onlyfacts:


Henry Cavendish experiment that has been replicated many, many times and that was how we figured out the gravitational constant. I know you love YouTube, watch YouTube and see amateurs replicate it and that's does not include university physics professors who are pros at it.

Schuler tuning is part of all crafts gyroscopic design. It's not an argument, it's all over the internet. And it's work is to account for earth's curvature in order to keep the plane level.

no you are wrong, the cavendish experiment has never been replicated by any and that is why it is criticized to day even within the science community.

There is no experiment anywhere that shows a ball of mass getting attracted to another ball of mass.

What are you saying about schuler tuning? It thought you said gravity curves the plane now it is schuler tuning that curves the plane.


There is absolutely no way an aircraft will be curving and it will remain level at the same time time this is impossible schuler tuning is a fraud that does nothing. Many pilots do not use this and some do not even know of it. This schuler tuning is only a propaganda tool to hide the truth. The fact is that pilots use attitude indicator to maintain a flat horizon. If schuler tuning is accounting for curvature then why do planes fly straight? Why used an attitude indicator to keep the flight straight and level. How come this curvature is not detected by the attitude indicator that uses Gyroscopes?. How can a plane fly horizontally for several miles and then vertical again for several mile and this is not accounted for by our reality or the attitude indicator? Schulert tuning does nothing and this is why it is not known by many pilots and is not even used in flight.

EMILO2STAY:
this question is unnecessary. Anything can fly if given wings with proper design that enables the aerodynamics necesary for flight. This is why aircrafts fly. The design of the wings causes the aerodynamics necessary for flight and the jet engines moves the plane and the wings to go against the air. It is the same thing with helicopter blades. They rotate against the wing and the aerodynamics provide lift.

yes the magnetic field is from the earth and this is evidenced bt the fact that Every compass on The earth points northwards because of the strong magnetic field emanating from that part of the earth

the sun and moon are plasmas not a ball with a core. This things have there own place and area which they never move away from.

So you are saying you can fly given a wing right? Same as a rat, a donkey etc?
The sun and moon are plasma, but the plasma has to be formed somewhere? If they don't have a very hot CORE to form the plasma ,then how did the plasma come about? Plus if they were initially plasma from the beginning by now they should have exhausted all the plasma and burnt out.

onlyfacts:


I have explained all this already, reason along with the new inputs I am giving you and we can both learn things from each other. Don't go bring up things I have already explained. I told you the 2 conditions at least required for an object to orbit successful around another one safely without a collision. Re-read again and ask any questions from that.

Might I also add that depending on the hemisphere of the earth you are you can only see different sets of stars. How does the flat earth model explain this, since we should be seeing the same sky at night.

this is not about explaining, this is about proving. Explaining only have to do with theories. Proving have to do with facts. You have not proved any thing.

There is no experiment anywhere in the world that shows a massive object attracting other massive objects. The common sense and logic in the theory of gravitation by mass is that if the earth is a ball attracted to another massive ball like the sun then it follows that the earth should be gumming unto the the ball of the sun by now instead of orbiting around it. This magic gravity that is said to be making the earth spin around the sun instead of gumming unit it does not follow the common sense and logic of gravitationn by mass and so it is null and void.




If the earth is a spinning ball coursing through space with the entire solar system moving we should not be seeing the same stars our fore fathers seas hundreds of years ago, this shouldn't even be an argument at all it is common sense. The conatlation with which the zodiacs are made can still be seen today proving the earth to be non moving.
Polaris the north pole star should not be standing in the north pole today if the earth is shining in space.
This matter about dates settles the fact that the earth is not moving. Again these are facts not theories like you present.

EMILO2STAY:
no you are wrong, the cavendish experiment has never been replicated by any and that is why it is criticized to day even within the science community.

There is no experiment anywhere that shows a ball of mass getting attracted to another ball of mass.

What are you saying about schuler tuning? It thought you said gravity curves the plane now it is schuler tuning that curves the plane.


