Welcome, Guest: Register On Nairaland / LOGIN! / Trending / Recent / New
Stats: 3,157,954 members, 7,835,182 topics. Date: Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 06:43 AM

What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? - Religion (2) - Nairaland

Nairaland Forum / Nairaland / General / Religion / What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? (476 Views)

The Arrival Of Wormwood And The Commencing Of The Battle Of Armageddon / The Battle of Armageddon and the end of this world / Will The “Great Crowd” Be On Earth When Armageddon Breaks Out? (2) (3) (4)

(1) (2) (Reply) (Go Down)

Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 10:35am On Feb 02
MaxInDHouse:


So you think when the Bible said God is mighty in battle it means humans have PHYSICAL weapons to participate shey? Psalms 24:8

You're just anxious to argue for nothing! smiley

Olodo...the lying liar

The article says "What will conditions be like during the battle of Armageddon?

While we do not know how God will use his power, he will have at his disposal weapons such as those he has used in the past​—hail, earthquake, flooding downpour, fire and sulfur, lightning, and disease."


Even the picture on the article was a ball of fire from heaven, yet you lied that Watchtower doesn't used such pictures again because there's a NEW LIGHT cheesy grin cheesy grin

OR YOU FORGOT

SEE receipt below cheesy grin cheesy grin grin grin

I know you're lying because you don't know how to defend this especially how God will destroyed this earth with all the nuclear weapons already in store not to talk of millions of warhead and the earth will remain the same.

Well God knows this and that's the reason He already has a plan for A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH.

God can't be mocked!

Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by MaxInDHouse(m): 11:17am On Feb 02
Emusan:


Olodo...the lying liar

The article says "What will conditions be like during the battle of Armageddon?

While we do not know how God will use his power, he will have at his disposal weapons such as those he has used in the past​—[b]hail, earthquake, flooding downpour, fire and sulfur, lightning, and disease
."[/b]

Even the picture on the article was a ball of fire from heaven, yet you lied that Watchtower doesn't used such pictures again because there's a NEW LIGHT cheesy grin cheesy grin

OR YOU FORGOT

SEE receipt below cheesy grin cheesy grin grin grin

I know you're lying because you don't know how to defend this especially how God will destroyed this earth with all the nuclear weapons already in store not to talk of millions of warhead and the earth will remain the same.

Well God knows this and that's the reason He already has a plan for A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH.

God can't be mocked!

You still don't get it.

All the highlighted that God used aren't what humans can practice themselves to use during wars so they're not PHYSICALLY WEAPONS but SPIRITUAL WEAPONS! smiley
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:24am On Feb 02
Emusan:


Nothing took place in 1914 about God's Word.

But from this write up, it stated Armageddon TAKES PLACE from Jesus invisible presence began in 1914.

Go back to your elementary English text book.

There's a difference between Armageddon WILL TAKE PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914 (which means the period of Jesus invisible presence is a long one and the time for Armageddon is unknown but yet will happen before that period ended) and Armageddon TAKES PLACE during Jesus invisible presence which began in 1914.

This is a simple present tense for something such as:

1. something that is true in the present:
I'm nineteen years old.
I'm a student.
He lives in London.

2. something that happens regularly in the present:
°I play football every weekend.
°Victor loves going to the Gym every Tuesday

3. something that is always true:
°The human body contains 206 bones.
°Light travels at almost 300,000 kilometres per second.
°Sun rises from the East and sets in the West

Well, I don't expect you to know this since you and the person who wrote the article were deprived from formal education.

English has failed you
It's not wrong to have written in Yoruba or another language you understand well

If I say crowning of a new champion takes place in the league which kickoff in August.
What does that mean.
That the league began in August or that it is August they will crown a new champion?
English no too hard.
I guess you went to school

You are only teaching yourself the basics of English
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:27am On Feb 02
MaxInDHouse:


You still don't get it.

All the highlighted that God used aren't what humans can practice themselves to use during wars so they're not PHYSICALLY WEAPONS but SPIRITUAL WEAPONS! smiley

You're still lying cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:29am On Feb 02
MaxInDHouse:


You still don't get it.

All the highlighted that God used aren't what humans can practice themselves to use during wars so they're not PHYSICALLY WEAPONS but SPIRITUAL WEAPONS! smiley

Interestingly, ask him to visit the internet amd search what Kumuyi taught about the war of Armageddon whether it is physical or not
Let him go and argue those ones first before he just start saying baseless stuff

Like someone burning potato fields in a community in rage but not realizing that his own field is growing same potato
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:34am On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:
English has failed you

While you failed English.

It's not wrong to have written in Yoruba or another language you understand well

Take this advice to the heart.

If I say crowning of a new champion takes place in the league which kickoff in August.

Wonder why you people quick to use football as example, this shows that you people watch football a lot.

What does that mean.
That the league began in August or that it is August they will crown a new champion?
English no too hard.
I guess you went to school

If not because you failed English, you would have known that the emphasis is on "NEW CHAMPION" which is the reason it's followed by present tense "TAKES" PLACE.

But asking question about LEAGUE shows you really failed English.

