nowhere found in scripture

The council of Laodicea states in cannon 29:


Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.

Why did the members of a Heathen council consider Saturday worship a sin and even worthy of such punishment? Why were Saturday worshipers on the same level as heretics and enemies of the professed earthly church?

Also, why would the professed earthly church state something that is in direct contrast with the ten commandments? Calling the Sabbath rest Judaizing is one thing, but then it says to do it on Sunday.


8 “Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. 11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. Exodus 20:8-11


Dan 7:25 And he [the little horn] shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. smiley

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by Nobody: 9:28am On Jul 31, 2013
MostHigh:

Derogatory term.

A Slur word

Used for those that uphold the efficacy of the law

It is nowhere found in scripture

The council of Laodicea states in cannon 29:


Christians must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.

Why did the members of a Heathen council consider Saturday worship a sin and even worthy of such punishment? Why were Saturday worshipers on the same level as heretics and enemies of the professed earthly church?

Also, why would the professed earthly church state something that is in direct contrast with the ten commandments? Calling the Sabbath rest Judaizing is one thing, but then it says to do it on Sunday.


8 “Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. 9 Six days you shall labor and do all your work, 10 but the seventh day is a sabbath to the Lord your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your male or female servant, nor your animals, nor any foreigner residing in your towns. 11 For in six days the Lord made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the Lord blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy. Exodus 20:8-11


Dan 7:25 And he [the little horn] shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. smiley

very poignant and apt post sire especially the daniel 7 vs 25 reference. i believe i can add one more reference verse >>>>>

revelation 20 v 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, wink
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 9:38am On Jul 31, 2013
obadiah777: very poignant and apt post sire especially the daniel 7 vs 25 reference. i believe i can add one more reference verse >>>>>

revelation 20 v 8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, wink

Spot on Sire.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 12:15pm On Jul 31, 2013
@MostHigh
You raised two questions and I will endeavor to answer them accordingly. :
1. Can you tell me why you are quoting Paul’s words and only Paul’s words to fight against Yashua and NOT DOING AS PAUL DID?
2. And even after you have seen Paul as a JUDAIZER, as you put it, why are you still raging and imagining vain things?
I will answer your question under two topics: Dispensation and Paul was not a Judaizer. I have learnt on nairaland.com that rather than answer questions piecemeal, it would do one’s readers great good to do a thorough job at answering questions so as to silence any gainsayer that may arise and to make one’s position to be as clear as the noon day. So please endure the essay below in answering MostHigh prodding:
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 12:19pm On Jul 31, 2013
DrummaBoy: @MostHigh
You raised two questions and I will endeavor to answer them accordingly. :
1. Can you tell me why you are quoting Paul’s words and only Paul’s words to fight against Yashua and NOT DOING AS PAUL DID?
2. And even after you have seen Paul as a JUDAIZER, as you put it, why are you still raging and imagining vain things?
I will answer your question under two topics: Dispensation and Paul was not a Judaizer. I have learnt on nairaland.com that rather than answer questions piecemeal, it would do one’s readers great good to do a thorough job at answering questions so as to silence any gainsayer that may arise and to make one’s position to be as clear as the noon day. So please endure the essay below in answering MostHigh prodding:

I await. smiley
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 12:22pm On Jul 31, 2013
Answer to question 1:

DISPENSATIONS

John 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.


Ephesians 3:1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellowheirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power.


Galatians 1: 6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel: 7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ. 8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed… 15 But when it pleased God, who separated me from my mother's womb, and called me by his grace, 16 To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood: 17 Neither went I up to Jerusalem to them which were apostles before me; but I went into Arabia, and returned again unto Damascus. 18 Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days. 19 But other of the apostles saw I none, save James the Lord's brother.


Galatians 2: 1 Then fourteen years after I went up again to Jerusalem with Barnabas, and took Titus with me also. 2 And I went up by revelation, and communicated unto them that gospel which I preach among the Gentiles, but privately to them which were of reputation, lest by any means I should run, or had run, in vain



I will not be treating dispensations in an exhaustive manner (my readers may refer to Google or other authorities on dispensation for better understanding on that doctrine) but simply to answer your query of why folks like us who preach a gospel of grace always quote Paul. It is simple. Jesus the Son of God had a purpose in coming to the earth, this purpose was to save man from his sins (Matthew 1:21)

21 And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.


To achieve this people he was brought to life through a woman and born to the lineage of David so as to fulfill the prophesy that he was to be called the Son of David. Born in the lineage of David made him a Jew in every aspect. This mission of saving man from his sin was to be fulfilled in two manners: 1. The one to save humanity must obey perfectly the good laws a righteous God had given His people. A law that the people never could keep. Jesus kept this law perfectly and fulfilled the righteous requirement of the law. That is why he could say he never came to destroy the law but to fulfill it. Jesus was born under the law and kept the law perfectly. 2. Those who will enjoy what Christ has done can only do so by be faith – an extension of God’s grace.

