vaxx:
this statement is too weak for my liking

Of course it will be. Remember you are a psychopath.

dalaman:


Of course it will be. Remember you are a psychopath.

lol , I don't do insult. I do logic and reasons.

vaxx:
ooh sorry dear. it is still early here. it seems you do not know where am coming from.

I don't believe in judgemental God and non existing devil. I am African traditional faithful.

ok then. there is no treatment for your psychopathic behavior

Proudgorgeousga:


ok then. there is no treatment for your psychopathic behavior

self defeating statement .pls i don't do insult pls . you are a lady and I expect you to be soft spoken.

vaxx:
self defeating statement .pls i don't do insult pls . you are a lady and I expect you to be soft spoken.

l have no intention of insulting you, I was referring to your hypothetical self for the purpose of this thread.

btw I'm not speaking, I'm typing

Proudgorgeousga:


atheist is the same as psychopath says the logical and scientific human lol

yes atheists are psychopathic.

daily UK published a scientific evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3506294/Are-atheist-probably-PSYCHOPATH-Non-believers-lack-empathy-religious-people-intelligent-claims-study.html

Proudgorgeousga:


l have no intention of insulting you, I was referring to your hypothetical self for the purpose of this thread.

btw I'm not speaking, I'm typing

sure

vaxx:
yes atheists are psychopathic.

daily UK published a scientific evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3506294/Are-atheist-probably-PSYCHOPATH-Non-believers-lack-empathy-religious-people-intelligent-claims-study.html

No offense, your statements here reveal some deficiency in your comprehension skills.

DeSepiero:


No offense, your statements here reveal some deficiency in your comprehension skills.

no problem bro. am open to correction. what do you mean?.

vaxx:
no problem bro. am open to correction. what do you mean

The post by dailymail suggests that an atheist is PROBABLY a psychopath. I doesn't state categorically that atheists are psychopaths like you're saying.

DeSepiero:


The post by dailymail suggests that an atheist is PROBABLY a psychopath. I doesn't state categorically that atheists are psychopaths like you're saying.

hummn . no science evidence is absolute. it a research.(intelligence guess) or do you have an evidence to rebuke it for now scientifically.

vaxx:
hummn . no science evidence is absolute. it a research.(intelligence guess) or do you have an evidence to rebuke it for now scientifically.

Considering the aforementioned, you should revisit your statement here

vaxx:
yes atheists are psychopathic.

daily UK published a scientific evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3506294/Are-atheist-probably-PSYCHOPATH-Non-believers-lack-empathy-religious-people-intelligent-claims-study.html

and acknowledge that element of probability included in the scientific finding.

DeSepiero:


Considering the aforementioned, you should revisit your statement here and acknowledge that element of probability included in the scientific finding.

OK. I hear you for the sake of argument.

every scientific findings you know can also be subject to probability. therefore i am not wrong quoting it categorically unless you have an hypothesis that state otherwise.

vaxx:
lol many of that kind of criminal exist in the world . but known and unknown. some have die and go scot free and some are nursing the ambition now and are currently under training.

And most of them are religious people

obinna58:

And most of them are religious people

lol . most of them, not all of them. yes they are the black sheep in the midst of the saint.

vaxx:
OK. I hear you for the sake of argument.

every scientific findings you know can also be subject to probability. therefore i am not wrong quoting it categorically unless you have an hypothesis that state otherwise.

Yet again you fail to grasp it.

The scientific study suggests probability NOT absolute certainty. So if you must quote this same study, you should quote it correctly (probability NOT absolute certainty).
By the way, don't leave out the part where the same study suggests that religious people are often less intelligent?

vaxx:
lol . most of them, not all of them. yes they are the black sheep in the midst of the saint.

And if I'm to go straight to your point, you saying that atheists have more access to committing evil,
Atheist and religionists who do think value their lives most

DeSepiero:


Yet again you fail to grasp it.

The scientific study suggests probability NOT absolute certainty. So if you must quote this same study, you should quote it correctly (probability NOT absolute certainty).
By the way, don't leave out the part where the same study suggests that religious people are often less intelligent?