There is absolutely no way an aircraft will be curving and it will remain level at the same time time this is impossible schuler tuning is a fraud that does nothing. Many pilots do not use this and some do not even know of it. This schuler tuning is only a propaganda tool to hide the truth. The fact is that pilots use attitude indicator to maintain a flat horizon. If schuler tuning is accounting for curvature then why do planes fly straight? Why used an attitude indicator to keep the flight straight and level. How come this curvature is not detected by the attitude indicator that uses Gyroscopes?. How can a plane fly horizontally for several miles and then vertical again for several mile and this is not accounted for by our reality or the attitude indicator? Schulert tuning does nothing and this is why it is not known by many pilots and is not even used in flight.

You can keep arguing with the Henry Cavendish experiment, that won't change the fact. Just watch rookies demonstrate it to you on YouTube at least, if you find it hard to read articles on it.

The attitude indicator (AI) also known as the gyro horizon is part of the design feature of all altitude adjustment indicators, manual or artificial which accounts for schuher tuning. Like I said its all over the internet. Maybe you should take it up with Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, Mitsubishi and the rest of airline manufacturing
companies. They all agree it's part of their design feature for attitude indicators so rest the matter, or take it up in court, or start a petition against them.

If the Earth is a circular flat, can you tell us how possible it is for Day and night to occur at different times at different places.....

We can see that the moon is a sphere, same as the sun, How then is it possible that the bodies like it won't be a sphere itself, as created by God the designer?

If the Earth is flat, how come theres something called 'the earth core'? Also remember that we as creatures are on the surface of the Earth, if we as geologists can dig up to 50-60Ft for petroleum, that means the Earth is not a circular flat....

EMILO2STAY:
this is not about explaining, this is about proving. Explaining only have to do with theories. Proving have to do with facts. You have not proved any thing.

There is no experiment anywhere in the world that shows a massive object attracting other massive objects. The common sense and logic in the theory of gravitation by mass is that if the earth is a ball attracted to another massive ball like the sun then it follows that the earth should be gumming unto the the ball of the sun by now instead of orbiting around it. This magic gravity that is said to be making the earth spin around the sun instead of gumming unit it does not follow the common sense and logic of gravitationn by mass and so it is null and void.




If the earth is a spinning ball coursing through space with the entire solar system moving we should not be seeing the same stars our fore fathers seas hundreds of years ago, this shouldn't even be an argument at all it is common sense. The conatlation with which the zodiacs are made can still be seen today proving the earth to be non moving.
Polaris the north pole star should not be standing in the north pole today if the earth is shining in space.
This matter about dates settles the fact that the earth is not moving. Again these are facts not theories like you present.

You still didn't explain how we see different set of stars on different poles of the earth?

By the way before I gift you too many evidence, DON'T FORGET TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS I ASKED ON THE OTHER THREAD. thanks.

onlyfacts:


So you are saying you can fly given a wing right? Same as a rat, a donkey etc?

you are not making sense here, are birds the only animals that fly? Do we not have mammals like bats the size of rats and mouse that fly? Your statement proves nothing.

The sun and moon are plasma, but the plasma has to be formed somewhere? If they don't have a very hot CORE to form the plasma ,then how did the plasma come about? Plus if they were initially plasma from the beginning by now they should have exhausted all the plasma and burnt out. [/quote] God created the lights and put them there that is how they came about. No one has been to the sun or the moon to proper study them and know why they are not burning out. The God who put them there mainland them.

onlyfacts:


You still didn't explain how we see different set of stars on different poles of the earth?

By the way before I gift you too many evidence, DON'T FORGET TO ANSWER THE REMAINING QUESTIONS I ASKED ON THE OTHER THREAD. thanks.

perspective simple. That is why we see deffermet set of stars at different locations.

And you failed to explained why Wes still see the same stars if the earth is spinning? You ask more questions now than proving your self.

