onlyfacts:


After more than 24 hours of research on your part and this was the weak defence you want to put up?

You can take that up with the internet, start a petition but remember any time you mention GYROSCOPE it means "to see the spin of the earth" and it's inventor used it to prove the Earth spin and curvature.

But in case you forget, anytime you mention "gyroscope" I will always remind you.

onlyfacts:


I have a point to make, I will lead you there and drop it hot on you. Let's keep going please, it's too early to lose your patience.

You are almost there

EMILO2STAY:
are you seriously saying that attitude indicator gyro means the spin of the earth. If this is true then you have finally exposed your ignorance.

I am a busy person, if you think my late reply is because I am doing research then think again. Look at the time which I reply you and you notice that.

I have been defending the flat earth reality since last year. Check my profile I have two threads on on the flat earth. I have done my research a long time ago. It is you who need to do your own bone work.

EMILO2STAY:
your defence are weak. None is provable observable and repeatable.

You are exhausted and now your just typing for the sake of it.

What ever proof you think is still left on you ( I know there is nothing left in you) then I challenge you to bring it on and I promise to debunk it and show you that you have living in ignorance.

onlyfacts:


Not my problem if you didn't comprehend properly my previous post on gyroscope and Schuler tuning. Whenever you are less "busy" go and read it again but whether you eventually do that doesn't change the fact that a gyroscope was made to detect the spin of the earth.

I know it's a shocker to you but I got more where that came from. Let's just keep going okay. Just relax.

EMILO2STAY:
you are not making any sense at all, the gyroscopes in an aircraft is meant to maintain a flat horizon. Not to detect the spin of the earth.


Now let me ask you pls how does a gyroscope detect the spin of the earth.?.

onlyfacts:



Coming from you who lack "evidence" as to how the sun and moon maintain their orbit?

How the sun and moon keep their plasma state without burning out since they have no core to heat up matter to plasma state, as they must be light enough to float in air?

Does that even sound logical?

More like your own "defence is weak. None is provable observable and repeatable".



I'm still wmaiting to hear how planes fly.

onlyfacts:


You are still mentioning GYROSCOPE, better invent a linearscope.

To find out how it detect the spin of the earth a simple google search will help you, mind you if that doesn't satisfy you take that up with the inventor or better still make your own device.

But if you are too busy to google then read my "previous post on gyroscope" for a recap.

EMILO2STAY:
why should i tell you about how the sun and moon maintain their orbit? Did I put them there?

You also lack evidence about gravity is said to make the ball earth runs around it from 93 million miles away.
. if you are still waiting for how air planes fly then you are the one who have chosen to remain in you state of induced ignorance.

I thought you where some matured intellectual but now I see how childish you are.

EMILO2STAY:
buy I thought you have facts? Why not present it? Present it here and debunk me if you can.

onlyfacts:


So you didn't put the moon and sun there yet you say your knowledge on physical laws are tested and trusted?

What did you do with Henry Cavendish experiment on gravity? Something that rookies replicate in physics lab.

Like I said if you really want to enjoy this game, just let's keep going.

Do you play chess?

Well I love chess and I have some moves to end this game but we just have to keep playing. Trust me okay.

onlyfacts:

[b]Of cause pilots know all components of their planes and that is why pilots are also trained aeronautical engineers... They literally fix the plane on ground when its bad.

That's sarcasm by the way.

You shouldnt even be mentioning gyroscopes at all because it was Foucault who gave the device its name, in an experiment (Greek "skopeein" ) meaning "TO SEE" the (Greek gyros, circle or rotation) "EARTH'S ROTATION".
The gyroscope was invented in 1852 by the French experimental physicist Leon Foucault (1819-1868) as part of a two-pronged investigation of the rotation of the earth.As the earth rotated beneath the gyroscope, it would maintain its orientation in space.

NB: Johann Bohnenberger of Germany made a similar instrument like a gyroscope but called it "machine" and it too was based on a rotating massive sphere.

