1. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:44

2. And the Lord said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets
1 Kings 22:21-23

3. Reverend father/clergy/the religious says to his steward: " tell the visitor that I'm not around..."

You've never been sincere with your questions otherwise i would have taken the pain to help but it's always an insincere inquisition on your part!

Broveens42:
1. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:44

2. And the Lord said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets
1 Kings 22:21-23

3. Reverend father/clergy/the religious says to his steward: " tell the visitor that I'm not around..."

I don't follow.... How does #3 compare with #1 and #2 taken in context?

Let's start with this. Are you an anti-christ?

McLizbae:
Let's start with this. Are you an anti-christ?

This question sums up the decay in nija's education system.
I asked a simple question and you wanna start a twist of your reply with a question?
This is funny

Kobojunkie:
I don't follow.... How does #3 compare with #1 and #2 taken in context?

Which one is context again.
I gave 3 points demonstrating each character/characters as having no big deal in lying or supporting lies.

But because you are lost in your own doctrines, you choose to contextualize instead of focusing on the act.
This is what happens to you when you try to twist.
Point number 3: shows two characters; the master sends and the steward delivers the message (lies), because of doctrine, you are fixated on only the priest for lying which is very hilarious.

Now you get the point? Are you going to tell me the difference between the characters (not 3 characters)

#English language

Broveens42:
■ Which one is context again.
■ I gave 3 points demonstrating each character as having no big deal in lying or supporting lies. But because you are lost in your own doctrines, you choose to contextualize instead of focusing on the act. This is what happens to you when you try to twist.
■ Point number 3: shows two characters; the master sends and the steward delivers the message (lies), but because of doctrine, you are fixated on only the priest for lying which is very hilarious. Now you get the point. Are you going to tell me the difference between the characters (not 3 characters) #English language

Language 101: When considering text or communication in any language, context is King.

con·text

1. the circumstances that form the setting for an event, statement, or idea, and in terms of which it can be fully understood and assessed.
2. the parts of something written or spoken that immediately precede and follow a word or passage and clarify its meaning.
"word processing is affected by the context in which words appear"

Context, as explained in the Oxford Dictionary, helps establish the meaning intended by the speaking or author.

2. Clearly, a lack of comprehension probably due to ignorance of context plagues you here.

3. You can sparsely make a point when you conveniently ignore context, assert a meaning of your own making in place of that intended by the author of the text, and then harass others for not applying your particular special interpretation to the same texts. None of what you posted makes sense.

Kobojunkie:
Language 101: When considering text or communication in any language, context is King.
Context, as explained in the Oxford Dictionary, helps establish the meaning intended by the speaking or author.

2. Clearly, a lack of comprehension probably due to ignorance of context plagues you here.

3. You can sparsely make a point when you conveniently ignore context, assert a meaning of your own making in place of that intended by the author of the text, and then harass others for not applying your particular special interpretation to the same texts. None of what you posted makes sense.

Meaning you didn't study English if you don't know the most important context, is to decipher an affinity for the act (lies) according to the 3 points.
It's not by shouting and cramming context context lol

Broveens42:
■ Meaning you didn't study English if you don't know the most important context, is to decipher an affinity for the act (lies) according to the 3 points. It's not by shouting and cramming context context lol

See this one trying to switch up language rules even on Oxford Dictionary!

McLizbae:
Let's start with this. Are you an anti-christ?

Clearly he is!

Broveens42:
1. Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
John 8:44

2. And the Lord said unto him, Wherewith? And he said, I will go forth, and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets
1 Kings 22:21-23 .."

The difference is Satan, John 8:44 attacks and murders unsuspecting and defenceless people like the evil herdsmen and bandits always using lies and deception like lordReed as his primary weapon.

Whereas God in 1 Kings 22:21-23 ..is simply replying in defence and counter attack after being first attacked, that He too can use lies as a weapon against enemies which as we have seen He rarrely uses it

But for Satan, as lordReed shows, lies must always be used and it's Satan's primary weapon of choice. That is the difference

O Lord, come Thou and avenge thyself and burn Thou thy enemies!

Dtruthspeaker:


The difference is Satan, John 8:44 attacks and murders unsuspecting and defenceless people like the evil herdsmen and bandits always using lies and deception like lordReed as his primary weapon.

Whereas God in 1 Kings 22:21-23 ..is simply replying in defence and counter attack after being first attacked, that He too can use lies as a weapon against enemies which as we have seen He rarrely uses it

But for Satan, as lordReed shows, lies must always be used and it's Satan's primary weapon of choice. That is the difference

O Lord, come Thou and avenge thyself and burn Thou thy enemies!

