Maynman:

A god is a deity. Yahweh, allah, ogun, zeus are all gods.
As an agnostic, Why do you think a god like zeus or allah has the ability to exist or not?

Read what I typed again and think about it. I know all this is becoming too much for your intellectual capacity because a smart person will easily grasp these things.

A001:

Read what I typed again and think about it. I know all this is becoming too much for your intellectual capacity because a smart person will easily grasp these things.

You wrote garbage. You think god is a single person or a thing.
The agnostics should say they don’t if ANY god exist or not.

first start with the origin of the word “god”, what are things that are called “god”?

A god is a deity.

Workch:
this is not true, I am aware of all gods and I am sure that all of them do not exist but deistic god.

You are aware of all gods?
That means you are aware of every thought that ever crossed the minds of people because that’s where gods reside. I doubt you are aware of all gods.
What makes the deistic god any different from the theistic gods apart from laziness or disinterest? As you imply, theistic gods purportedly interfere while deistic god does not interfere.

Workch:

I know a method to test and invalidate all gods, I don't know any to use to invalidate a deistic god.

What is the method to test and invalidate “all gods” and why and how are the deistic gods immune to your method?

Workch:

If you know any, i Will revert me back to atheism or deism if need be

Gods are nonsense, regardless if it is the busy theist gods, the lazy deist gods, the unknowable gods of the agnostic, or the gods atheist doesn’t believe in.

Of course, McMickie is exempt from this godsip drama because McMickie is. Lol

Maynman:


You wrote garbage. You think god is a single person or a thing.
The agnostics should say they don’t if ANY god exist or not.

first start with the origin of the word “god”, what are things that are called “god”?

A god is a deity.

My post is based on key scientific facts, and I know as an ignorant person, those facts are garbage to you.

All this is obviously too much for your low IQ, just like calculus is garbage to a 2-year-old.

Before you engage in this sort of discussion and embarrass yourself in public, first read important books on science, especially Physics.

You clearly don't know the meaning of the word "agnostic". Just like a person can be atheistic to a specific god, you can also be agnostic about a specific god or deity or any or all gods.

Stop typing gibberish with confidence. You're embarrassing yourself.

A001:

My post is based on key scientific facts, and I know as an ignorant person, those facts are garbage to you.

All this is obviously too much for your low IQ, just like calculus is garbage to a 2-year-old.

Before you engage in this sort of discussion and embarrass yourself in public, first read important books on science, especially Physics.

You clearly don't know the meaning of the word "agnostic". Just like a person can be atheistic to a specific god, you can also be agnostic about a specific god or deity or any or all gods.

Stop typing gibberish with confidence. You're embarrassing yourself.

Empty!
Base on scientific facts, then tell me, what are the composition of a omnipresent material?

An agnostic claim they don’t know if a god like zeus exist or not.
They should answer why they think a god like zeus can exist.

A001:

My post is based on key scientific facts, and I know as an ignorant person, those facts are garbage to you.

All this is obviously too much for your low IQ, just like calculus is garbage to a 2-year-old.

Before you engage in this sort of discussion and embarrass yourself in public, first read important books on science, especially Physics.

You clearly don't know the meaning of the word "agnostic". Just like a person can be atheistic to a specific god, you can also be agnostic about a specific god or deity or any or all gods.

Stop typing gibberish with confidence. You're embarrassing yourself.

don't argue with a militant Atheist who knows nothing.
He doesn't even under basic science

Workch:
don't argue with a militant Atheist who knows nothing.
He doesn't even under basic science

What are the scientific composition of an omnipresent material?

Maynman:

Empty!
Base on scientific facts, then tell me, what are the composition of a omnipresent material.

An agnostic claim they don’t know if a god like zeus exist or not.
They should answer why they think a god like zeus can exist.

Lols, I don't have time for a silly argument. As stated earlier, the agnostic position is a response to the "god" position by a theist.

The onus is on the person making the assertion (which is a mere claim) to substantiate their claim with a solid proof.

Don't waste my time with a silly argument, Mr "divine light", one of Nairaland's dumb religionists.

Workch:
don't argue with a militant Atheist who knows nothing.
He doesn't even under basic science

I can see that clearly now. He's calling basic scientific knowledge "garbage". Empty brain.

A001:

Lols, I don't have time for a silly argument. As stated earlier, the agnostic position is a response to the "god" position by a theist.

The onus is on the person making the assertion (which is a mere claim) to substantiate their claim with a solid proof.

Don't waste my time with a silly argument, Mr "divine light", one of Nairaland's dumb religionists.