I would like it very much if you gift me this poofs because that is what I have been longing for.

EMILO2STAY:
perspective simple. That is why we see deffermet set of stars at different locations.

And you failed to explained why Wes still see the same stars if the earth is spinning? You ask more questions now than proving your self.

I would like it very much if you gift me this poofs because that is what I have been longing for.

You know I have so many proofs but you really haven't processed the earlier ones I gave you. But those already proven and demonstrated countless times over to actually work. So I'm becoming a bit skeptical in sharing too much of those information, so I don't give you an OVERLOAD.

If it's just perspective then you are incorrect. Since it's the same sky we should still be able to see the same stars, WORSE CASE SCENARIO WOULD BE FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES.

onlyfacts:


You can keep arguing with the Henry Cavendish experiment, that won't change the fact. Just watch rookies demonstrate it to you on YouTube at least, if you find it hard to read articles on it.

The attitude indicator (AI) also known as the gyro horizon is part of the design feature of all altitude adjustment indicators, manual or artificial which accounts for schuher tuning. Like I said its all over the internet. Maybe you should take it up with Boeing, Airbus, Embraer, Mitsubishi and the rest of airline manufacturing
companies. They all agree it's part of their design feature for attitude indicators so rest the matter, or take it up in court, or start a petition against them.

. We are talking about observable, testable and repeatable experiments here. Also we are talking about physics which deals with the physical and as such it has to do with common sense, every day experience and and our reality.

Schuler or not plane have been flying straight before anything called schuler tuning. So what accounts for the curvature for planes without schuler.

It is common sense and our reality that plane fly horizontally till they get to their destination.
. you can't tell meet that I have been flying horizontally and vertically for hundreds of miles without my summon sense and reality accounting foe them. We are humans, living things with senses this is why we are intelligent creatures. Mitsubishi , Boeing , embraer, airbus can't tell me I am flying vertically when I am sitting upright. When the right brothers fly their planes was their any schuler there to account foe the curvature for them? This is why I told you that it is a fraud because even pilots don't use it because it is not needed, why is it not needed? ;because there is no curvature to account for.

EMILO2STAY:
you are not making sense here, are birds the only animals that fly? Do we not have mammals like bats the size of rats and mouse that fly? Your statement proves nothing.

The sun and moon are plasma, but the plasma has to be formed somewhere? If they don't have a very hot CORE to form the plasma ,then how did the plasma come about? Plus if they were initially plasma from the beginning by now they should have exhausted all the plasma and burnt out. God created the lights and put them there that is how they came about. No one has been to the sun or the moon to proper study them and know why they are not burning out. The God who put them there mainland them.

So in other words you have no answer but GOD to give and this is EVIDENCE you have to prove your point?

Good, make yourself a bird wing or any other wing and attempt to fly from the ground upwards and see if it's not a MASSIVE FAIL.

onlyfacts:


You know I have so many proofs but you really haven't processed the earlier ones I gave you. But those already proven and demonstrated countless times over to actually work. So I'm becoming a bit skeptical in sharing too much of those information, so I don't give you an OVERLOAD.

If it's just perspective then you are incorrect. Since it's the same sky we should still be able to see the same stars, WORSE CASE SCENARIO WOULD BE FROM DIFFERENT ANGLES.

I don't know of any proof you posses unless you present them.

And I have proceeds the theories you have as proofs. You are the one who have failed to give proof of a massive ball attracting another ball, how plane fly straight in reality if the earth was a ball. How we see the same stars our forefather used to navigate around the world, how we don't feel any movement of the earth etc. Give proofs that can be replicated in reality not theories. Every thing I tell you can be replicated I reality, tried tested and proven.

EMILO2STAY:
. We are talking about observable, testable and repeatable experiments here. Also we are talking about physics which deals with the physical and as such it has to do with common sense, every day experience and and our reality.

Schuler or not plane have been flying straight before anything called schuler tuning. So what accounts for the curvature for planes without schuler.