Bible teachers call the period Jesus lived on earth in the flesh the Christocentric dispensation. This is if we divide the whole of time to three dispensations: the theocentric, the Christocentric and the eschatological dispensations. Under the Theocentric dispensation we have the age of the gentiles (the time of Abraham and his calling out to follow God) and the age of Isreal (mainly the time of Moses and afterwards); the Christocentric dispensation has the Hypostatic Union (the time Jesus lived in the flesh) and the Church age (from the moment of Christ ascension until the catching away of the church); the eschatological dispensation will include the time of tribulation and the Millennium. We are in the church age presently.

Under the Christocentric dispensation, we have Jesus’ coming and the purpose of his coming: this period is termed the Hypostatic Union and it has the unique characteristic of being the only time in all dispensations that law and grace came into union. This was necessary so that Jesus could fulfill the law perfectly in one hand and grant the benefit of this fulfillment to men (you and me) in the church age who will come to Him by faith. Thus the scripture concludes that the law was given through Moses but grace and truth came with Jesus Christ (John 1: 17). The grace of God through Jesus is then extended to those of us in the church age. So there is no need for us to follow and keep the law anymore since it has been fulfilled in Christ; we only appropriate this fulfillment by faith in Him.

Because Jesus lived in the time of the law and was to bring grace to the church, he could not preach the gospel of grace as revealed to Paul or it will nullify his purpose of coming to earth: to fulfill the law. So Jesus words are scripture and Paul encourages us to allow Christ words to dwell in our hearts richly (Colosians 3:16) but Jesus words must be seen in the context of which they were stated and thus the need for sound bible teachers to rightly divide the word of God, keeping to the truth of Scripture. The Christian is not again held bound by the law Jesus operated under and which he came to fulfill.

Paul the apostle was chosen by God to be the harbinger of this unique gospel of grace. He made it clear in Galatians that this gospel was his gospel revealed to him by God and there was to be no other. This gospel is the message the church in the church age was to be built upon and it is no mere accident that Paul’s writing constitutes two-third of the New Testament: God providentially orchestrated this.

So any sound Bible scholar must understand Paul; must preach Paul; all under the auspices of the Holy Spirit and ofcourse subject to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Paul in 1 Corinthinas 12 said that no man can say Jesus is Lord but by the Spirit of God; he was not just talking about mouthing such talk - anyone can do that. He was saying no one can preach Jesus the way he is doing it except the Spirit of God gives such a man utterance. That is the reason why I cannot be quoting Paul and be accused of fighting against Christ. The two are not congruent because there is no single passage in all of Paul’s epistle were he disparaged Christ. He exalted Jesus to the end and so do we.

The reason why we quote Paul is because Paul had the message for the church age. Paul was the apostle to the gentiles like us and whatever he had to say was relevant to us. It makes sense to us state succinctly that if we preach and quote Paul, then we also do what Paul did. Thus leading me to answer the next question: Paul did not live subject to the law; Paul was not a Judaizer.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 12:24pm On Jul 31, 2013
Answer to question 2:

Paul was not a Judaizer

None of us was alive in the time of Paul and so are left to decipher how he really lived from what he wrote. The assumption is that he was a man of truth and was not writing one thing and living another thing. Permit me to quote what I had written on Paul on the other thread “Unveiling Modern Day Judaizers”:

Paul the apostle can only be described as a remarkable man when we realize that he confronted Judaism both in the world and in the church. Jesus had given a brief remark on the kind of suffering this man’s ministry was going to encounter when he was speaking to Ananias at Paul’s conversion (Acts 9:15-16).

From Paul’s own testimony, Paul was born a Jew. He grew up and was discipled under the strictest form of Judaism – he was a Pharisee. He was taught by Gamaliel; a man of such profound knowledge of the Torah and who was held at the highest esteem by the Jewish leaders that a word from him got the release of Peter and John from the murderous grip of the Jews in Acts 4. So Paul was well taught.

