LordReed:


LMFAO! Kai! What a fanboy. You have now developed papal reverence for Musk. Bwahahahahaha!

Who was laughing at him? See below


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGx16XABgaI

FreeIgboho:


It is different saying something in theory, not knowing quite what u r talking about, than saying something you’ve seen and KNOW, and you are the only one of your contemporaries seriously warning about it!

He's the only one you're a fanboy of. I mentioned Gates but you're not a fanboy of Gates so it didn't even register. LoL.

FreeIgboho:


Who was laughing at him? See below


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGx16XABgaI

And where in that video was NDT laughing? How is someone giving a personal opinion in a serious manner, laughing? Do you imagine that at everything you start something everybody is going to say you'll succeed?

LordReed:


What reason should there be no limit?

Common sense, logic, classic physics - if light travels on a bus going 90m/hr it ought be 90m/hr faster, but it is not. The more force you apply the faster something ought go till infinity

FreeIgboho:


Common sense, logic, classic physics - if light travels on a bus going 90m/hr it ought be 90m/hr faster, but it is not. The more force you apply the faster something ought go till infinity

What evidence do you have for anything that is infinite?

LordReed:


He's the only one you're a fanboy of. I mentioned Gates but you're not a fanboy of Gates so it didn't even register. LoL.

I gave you references, provide a reference where Gates was preoccupied with dangers of AI like Musk, I’m always open to correction

LordReed:


And where in that video was NDT laughing? How is someone giving a personal opinion in a serious manner, laughing? Do you imagine that at everything you start something everybody is going to say you'll succeed?

You obviously haven’t followed. Google people who laughed at Musk including Russians

LordReed:


What evidence do you have for anything that is infinite?

Meaning what?

FreeIgboho:


Meaning what?

You said velocity should have been infinite so I am asking if you know of anything that is infinite.

FreeIgboho:


You obviously haven’t followed. Google people who laughed at Musk including Russians

Laughing implies mocking. I am not aware of anyone who mocked Musk for starting a space exploration Co.

FreeIgboho:


I gave you references, provide a reference where Gates was preoccupied with dangers of AI like Musk, I’m always open to correction

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmfrMKLwr3k

LordReed:
You said velocity should have been infinite so I am asking if you know of anything that is infinite.

See below.
Can you envision coming to the end of space, where there is no empty space on the other side? Same with time

FreeIgboho:


See below.
Can you envision coming to the end of space, where there is no empty space on the other side? Same with time

"Could be" is different from "is". Point being there is no real thing that we KNOW of that is infinite so it is pointless to expect that velocity should have been infinite. We live in a universe that very much bound to what is finite. Using the speed of light as some kind of hard limit doesn't make any sense since every other thing is similarly finite, why are you choosing light and saying ah ha! this one does the trick. Why are you not saying ah ha! All the mass of the universe is finite therefore we are in a simulation?

LordReed:


Laughing implies mocking. I am not aware of anyone who mocked Musk for starting a space exploration Co.

See below

LordReed:


https://youtu.be/EmfrMKLw3k

You compare this to Musk almost crying about AI?? Smh

LordReed:


"Could be" is different from "is". Point being there is no real thing that we KNOW of that is infinite so it is pointless to expect that velocity should have been infinite. We live in a universe that very much bound to what is finite. Using the speed of light as some kind of hard limit doesn't make any sense since every other thing is similarly finite, why are you choosing light and saying ah ha! this one does the trick. Why are you not saying ah ha! All the mass of the universe is finite therefore we are in a simulation?

You are acting dumb again. Give an example of something as counterintuitive as light riding an a truck without increasing it’s speed. Also you didn’t answer my question: what would be on the other side at end of your finite space? Same with time

FreeIgboho:


See below.
Can you envision coming to the end of space, where there is no empty space on the other side? Same with time

Here's another reason I think the simulation hypothesis is fallacious. Thinking that because we can simulate part of our universe doesn't automatically infer that our universe is a simulation. Even if we could simulate the entire universe we still won't have the leeway to infer that the universe is actually a simulation.