You are only teaching yourself the basics of English

It's good for you and your, this is so obvious.
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:38am On Feb 02
Emusan:


While you failed English.



Take this advice to the heart.



Wonder why you people quick to use football as example, this shows that you people watch football a lot.



If not because you failed English, you would have known that the emphasis is on "NEW CHAMPION" which is the reason it's followed by present tense "TAKES" PLACE.

But asking question about LEAGUE shows you really failed English.



It's good for you and your, this is so obvious.

Another example
A victory ceremony took place in the Olympics which began in September 20

Which one took place in September 20
The Olympics or the Victory ceremony?
😂

More examples coming
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:38am On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:


Interestingly, ask him to visit the internet amd search what Kumuyi taught about the war of Armageddon whether it is physical or not
Let him go and argue those ones first before he just start saying baseless stuff

Like someone burning potato fields in a community in rage but not realizing that his own field is growing same potato

So you listen to kumuyi, that's wonderful grin cheesy grin
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:40am On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:


Another example
A victory ceremony took place in the Olympics which began in September 20

Which one took place in September 20
The Olympics or the Victory ceremony?
😂

More examples coming

"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:41am On Feb 02
Emusan:


So you listen to kumuyi, that's wonderful grin cheesy grin

Listen to who? grin
I heard about it before from a DL and i checked the internet and
I just drew your attention
I guess you were not taught yet. When last did you go to church?
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 11:42am On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:


Listen to who? grin
I heard about it before from a DL and i checked the internet and
I just drew your attention
I guess you were not taught yet. When last did you go to church?

Still the same thing cheesy grin cheesy grin
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:51am On Feb 02
Emusan:


"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."

Another example
A victory ceremony takes place in the Olympics which begins in September 20

Harvesting of maize takes place during the planting season which begins around February / March
Which ones takes place in February/ March? The planting season for Maize or the harvest?

An award ceremony to present prizes the to students of the school session which takes place in September
Which one takes place in September? School session or the awards ceremony

I'm sorry to be schooling you on basic English
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:51am On Feb 02
Emusan:


"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."

The new one i mention in the present tense is invalid shey?
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 11:59am On Feb 02
Emusan:


"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."

You've seen your error
Still it does not invalidate my point even if i use took cos it will be a reported event.
Imagine if the war of Armageddon had been fought, how wikk) would the publishers have presented it...
I even used football, something that every one can understand.
I humbly take corrections where I am wrong. I don't bury my head in the sand.
Bible helps us see that the war of Armageddon will mark the grand finale of events beginning with the Lord's day. The Lord's day has started already. We know that Armageddon is a future event. Hate and ignorance and arrogance don block your sense to make you criticize a correct sentence.
grin grin grin
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 12:02pm On Feb 02
Emusan:


Still the same thing cheesy grin cheesy grin


You think I'll engage you endlessly shey? grin
You are just like someone in a unitarian church criticizing someone else for rejecting the Trinity not knowing that his own church rejects it too.
When the other person shows him his folly, he concludes that the other person must have been listening to what his church teaches.
grin grin grin
I'm done with you for the week
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 12:16pm On Feb 02
Emusan:


"TOOK" is past tense

Omar se oooo cheesy grin cheesy grin

You see why I said you failed English cheesy grin cheesy grin

Don't forget this is Watchtower statement "Nevertheless, the Bible does show that Armageddon takes place during Jesus’ invisible presence, which began in 1914.—Matthew 24:37-39."

Where I did not use took, he complained I was using football
You are just a faultfinder. It seems that is what brings you joy.
In a forum where you are free to educate us what your church teach about the topic on ground, it is English you find fault with cos you don't understand what was clearly written and understood by millions. Mr Emusan, professor of Linguistics 🤷‍♂️.
He started to use off-point examples of sun rises in the east grin grin grin
Enjoy your weekend 🍷
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 12:38pm On Feb 02
Just one post of mine you have to quote it four times which shows the post hit the right place.

Aemmyjah:
Where I did not use took, he complained I was using football

One thing is to be ignorant another thing is to be ignorant and pride in it.

You use "TOOK" which is a past tense meanwhile the sentence I'm tutoring you on is A PRESENT TENSE.

So how can you use a past TENSE example to justify a present TENSE statement?

Only someone who failed English will do that.

You are just a faultfinder. It seems that is what brings you joy.

Still Priding in his ignorance.

So telling you that you can't use Past Tense example for Simple Present Tense is fault-finding to you cheesy grin

In a forum where you are free to educate us what your church teach about the topic on ground, it is English you find fault with cos you don't understand what was clearly written and understood by millions.

The reason you can't see anything with that sentence is because you're deprived of formal education, that means the millions who understand it also affected.

I showed you how PRESENT TENSE is used and the rules that guides it yet you still dull to comprehend it.

Mr Emusan, professor of Linguistics 🤷‍♂️.
He started to use off-point examples of sun rises in the east grin grin grin
Enjoy your weekend 🍷

My example shows how PRESENT TENSE is used which is what Watchtower used in that sentence.

I'm expecting you to point to the rule that guides Watchtower sentence, you can't provide it which is how to proof or correct information.