Paul, however, had an encounter with Jesus on his way to Damascus, as he was persecuting Christians with authority from the Jewish leaders. He was born-again, and scripture records that immediately he began to preach Jesus whom he had been persecuting. Paul’s account in Galatian 2 shows that sometimes between the period of his conversion and the time he visited Peter and James, Paul was on a retreat in the wilderness and their God revealed the gospel of grace to him. Jesus himself had preached bits and pieces of this gospel in his earthly ministry but because he was born under the law and had to be subject to the law so as to fulfill the righteous requirement of the law for those of us who will subsequently come to have faith in Him, Jesus could not preach the gospel of grace (completely) as he would later reveal to Paul (this is the only way to explain why Paul’s message differed from Jesus’ without discussing the doctrine of dispensation). Jesus had however told the disciples that he could not teach them everything now but will reveal things to them bit by bit (John 14:26).

The gospel of grace was part of the revelation that Peter got when he had the encounter with God on the top of a house subsequent to his meeting Cornelius in Acts 10. Though what Peter understood was that the gospel had been sent to the gentiles also and was not to be confined to Jews, alone. The fact that Peter’s ministry was limited to the Jews shows that he did not completely grasp the gospel of grace like Paul did and even if he did, he could not pay the price to preach it.

But Paul paid that price. Why? Because God had given him the grace to do so, (1 Corinthians 15:10).
The gospel of grace as revealed to Paul was revolutionary. The core point of it was Justification by grace through faith (alone), Ephesians 2:8-9. The implication of this gospel meant that everything Moses gave as law was defunct and obsolete Galatians 3, 2Corinthians 3. There has been a change of law from the law of sin and death to the law of Spirit of Life, Hebrew 7:12; Romans 8:2. Rather than be led by law written of tablets of stones, the believer was now to be led by the Spirit of God, Romans 8:14.

This gospel preached by Paul was against the Judaizers both in the Church and in the world. The latter part of the book of Acts gives an account of what Paul experienced in the hands of worldly Judaizers. But if his contention was with those in the world alone, it would have been a small matter. But Paul also had to contend with Judaizers in the church.
The main object of contention with the Judaizers of Paul’s time was the question of whether gentile believers were to be circumcised or not. In Acts 15:2 it is recorded that Paul and Barnabas had no small dissention with these group of people. The matter was taken to the Jerusalem church and the verdict read:

28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; 29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.
The case seem to have closed there, not until again we see Paul in Galatians 2 saying that he had to withstand Peter to the face because he was acting hypocritical. What was the matter? Some Judaistic Christians had come from James, and Peter was now beginning to withdraw from the gentiles Christians who prior to those people’s coming, he had been eating with them. Following this rebuke, Paul laid down the eternal foundations upon which the gospel of grace is founded on in the book of Galatians:

[b]1. There is only one gospel: the Gospel of Grace, any other is an accursed thing. And anyone who preaches such is accursed. Galatian 1:8,9
2. Justification is by faith(Galatians 3:6-7) and the subsequent life that the believer lives must be lived by faith, Galatians 2:20. Nothing in the law could secure a man’s salvation, v.21.
3. To start in faith and then to think you can secure your salvation by doing anything else in addition to it is foolishness. Galatians 3:1-3
4. Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law. Galatians 3:13 (including the curse of not tithing in Malachi 3) and the blessing of Abraham comes to the believer by faith and not works, v.14
5. The purpose of the law was to reveal what sin is and the utter sinfulness of man that tries to keep it, and thus our need of a savior. Galatians 3:19-24
6. The law is weak and beggarly. Galatians 4: 8-9
7. God calls the believer to stand in liberty and not bondage to the law. Galatians 5:1
8. Those who seek to be justified by the law have fallen from grace. Galatians 5:4
9. Christ fulfilled the law and those of us who obey the law of love, have fulfilled the law also; for all the law is fulfilled in the law of love. Galatians 5:14
10. The call on all believers is not to keep any aspect of the law but to be led by the Spirit and bear the fruit of the Spirit; for when we do this we are not obliged to keep the law. Galatians 5:22-23[/b]
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 12:27pm On Jul 31, 2013
continued...

An in depth study of Galatians will reveal much more than these things enumerated above.

My point in this piece is not to discuss what the gospel of grace is but to show that the gospel that Paul preached was not the ones the Judaistic Christians preached and it was a source of offence to these people, for which Paul suffered through out his ministry.

