From the dawn of time, Women have been prune to be idiots...

For every 1 intelligent girl, you would have counted 100 foolish girls, if not a thousand.

Statistics not a hater 4 the feminine sex.

back in College, of all the girls I met I could count only 7 girls who were truly intelligent and smart.

unintelligent girls are a big turn down 4 me...

StacyO:
Back in school then, girls lead while the guys followed.


It was competitive but, the males were no where to be found.


MODIFIED:::

Women are far more intelligent than men, why they tend to be manipulative as well.

Men only channel all their energy on what goes into their pocket (that is, they concentrate on making money).
Though little knowledge is acquired during this process, men are quite slow when it comes to thinking outside the box.


Women on the other hand are logical thinkers who without concentrating more on a particular thing, focuses more on acquiring versatile knowledge.




WOMEN ARE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN MEN.

Though times have changed and you can agree with me that knowledge is no longer a gender thing.

Women emot-think that's why they are not dominating the important sectors of the world like business and politics. Women are sexual objects. Motherhood is far more important than having a career to most women.

Academic intelligence is not true intelligence, it is all about memorizing and indoctrination.

Women are not built for leadership that is why no matter how successful a woman is, she still needs a stronger man that's more successful than her. It's hypergamy!...why because women are the vulnerable sex and that makes them the weaker sex.

Lordpeckxy:
From the dawn of time, Women have been prune to be idiots...

For every 1 intelligent girl, you would have counted 100 foolish girls, if not a thousand.

Statistics not a hater 4 the feminine sex.

back in College, of all the girls I met I could count only 7 girls who were truly intelligent and smart.

unintelligent girls are a big turn down 4 me...

Women are not built for logic. They are emotional beings and not logical beings nahh

DEMZEE:


Women emot-think that's why they are not dominating the important sectors of the world like business and politics. Women are sexual objects. Motherhood is far more important than having a career to most women.

Academic intelligence is not true intelligence, it is all about memorizing and indoctrination.

Women are not built for leadership that is why no matter how successful a woman is, she still needs a stronger man that's more successful than her. It's hypergamy!...why because women are the vulnerable sex and that makes them the weaker sex.

We'll go discuss leadership with queen Elizabeth OR should we do that with M Buhari?

In as much as the leadership ratio of men to women is high, when a woman is elected into power, she tends to perform far more better than her male counterparts.

No two ways about that.


Women don't dominate most of these sectors due to what they are faced with (this same emotional stuff). They are never granted a chance, especially from their male counterparts.

StacyO:

We'll go discuss leadership with queen Elizabeth then OR should we do that with M Buhari?

In as much as the leadership ratio of men to women is high, when a woman is elected into power, she tends to perform far more better than her male counterparts.

No two ways about that.


Women don't dominate most of these sectors due to what they are faced with (this same emotional stuff). They are never granted a chance, especially from their male counterparts.

That's a feminine imperative fallacy

There's no evidence to back up that wen women enter leadership they perform more better than their male counterparts.

Look at new Zealand for example, the prime minister is a woman and she has legalized abominations such as abortion and assisted dying ie suicide.

Look at Pelosi in USA that passed a law in the house that states that recognition of biological sex in the USA is illegal

Women are not built for logic and leadership

Any woman that wants to take on the masculine essence is a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman

DEMZEE:


That's a feminine imperative fallacy

There's no evidence to back up that wen women enter leadership they perform more better than their male counterparts.

Look at new Zealand for example, the prime minister is a woman and she has legalized abominations such as abortion and assisted dying ie suicide.

Look at Pelosi in USA that passed a law in the house that states that recognition of biological sex in the USA is illegal

Women are not built for logic and leadership

Any woman that wants to take on the masculine essence is a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman

Biden that legalized homo isn't a leader

How about Idi Amin? Do you remember him?

Many more like them too.
What of the nuclear weapon Korean guy


I no wan laugh abeg.
I can list thousands of them and I can give you thousands of women that made a difference while they held power in different sectors.

StacyO:


Biden that legalized homo isn't a leader

How about Idi Amin? Do you remember him?

Many more like them too.
What of the nuclear weapon Korean guy


I no wan laugh abeg.
I can list thousands of them and I can give you thousands of women that made a difference while they held power in different sectors.

I am not saying men are perfect in leadership

I'm talking evolutionary science and biology

Women are the vulnerable gender and therefore the weaker sex

Men are the strongest gender

Men lead , women follow

That's why the only religion created by women is feminism and it's ideology is based on neo Marxism and it was a man named Karl Marx who created it.

Any woman in a masculine role is a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman.

Women are meant to be feminine, submissive, cooperative, fit and have fidelity.

DEMZEE:


I am not saying men are perfect in leadership

I'm talking evolutionary science and biology

Women are the vulnerable gender and therefore the weaker sex

Men are the strongest gender

Men lead , women follow

That's why the only religion created by women is feminism and it's ideology is based on neo Marxism and it was a man named Karl Marx who created it.

