First evidence of a crucifixion in the UK is uncovered in CAMBRIDGESHIRE: Roman slave who lived up to 1,900 years ago is found buried with a 2 inch nail driven through his heel in world's 'best example' of the capital punishment
• The skeletal remains of the man were uncovered in the village of Fenstanton by archaeologists back in 2017
• Analysis by University of Cambridge experts has confirmed crucifixion as the only possible cause of death
• The slave was 5'7'' — average-height for the time — and thought to have reached some 25–35 years old
• Archaeologists found him with the remnants of a wooden board on which he was buried, known as a 'bier'
By IAN RANDALL FOR MAILONLINE

PUBLISHED: 12:00, 8 December 2021 | UPDATED: 17:26, 8 December 2021

Remains of a Roman slave with a two-inch iron nail driven through his heel bone have been found in Cambridgeshire — and are the 'world's best example of crucifixion' and the first evidence of such from the UK.

Archaeologists unearthed the skeleton during an excavation at the village of Fenstanton back in 2017 and have just completed their analysis of the grisly find.

Radiocarbon dating has placed the finds between 130–337 AD.

OLAADEGBU:


See more here:

Janosky:

Nonsense!
At the excavation site, Was his two hands tied on opposite sides of a transverse beam?

Emusan:


So it's nonsense!

On a similar thread, you are still unable to answer my question, it's Roman that crucified Jesus Christ, can you show us just one instance where Roman crucified person on a POLE?

The article wrote by archeologist Vassilos Tsaferi spells this out. Which you're still turning a blind eyes to.

Janosky:

Nonsense!
At the excavation site, Was his two hands tied on opposite sides of a transverse beam?

achorladey:
The post no dance to his religious organization tune. He has to call it NONSENSE

Janosky:

Nonsense!
At the excavation site, Was his two hands tied on opposite sides of a transverse beam?

Emusan:


Absolutely!

The Roman has been crucifying people on crosses centuries before Jesus was born.

According to history "Accounts of the suppression of the revolt of Spartacus in 71 B.C. tell how the Roman army lined the road from Capua to Rome with 6,000 crucified rebels on 6,000 crosses."

How come Roman will suddenly use POLE for Jesus.

I know if possible for them they would have denied Roman execution of Jesus Christ.

achorladey:



The post no dance to his religious organization tune. He has to call it NONSENSE

Janosky:

Continue WAILING and console yourselves.
The BBC news proven your cross is NOT originally called "cross"
It's original Greek meaning is "stauros", single, upright POLE where convicts were impaled.
"IMPALED" continue uttering the word until it registers in your brains
.

Janosky:

Continue WAILING and console yourselves.
The BBC news proven your cross is NOT originally called "cross"
It's original Greek meaning is "stauros", single, upright POLE where convicts were impaled.
"IMPALED" continue uttering the word until it registers in your brains
.

Emusan:


This is what you can come up with

The challenge still remains, provide just one single case where Roman crucified with POLE!

You can now deny historical evidences just because you hold on to a lie.

Let me summarized it with questions!

1. Who crucified Jesus? a) Roman b) JWs c) Nigeria
2. Has Roman ever crucified with POLE? a) Yes b) No
3. If your No. 2 is Yes, provide your fact and if it's No! You know the next thing

This half baked illiterate no want to understand this English from BBC News
"The Roman word "Cruz" generally translated 'cross' ORIGINALLY HAD A LESS SPECIFIC MEANING refering to any object on which victims were IMPALED or hanged"

BBC News NEVER said crucifixion or anything close to it.
E get why .

These WAILERS, Achorladey & Emusan, should continue DECEIVING themselves

Janosky:


This half baked illiterate no want to understand this English from BBC News
"The Roman word "Cruz" generally translated 'cross' ORIGINALLY HAD A LESS SPECIFIC MEANING refering to any object on which victims were IMPALED or hanged"

BBC News NEVER said crucifixion or anything close to it.
E get why .