Paul did not take it kindly with these people. Because in the bid to walk in love and discern the body of Christ, we are not to condemn other believers because they are weak (Romans 14), but the fact that Paul used the strongest terms possible against these people showed that these people were not Christians but the enemies of the gospel.
In Galatians, Paul suggested that any one who wanted to circumcise others to be saved should not only circumcise himself but totally cut off his own manhood:

Galatians 5:12 I would they were even cut off which trouble you.


Paul talked about how some people came in to secretly spy on the liberty they enjoyed as Christians in Galatians 2

3 But neither Titus, who was with me, being a Greek, was compelled to be circumcised: 4 And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage: 5 To whom we gave place by subjection, no, not for an hour; that the truth of the gospel might continue with you.


In Phillipians 3, Paul used the strongest word ever to describe the sect of the circumcision: dogs

1 Finally, my brethren, rejoice in the Lord. To write the same things to you, to me indeed is not grievous, but for you it is safe. 2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision. 3 For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.
Paul emphasized in Colosians 2 so many times the phrase “let no man…”; to drive home the point that people of the Judaistic religion must be resisted at all cost:
16 Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbathdays: 17 Which are a shadow of things to come; but the body is of Christ. 18 Let no man beguile you of your reward in a voluntary humility and worshipping of angels, intruding into those things which he hath not seen, vainly puffed up by his fleshly mind, 19 And not holding the Head, from which all the body by joints and bands having nourishment ministered, and knit together, increaseth with the increase of God. 20 Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, 21 (Touch not; taste not; handle not; 22 Which all are to perish with the usingwink after the commandments and doctrines of men? 23 Which things have indeed a show of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body; not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.


In verse 18, the apostle leaves a word for those who, like today, are always coming up with a new revelation of heaven and hell. He says it is the outcome of their fleshly minds.

In Titus 1, Paul says the mouth of these Judaizers should be stopped

10 For there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: 11 Whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre's sake. 12 One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretiansarealway liars, evil beasts, slow bellies. 13 This witness is true. Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be sound in the faith; 14 Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth. 15 Unto the pure all things are pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving is nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled. 16 They profess that they know God; but in works they deny him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate.


Paul contended these men to the end. I have an intimation that the thorn in the flesh God gave Paul was the opposition to the gospel he was going to be preaching and these opposition, though from many sources, came primarily from the Judaizers of his time.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 12:31pm On Jul 31, 2013
In extension to this I wish to add that Paul did not live as a Jew anymore after his conversion or better still, after his calling to preach the gospel of grace. Why do I put forward this position? Paul would never had had the moral ground to rebuke Peter for acting hypocritical if he himself was equally guilty. What was Peter guilty of? From the laws in the Torah, and as exemplified by the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, the Jews were not to have any dealing with Gentiles. God showed Peter in a vision in Acts 10 that this had changed. The implication was that Peter could go into a gentile’s house and minister to him. In reality one may conclude that Peter understood God’s message to him then in letter alone; having practiced Judaism for so long, it was difficult to put that vision into practice continually. So he arrives in Antioch and noticing that the believing Jews were not there (as in Jerusalem) he felt free to eat with the gentile Christians. The minute these Jews appeared he stopped eating with them; so much so that Barnabas too followed suit. Paul rebuked him. What this implies is that Paul was still eating with the gentiles. Hear Paul in Galatians 2:

11 But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed. 12 For before that certain came from James, he did eat with the Gentiles: but when they were come, he withdrew and separated himself, fearing them which were of the circumcision. 13 And the other Jews dissembled likewise with him; insomuch that Barnabas also was carried away with their dissimulation. 14 But when I saw that they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews? 15 We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles, 16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified. 17 But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners, is therefore Christ the minister of sin? God forbid. 18 For if I build again the things which I destroyed, I make myself a transgressor. 19 For I through the law am dead to the law, that I might live unto God. 20 I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. 21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.


While every verse quoted above is worth expatiating on, notice what Paul says of Peter in verse 14: “I said unto Peter before them all, If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?”. Paul is saying here that even Peter, at least while he was at Antioch, was living as a gentile. And it is also possible to posit from this scripture that Peter had always lives like a gentiles, at least after his grasp of the doctrine of grace. From Paul’s denunciation here we can posit rightly that PAUL HIMSELF LIVED LIKE A GENTILE.

