Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / NewStats: 3,163,429 members, 7,853,860 topics. Date: Saturday, 08 June 2024 at 06:32 AM |
Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Politics / Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? (34461 Views)
Zamfara: Supreme Court Affirms Gov Lawal-Dare (PDP), Dismisses APC's Suit / 8 APC Campaign Council Members Defect To PDP; Meet Atiku (Video) / Celebration At Muhammad Matawalle's House Over Zamfara Supreme Court Victory (2) (3) (4)
(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply) (Go Down)
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by ihatesycophant(m): 3:18pm On May 25, 2019 |
shayubobo:The electoral law has been modified and re-modified since that time. In our today's electoral law no such vote as wasted but invalid vote which are part of vote cast. No court and I mean no court can segregate citizen vote because he voted for a certain party of his choice. As at the time of voting APC candidates were legally entitled to be voted for based on court ruling and sustained by the process of Appeal sought by one party. A case that has been Appealed cannot be implemented. Meaning APC votes were part of the votes cast as at the time PDP had its own. Now that APC has no right to contest in the first place that does not take a way the vote cast for them as valid but now turned to invalid by Supreme Court judgement. By our electoral law every invalid vote is also part of cast vote 1 Like |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by seunmsg(m): 3:39pm On May 25, 2019 |
udemzyudex: Wasted votes and void votes are the same. All these arguments are just semantics from partisan interest. Wasted/void votes are valid when determining the total vote cast in any election. Arguing otherwise is going against the constitution and the electoral act. If the PDP candidate failed to get 25% of total vote cast in at least 2/3 of the local governments in the state, INEC will have to conduct a run-off election between the candidates of PDP and the party that came third. Anything short of what I have explained will amount to illegality. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Sufisunni: 4:11pm On May 25, 2019 |
seunmsg:No! Wasted votes are non-existence votes. Valid, invalid and voided votes these terms have been in legal parlance for a while and supreme Court judges are well acquainted with it, but explicitly used the term "wasted votes". No one counts wasted votes, this is the interpretation of Apex court judges. The required spread is a discussion of valid votes, which APC's non-existence votes don't in. Law doesn't deal with emotions but legality of matter at hand and often to serve as deterrent to others. Whether 1 million people are being disenfranchised is non issue in court of law. Don't forget in a hurry, that Rotimi Amaechi was in USA enjoying himself while Celestine Omeh whom campaiged and people voted for was later on denied by same Apex court based on the fact that people don't vote candidates but party Furthermore, voided vote is an invalid vote because it's not well thumb printed; the party voted for can't be ascertained, but wasted votes are thumb printed votes in favour of a particular party. This is the interpretation of supreme Court. No where in electoral law that says a vote well ascertained for a party is voided vote.
|
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by AbidemiAy(m): 4:13pm On May 25, 2019 |
Very interesting topic to debate. having read through all the contributions by learnered Professors on this forum *PaChukwudi44*, *Garfield1*, *Philipu1* Engineerboat* and many others. My opinion as a layman is also in line with *Backubuck* concern why Supreme Court did not declare the winner directly but rather still hinged it on *IF* the runners up fulfilled *the electroal law*. The question as asked by op of the topic is *Did PDP meet the constitution requirements*? I think we need to put our parties affiliate aside as ponder on this question or concern by *Backubuck*. Why didn't Supreme court declare PDP or the runners up the winner.? *PaChukwudi44* made reference to margin of wins in Sokoto and Osun elections, but what he fails to realise was that Tambuwal and Oyetola met the Constitution requirements of 25% of 2/3. Therefore invalid votes cannot invalidate their wins. But in this case having removed APC votes, does PDP met constitution requirements. The answer is *NO* Supreme Court ruled and used conditional word *IF*, the court did not say or order INEC to declare runner's up a winner. I will conclude to say not likely to declare PDP winner by INEC but more likely to order a rerun in order to fulfil constitutional requirements and in order not to defranchise more than 500k people who voted for APC. 1 Like |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by wingmanII: 4:31pm On May 25, 2019 |
Inec has already declared PDP winner in all the Zamfara elections. You all can take them to court. Fucking beer parlor lawyers |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Udantu: 4:35pm On May 25, 2019 |
My analysis is on point https://thenationonlineng.net/breaking-inec-declares-pdp-winner-in-all-zamfara-elections/ |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Udantu: 4:37pm On May 25, 2019 |
seunmsg: Yen yen yen Inec has already declared Pdp winners Go and argue with supreme court https://thenationonlineng.net/breaking-inec-declares-pdp-winner-in-all-zamfara-elections/ 1 Like |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:44pm On May 25, 2019 |