FreeIgboho:


You are acting dumb again. Give an example of something as counterintuitive as light riding an a truck without increasing it’s speed. Also you didn’t answer my question: what would be on the other side at end of your finite space? Same with time

You are the one acting dumb. Is light the only thing that defies classical physics? My question is why are you picking light but of course you can't understand or answer the question so you deflect with inanities.

LordReed:


Here's another reason I think the simulation hypothesis is fallacious. Thinking that because we can simulate part of our universe doesn't automatically infer that our universe is a simulation. Even if we could simulate the entire universe we still won't have the leeway to infer that the universe is actually a simulation.

This makes no sense. Hypothesis is that the entire universe is a simulation (of some sort) What’s your point?

FreeIgboho:


You compare this to Musk almost crying about AI?? Smh

LoL. Na wa for your fanboyism o. Tesla cars are driven by AI but because you're so in love with Musk you can't even recognise any limits again. Bwahahahahaha!

FreeIgboho:


This makes no sense. Hypothesis is that the entire universe is a simulation (of some sort) What’s your point?

The point is, since it flew over your head so clearly, inferring that the universe is a simulation because we can create simulations is a fallacy. Do you understand it or do I need to write it in your local dialect.

LordReed:


You are the one acting dumb. Is light the only thing that defies classical physics? My question is why are you picking light but of course you can't understand or answer the question so you deflect with inanities.

You don’t get it. There is an easily measurable, rather low speed limit in the universe - the SPEED OF LIGHT - just as you would expect in a simulation. Can you measure the end of space or of time? That quantum particles also defy classical Physics also buttresses the simulation argument

LordReed:


The point is, since it flew over your head so clearly, inferring that the universe is a simulation because we can create simulations is a fallacy. Do you understand it or do I need to write it in your local dialect.

I never made any such inference. Where did you get that from? I even said we provably can’t imagine what’s on the other side.

You still didn’t answer my question: what would be on the other side at end of your finite space? Same with time

LordReed:


LoL. Na wa for your fanboyism o. Tesla cars are driven by AI but because you're so in love with Musk you can't even recognise any limits again. Bwahahahahaha!

That’s exactly why him warning about it is different from someone theoretically talking about it in 1820

TenQ:

Your conscience is disturbing you!?
Dont kill it.
He's there for your own good!!

Sewage

FreeIgboho:


That’s exactly why him warning about it is different from someone theoretically talking about it in 1820

If you are looking for people with unusual insight wouldn't you have been seeking people who had not even seen AI yet but warned about it but yeah you're a fanboy so no wahala, enjoy your Musk worship. LMFAO!

FreeIgboho:


I never made any such inference. Where did you get that from? I even said we provably can’t imagine what’s on the other side.

You still didn’t answer my question: what would be on the other side at end of your finite space? Same with time

I didn't you did. I said it was one of my reasons against the hypothesis.

It is an incoherent question because there is no way to understand anything beyond space and time. It is like asking what is north of the northpole.

FreeIgboho:


You don’t get it. There is an easily measurable, rather low speed limit in the universe - the SPEED OF LIGHT - just as you would expect in a simulation. Can you measure the end of space or of time? That quantum particles also defy classical Physics also buttresses the simulation argument

How does quantum mechanics buttress the simulation hypothesis?

MaxInDHouse:

No let am pain you, because i may be buoyant tomorrow morning and ask for your account details, i know you're a frustrated social media beggar. So use your brains so that you don't insult people who may dash you money!
The evidence of SPIRITS can be seen in the way people do things in common even though they are not under duress!

This can't hurt me......

LordReed:


How does quantum mechanics buttress the simulation hypothesis?

Existence is the property of something to
exist or possess limits

In other words, anything that exists except existence itself possesses limits or is finite.....

Nothingserious:


Some other people who view reality differently from you and have a different worldview.

You guys rely on useless analogies, comparisons and diversions.....


Calling me names won't help you.......

Crystyano:

This can't hurt me......

Nobody is out to hurt you, just try to be contented with whatever you have be it little or much that's what will help so that you won't keep expecting what is not possible all in the name of God and when you're disappointed you want everyone around you to delete God from their brains simply because you only worship for selfish reasons!