In chapter two he talks about some of this circumcision folks coming in to spy out their liberty in Christ: what was this liberty; the fact that they no longer lived as Jews but as gentiles. The truth of the matter we can deduce from this passage is that Paul lived the message he preached. He was sent to the gentiles and part of the message to the gentiles was that they needed not keep the Mosaic laws anymore to be saved; he preached that message and lived that message. Hear Paul again in the epistles to the Philippians:

4 Though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof he might trust in the flesh, I more: 5 Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee; 6 Concerning zeal, persecuting the church; touching the righteousness which is in the law, blameless. 7 But what things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ. 8 Yea doubtless, and I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord: for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ, 9 And be found in him, not having mine own righteousness, which is of the law, but that which is through the faith of Christ, the righteousness which is of God by faith:


Here Paul reels out his Judaistic credentials but how does he sum it all up: dung – shit (excuse my language), that is the perfect expression for it. In Galatians he had called the law weak and beggarly but here he calls it dung! Why is this so? Because there are two righteousness he is discussing here: a righteousness by the law and a righteousness by faith in Christ. Comparing the two, one is but dung to the other. You cannot serve two masters: you cannot be pursuing a righteousness of the law and also that of faith; one has to go for the other. It is safe to say that Paul no longer lived as a Jew after his grasp of the doctrine of grace. The righteousness of the law, the life of Judaism, Pauls says here he has counted but loss for Christ sake.

Now, MostHigh quotes a passage in Acts were it was said that Paul went to offer a vow at the instance of James and the other apostles.

Acts 21:17 And when we were come to Jerusalem, the brethren received us gladly. 18 And the day following Paul went in with us unto James; and all the elders were present. 19 And when he had saluted them, he declared particularly what things God had wrought among the Gentiles by his ministry. 20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: 21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise their children, neither to walk after the customs. 22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come. 23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them; 24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. 25 As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication. 26 Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them entered into the temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.


He claims from this passage that Paul lived like a Jew. That passage is easy to explain with two verses found in 1 Corinthians 9:

19 For though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more. 20 And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law;


From this passage we can learn that Paul was free from pleasing men; he exercisedhis full liberty in Christ to live and preach the gospel of grace. But so as to win the Jews he lived like a Jew and subjected himself to the law. Jerusalem, at the time Paul visited, was in uproar. The allegation made against Paul that he taught men not to live under the law WAS TRUE. James and others’ suggestion was the sort of “wisdom” Paul had discussed about in the above passage. His main aim of going to Jerusalem, was to testify about Christ to the Jews, as he would later do to Ceasar, so that the Jews could have their very last warning from God to accept Christ or be overthrown (as it happened in AD 70). So Paul took up the vow and went into the temple to make the sacrifices, to be under the law, all in a bid to be acceptable to his people so that he could have the chance to tell them about Christ.

Apparently, it did not work. But they got the testimony they needed to hear. And Jesus confirming this testimony stood by Paul subsequently and told him the same way he testified of him before the Jews, he was to do the same before Caesar (Acts 23:11). Any sound bible scholar will realize that the message of that section of Scripture was not that Paul lived like a Jew but simply that Paul did everything, including coming under the law, to witness to his people.

Another example to buttress this point is Paul taking Timothy and circumcising him. He did this so that Timothy’s message before the Jews will not be rebuffed. But notice that he did not circumcise Titus (Galatains 2:3). So if Paul kept the law strictly, he would have circumcised Timothy and Titus but he did for one and not for the other. It is called walking in wisdom.

From this few words of mine, I hope I have been able to convince you, MostHgh,s and not confuse you that Paul did not live subject to the law; Paul was not a Judaizer.

Thank you for enduring the long essay. I am done for now. You may respond as you wish.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by PastorKun(m): 2:31pm On Jul 31, 2013
^^^
@Drummaboy
You sef suppose write book oh!
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by DrummaBoy(m): 2:53pm On Jul 31, 2013
@ Kun

Wetin person go do now. Lol!!!