Any woman in a masculine role is a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman.

Women are meant to be feminine, submissive, cooperative, fit and have fidelity.

You're right when you said women are weak actually but, we can only prove that a fact as regards physical strength and emotions.


Men lead, women follow.
I don't think this hypothesis still holds water.


Feminists will surely meet misogynists.



You're right at the last statement but, I dont think it has added anything into the life of an average woman.
Feminity should be well embraced but, men tend to use it to their advantage.

StacyO:


You're right when you said women are weak actually but, we can only prove that a fact as regards physical strength and emotions.


Men lead, women follow.
I don't think this hypothesis still holds water.


Feminists will surely meet misogynists.



You're right at the last statement but, I dont think it has added anything into the life of an average woman.
Feminity should be well embraced but, men tend to use it to their advantage.

Yes men are the stronger gender that's why women result in the use of Machiavellian and manipulation tactics to at least have that fighting chance when dealing with men. Because women innately know they are the vulnerable gender and therefore the weaker sex.

Men lead women follow
That's why the most successful woman still needs a man that's more successful than her. She can't settle for less because of hypergamy. Women don't see equality, they either see weak or strong males.

Feminists are pseudo masculine hybrid beast women

Because women are choosing to be pseudo masculine hybrid beast women instead of them to not fight their feminine nature and feminity.

Men and women are far better together than apart. We need both the masculine essence and the feminine essence to sustain civilization. No one should take advantage of the other or no one should switch places with the other.

StacyO:
Back in school then, girls lead while the guys followed.


It was competitive but, the males were no where to be found.


MODIFIED:::

Women are far more intelligent than men, why they tend to be manipulative as well.

Men only channel all their energy on what goes into their pocket (that is, they concentrate on making money).
Though little knowledge is acquired during this process, men are quite slow when it comes to thinking outside the box.


Women on the other hand are logical thinkers who without concentrating more on a particular thing, focuses more on acquiring versatile knowledge.




WOMEN ARE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN MEN.

Though times have changed and you can agree with me that knowledge is no longer a gender thing.

Even though you seem to be highly logical but your sentiment is in display here no argument.

Females have more retentive memory than men and are better crammer. Back in school days, females are expected to do better than males from academic intelligence but where are those girls that led back in school days?. Can you mention any?. In their husbands house, l guess.

Moreover, when you said "back in school days" l think is just about less than half a century when men were encouraged to send their female child to school.

Aside cramming, nature made male to be highly logical and superior that they can think deep or question things to get solutions. That's why you rarely see females inventors, noble lauret, leaders and so called religion etc.

Men are adventurers and territorial conquerors with combined logical, physical strength and ego.

Since men concentrate on making money, where do women concentrate on with their versatile knowledge?. Making babies and homes, l guess? This is your sentiment.

If women are versatile than men why are they not dominating every sphere or at least fraction of it or are they Jack of all trades?.

Listen, men are more versatile in knowledge than women. It's undisputed than when social topics, automobile, games, food, Politics, entertainment (football, WWE, Olympics), religion, current affairs etc are opened, 95% of women can talk pass food preparation and telemundo.

Take it or leave it. Man defined the universe even Bible didn't take records of women. Male were targeted for killing both at infant or in war and women to be protected or taken as slaves. Ask yourself why is it so.


A man is what give a woman a honor. That's why you have WO-Man. Made for the man.

The creator made it so. Ask him why.

kalu61:
Even though you seem to be highly logical but your sentiment is in display here no argument.

It might be but, that's just the fact.

Things have changed (that's just it).

DEMZEE:


Yes men are the stronger gender that's why women result in the use of Machiavellian and manipulation tactics to at least have that fighting chance when dealing with men. Because women innately know they are the vulnerable gender and therefore the weaker sex.

Men lead women follow
That's why the most successful woman still needs a man that's more successful than her. She can't settle for less because of hypergamy. Women don't see equality, they either see weak or strong males.

Feminists are pseudo masculine hybrid beast women

Because women are choosing to be pseudo masculine hybrid beast women instead of them to not fight their feminine nature and feminity.

Men and women are far better together than apart. We need both the masculine essence and the feminine essence to sustain civilization. No one should take advantage of the other or no one should switch places with the other.

I don't want to argue today.



I think I would've used queen Elizabeth through out this argument though.


However, you're right @last sentence.

StacyO:


It might be but, that's just the fact.

Things have changed (that's just it).

I was still typing sha. The only thing that has changed is women inclusiveness is all fields of life and fathers agreeing to give equal or more opportunities to their daughters including inheritance. However, doesn't mean than the world is turning to female as you and sapphire claim.