These WAILERS, Achorladey & Emusan, should continue DECEIVING themselves

BBC News NEVER said crucifixion or anything close to it

Janosky:
This half baked illiterate no want to understand this English from BBC News

"The Roman word "Cruz" generally translated 'cross' ORIGINALLY HAD A LESS SPECIFIC MEANING refering to any object on which victims were IMPALED or hanged"

BBC News NEVER said crucifixion or anything close to it.
E get why

These WAILERS, Achorladey & Emusan, should continue DECEIVING themselves[/b]

MaxInDHouse:

.... may we never loose the narrow path to everlasting life. Amen!

Janosky :

The word "godhead' (alias doghead)

OLAADEGBU:


See more here:

CRUCIFIXION EXPLAINED: HOW PAINFUL WAS IT AND WHEN WAS IT USED AS CAPITAL PUNISHMENT?

Pictured: a 19th century illustration of rebels being crucified by the Carthaginians in 283 BC

What is crucifixion?

Crucifixion was an ancient method of punishment — commonly associated with the Romans but also practiced by the Carthaginians, Macedonians and the Persians.

The name for the procedure literally means 'fixed to a cross' and it is the etymological root of the word 'excruciating' — literally a pain so bad it is as if it were 'out of crucifying'.

A victim would eventually die from asphyxiation or exhaustion and it was long, drawn-out, and painful.

The act was used to publicly humiliate slaves and criminals — with the goal of dissuading witnesses from perpetrating similar acts — as well as an execution method employed on individuals of very low status or those whose crime was against the state.

This is the reason given in the Gospels for Jesus' crucifixion.

As King of the Jews, Jesus challenged Roman imperial supremacy (Matt 27:37; Mark 15:26; Luke 23:38; John 19:19–22).

Crucifixion could be carried out in a number of ways.

In Christian tradition, nailing the limbs to the wood of the cross is assumed, with debate centring on whether nails would pierce hands or the more structurally sound wrists.

But Romans did not always nail crucifixion victims to their crosses, and instead sometimes tied them in place with rope.

Other forms of the practice included victims being tied to a tree — or even impaled on a stake.

In fact, the Roman philosopher Seneca the Younger one wrote of seeing crosses 'not just of one kind but made in many different ways: some have their victims with head down to the ground; some impale their private parts; others stretch out their arms on the gibbet.'

Until recently the only archaeological evidence for the practice of nailing crucifixion victims is an ankle bone from the tomb of Jehohanan, a man executed in the first century CE.

Why is there so little evidence of it?

The victims were normally criminals and their bodies were often thrown into rubbish dumps meaning archaeologists never see their bones.

Identification is made even more difficult by scratch marks from scavenging animals.

The nails were widely believe to have magical properties.

This meant they were rarely left in the victim's heel and the holes they left might be mistaken for puncture marks.

Most of the damage was largely on soft-tissue so damage to the bone may have not been that significant.

Finally, wooden crosses often don't survive as they degrade or end up being re-used.

johnw47:
false jw's taught for a long time that Jesus was crucified on a "cross"

then they changed it to "torture stake" and showed a picture in the Watchtower publication: Knowledge That Leads to Everlasting Life, with a nail through the wrists of Jesus

but their light is getting brighter

so bright that they have been blinded:

2Co_4:4  In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

LYING is your talent, John W fraud
The Jews have exposed you

Emusan:


Now it's about BBC News NIT Washington Post again.

Emusan:

How does this erase the eyes witness testimonies of Roman executing people on cross?

Whose eye Witness?
Your so called "eye witness" Proven FALSE by the Washington Post, BBC News, Wikipedia and more importantly, the Complete Jewish Bible.

Emusan:

Firstly, post the link to that article from BBC news.

You always hide link to articles you know you just cherry-picked from.

No wonder you couldn't attempt any of my questions.

Very childish,silly claim
For your mind, Janosky wrote the link for the BBC, Washington Post, Wikipedia and the Complete Jewish Bible
Emusan too dull.

Emusan:

Josephus Flavius a great historian of early century wrote that he witnessed where Roman crucified people and he said it's on cross.

Emusan:

Josephus Flavius a great historian of early
1. Jews themselves never executed anyone on pole, only the lifeless body hanged on pole according to Deu 21:22-23

2. Roman Empire has been executing people on Cross never used POLE, until you provide the source that says otherwise.

I know you've been searching Google up and down but found none, reason you stick to that cropped portion of BBC news to dismiss the historical evidences we know today.

