aceman88:


According to the write-up, APC's argument here is that, the American Court was not against Tinubu but the various sums of money lodged in his account ooo.

So those crucifying Tinubu should free him ooo because the guilty person here is his money which American Court has arrested and prosecuted and not his very person who is innocent. In APC's voice ooo

KPGGlobal:



Walai


ITS very difficult to defend evil ooooooooooooooooooooo


How do these guys sleep at night?

onuman:



Your mumu is hitting sky level. Even the most foolish person in any 1950s industry wouldn't allow huge sums of money deposited in his account without first ascertaining the source of the money.

aceman88:


According to the write-up, APC's argument here is that, the American Court was not against Tinubu but the various sums of money lodged in his account ooo.

So those crucifying Tinubu should free him ooo because the guilty person here is his money which American Court has arrested and prosecuted and not his very person who is innocent. In APC's voice ooo

aceman88:


According to the write-up, APC's argument here is that, the American Court was not against Tinubu but the various sums of money lodged in his account ooo.

So those crucifying Tinubu should free him ooo because the guilty person here is his money which American Court has arrested and prosecuted and not his very person who is innocent. In APC's voice ooo

Gucciblog:


Me wey no be even Lawyer go carry lighter burn this kind defense brought by APC. Kai.

Well, for those that care to hear what APC said as reason for the forfeiture;

The forfeiture order was made against the bank account of Bola Tinubu and not the person of Bola Tinubu, claims BAT.

With this, all the boys EFCC are arrested in regards bank fraud can now appeal there cases.
Na their account get case no be them 😆 😂

APC'S defense be like

aceman88:


According to the write-up, APC's argument here is that the American Court was not against Tinubu but against the various sums of money lodged in his account ooo.

So those crucifying Tinubu should free him ooo because the guilty person here is his money which American Court has arrested and prosecuted and not the very innocent person. In APC's voice ooo

tonididdy:


I don't debate with sympathisers of a drug Lord!

NaijaCowFarm:

And in the nineties. That is like N345 million and you call it decree of forfeiture.

Dezianne is a SAINT

popesco123:
Olodo, read before you comment. Coco nut brain.

quote author=citygarden post=122450558]Finger Cross, tinubu will win this case. Is dead on arrival. Obi only want to try his luck. You can see the petition obi wrote to the court. He only want the Court to disqualify tinubu and court should order fresh election. He didn't claim he won the election as stated before he went to court. This case of drug have been tested in the courts doing obasanjo regime tinubu won upon being opposition to the government . Talk less of when is now awaiting gcfr.

Islie:
….insists he was not convicted of crime




https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/04/alleged-drug-case-why-tinubu-forfeited-460000-in-us-apc-tells-court/

abbey621:


Yet we have many U.S court cases from the 90s upwards that shows the opposite. Yet the infiltration of illicit money used to purchase insurance policies, real estate etc have led to money laundering laws being strengthened now compared to the 70s, 80s and early 90s.

Go and educate yourself on the following U.S laws/acts before arguing online & stop embarrassing yourself:

Annunzio-Wylie Anti-Money Laundering Act (1992)
Money Laundering Suppression Act (1994)
Money Laundering and Financial Crimes Strategy Act (1998)
Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act)
Intelligence Reform & Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004

onuman:


But it's hard to believe that you are a lawyer.
Even your grammatical blunders in nearly every sentence in your comments must be an embarrassment to TEUE American lawyers.
Lawyers hardly make their points through insulting epithets. Or are you another of Tinubu's artiful forgers based in the USA?
Even those on whose behalf Tinubu was banking the drug trafficking money were jailed.

43Ronin:

Please stop this! Lawyer or not we saw court documents and prosecution stating that the forfeiture was for heroine related case.... Stop showing US consulate letters and IGP they are not concrete evidence. If you guys wana do a good job, subpoena the FBI or the Chicago state Court for unclassified docs they will release to you with joy. I have helped you paste it below, pls can you or can you not see narcotics trafficking as reason for the forfeiture? The US govt also gave then the chance to come dispute but he never came cos he knew in the 90s racism was still an ish and he's black ass would have been incarcerated.
I also heard Kevin moss is coming to testify pray it's not true, cos that would be the final nail to the coffin. The judges will avoid a wrong judgement like plague.

Allardyce:
They are admitting that he forfeited that huge sum.
Good, dem go hear am

colorsofrainbow:


OBJ had no solid direct evidence as it is now. Was more like a rumour at that time.. Now,all the documents regarding the criminal drug case are intact dug out & in the public domain with witnesses in line. Don't try to compare this to obj cos u will be making huge mistakes on that basis.

abbey621:


Yea you don't have anything to say, too lazy to do research, too pompous to admit you need education.....No be juju be that?

P.S. Who told you I'm a lawyer? What part of I.T and financial services do you not understand? Speaking of grammatical errors, I'm sure your onset amnesia caused you to forget punctuation and spell check; who starts a conversation with 'but'?

Islie:
….insists he was not convicted of crime




https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/04/alleged-drug-case-why-tinubu-forfeited-460000-in-us-apc-tells-court/

onuman:



But my 'conversation' with you didn't start with my last comment. My use of 'but' as opening word was for continuation from where I stopped earlier.

You rolled out law references that made you sound like a lawyer. And you now question why I believe that you are a lawyer.
Why then do you go into legal matters quoting references in defence of Tinubu if you are not a lawyer? Are you a busybody, or just another of Tinubu's urchinss in America doing the dirty deals for him in America?
My question: if you lived in the 1950s US, not to talk of the US of yesterday 1990s, and some people or person pumped huge sums of money into your bank account, and you didn't know the source of the money, would you accept the situation?

simongonner:
exactly. If TINUBU becomes president. Nigeria image will be stained further

citygarden:
Finger Cross, tinubu will win this case. Is dead on arrival. Obi only want to try his luck. You can see the petition obi wrote to the court. He only want the Court to disqualify tinubu and court should order fresh election. He didn't claim he won the election as stated before he went to court. This case of drug have been tested in the courts doing obasanjo regime tinubu won upon being opposition to the government . Talk less of when is now awaiting gcfr.

Tntsi:
You cannot defend indefensible.
Druggie is in for it. He must personally show up to discuss this matter that he has managed to suppress and repress since 1999.

PODATTI has finally brought it to the world stage. Druggie must show up to testify.

Guestlander:
Obi is grasping at straws.