Trollronaldo:
The link and image I shared showed that not only Lavoisier did the experiment. Did you read it before crating that straw? I also stated in one of my responses that the "scientists" were specifically looking to disprove phlogiston.

You moved the goalpost from you don't want to discuss deism, to atheists don't have to disprove God, to there is no scenario in science where someone disproves non-existence, to the case of phlogiston is not a similar analogy because the phenomenon exist and now Lavoisier is not the only scientisr involved..
That's not how to argue, I expect better from you.

It seeming like I am arguing with a typical theist who's running away from the point of the argument.

The scientists that came before Lavosier where trying to prove phlogiston, you look at my own screenshot.

LoLz. You can expect anything you like, I only deal in facts. Your expectations are irrelevant to me. Where did I say atheists don't have to disprove god? Something must be wrong with your eyes.

You who can't focus on the subject at hand is talking about point of an argument. Abegi. LMFAO!

LordReed:


Because it is only Lavosier you mentioned.

Which goalpost is being moved here? You are talking about the history of phlogiston and only mentioning Lavosier as if he was the only one who conducted experiments on it. Lavosier's experiments built on others that came before him.

I have gone through the thread, I think you have been shifting the goalpost a lot.

When he answers this, you leave it and create another one.

Try to exhaust his points, when he addresses one, agree with it before moving to another.

Workch:
But I agree with na, what's now the purpose of arguing when we are now on the same page 😂

Agnostics claim they don’t know if any god(s) exist or not.
Then, As an agnostic why do you think a god like zeus has the ability to exist?

Workch:
I have gone through the thread, I think you have been shifting the goalpost a lot.

When he answers this, you leave it and create another one.

Try to exhaust his points, when he addresses one, agree with it before moving to another.

Huh? You have to be kidding me. I should address deist claptrap I am not interested in? Guy, go address that if you wish, I am not interested. LoLz.

LordReed:


The scientists that came before Lavosier where trying to prove phlogiston, you look at my own screenshot.

LoLz. You can expect anything you like, I only deal in facts. Your expectations are irrelevant to me. Where did I say atheists don't have to disprove god? Something must be wrong with your eyes.

You who can't focus on the subject at hand is talking about point of an argument. Abegi. LMFAO!

Before we proceed, what's your issue exactly, so I can address it properly.

Now my argument is, Atheism is equally as fallacious as deism because deism is not required to provide evidence for their claims, atheist can disprove it before rejecting it. It's how science works.


What issue do you have with that argument exactly?

LordReed:


Huh? You have to be kidding me. I should address deist claptrap I am not interested in? Guy, go address that if you wish, I am not interested. LoLz.

I see you portraying cognitive dissonance now.

If not then why running from a deistic argument if it's not superior to yours?

Workch:
I see you portraying cognitive dissonance now.

If not then why running from a deistic argument if it's not superior to yours?

Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.

You CLAIM a god that has all this power to be a creator but doesn’t intefere.
A Sango worshipper CLAIM that sango is the creator and interferes.

Different gods, different characteristics bwahahahah

Maynman:

Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.

You CLAIM a god that has all this power to be a creator but doesn’t intefere.
A Sango worshipper CLAIM that sango is the creator and interferes.

Different gods, different characteristics bwahahahah

what's your point?

Workch:
I see you portraying cognitive dissonance now.

If not then why running from a deistic argument if it's not superior to yours?

What part of I AM NOT INTERESTED is giving you a problem to understand?

Trollronaldo:
what's your point?

I wasn’t even quoting you, who is stalking now?

Maynman:

Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.

You CLAIM a god that has all this power to be a creator but doesn’t intefere.
A Sango worshipper CLAIM that sango is the creator and interferes.

Different gods, different characteristics bwahahahah

you are very correct 😂😂

Trollronaldo:


Before we proceed, what's your issue exactly, so I can address it properly.

Now my argument is, Atheism is equally as fallacious as deism because deism is not required to provide evidence for their claims, atheist can disprove it before rejecting it. It's how science works.


What issue do you have with that argument exactly?

This is the 3rd time you asked this question go look at my previous answer it hasn't changed.

LordReed:


What part of I AM NOT INTERESTED is giving you a problem to understand?