So a gyroscope is a device in other words that proves the "spherical rotating earth", but it has to be on ground to prove that.

Now back to topic. Above the surface of the ground; that is on a craft like a ship, airplane, rocket etc, a gyroscope has found other applications other than proving the earth is spherical and spinning. It is an important component now in balancing and inertial navigation system of those crafts or any craft for that matter. Since the gyroscope is no longer on the ground but inside a craft to account for earth's curvature schuler tuning is then applied.

Autopilots use gyroscopes that account for the curvature of the earth and that is what schuler tuning is about. Which ever way you look at gyroscopes, if you truly understand why it was invented and how it works, you will see it was invented to prove ONE THING: THE EARTH'S SPIN AND ITS CURVATURE.

so maybe you can take that up with the late physicist Leon Foucault(Its inventor, the guy that proved the earth was rotating) or start a petition against the gyroscope or the use of the gyroscope all together.

Least I forget, the modification system doesn't break down, if it's does the altitude indicator become bad completely.[/b]




Let me help you repost my comment here since you are a "busy" person.

Learn or don't learn, I won't teach you about gyroscopes again.

EMILO2STAY:
yes they are testable. the fact that I didn't put them there does not means you cannot observe them. From the observation of the moon it show that it is likely a plasma because the moon is translucent sometimes. hard ball of rock is not. It is on record that stars can be seen through the moon. And this is my observable respectable and testable proof.

Which observable proof have you presented? None.


If you have any thing you call facts or proof pls present them.
This will be the last time I will tell you so, if you don't, don't quote me again. I am not here for childish games.

onlyfacts:


Honestly I kinda feel pity for you now. I'm being serious now. You don't need proof, what you need is God coming down from heaven to silently whisper to you that the earth is round. Cavendish, Schuler etc won't help you much as you think you are fighting a righteous fight for God.

I don't want to toy with you cause I am capable of it but your proof and science are very weak. I'll still manage with you as long as you stick around.

EMILO2STAY:
you are beating about theMomma Bush.


The fact here is that on every single aircraft attitude indicator gyroscopes are the maintain a flat horizon.

The gyro is not referring to the spin of the earth but the spin of the disc or wheel mounted so it can spin. On its axis.

You obvioulsy do not know what your talking about.
What you presented are not fact.

If they are fact then prove this fact and tell me how does a gyroscope prove the spirit. Of the earth? Now let's go!!!

EMILO2STAY:
I is now obvious that I have been wasting my time with you. Am done with you.

budaatum:
Contrary to popular belief fostered in countless school classrooms the world over, Christopher Columbus did not discover that the earth was round. The idea of a spherical world had been widely accepted in educated circles from as early as the fourth century b.c. Yet, bizarrely, it was not until the supposedly more rational nineteenth century that the notion of a flat earth really took hold. Even more bizarrely, it persists to this day, despite Apollo missions and widely publicized pictures of the decidedly spherical Earth from space.

Based on a range of original sources, Garwood’s history of Flat-Earth beliefs---from the Babylonians to the present day---raises issues central to the history and philosophy of science, its relationship to religion and the making of human knowledge about the natural world. Flat Earth is the first definitive study of one of history’s most notorious and persistent ideas, and it evokes all the intellectual, philosophical, and spiritual turmoil of the modern age. Ranging from ancient Greece, through Victorian England, to modern-day America, this is a story that encompasses religion, science, and pseudoscience, as well as a spectacular array of people and places. Where else could eccentric aristocrats, fundamentalist preachers, and conspiracy theorists appear alongside Copernicus, Newton, and NASA, except in an account of such a legendary misconception?

Thoroughly enjoyable and illuminating, Flat Earth is social and intellectual history at its best.

Flat Earth: The History of an Infamous Idea
Christine Garwood 1.5Mb ebook dload
www.nairaland.com/attachments/12260964_20200903114339101_jpeg_jpeg10f961feda39bb1113c2aedc6c92f8f9