It is common sense and our reality that plane fly horizontally till they get to their destination.
. you can't tell meet that I have been flying horizontally and vertically for hundreds of miles without my summon sense and reality accounting foe them. We are humans, living things with senses this is why we are intelligent creatures. Mitsubishi , Boeing , embraer, airbus can't tell me I am flying vertically when I am sitting upright. When the right brothers fly their planes was their any schuler there to account foe the curvature for them? This is why I told you that it is a fraud because even pilots don't use it because it is not needed, why is it not needed? ;because there is no curvature to account for.

You still don't know how airplanes fly but you want to school airline manufacturers about altitude indicators? All the best.

And mind you schuler tuning has been part of aviation gyroscopes.

Like I said start a petition already. You may uncover something or maybe learn something in the process

onlyfacts:


So in other words you have no answer but GOD to give and this is EVIDENCE you have to prove your point?

Good, make yourself a bird wing or any other wing and attempt to fly from the ground upwards and see if it's not a MASSIVE FAIL.

yes that is my evidence because the earth is designed by a higher entity and every thing in it.it is not the product of a big bang from nothing because it lacks proof but the evidence for a creator has proof. The chambers of the sun and the moon and how they go about the earth is explained in the book of enoch and this tallies with reality.


Your last statement is void and null because we have mammals that fly too not just birds.

EMILO2STAY:
I don't know of any proof you posses unless you present them.

And I have proceeds the theories you have as proofs. You are the one who have failed to give proof of a massive ball attracting another ball, how plane fly straight in reality if the earth was a ball. How we see the same stars our forefather used to navigate around the world, how we don't feel any movement of the earth etc. Give proofs that can be replicated in reality not theories. Every thing I tell you can be replicated I reality, tried tested and proven.

Henry Cavendish experiment, Schuler tuning, Foucault pendulum. They are being replicated globally. You can take that up with the internet if you wish.

EMILO2STAY:
yes that is my evidence because the earth is designed by a higher entity and every thing in it.it is not the product of a big bang from nothing because it lacks proof but the evidence for a creator has proof. The chambers of the sun and the moon and how they go about the earth is explained in the book of enoch and this tallies with reality.


Your last statement is void and null because we have mammals that fly too not just birds.

That doesn't change the fact that if you tried flying from the ground up it would be a massive fail.

I am a Godly person too but saying God in a scientific discussion and not a religious discussion is totally unnecessary. Just say you dont know or have the answers, you can even add YET to it.

onlyfacts:


You still don't know how airplanes fly but you want to school airline manufacturers about altitude indicators? All the best.

if I don't know how air planes fly then give your own explanation and let's see of it has nothing to with the wings or the jet engine. Pls tey and let's see.

onlyfacts:
And mind you schuler tuning has been part of aviation gyroscopes.

yes but it proves proves nothing but it beeing a fraud. Gyroscopes with attitude indicator is what every pilot who flies both military and commercial aircraft use every single day of flight. Schuler tuning is only found in less than 10% of every aircraft in the world so not all pilots use it at all.

Like I said start a petition already. You may uncover something or maybe learn something in the process[/quote]

EMILO2STAY:
if I don't know how air planes fly then give your own explanation and let's see of it has nothing to with the wings or the jet engine. Pls tey and let's see.

yes but it proves proves nothing but it beeing a fraud. Gyroscopes with attitude indicator is what every pilot who flies both military and commercial aircraft use every single day of flight. Schuler tuning is only found in less than 10% of every aircraft in the world so not all pilots use it at all.