Spare us the long story and say
Lies are divided into two: necessary lies and unnecessary lies.

What a submission
More differences please

Dtruthspeaker:


Clearly he is!

Where in my submission did I say jesus didn't come in flesh?
Bilble student for mouth

1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it .

Broveens42:

Where in my submission did I say jesus didn't come in flesh?
Bilble student for mouth

1 John 4:3
And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it .

He asked if you are antichrist and not whether Jesus did not come in the flesh, so off point And thanks for showing that you are a Satanist and antichrist.

Broveens42:


Spare us the long story and say
Lies are divided into two: necessary lies and unnecessary lies.

What a submission
More differences please

Antichrist, clearly you do not have any counter because you thought this twist was impossible to explain

For people already know.that lies are simply weapons usable by any party in War.

Dtruthspeaker:


He asked if you are antichrist and not whether Jesus did not come in the flesh, so off point And thanks for showing that you are a Satanist and antichrist.

He asked a very useless question.
How do you ask if i am something that's fictional ?

#Antichrist Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
1.The meaning of ANTICHRIST is one who denies or opposes Christ. (Where did i oppose the character jesus in my post?
infact, it is the god character i implied was sending a lying spirit to the prophets)
2 specifically , a great antagonist expected to fill the world with wickedness.
www.merriam-webster.com › dictionary.

Dtruthspeaker:


Antichrist, clearly you do not have any counter because you thought this twist was impossible to explain

For people already know.that lies are simply weapons usable by any party in War.

Are you not going to man up to your post, where you clearly categorized lies as necessary and unnecessary ?

Are you also going to lie about this ?

Broveens42:


Are you not going to man up to your post, where you clearly categorized lies as necessary and unnecessary ?

Are you also going to lie about this ?

Antichrist and their twisting lies like lordReed when they cannot counter.

What's it called when you're debating someone and they twist around your words and reply to a point you didn't make?

There are 2 errors in such arguments to be studied. The first error occurs when someone changes the words or terminology in your Standing Point. That is a violation of Rule #3, The Standpoint Rule.

3 The Standpoint Rule

A person's analysis and critique of another's standpoint must relate to the standing point that was introduced a an original argument.

No where did i categorized lies as necessary and unnecessary which is a proof that atheists minds are contorted and do not work properly.

Broveens42:

He asked a very useless question. ..

Off point!

Thanks for confirming that he asked, Antichrist. Obviously you atheists do not know how to argue.

Dtruthspeaker:


Antichrist and their twisting lies like lordReed when they cannot counter.

What's it called when you're debating someone and they twist around your words and reply to a point you didn't make?

There are 2 errors in such arguments to be studied. The first error occurs when someone changes the words or terminology in your Standing Point. That is a violation of Rule #3, The Standpoint Rule.

3 The Standpoint Rule

A person's analysis and critique of another's standpoint must relate to the standing point that was introduced a an original argument.

No where did i categorized lies as necessary and unnecessary which is a proof that atheists minds are contorted and do not work properly.

You knew you shot yourself on the foot, that's why you are gasping for Air. You dont wana shout context again abi?
Let me use your words: didn't you categorize lies according to the context of your initial reply ? Yes or no

Dtruthspeaker:


The difference is Satan, John 8:44 attacks and murders unsuspecting and defenceless people like the evil herdsmen and bandits always using lies and deception like lordReed as his primary weapon.

Whereas God in 1 Kings 22:21-23 ..is simply replying in defence and counter attack after being first attacked, that He too can use lies as a weapon against enemies which as we have seen He rarrely uses it

But for Satan, as lordReed shows, lies must always be used and it's Satan's primary weapon of choice. That is the difference

O Lord, come Thou and avenge thyself and burn Thou thy enemies!

You said lies must always be used by the devil while god uses it as a defence.
Now mr. Context crammer, how is this not put into category; necessary and unnecessary?

Why are you forcing yourself to be another character of lies in my topic

Broveens42:

You said lies must always be used by the devil while god uses it as a defence.
Now mr. Context crammer, how is this not put into category; necessary and unnecessary?

Why are you forcing yourself to be another character of lies in my topic

Your post is not on "necessary/unnecessary lies" but on finding out the difference between when satan uses lies and the occasion when God used it.

Which is what i have addressed and i did not say anything about "necessary/unnecessary.

So, you committed the fall of changing my words (Rule 3 Thou shalt not twist or change your opponents words)

So clearly, you have no reasonable counter.