I just tell you. no scientific findings is absolute. that is why scientist use the phrase like theory, law or fact. another research can counter argue tomorrow


yes am aware of the second statement. and I am not running from it.

vaxx:
I just tell you. no scientific findings is absolute. that is why scientist use the phrase like theory, law or fact. another research can counter argue tomorrow


yes am aware of the second statement. and I am not running from it.

Then refrain from making absolute statements based on uncertain scientific theories.

obinna58:

And if I'm to go straight to your point, you saying that atheists have more access to committing evil,
Atheist and religionists who do think value their lives most

no report has been published on that, so whatever answer I gave you might be subject to scrutiny...... the only evidence I have here is the report base on what harm atheist can caused.

DeSepiero:


Then refrain from making absolute statements based on uncertain scientific theories.

I never say it is absolute. I even agree with you that it can be wrong if you have any more accurate hypothesis that state otherwise.

vaxx:
no report has been published on that. so whatever answer I gave you might be subject to scrutiny...... the only evidence I have here is the report base on what harm atheist can caused.

Talking about sanctity of human life, I don't need a report to tell me the religious inclinations of people in Nigeria who:

strap explosives to themselves and blow up people in the name of a certain god;
offer human sacrifices to certain gods with hope of favour.

vaxx:
I never say it is absolute. I even agree with you that it can be wrong if you have any more accurate hypothesis that state otherwise.

Here is your absolute statement

vaxx:
yes atheists are psychopathic.

daily UK published a scientific evidence.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3506294/Are-atheist-probably-PSYCHOPATH-Non-believers-lack-empathy-religious-people-intelligent-claims-study.html

Now, will you take it back?

vaxx:
no report has been published on that. so whatever answer I gave you might be subject to scrutiny...... the only evidence I have here is the report base on what harm atheist can caused.

If atheism has more liability in terms of causing harm to humanity, is it better then to withdraw informations and lie to keep people in order.

vaxx:
no report has been published on that. so whatever answer I gave you might be subject to scrutiny...... the only evidence I have here is the report base on what harm atheist can caused.

If atheism has more liability in terms of causing harm to humanity, is it better then to withdraw informations and lie to keep people in order.
What do you think?

DeSepiero:


Here is your absolute statement
Now, will you take it back?

in scientists techniques, it will not be treated just the way you are treating it

it will be labelled an hypothesis. meaning intelligence guess.

for example. all human evolute from ape's.

is it absolutely true? no or yes it depends on another research that can argue it

DeSepiero:


Talking about sanctity of human life, I don't need a report to tell me the religious inclinations of people in Nigeria who:

strap explosives to themselves and blow up people in the name of a certain god;
offer human sacrifices to certain gods with hope of favour.

if you are to make a conclusion base on that, it will be treated as assumption

vaxx:
[s]in scientists techniques, it will not be treated just the way you are treating it

it will be labelled an hypothesis. meaning intelligence guess.

for example. all human evolute from ape's.

is it absolutely true? no or yes it depends on another research that can argue it[/s]

Atheists are psychopathic: inappropriate.
Atheists are more likely psychopathic: appropriate.

Stop beating about the bush.

obinna58:

If atheism has more liability in terms of causing harm to humanity, is it better then to withdraw informations and lie to keep people in order.

you are asking two question with different perspective. the general answer to your question is atheist are prone to lie ,cunning in character than a believer. so the best option is to keep atheist in check so they do not abuse a peaceful environment.

DeSepiero:


Atheists are psychopathic: inappropriate.
Atheists are more likely psychopathic: appropriate.

Stop beating about the bush.

what you are now doing is paraphrasing. i have given you the evidence scientifically that what i post there is acceptable. and you called it beating around. i have evidence for it and i have show you.

vaxx:
what you are now doing is paraphrasing. i have given you the evidence scientifically that j was post there is acceptable. and you called it beating around. i have evidence for it and i have show you.

Like i said earlier, you had a problem interpreting that scientific report properly.

DeSepiero:


Like i said earlier, you had a problem interpreting that scientific report properly.

but you have not been able to identify the problem