When push comes to shove between the two genders in future. Nature will take care of that by way of emotional and physical war, strength, courage, conquering etc which will never happen.

A woman will always be a woman and a man a man. Both have their roles in nature. This has not changed for billions of years ago and will not for more coming years.

Nah

StacyO:
Back in school then, girls lead while the guys followed.


It was competitive but, the males were no where to be found.


MODIFIED:::

Women are far more intelligent than men, why they tend to be manipulative as well.

Men only channel all their energy on what goes into their pocket (that is, they concentrate on making money).
Though little knowledge is acquired during this process, men are quite slow when it comes to thinking outside the box.


Women on the other hand are logical thinkers who without concentrating more on a particular thing, focuses more on acquiring versatile knowledge.




WOMEN ARE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN MEN.

Though times have changed and you can agree with me that knowledge is no longer a gender thing.

“women are logical thinkers"!!!

Don't be stupid my dear

DONFRANSKID:
it's only you not me

You are just a spoon
Your case is just a bread

Nigeriabiafra80:
You are just a spoon Your case is just a bread

a woman can control you with sex but not me

StacyO:


I don't want to argue today.



I think I would've used queen Elizabeth through out this argument though.


However, you're right @last sentence.

Queen Elizabeth is not a feminine woman nahh

She's a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman.

I'm still shocked how England shifted from kingship rule to queenship rule. No wonder Britain has the most feminists in the world. 7% of women in Britain identify as being feminists though.

Oturatetuala:



Whatever !

Yeah

DEMZEE:


Queen Elizabeth is not a feminine woman nahh

She's a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman.

I'm still shocked how England shifted from kingship rule to queenship rule. No wonder Britain has the most feminists in the world. 7% of women in Britain identify as being feminists though.

What makes her a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman?

So, you mean the queens that ruled England were all pseudo hybrid?

kalu61:
I was still typing sha. The only thing that has changed is women inclusiveness is all fields of life and fathers agreeing to give equal or more opportunities to their daughters including inheritance. However, doesn't mean than the world is turning to female as you and sapphire claim.

When push comes to shove between the two genders in future. Nature will take care of that by way of emotional and physical war, strength, courage, conquering etc which will never happen.

A woman will always be a woman and a man a man. Both have their roles in nature. This has not changed for billions of years ago and will not for more coming years.

It won't change but, society and men themselves have changed it.

Always complaining, do you want women to go extinct?


Make una make up una mind oo

Lucrativress:

I'd say a bigger percentage of women are more clever,in the sense that most women choose the area they wish to be smart in,but for men,they'd rather diversify their intelligence in different aspect's...
So they're both wise, clever and smart but more restricted compared to a man's vast intelligence.

Your comment is very noteworthy. And it sounds honest. Nice one

kalu61:
Even though you seem to be highly logical but your sentiment is in display here no argument.

Females have more retentive memory than men and are better crammer. Back in school days, females are expected to do better than males from academic intelligence but where are those girls that led back in school days?. Can you mention any?. In their husbands house, l guess.

Moreover, when you said "back in school days" l think is just about less than half a century when men were encouraged to send their female child to school.

Aside cramming, nature made male to be highly logical and superior that they can think deep or question things to get solutions. That's why you rarely see females inventors, noble lauret, leaders and so called religion etc.

Men are adventurers and territorial conquerors with combined logical, physical strength and ego.

Since men concentrate on making money, where do women concentrate on with their versatile knowledge?. Making babies and homes, l guess? This is your sentiment.

If women are versatile than men why are they not dominating every sphere or at least fraction of it or are they Jack of all trades?.

Listen, men are more versatile in knowledge than women. It's undisputed than when social topics, automobile, games, food, Politics, entertainment (football, WWE, Olympics), religion, current affairs etc are opened, 95% of women can talk pass food preparation and telemundo.

Take it or leave it. Man defined the universe even Bible didn't take records of women. Male were targeted for killing both at infant or in war and women to be protected or taken as slaves. Ask yourself why is it so.


A man is what give a woman a honor. That's why you have WO-Man. Made for the man.

The creator made it so. Ask him why.

Women are not given the opportunity to explore more of their capabilities.

I think thats the point I'm trying to bring out.


If given that opportunity, imagine how it would turn out.


Football, WWE, sports are all evolving and you can equally agree that women are coming into the picture.
That is to tell you that no opportunities were offered them from the start.

RisenPhoenix1:
No popular belief holds that to be even remotely true. According to statistics, most women tend to hover around an IQ of 100 (average) with very little standard deviation, while men tend to have a larger variance; that is we are more likely to find men who are geniuses and men who are mentally challenged. The final average for men is about 3-4 points higher for women globally.

In practise, men easily outclass women in virtually every field requiring the application of native intelligence; from playing Chess to STEM research. For every Marie Curie, there have been 20 Albert Einsteins. This is still true now that women are overtaking men in academic representation. The few remaining men still excel.