I had to write all that to help this MostHigh chap but if after now he doesn't change. I leave him to himself

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 3:04pm On Jul 31, 2013
DrummaBoy: Answer to question 1:

DISPENSATIONS






[/color]

[color=#000099]


I will not be treating dispensations in an exhaustive manner (my readers may refer to Google or other authorities on dispensation for better understanding on that doctrine) but simply to answer your query of why folks like us who preach a gospel of grace always quote Paul. It is simple. Jesus the Son of God had a purpose in coming to the earth, this purpose was to save man from his sins (Matthew 1:21)

[color=#000099][/color]

To achieve this people he was brought to life through a woman and born to the lineage of David so as to fulfill the prophesy that he was to be called the Son of David. Born in the lineage of David made him a Jew in every aspect. This mission of saving man from his sin was to be fulfilled in two manners: 1. The one to save humanity must obey perfectly the good laws a righteous God had given His people. A law that the people never could keep. Jesus kept this law perfectly and fulfilled the righteous requirement of the law. That is why he could say he never came to destroy the law but to fulfill it. Jesus was born under the law and kept the law perfectly. 2. Those who will enjoy what Christ has done can only do so by be faith – an extension of God’s grace.

@ MOSTHIGH You are spot on here regarding the LIFE and WALK of the master, and I thank you for the reference to math 5 where he states the bolded in your response

Now to reveal the bolded in the true context one must read math 5:18-19 as well, and it reads

18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, [b]till all be fulfilled.
[/b]

And we all know tha ALL has not been fullfilled from the world we live in today.


19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach [them], the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven

Verse 19 reveals the full penalty for the actions of Goshen, Shidedemi and drummaboy for they teach men to speak against the LAW and PROPHETS


Bible teachers call the period Jesus lived on earth in the flesh the Christocentric dispensation. This is if we divide the whole of time to three dispensations: the theocentric, the Christocentric and the eschatological dispensations. Under the Theocentric dispensation we have the age of the gentiles (the time of Abraham and his calling out to follow God) and the age of Isreal (mainly the time of Moses and afterwards); the Christocentric dispensation has the Hypostatic Union (the time Jesus lived in the flesh) and the Church age (from the moment of Christ ascension until the catching away of the church); the eschatological dispensation will include the time of tribulation and the Millennium. We are in the church age presently.

@ MOSTHIGH Even if we are to agree with your dispensationalism it in no way negates the actions of the master who is our chief model our GLORY.

Under the Christocentric dispensation, we have Jesus’ coming and the purpose of his coming: this period is termed the Hypostatic Union and it has the unique characteristic of being the only time in all dispensations that law and grace came into union. This was necessary so that Jesus could fulfill the law perfectly in one hand and grant the benefit of this fulfillment to men (you and me) in the church age who will come to Him by faith. Thus the scripture concludes that the law was given through Moses but grace and truth came with Jesus Christ (John 1: 17). The grace of God through Jesus is then extended to those of us in the church age. So there is no need for us to follow and keep the law anymore since it has been fulfilled in Christ; we only appropriate this fulfillment by faith in Him.

@ MOSTHIGH Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: wink that is my respone to the bolded.

Now you know where you stand smiley The master says to label you and your kind the LEAST. smiley

We of the way are of the firm belif in the miaphystic union one person one character made up of two characters unmixed and undivided

Any other definition is plain magic and sorcery, hope you are aware this is the reason why the east and west are divided today, it is because of thier christology or simply put thier definition of the nature of christ



Because Jesus lived in the time of the law and was to bring grace to the church, he could not preach the gospel of grace as revealed to Paul or it will nullify his purpose of coming to earth: to fulfill the law. So Jesus words are scripture and Paul encourages us to allow Christ words to dwell in our hearts richly (Colosians 3:16) but Jesus words must be seen in the context of which they were stated and thus the need for sound bible teachers to rightly divide the word of God, keeping to the truth of Scripture. The Christian is not again held bound by the law Jesus operated under and which he came to fulfill.


@ MOSTHIGH Now you are being ignorant and blasphemous. You are also expressing you VAIN opinions regarding the master and GRACE..

Who in scripture is more graciouse than yashua Ibn Joseph?

The sermon on the mount is liberating.

I say liberating because here we have God in flesh schooling all who read the book about the coming kingdom and its constitution. Throughout the sermon one can see that the master openly reveals to all true desciples that the offence has been tramnsferd from the OVERT ACT to the INTENTION smiley

POINT TO NOTE IS THAT THERE IS STILL AN OFFENCE BUT now it is the intention that is important

Also

Your conviction that the Christian is not again held bound by the law Jesus operated under and which he came to fulfill is very wrong and misleading, his very words were carry your cross and follow me.

Now how do you expect to achieve that drummaboy? seeing you rage against math 5:18-19?


Paul the apostle was chosen by God to be the harbinger of this unique gospel of grace. He made it clear in Galatians that this gospel was his gospel revealed to him by God and there was to be no other. This gospel is the message the church in the church age was to be built upon and it is no mere accident that Paul’s writing constitutes two-third of the New Testament: God providentially orchestrated this.