You yourself said this earlier “ Agnosticism, atheism, apatheism, and similar positions all exist because of theism.“
We also have monotheism and polytheism.
What I’m saying is the definition of god is different from a monotheist or a polytheist.
A sango worshipper is a theist.
A yahweh worshipper is a theist.
A allah worshipper is a theist.

If you claim “god” is a creator and has all this qualities and attributes, you are taking the monotheist definition.
If that’s so, they tell us the name of the monotheistic god.

Mr agnostic, you claim you don’t know if a god like zeus exist.
Why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

A001:

I can see that clearly now. He's calling basic scientific knowledge "garbage". Empty brain.

It's not every atheist that is smart.

Some are just following the bandwagon while some are sciolists. Some are just doing atheism because they are looking for reasons to justify their "ungodly" bahavoir.

The most scientific approach to the issue of God is Agnosticism.

Workch:
It's not every atheist that is smart.

Some are just following the bandwagon while some are sciolists. Some are just doing atheism because they are looking for reasons to justify their "ungodly" bahavoir.

The most scientific approach to the issue of God is Agnosticism.

Have you read the tanakh and see how a god called yahweh ordered for massacre of kids and women, is that the “godly” behavior?

Like i said agnostics are monotheists that are afraid of religion.

Maynman:

You yourself said this earlier “ Agnosticism, atheism, apatheism, and similar positions all exist because of theism.“
We also have monotheism and polytheism.
What I’m saying is the definition of god is different from a monotheist or a polytheist.
A sango worshipper is a theist.
A yahweh worshipper is a theist.
A allah worshipper is a theist.

If you claim “god” is a creator and has all this qualities and attributes, you are taking the monotheist definition.
If that’s so, they tell us the name of the monotheistic god.

Mr agnostic, you claim you don’t know if a god like zeus exist.
Why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Stop asking me a silly question. Is everything okay with you?

Can you point to where I said a god means a creator? It seems you're imagining things.

I haven't made any claim about the nature of god on this thread. Religious people make a claim about god; if you're smart, you should know where to direct your question to: It's the claimant that'll substantiate their claim with evidence.

Religious people make the claim; they should provide the evidence for their claim. The agnostic says the claim (god) is unknown simply because the theist hasn't substantiated their claim with a proof.

Only a fool will leave those claiming that something exists with certainty and be asking skeptics a proof for a claim they didn't make.

Workch:
It's not every atheist that is smart.

Some are just following the bandwagon while some are sciolists. Some are just doing atheism because they are looking for reasons to justify their "ungodly" bahavoir.

The most scientific approach to the issue of God is Agnosticism.

Dumb is an understatement for the guy.

A001:

Stop asking me a silly question. Is everything okay with you?

Can you point to where I said a god means a creator? It seems you're imagining things.

I haven't made any claim about the nature of god on this thread. Religious people make a claim about god; if you're smart, you should know where to direct your question to: It's the claimant that'll substantiate their claim with evidence.

Religious people make the claim; they should provide the evidence for their claim. The agnostic says the claim (god) is unknown simply because the theist hasn't substantiated their claim with a proof.

Only a fool will leave those claiming that something exists with certainty and be asking skeptics a proof for a claim they didn't make.

But the religious claims that the theists make of theirVarious gods you agnostics already accepted it, they said a thing called god/deity can exist and is a supreme being.
Agnostics say they don’t know if that thing exist or not, then answer me, why do you think that thing has the ability to exist?

Maynman:

But the religious claims that the theists make of their. Various gods you agnostics already accepted it, they said a thing called god can exist and is a supreme being.
Agnostics say they don’t know if that thing exist or not, then answer me, why do you think that thing has the ability to exist?

Keep embarrassing yourself in public, ode. An agnostic should give you reasons why a god can exist when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.

Better go back to religion. It's where a rètard like you can thrive.

You're a disgrace to atheism, Mr divine light. Lols. An atheist using the word divine is a big fool.

A001:

Keep embarrassing yourself in public, ode. An agnostic should give you reasons why a god can exist when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.

Better go back to religion. It's where a retard like you can thrive.

You're a disgrace to atheism.

“when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.” God is not a person, it’s a TITLE!
Oponu, if the thing is unknown then how do you know its called god and it exist, it also a nature?
How do you know all these?

Maynman:


“when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.” God is not a person, it’s a TITLE!
Oponu, if the thing is unknown then how do you know its called god and is exist?

Quote the religious text that calls "God" a title and let's see. Religious people don't see God as a title, dumbo. They define God as a supernatural being.

A001:

Keep embarrassing yourself in public, ode. An agnostic should give you reasons why a god can exist when he says the nature of God's existence is unknown.

Better go back to religion. It's where a rètard like you can thrive.