Of course, in all fairness to women's brains, men do tend to lag far behind when trying to analyse the plot of some third tier romantic Mexican drama or Telemundo serie. But I don't know whether you want to call that evidence of 'superior intelligence'.

Epic response. I will take this to the bank...Hehehehe

StacyO:


What makes her a pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman?

So, you mean the queens that ruled England were all pseudo hybrid?

Kings and not queens rule, Queens only follow the leadership of their King.

A pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman is a woman who wud rather embrace the masculine essence than embrace her innate femininity and feminine nature.

We also have pseudo feminine hybrid beast men for example bobrisky

Collinsaik:
By default many Women are more intelligent and mentally stronger than most men but in many cases they never develop their IQ to its full capacity unlike men. nature has made it so by default but what we notice is that many men go the extra mile to develop thier IQ through a lot of means such as education, extensive reading and reaserch and everday life experiences whereas the women get distracted by their beauty along the way. okonjo iweala and allison maduekwe are good examples of super inteligent women. take note of the lofty height they were able to attain in lyf. hope i made sence

Your answer is all over the place son. But how about this few lines I copied from somewhere;

A man can have 2 mistress outside marriage and still love his wife and drop money for upkeep at home. He can handle 3 women at once for years but knows where his heart belongs.. Its a brain task.

But if a woman likes another man, all her affections goes to that man and she starts becoming rude to her husband or first guy.. In fact its dat rudeness you'll use to know something is going on till she's caught..they can barely handle 2 men smoothly. They use emotions to reason instead of brain/mental sense. Yet want equality with men. How funny.

So how do you reconcile that to women's mental strength superiority?

DEMZEE:


Kings and not queens rule, Queens only follow the leadership of their King.

A pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman is a woman who wud rather embrace the masculine essence than embrace her innate femininity and feminine nature.

We also have pseudo feminine hybrid beast men for example bobrisky

Funny.

I don't even think there's anything like pseudo masculine hybrid beast women.


Another grammar brought out just to make women feel like they're worth nothing. Lol

StacyO:


Women are not given the opportunity to explore more of their capabilities.

I think thats the point I'm trying to bring out.


If given that opportunity, imagine how it would turn out.


Football, WWE, sports are all evolving and you can equally agree that women are coming into the picture.
That is to tell you that no opportunities were offered them from the start.

Yes we are seeing the results

Single motherhood and unmarried women is on the increase in the west.

Feminism isn't doing any good to women especially relationship wise. It's helping the economy but it's not helping women personally.

I'm always surprised when I see ladies choose to be career sluts and slave to their bosses whom are mostly men than choose to be housewives.

Our foremothers are far more smarter than modern women

StacyO:


Funny.

I don't even think there's anything like pseudo masculine hybrid beast women.


Another grammar brought out just to make women feel like they're worth nothing. Lol

U sha understand my point.

A pseudo masculine hybrid beast woman means nothing to me, she ain't wife-able cos she's just another caricature of a man

DEMZEE:


Yes we are seeing the results

Single motherhood and unmarried women is on the increase in the west.

Feminism isn't doing any good to women especially relationship wise. It's helping the economy but it's not helping women personally.

I'm always surprised when I see ladies choose to be career sluts and slave to their bosses whom are mostly men than choose to be housewives.

Our foremothers are far more smarter than modern women

Unmarried women increasing in the west?
Who fed you that? Lol


Feminists I believe took that part as a result of personal choice, just like misogynists.
Everyone will bear the consequences of their actions.


How many men will accept to take in full time housewives?? (Honest answer please)


Our foremothers never experienced such harsh realities being faced by the modern day women.

StacyO:

Unmarried women increasing in the west?
Who fed you that? Lol


Feminists I believe took that part as a result of personal choice, just like misogynists.
Everyone will bear the consequences of their actions.


How many men will accept to take in full time housewives?? (Honest answer please)


Our foremothers never experienced such harsh realities being faced by the modern day women.

The stats are there

Modern women are the most miserable and loneliest women in the world. Especially the unmarried successful ones.

Marriage is on the decline in the west.

High value alpha males will take in full time housewives especially the polygamous ones.

So u are telling me modern women are suffering more than our foremothers, u must be a joker!!

Our foremothers were having challenges of not having safe childbirths, wars and menstruation challenges uhn

DEMZEE:


The stats are there

Modern women are the most miserable and loneliest women in the world. Especially the unmarried successful ones.

Marriage is on the decline in the west.

High value alpha males will take in full time housewives especially the polygamous ones.

So u are telling me modern women are suffering more than our foremothers, u must be a joker!!

Our foremothers were having challenges of not having safe childbirths, wars and menstruation challenges uhn

You're right but, I can say they were not granted the priviledge to live amongst confused men.

You can agree with me that this present generation of men are highly confused.