Why do think theists that are fighting cognitive dissonance avoid religious discussions with atheists?

😂

Trollronaldo:
what's your point?

Your idea of a thing that is a creator, that has all this power is gotten from monotheism.
Monotheist claim that their variou god can do this and that and give it ridiculous qualities and attributes.

You as a deist, accept that a thing called god is also a creator, you also give it ridiculous qualities and attributes.
How do you know any god is powerful?

LordReed:


What part of I AM NOT INTERESTED is giving you a problem to understand?

The thing is,

Deism and atheism are superior to religious theism.

Deism and atheism falls flat in the face of Agnosticism.

Agnosticism will use each of them against each other to edge both.

Workch:
you are very correct 😂😂

Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.
Tell them to tell us the origin of the meaning of god/deity, they fold

Workch:
The thing is,

Deism and atheism is superior to theism.

Deism and atheism fall flat in the face of Agnosticism.

Agnosticism will use each of them against each other to edge both.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Agnostics are afraid of their former religion gods.

Maynman:


Only fellow deistic worshippers think their argument is superior.
Tell them to tell us the origin of the meaning of god/deity, they fold

I totally agree with you on this 😂😂

Maynman:

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Agnostics are afraid of their former religion gods.

very correct 👍👍

Workch:
very correct 👍👍

Keep running deistic worshipper.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Maynman:


Keep running deistic worshipper.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

Mosafejo 😂

Workch:
Why do think theists that are fighting cognitive dissonance avoid religious discussions with atheists?

😂

Right. Anybody who doesn't want to discuss with you has cognitive dissonance. LMFAO!

Workch:
Mosafejo 😂

The same way you think deistic gods are superior is the same way a yahweh worshipper thinks also.

An agnostic claim they don’t if a god like zeus can exist or not.
They should tell us why they think a god like zeus has the ability to exist.

LordReed:


Right. Anybody who doesn't want to discuss with you has cognitive dissonance. LMFAO!

Lol, LordReed my guy.

There's nothing wrong in being wrong. Think about it.

That guy properly followed you everywhere you were running to in the argument. You know that he will nail you patapata if you engage in the deism debate.

Workch:
The thing is,

Deism and atheism are superior to religious theism.

Deism and atheism falls flat in the face of Agnosticism.

Agnosticism will use each of them against each other to edge both.

LoLz! You think I care what you think is the superior position? Dude you have some things to learn about me.

Workch:
Lol, LordReed my guy.

There's nothing wrong in being wrong. Think about it.

That guy properly followed you everywhere you were running to in thr argument. You know that he will nail you patapata if you engage in the deism debate.

Lazy deistic god

Workch:
Lol, LordReed my guy.

There's nothing wrong in being wrong. Think about it.

That guy properly followed you everywhere you were running to in thr argument. You know that he will nail you patapata if you engage in the deism debate.

LoLz. Like I said in my last response to you, you have quite a bit to learn about me.

LordReed:


LoLz! You think I care what you think is the superior position? Dude you have some things to learn about me.

I know you are smart, sincerely.
I know you will think about this topic carefully after this.


It's not easy to accept that one is wrong, it wasnt easy for me as well to accept that my atheistic ideas were wrong. It took time, no be one day thing

Workch:
I know you are smart, sincerely.
I know you will think about this topic carefully after this.


It's not easy to accept that one is wrong, it wasnt easy for me as well to accept that my atheistic ideas were wrong. It took time, no be one day thing

Good for you! LoLz.

LordReed:


LoLz. Like I said in my last response to you, you have quite a bit to learn about me.

Trust me, you don't usually shy away from an argument you know that you can win.

You know that you cannot win the deistic argument and you have realized that. With time, you Wil accept Agnosticism. It's a matter of time before you know.

Agnosticism is the best approach for someone who's considering all possibilities.

Maynman:


Lazy deistic god

Bros abeg leave me, I use diestic god beg you 😂😂

Workch:
Bros abeg leave me, I use diestic god beg you 😂😂

That you borrowed from monotheism? Isn’t this deistic god powerful and the creator that doesn’t interfere?
Then tell me the name. God is not a person, it’s a title.