You're a disgrace to atheism, Mr divine light. Lols. An atheist using the word divine is a big fool.

😂😂😂
Seriously a retardd

Hes expecting an agnostic to describe God.

A001:

Quote the religious text that calls "God" a title and let's see. Religious people don't see God as a title, dumbo.

“God” is an English word.
Which religion original text use “god”? Maybe in the English translation.

Religious people have different deities. A Sango is a god.
Yahweh is a god
Allah is a god.

A god is a title not a person.

Maynman:

“God” is an English word.
Which religion original text use “god”? Maybe in the English translation.

Religious people have different deities. A Sango is a god.
Yahweh is a god
Allah is a god.

A god is a title not a person.

I don't know what point you're to prove here. Mr divine light, lols, asking an agnostic to provide a proof for a claim they didn't make.

A001:

I don't know what point you're to prove here. Mr divine light, lols, asking an agnostic to provide a proof for a claim they didn't make.

God is a title not a person.
The moment an agnostic say they don’t know if any “god” can exist or not, they have already ascertain that a “god” has the ability to exist.

Maynman:

God is a title not a person.
The moment an agnostic say they don’t know if any “god” can exist or not, they have already ascertain that a “god” has the ability to exist.

😂😂😂

Otilo, not every atheist is smart o

A001:

I don't know what point you're to prove here. Mr divine light, lols, asking an agnostic to provide a proof for a claim they didn't make.

Atheists reject all gods.
An atheist can say alien or santa exist, that doesn’t stop him from being an atheist.
He just reject all gods whether christian god called yahweh or muslim god call allah. Etc

What has my divine light got to do with “god”?

Workch:
😂😂😂

Otilo, not every atheist is smart o

Atheist from Atheos.
What’s “theos”?

Maynman:

God is a title not a person.
The moment an agnostic say they don’t know if any “god” can exist or not, they have already ascertain that a “god” has the ability to exist.

If you're smart you'll have found your answer here, but keep asking me a silly question.

The average stupid African will see something written clearly in black and white and still be asking a silly question because they don't read.

A001:

You asking me this silly question shows you don't know what's called agnosticism.

The earth is approximately 4.6 billion years old, and recorded history doesn't account for even 5% of the planet's age.

There are billions of galaxies and hundreds of billions of planets in the Universe, which is unimaginably big, and scientists haven't explored even 1% of the Universe.

There are natural limits of our abilities as a human; for instance, we can only hear within a narrow range of sound frequencies and see only within a narrow range of frequencies.

There's a vast amount of information and data in our immediate surrounding we're not able to detect and know, just like we're starkly ignorant of things happening in the extrasolar or extraterrestrial worlds.

As a result of these, what the average human know pales in comparison with what they don't know; hence, agnosticism.

A god can exist or not exist; we may never really know for sure due to our limited knowledge of our nature, of our planet, and of the Universe.

That's the agnostic position in simple terms, which is more reasonable than saying with certainty that a god exists (yet the claimant can't provide a concrete proof for such a claim) or doesn't exist.

A001:

If you're smart you'll have found your answer here, but keep asking me a silly question.

The average stupid African will see something written clearly in black and white and still be asking a silly question because they don't read.

A god is a title not a person.
Which of the gods can exist or not?

Why do you think a thing called “god” has effect on nature, universe or planet?
Why do you think a thing called “god” is more powerful than a bull?
Why do you think a thing called “god” has the ability to exist?
Is just like me saying thanos has the ability to exist.

Define what “god” is and its attributes.
Are you using the monotheistic definition for “god”?

Maynman:


A god is a title not a person.
Which of the gods can exist or not?

Why do you think a thing called “god” has effect on nature, universe or planet.
Why do you think a thing called “god” is more powerful than a bull?

Define what “god” is and it’s attributes.
Are you using the monotheistic definition for “god”?

Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

A001:

Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

Stop responding to him, he will continue to repeat whatever he thinks that is correct irrespective of your replies.

A001:

Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

If the agnostic doesn’t know the definition of god, then why is he saying it can exist or not?
Shouldn’t you know what something is before saying it can exist or not?

What if “god” is a marvel character?

A001:

Keep asking me a silly question. I would ignore your posts henceforth because your stupidity is incurable.

Ode, an agnostic isn't the one to define a god or gods because they don't believe in a god or gods. The theist defines what they mean by a god and the agnostic or skeptic takes his position based on a lack of evidence. Simple.

I don't have the time to engage fools.

he's here for the long unnecessarily argument and not for the knowledge

The fool keeps embarrassing himself by not understanding a simple position such as agnosticism.

I don't blame him sha. He's only product of Nigeria's failed education system that churn out so-called graduates lacking in critical thinking skills.