I even went further to give example of how the sentence could've been placed yet your tiny brain couldn't comprehend it just because you must defend your organisation.
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by MaxInDHouse(m): 12:57pm On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:


Interestingly, ask him to visit the internet amd search what Kumuyi taught about the war of Armageddon whether it is physical or not
Let him go and argue those ones first before he just start saying baseless stuff

Like someone burning potato fields in a community in rage but not realizing that his own field is growing same potato

Physical means what humans can put to use but spiritual means what can work yet humans can't figure out how it's working.

He knows he had nothing tangible to say only poised to trade words and i won't give him that chance if he likes let him continue arguing blindly! smiley
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Aemmyjah(m): 1:17pm On Feb 02
MaxInDHouse:


Physical means what humans can put to use but spiritual means what can work yet humans can't figure out how it's working.

He knows he had nothing tangible to say only poised to trade words and i won't give him that chance if he likes let him continue arguing blindly! smiley

He thinks humans can fight spirits?
Even where our publications shows those army shooting their weapon at Michael, it is just to show how foolish and useless they can seem to be shooting towards invisible spirits but why would they do that? They have seen things that made them realize that Jesus is intervening on behalf of his people and to attack their earthly enemies. They won't just sit there and expect destruction, they may want to defend themselves with that they have, it's just a foolish thing to do.
Even Paul said that the battles true Christians face are not carnal (earthly or physical) since they are against wicked spirits. Is it the one of Gog of Magog that will?
Just ignore him
Ignore faultfinders
It's just envy that's worrying them
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 1:30pm On Feb 02
MaxInDHouse:
Physical means what humans can put to use but spiritual means what can work yet humans can't figure out how it's working.

But at Armageddon people will figure out how it's working.

Or you think earthquake, fire from heaven, flood will happen and people won't figure it out? cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy

He knows he had nothing tangible to say only poised to trade words and i won't give him that chance if he likes let him continue arguing blindly! smiley

But you're the very liar here

You lied it's not physical but your organisation says otherwise

You lied your organisation had a NEW LIGHT you haven't provided where the new light is grin cheesy grin cheesy grin

Well, you can't deny that thousands of nuclear weapons are already in the hands of many countries.

You can't deny that millions of warhead are in store in many countries.
Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by Emusan(m): 1:41pm On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:
He thinks humans can fight spirits?

You people are just so funny.

I said your organisation says Armageddon is a PHYSICAL BATTLE your deluded brother said No! And that the pictures of your publication showing different weapons is old light and there is a new light where no physical weapons are shown yet the article you posted here still shows FIRE FROM HEAVEN.

But from your own thread isn't Armageddon a physical WAR?

Even where our publications shows those army shooting their women at Michael, it is just to show how foolish and useless they can seem to be shooting towards invisible spirits but why would they do that? They have seen things that made them realize that Jesus is intervening on behalf of his people and to attack their earthly enemies. They won't just sit there and expect destruction, they may want to defend themselves with that they have, it's just a foolish thing to do.

Army shooting WOMEN TO MICHAEL KE.... grin cheesy grin


Now see how you confirm my point that Armageddon is a PHYSICAL WAR.

Whether what they do is foolishness or not, weapons of destruction will be exchanged cheesy grin cheesy grin cheesy grin

If you can support your brother who said "Anyone who thing he belongs to Christ under the OLD CURSED AND BASTARDIZED name(Christian) should think twice" is it on matter like this you'll disagree with him?

Even Paul said that the battles true Christians face are not carnal (earthly or physical) since they are against wicked spirits. Is it the one of Gog of Magog that will?

But the people who will fight at Armageddon aren't TRUE CHRISTIANS.

So why should you apply the verse that meant for TRUE CHRISTIAN to the battle of WICKED LEADER?

Just ignore him
Ignore faultfinders
It's just envy that's worrying them

Usual excuse grin cheesy grin cheesy

1 Like

Re: What Is The Battle Of Armageddon? by MaxInDHouse(m): 8:33pm On Feb 02
Aemmyjah:

He thinks humans can fight spirits?
Even where our publications shows those army shooting their women at Michael, it is just to show how foolish and useless they can seem to be shooting towards invisible spirits but why would they do that? They have seen things that made them realize that Jesus is intervening on behalf of his people and to attack their earthly enemies. They won't just sit there and expect destruction, they may want to defend themselves with that they have, it's just a foolish thing to do.
Even Paul said that the battles true Christians face are not carnal (earthly or physical) since they are against wicked spirits. Is it the one of Gog of Magog that will?
Just ignore him
Ignore faultfinders
It's just envy that's worrying them

When someone reasonable comes in let me know! smiley

(1) (2) (Reply)

Is It Right For Women To Lead Churches? / Thanks Given For Wisdom / The Other Side

(Go Up)

Sections: politics (1) business autos (1) jobs (1) career education (1) romance computers phones travel sports fashion health
religion celebs tv-movies music-radio literature webmasters programming techmarket

Links: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)

Nairaland - Copyright © 2005 - 2024 Oluwaseun Osewa. All rights reserved. See How To Advertise. 65
Disclaimer: Every Nairaland member is solely responsible for anything that he/she posts or uploads on Nairaland.