@ MOSTHIGH The bolded is a complete fantasy and a product of projection and classic mind controll techniques smiley

Paul has no GOSPEL OF HIMSELF you make him sound narcissistic when you say such things.

THE GOSPEL IS OF YASHUA

You are talking about what the church is being built upon

So what about the kingdom what is the constitution of the kingdom of heave?

smiley

So any sound Bible scholar must understand Paul; must preach Paul; all under the auspices of the Holy Spirit and ofcourse subject to the Lordship of Jesus Christ. Paul in 1 Corinthinas 12 said that no man can say Jesus is Lord but by the Spirit of God; he was not just talking about mouthing such talk - anyone can do that. He was saying no one can preach Jesus the way he is doing it except the Spirit of God gives such a man utterance. That is the reason why I cannot be quoting Paul and be accused of fighting against Christ. The two are not congruent because there is no single passage in all of Paul’s epistle were he disparaged Christ. He exalted Jesus to the end and so do we.

@ MOSTHIGH In other words Christ time don pass now na paul get the full revelation smiley



The reason why we quote Paul is because Paul had the message for the church age. Paul was the apostle to the gentiles like us and whatever he had to say was relevant to us. It makes sense to us state succinctly that if we preach and quote Paul, then we also do what Paul did. Thus leading me to answer the next question: Paul did not live subject to the law; Paul was not a Judaizer.

@ MOSTHIGH Basic pshychology says you are wrong.

Its like saying that (verbal utterance is the same as physical action)

Wrong smiley too much room for error there

In scripture it is written YOU CAN BE EXACTLY AS YOUR MASTER IS

BUT NOT GREATER.

YOU MR MAN ARE STRIVING TO BE GREATER smiley

FINALLY SOME VERSES TO CONFIRM TO YOU THAT PAUL IS A PPROPER JUDAIZER AS YOU PUT IT smiley

1. Acts 24:5 For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes: it dosent get any clearer than the bolded

2.Acts 21:21 And they are informed of thee, that thou teachest all the Jews which are among the Gentiles to forsake Moses, saying that they ought not to circumcise [their] children, neither to walk after the customs.


Act 21:22 What is it therefore? the multitude must needs come together: for they will hear that thou art come.


Act 21:23 Do therefore this that we say to thee: We have four men which have a vow on them;


Act 21:24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave [their] heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee spoken by goshen and his crew smiley, are nothing; but [that] thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law.


Finally

Act 21:26 ¶ Then Paul took the men, and the next day purifying himself with them [/b]entered into the [b]temple, to signify the accomplishment of the days of purification, until that an offering should be offered for every one of them.


Act 21:27 And when the seven days were almost ended, the Jews which were of Asia, when they saw him in the temple, stirred up all the people, and laid hands on him, smiley

And there you have it PAUL THE JUDAIZER smiley

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 3:19pm On Jul 31, 2013
Pastor Kun: ^^^
@Drummaboy
You sef suppose write book oh!

This is the MO of the lawless ones.

1. Grasshopping as ola puts it.

2. Mental constipation caused by greek speaking like above (too much takl)smiley

3.Evasive manouvers like goshen and shidedemi being glaringly absent from this discussion.

Drummaboy nice try but...... smiley
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by JesusisLord85: 4:45pm On Jul 31, 2013
Pastor Kun: Acts 15:5-11



5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”

6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion, Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel and believe. 8 God, who knows the heart, showed that he accepted them by giving the Holy Spirit to them, just as he did to us. 9 He did not discriminate between us and them, for he purified their hearts by faith. 10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear? 11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”

If I had a £ for each time I saw this passage misquoted, I would be a multi millionaire. Remove that 'Pastor' from your name

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by JesusisLord85: 4:49pm On Jul 31, 2013
MostHigh: This post is addressed to Goshen Shidedemi and drummaboy.

I will make it short and simple.

You have all been quite evasive over the issue of paul observing all jewish traditions and cultures as witnessed by scripture

Not one of you have been able to defent your position when asked this question

Shidedemi tried by propsing the vows taken by paul were from a different lifetime and that after his conversion he was compelled to complete it.

I have kindly shown him his errors by stating acts 18:18 happend after his conversion.

My question is..

1. Can you tell me why you are quoting pauls words and only pauls words to fight against yashua AND NOT DOING AS PAUL DID?