Like I said start a petition already. You may uncover something or maybe learn something in the process

Wow really 10% of all aircraft's, from what source please?

onlyfacts:


That doesn't change the fact that if you tried flying from the ground up it would be a massive fail.

this still prove nothing and you arw even wrong. There are suits desinged like that of a gliding squirrel that makes people fly and glide through the air, there are also wings desinged for flight like that of an aircraft that can be strapped to a person with a little jet engine to propel the person forward and fly. So pls dont make this comment again it is null and void.

onlyfacts:
I am a Godly person too but saying God in a scientific discussion and not a religious discussion is totally unnecessary. Just say you dont know or have the answers, you can even add YET to it.

. If you are truly scientific then you would truelly k owe that avoiding GOD scientific matters is not possible because science cannot explain every thing. Jeremiah 31:37Thus says the LORD: “If heaven above can be measured, And the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel For all that they have done, says the LORD.

EMILO2STAY:
this still prove nothing and you arw even wrong. There are suits desinged like that of a gliding squirrel that makes people fly and glide through the air, there are also wings desinged for flight like that of an aircraft that can be strapped to a person with a little jet engine to propel the person forward and fly. So pls dont make this comment again it is null and void.

. If you are truly scientific then you would truelly k owe that avoiding GOD scientific matters is not possible because science cannot explain every thing. Jeremiah 31:37Thus says the LORD: “If heaven above can be measured, And the foundations of the earth searched out beneath, I will also cast off all the seed of Israel For all that they have done, says the LORD.

Gliding isn't flying, but controlled crashing. For flying you need to lift off the ground into the sky like a plane. For a jet man suit, that's putting a "miniature jet like plane design" at the back of a man for him to fly, that is technically flying.

So if you give a man a wing, he will simply glide from TOP of a height to the GROUND. so man needs more than a wing to fly... He NEEDS SOMETHING RESEMBLING A JET OR ROCKET STYLE DESIGN WITHOUT WINGS TO FLY.

So they are using a jet like plane to fly. But you still don't know why he is able to fly since you don't know how airplanes fly.

Everything physical has a physical explanation, unless you just want to be lazy about it. Like how planes fly.

Anything spiritual that is left for God to explain, as we can't see spirits.

onlyfacts:


Wow really 10% of all aircraft's, from what source please?

schuler tuning is all about modification to already existing system of navigation. This modification only came about 25 to 30 years ago since the wright brothers invented the aircraft. Which is why most pilots do not know about it.. Some modern pilots who know about it don't even use it because when this modification system breaks down the pilots can still fly without any accounting of any curvature and when they call the company to explain the anomaly they would not answer and besides it is just one company that makes this modification device and distribute to all the aircraft companies.

.

onlyfacts:


Gliding isn't flying, but controlled crashing. For flying you need to lift off the ground into the sky like a plane. For a jet man suit, that's putting a "miniature jet like plane design" at the back of a man for him to fly, that is technically flying.

the point i am making is that if given the same thing birds or planes have to a person then that person would be able to fly just as that bird or plane flew. Whether gliding or flying these things have to do with aerodynamics. So i have proven my point

onlyfacts:
So if you give a man a wing, he will simply glide from TOP of a height to the GROUND. so man needs more than a wing to fly... He NEEDS SOMETHING RESEMBLING A JET OR ROCKET STYLE DESIGN WITHOUT WINGS TO FLY.

if you give a man wing and have him flap this wings like the birds do he will fly. We already have flying mammals pls stop making arguments out of nothing. Anf you already agreed to what i said that if wings like that of a plane and a miniature jet engine is strapped to a man he will fly. You are simply contradicting yourself.
self. Birds are not the only thing that flies bats which are mammal fly too. You your argument here is null and void.

So they are using a jet like plane to fly. But you still don't know why he is able to fly since you don't know how airplanes fly.

Everything physical has a physical explanation, unless you just want to be lazy about it. Like how planes fly.