Buckubuck:They voted sir legally for nobody but they voted.. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 4:47pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: lolzzzzzzzzzzzz pained meanwhile, Inec declares pdp winner of all elective positions in zamfara state. https://www.independent.ng/breaking-inec-declares-matawalle-other-pdp-candidates-winners-zamfara-polls/?utm_source=&utm_medium=facebook U need real emotional treatment. 2 Likes 1 Share |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:47pm On May 25, 2019 |
OGHENAOGIE:You cannot be pro pdp and still pretend to be neutral politically.i cant accept that.its morally wrong.seems you are not following or you dont know zamfara.a rerun means apc will retain the state mr |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:49pm On May 25, 2019 |
Osagyefo98:Yea,i am undergoing treatment but i heard that your a patient at yabaleft.it fits your station |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:50pm On May 25, 2019 |
PaChukwudi44:The one you invented |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:51pm On May 25, 2019 |
udemzyudex:Its a vote wasted or not |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 4:52pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1:Yes. Indeed they voted. Just as people in osun voted as well. I think we should just see how it pans out on Monday |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 4:52pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Am done with you. Done and Dusted... Let me beam my searchlight on other issues..... |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:54pm On May 25, 2019 |
Osagyefo98:Am sure you are celebrating the victory like adeleke.may you continue celebrating till you celebrate out of oblivion tribalist |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 4:56pm On May 25, 2019 |
Buckubuck:Inec just declared pdp candidate winner so the matter ends there for now but i still hold on to my opinion and hopes that one day,the records will be set straight |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by cyberguy72(m): 4:58pm On May 25, 2019 |
ihatesycophant:Lol desperate Zombie |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 4:59pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Look at unnecessary accusations again....have our part crossed before here? Anyway stop hitting my shares, is irritating...stop it...stop it... What sort of nonsense is that. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by garfield1: 5:01pm On May 25, 2019 |
Osagyefo98:But i warned you na.i told you to stop the debate but you pushed on.you should never have argued with me forgetting that i greatly disgust or unnerve you |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Udantu: 5:01pm On May 25, 2019 |
Udantu: Inec indeed cancelled Apc votes since they are legally dead 1 Like
|
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 5:04pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1:If inec just did that, then I suggest you let go of ur opinion. The matter has several precedence which inec followed. Osun 2010 is the clearest I remember 1 Like 1 Share |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Nobody: 5:06pm On May 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Let me legally ignore you, and focus on other issues. Don't just hit that shares again......The matter is over, u can masturbate on it or discuss it with other monikers but avoid my quote and shares.... Don't get me over worked and angry here...... Winner takes it all. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by mushystuff: 5:26pm On May 25, 2019 |
PHILipu1: No it is not a rerun. Good thing INEC isn't as confused as some of you are over simple English. PDP has been declared winner of all positions in Zamfara. 1 Like
|
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by Cutiesleezy: 5:30pm On May 25, 2019 |
seunmsg: |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by mushystuff: 5:32pm On May 25, 2019 |
seunmsg:
|
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by udemzyudex(m): 6:02pm On May 25, 2019 |
seunmsg: I don't think there will be anything like a rerun here. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by rafindo(m): 6:28pm On May 25, 2019 |
[quote author=Mk93 post=78708779] so we should take this case to Sharia court?[/quote. What does sharia has to with this case now. My opinion is strictly base on judicial reasoning. Does the constitution recognize wasted vote. What makes a vote wasted. What happens if the above scenarios occurs. The logical thing here is that 60% of those that voted for winner can't be disenfranchised just like .the number is enough to till the scale of who governs a state.if we allow this scenario to go unchallenged we will be in for more judicial reggae .where interests will disrupt primaries of their opponent hoping at the long run they benefit from the court vote. |
Re: Zamfara Supreme Court Judgement: Did PDP Meet The Constitutional Requirement? by buharitill2023: 6:55pm On May 25, 2019 |
Ratello:a clear winner as simple as ABC still need 25% of 2/3 local govt before he can be declare true winner |
(1) (2) (3) ... (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (Reply)
"I Have Fulfilled My Major Promises" – President Buhari / Obi Of Onitsha Commissions Dualised Sani Abacha Road Constructed By Wike(pics) / Ayiri Emami Does The Crate Challenge (Photos)
(Go Up)
Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 55 |