2. And even after you have seen paul as a JUDAIZER as you put it why are you still raging and imagining a vain thing? grin

AWAITING RESPONSES wink




That is rather interesting because shdemidemi's position used to be (or still is, depending on who he is engaging) that Jews must still observe the law, and gentile converts (aka Christians) do not have to. Part of his whole 2-gospel folly.
I wonder what shdemidemi calls a Jew who believes in Christ. Surely they can't be Jews, because, according to them, Jesus came to tear down Judaism. Oh my, I'm laughing so hard.

1 Like

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by PastorKun(m): 4:51pm On Jul 31, 2013
JesusisLord85:

If I had a £ for each time I saw this passage misquoted, I would be a multi millionaire. Remove that 'Pastor' from your name

Olodo tongue why don't you then quote it properly if you think you know better.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by MostHigh: 4:54pm On Jul 31, 2013
Pastor Kun:

Olodo tongue why don't you then quote it properly if you think you know better.

Pastor

pastor


Stop being a Lawless Man. smiley
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by JesusisLord85: 4:56pm On Jul 31, 2013
Pastor Kun:

Olodo tongue why don't you then quote it properly if you think you know better.

verse 11 shows you the context:

" No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are."

They were saying you must observe the law FIRST in order to be saved. It takes a year or more to fully convert to Judaism. Thse guys wanted them to pass through the usual rights, but now, through Christ, you are saved by faith and are a convert {to the religion of the Jews if you will, NOT some new religion called Christianity}. Notice what else James says:

19 “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20 Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. 21 For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.”

In other words, let them come to the faith. They will learn the rest (the law) as they attend synagogue every sabbath day.

You see. Judaizers all the way. Stop reading bible back to front.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by PastorKun(m): 5:04pm On Jul 31, 2013
JesusisLord85:

verse 11 shows you the context:

" No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are."

They were saying you must observe the law FIRST in order to be saved. It takes a year or more to fully convert to Judaism. Thse guys wanted them to pass through the usual rights, but now, through Christ, you are saved by faith and are a convert {to the religion of the Jews if you will, NOT some new religion called Christianity}. Notice what else James says:

19 “It is my judgment, therefore, that we should not make it difficult for the Gentiles who are turning to God. 20 Instead we should write to them, telling them to abstain from food polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from the meat of strangled animals and from blood. 21 For the law of Moses has been preached in every city from the earliest times and is read in the synagogues on every Sabbath.”

In other words, let them come to the faith. They will learn the rest (the law) as they attend synagogue every sabbath day.

You see. Judaizers all the way. Stop reading bible back to front.

Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by shdemidemi(m): 5:15pm On Jul 31, 2013
DrummaBoy: @ Kun

Wetin person go do now. Lol!!!

I had to write all that to help this MostHigh chap but if after now he doesn't change. I leave him to himself

You did a great job here bro.

God bless you.


As for the judaisers, I hail you lot as well.
Re: Apostle Paul Is A Judaizer by JesusisLord85: 5:18pm On Jul 31, 2013
Pastor Kun:


vs 20, the things he told them to observe. Where did James get that from? Torah of course.
In other words, they must obey these as a matter of urgency. They can learn the rest of the law as they attend the synagogue each sabbath.
Observing the law, NOT saved by the law. We don't observe it because we believe we are saved by it, we do it because those are God's instructions to his people, and we want to please him.

John 14:15 "If ye love me, keep my commandments."

What do you make of this?

Acts 21: When they heard this, they praised God. Then they said to Paul: “You see, brother, how many thousands of Jews have believed, and all of them are zealous for the law. 21 They have been informed that you teach all the Jews who live among the Gentiles to turn away from Moses, telling them not to circumcise their children or live according to our customs. 22 What shall we do? They will certainly hear that you have come, 23 so do what we tell you. There are four men with us who have made a vow. 24 Take these men, join in their purification rites and pay their expenses, so that they can have their heads shaved. Then everyone will know there is no truth in these reports about you, but that you yourself are living in obedience to the law. 25 As for the Gentile believers, we have written to them our decision that they should abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.”

Again, they kept the law.

Paul's letter requires a decent knwoledge of the Torah in order to understand it, along with context.

Shalom

1 Like

(1) (2) (Reply)

Is Having An Erection A Sin? / Prayer {incantation} To Avert Death ~ Eji Oko - Oriki Ire / Does Religion Matter?

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 170
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.