Anything spiritual that is left for God to explain, as we can't see spirits. [/quote]

onlyfacts:


Gliding isn't flying, but controlled crashing. For flying you need to lift off the ground into the sky like a plane. For a jet man suit, that's putting a "miniature jet like plane design" at the back of a man for him to fly, that is technically flying.

the point i am making is that if given the same thing birds or planes have to a person then that person would be able to fly just as that bird or plane flew. Whether gliding or flying these things have to do with aerodynamics. So i have proven my point

onlyfacts:
So if you give a man a wing, he will simply glide from TOP of a height to the GROUND. so man needs more than a wing to fly... He NEEDS SOMETHING RESEMBLING A JET OR ROCKET STYLE DESIGN WITHOUT WINGS TO FLY.

if you give a man wing and have him flap this wings like the birds do he will fly. We already have flying mammals pls stop making arguments out of nothing. Anf you already agreed to what i said that if wings like that of a plane and a miniature jet engine is strapped to a man he will fly. You are simply contradicting yourself.
self. Birds are not the only thing that flies bats which are mammal fly too. You your argument here is null and void.

onlyfacts:
So they are using a jet like plane to fly. But you still don't know why he is able to fly since you don't know how airplanes fly.

i already told you it is due to aerodynamics with the wings. If you think it is not then prove me wrong.

onlyfacts:
Everything physical has a physical explanation, unless you just want to be lazy about it. Like how planes fly.

you simply grasping at straws and beating around the bush.

Oga planes fly due to the aerodynamics of the wings to the air if you doubt this then prove me wrong i challenge you. it is you who do not know about the flight of planes. I know this since was a kid and i used to make toy planes with radio motor. They would never fly if you do get the design of the wings right. If every thing physical can be explained then tell me why we living things get old and die? Tell me what is the sun and the moon and the stars made of. You said every thing physical can be explained then explain Polaris is still standing in the north pole after millennials of rotation of the earth. The human knowledge has limits. you can't have explanation for every thing this is a fact.

onlyfacts:
Anything spiritual that is left for God to explain, as we can't see spirits.

the spiritual controls the physical.

EMILO2STAY:
the point i am making is that if given the same thing birds or planes have to a person then that person would be able to fly just as that bird or plane flew. Whether gliding or flying these things have to do with aerodynamics. So i have proven my point

if you give a man wing and have him flap this wings like the birds do he will fly. We already have flying mammals pls stop making arguments out of nothing. Anf you already agreed to what i said that if wings like that of a plane and a miniature jet engine is strapped to a man he will fly. You are simply contradicting yourself.
self. Birds are not the only thing that flies bats which are mammal fly too. You your argument here is null and void.

i already told you it is due to aerodynamics with the wings. If you think it is not then prove me wrong.

you simply grasping at straws and beating around the bush.

Oga planes fly due to the aerodynamics of the wings to the air if you doubt this then prove me wrong i challenge you. it is you who do not know about the flight of planes. I know this since was a kid and i used to make toy planes with radio motor. They would never fly if you do get the design of the wings right. If every thing physical can be explained then tell me why we living things get old and die? Tell me what is the sun and the moon and the stars made of. You said every thing physical can be explained then explain Polaris is still standing in the north pole after millennials of rotation of the earth. The human knowledge has limits. you can't have explanation for every thing this is a fact.


the spiritual controls the physical.

A man cant flap wings MANUALLY like a bird and fly, that isnt possible. Unless something else flaps the wing mechanical for him, fast enough for him to generate lift and fly.

I'm not going to teach you directly how planes fly but I'll lead you to the answer gradually, let's keep going.

So you finally agree you aren't sure of how the sun and moon maintain their "magnetic orbits" because you can't defend them being light enough to float and still having a metal core to produce magnetism. Shouldn't that alone tell you something is not right with your model?

EMILO2STAY:
schuler tuning is all about modification to already existing system of navigation. This modification only came about 25 to 30 years ago since the wright brothers invented the aircraft. Which is why most pilots do not know about it.. Some modern pilots who know about it don't even use it because when this modification system breaks down the pilots can still fly without any accounting of any curvature and when they call the company to explain the anomaly they would not answer and besides it is just one company that makes this medication device and distribute to all the aircraft companies.