1. Galatians 3:13 , Paul copied Deut 21:21-23 to reference Jesus execution on the stake .

Galatians 3:13 & Deuteronomy 21:21-23.
John19:6-7, 39-40,was Jesus tried, killed & buried according to the law of the Jews?
Yes !
John 19:16, Acts 3:14-15 Emusan receive SENSE
The soldiers followed the "plot" of the Jewish leaders.

Emusan:

Here are my questions again!
1. Who crucified Jesus? a) Roman b) JWs c) Nigeria
2. Has Roman ever crucified with POLE? a) Yes b) No
3. If your No. 2 is Yes, provide your fact and if it's No! You know the next thing

Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, who IMPALED Jesus Christ?
The Jews..

2.
The Bible evidence:Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, proven Emusan's question lacks merit.

3.
Oga,stick to your Bible's evidences:
Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15 .

Case closed

Janosky:

LYING is your talent, John W fraud
The Jews have exposed you
John 19
Complete Jewish Bible
19 :5-6
So Yeshua came out, wearing the thorn-branch crown and the purple robe. Pilate said to them, “Look at the man!” 6 When the head cohanim and the Temple guards saw him they shouted, “Put him to death on the stake! Put him to death on the stake!” Pilate said to them, “You take him out yourselves and put him to death on the stake, because I don’t find any case against him.”

Janosky:
The evidences dey pain you
Continue WAILING.

Whose eye Witness?
Your so called "eye witness" Proven FALSE by the Washington Post, BBC News, Wikipedia and more importantly, the Complete Jewish Bible.

This is the holy Scriptures believed by the same people whose ancestors demanded for Jesus execution on the stake.[/i]
John 19
Complete Jewish Bible
19 :5-6
So Yeshua came out, wearing the thorn-branch crown and the purple robe. Pilate said to them, “Look at the man!” 6 When the head cohanim and the Temple guards saw him they shouted, “Put him to death on the stake! Put him to death on the stake!” Pilate said to them, “You take him out yourselves and put him to death on the stake, because I don’t find any case against him.”

Very childish,silly claim
For your mind, Janosky wrote the link for the BBC, Washington Post, Wikipedia and the Complete Jewish Bible
Emusan too dull.

How many chapter and verse did Josephus Flavius write in Emusan Bible?

1. Galatians 3:13 , Paul copied Deut 21:21-23 to reference Jesus execution on the stake .

2. [b]Galatians 3:13 & Deuteronomy 21:21-23.
John19:6-7, 39-40,was Jesus tried, killed & buried according to the law of the Jews?
Yes!

John 19:16, Acts 3:14-15 Emusan receive SENSE
The soldiers followed the "plot" of the Jewish leaders.

1. Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, who IMPALED Jesus Christ? The Jews..

But the soldiers are Roman soldiers

Even the Jews don't use crucifixion as a mode of execution and according to that Deu 21:21-23 which I'll keep knocking on your dull skull, it is the dead body that should be hanged not mode of execution.

The Roman crucified Jesus as their usual method

2. The Bible evidence:Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15, proven Emusan's question lacks merit.

I don't even need to expose you further here because it shows your father the devil is really proud of you.

3. Oga,stick to your Bible's evidences:
Galatians 3:13, Deuteronomy 21:21-23, John19:6-7, & Acts 3:14-15 .

Case closed

orisa37:


EVERY ORIGINAL HISTORY IS IN CANTERBURY.

OLAADEGBU:
Crucifixion of Jesus Christ

JWs and Muslims will want to object to this evidence.

Janosky:


[i]That pagan invention wey you dey USE worship [/i]your 3 deities?

"Cross" is NOT in a Greek Bible manuscript. OLAADEGBU take note.
Your quote done cast your man made doctrine to
PROVE that Christ is a god.

"When they sang in alternative verses,a hymn to Christ as to a god"- Pliny the Younger.

OLAADEGBU:


The earlier you believe and accept the fact that Jesus Christ died on the Cross for your sins the more you will be better off.