Of cause pilots know all components of their planes and that is why pilots are also trained aeronautical engineers... They literally fix the plane on ground when its bad.

That's sarcasm by the way.

You shouldnt even be mentioning gyroscopes at all because it was Foucault who gave the device its name, in an experiment (Greek "skopeein" ) meaning "TO SEE" the (Greek gyros, circle or rotation) "EARTH'S ROTATION".
The gyroscope was invented in 1852 by the French experimental physicist Leon Foucault (1819-1868) as part of a two-pronged investigation of the rotation of the earth.As the earth rotated beneath the gyroscope, it would maintain its orientation in space.

NB: Johann Bohnenberger of Germany made a similar instrument like a gyroscope but called it "machine" and it too was based on a rotating massive sphere.

So a gyroscope is a device in other words that proves the "spherical rotating earth", but it has to be on ground to prove that.

Now back to topic. Above the surface of the ground; that is on a craft like a ship, airplane, rocket etc, a gyroscope has found other applications other than proving the earth is spherical and spinning. It is an important component now in balancing and inertial navigation system of those crafts or any craft for that matter. Since the gyroscope is no longer on the ground but inside a craft to account for earth's curvature schuler tuning is then applied.

Autopilots use gyroscopes that account for the curvature of the earth and that is what schuler tuning is about. Which ever way you look at gyroscopes, if you truly understand why it was invented and how it works, you will see it was invented to prove ONE THING: THE EARTH'S SPIN AND ITS CURVATURE.

so maybe you can take that up with the late physicist Leon Foucault(Its inventor, the guy that proved the earth was rotating) or start a petition against the gyroscope or the use of the gyroscope all together.

Least I forget, the modification system doesn't break down, if it's does the altitude indicator become bad completely.

ThothHermes:
Don't know why you are telling me this.

I am telling you this because you seem intelligent enough to understand what I mean, which you should considering your name.

obonujoker:
If the Earth is a circular flat, can you tell us how possible it is for Day and night to occur at different times at different places.....

I just don't understand why you people can't learn, despite me teaching this again and again! So, let me teach you again, and this time kindly pay very close attention!

You know the Japanese, right? Those people of the Land of the Rising Sun? Well, they used to work day and night shoving coal into this very big furnace to make it glow hot during the day and they rest at night so it stops glowing hence the very red hot ball you see in the day called the sun, and the less hot one you see at night called the moon. Sometime around the 60s or thereabouts, the Japanese stopped using coal and began using nuclear energy which is why there is more heat on earth today which is usually refered to as global warming, though its real proper name is flat earth heating.

It's like after God said, "let there be light", God then placed that light in the hands of the People of the Land of the Rising Sun to be maintained in perpetuity. If you zoom in really really close in the image below, you will observe the Japanese diligently at work creating night and day.

www.nairaland.com/attachments/10362598_notable00741_jpeg799419dad7756251a4e8d1a180e2dd77

Please don't make me have to keep teaching you all these very obvious "facts" that you can see with your own eyes if you could just use them. God gave you two eyes for a very good reason! The earth is a circular flat, the Japanese fuel the sun, the moon is made of swiss cheese, and would look like the picture below if not for photoshop and NASA who deceive everyone!

www.nairaland.com/attachments/10357230_notable00743_jpeg1b5131768968dc7a6ccee8c7163b3e2d

budaatum:

The Japanese have been fueling the sun for 1000s of years and are very good at controlling how hot it burns (or glows) and where, depending on the agreements signed by each nation.

We are very lucky in Africa. A very long time ago, like a million years ago, agreements were signed by Egypt to light the entire Africa in perpetuity, which is why we have so much sunlight. Aborigines in Australia too had such deals, but Europeans messed it up when they arrived and now burn until they sign new deals.

You can see the poles have ice. That's because there was no people there to sign deals and its now too expensive, though they are getting more now which is why the ice melts.

onlyfacts:


Of cause pilots know all components of their planes and that is why pilots are also trained aeronautical engineers... They literally fix the plane on ground when its bad.

That's sarcasm by the way.

You shouldnt even be mentioning gyroscopes at all because it was Foucault who gave the device its name, in an experiment (Greek "skopeein" ) meaning "TO SEE" the (Greek gyros, circle or rotation) "EARTH'S ROTATION".
The gyroscope was invented in 1852 by the French experimental physicist Leon Foucault (1819-1868) as part of a two-pronged investigation of the rotation of the earth.As the earth rotated beneath the gyroscope, it would maintain its orientation in space.

NB: Johann Bohnenberger of Germany made a similar instrument like a gyroscope but called it "machine" and it too was based on a rotating massive sphere.

So a gyroscope is a device in other words that proves the "spherical rotating earth", but it has to be on ground to prove that.

Now back to topic. Above the surface of the ground; that is on a craft like a ship, airplane, rocket etc, a gyroscope has found other applications other than proving the earth is spherical and spinning. It is an bimportant component now in balancing and inertial navigation system of those crafts or any craft for that matter. Since the gyroscope is no longer on the ground but inside a craft to account for earth's curvature schuler tuning is then applied.

Autopilots use gyroscopes that account for the curvature of the earth and that is what schuler tuning is about. Which ever way you look at gyroscopes, if you truly understand why it was invented and how it works, you will see it was invented to prove ONE THING: THE EARTH'S SPIN AND ITS CURVATURE.

so maybe you can take that up with the late physicist Leon Foucault(Its inventor, the guy that proved the earth was rotating) or start a petition against the gyroscope or the use of the gyroscope all together.

Least I forget, the modification system doesn't break down, if it's does the altitude indicator become bad completely.

you are now exhausted and as such begining to sound incoherent and displaying ignorance.

Gyroscopes In aircraft are not invented to prove a globe neither foes the word gyro which means rotation does not refer to the spin of the earth but refers to a device consisting of a wheel or disc mounted so that it can spin rapidly about an axis.

You are so wrong on every side.

onlyfacts:


A man cant flap wings MANUALLY like a bird and fly, that isnt possible. Unless something else flaps the wing mechanical for him, fast enough for him to generate lift and fly.

I'm not going to teach you directly how planes fly but I'll lead you to the answer gradually, let's keep going.

So you finally agree you aren't sure of how the sun and moon maintain their "magnetic orbits" because you can't defend them being light enough to float and still having a metal core to produce magnetism. Shouldn't that alone tell you something is not right with your model?

you mentions have not proven any point you are trying to make. You now just type for the sake of replying.

You have facts about how planes fly yet you just want to lead me on. Just listen to your self.

You were busy giving me multiply mentions now you just want to lead me on, but you user name is "onlyfacts" yet you have no facts to present.

EMILO2STAY:
you mentions have not proven any point you are trying to make. You now just type for the sake of replying.

You have facts about how planes fly yet you just want to lead me on. Just listen to your self.

You were busy giving me multiply mentions now you just want to lead me on, but you user name is "onlyfacts" yet you have no facts to present.

I have a point to make, I will lead you there and drop it hot on you. Let's keep going please, it's too early to lose your patience.

You are almost there

EMILO2STAY:
you are now exhausted and as such begining to sound incoherent and displaying ignorance.

Gyroscopes In aircraft are not invented to prove a globe neither foes the word gyro which means rotation does not refer to the spin of the earth but refers to a device consisting of a wheel or disc mounted so that it can spin rapidly about an axis.

You are so wrong on every side.

After more than 24 hours of research on your part and this was the weak defence you want to put up?

You can take that up with the internet, start a petition but remember any time you mention GYROSCOPE it means "to see the spin of the earth" and it's inventor used it to prove the Earth spin and curvature.

But in case you forget, anytime you mention "gyroscope" I will always remind you.